{"id":59043,"date":"2009-11-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-07T02:55:59","modified_gmt":"2017-11-06T21:25:59","slug":"the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA.No. 1060 of 2008()\n\n\n1. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS SCHOOLS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. THE PRINCIPAL,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. JOSEPHINE SHERLY PAUL, W\/O.P.MATHAI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION)\n\n4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER,\n\n5. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS,\n\n6. SMT.ALICE PAUL,\n\n7. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.BABU VARGHESE\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.BALAKRISHNAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.BHAVADASAN\n\n Dated :02\/11\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n     K. BALAKRISHNAN NAIR & P. BHAVADASAN, JJ.\n\n                 ------------------------------\n               W.A. Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2008\n                 ------------------------------\n\n            Dated this, the 2nd day of November, 2009\n\n\n                          JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Balakrishnan Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n
           These appeals are directed against the judgment of<\/p>\n
the learned Single Judge in O.P.No.38429 of 2002 filed by the<\/p>\n
first respondent, Smt.Josephine Sherly Paul. W.A.No.1060 of<\/p>\n
2008 is treated as the main case for the purpose of referring<\/p>\n
to the parties and the exhibits.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
           2. The first respondent is at present working as<\/p>\n
Lower Grade Hindi Teacher in the C.M.S. Higher Secondary<\/p>\n
School at Mallappally.    There was    dispute concerning her<\/p>\n
posting at Kalavankode in Cherthala, her re-transfer to<\/p>\n
Mallappally and the alleged non-joining duty etc. But, in view<\/p>\n
of the judgment of the learned Single Judge, which is under<\/p>\n
appeal, the only dispute that survives for consideration by the<\/p>\n
Division Bench is concerning the claim of the first respondent<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                              – 2 –\n<\/p>\n
for transfer to CMS High School at Pallom. The claim of the<\/p>\n
first respondent for payment of salary for the period from<\/p>\n
12.2.2002 to 4.3.2003 has been resolved to the satisfaction of<\/p>\n
the first respondent. Since the Government did not file any<\/p>\n
appeal against the judgment, we need not go into the said<\/p>\n
part of the decision of the learned Single Judge. But, in the<\/p>\n
judgment under appeal, there is a direction to accommodate<\/p>\n
the first respondent\/writ petitioner at CMS High School,<\/p>\n
Pallom, if necessary by transferring the 6th respondent. In<\/p>\n
view of the said direction, W.A.No.1060 of 2008 is preferred<\/p>\n
by the Manager of the Corporate Educational Agency and the<\/p>\n
Principal of CMS Higher Secondary School, Mallappally and<\/p>\n
W.A.No.1063 of 2008 by the 6th respondent.<\/p>\n
           3. According to the first respondent\/writ petitioner,<\/p>\n
she is senior and therefore, by virtue of Rule 10(1) of Chapter<\/p>\n
XIV-A of Kerala Education Rules, she is entitled to get posting<\/p>\n
at Pallom. The above said rule permits deviation from the<\/p>\n
seniority rule to the extent of 25%. The deviation can be<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                                – 3 –\n<\/p>\n
made to make the transfer on compassionate grounds. The<\/p>\n
sixth respondent was transferred to Pallom overlooking the<\/p>\n
seniority of the first respondent on compassionate grounds.<\/p>\n
The learned Single Judge interfered with the transfer based on<\/p>\n
the finding that transfer order does not spell out the reason<\/p>\n
for transferring the sixth respondent.       The learned Single<\/p>\n
Judge also took the view that presence of aged parents cannot<\/p>\n
be a ground for overlooking the seniority rule, as aged<\/p>\n
parents are there in all families. Attacking the above finding<\/p>\n
of the learned Single Judge, the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellants, submitted that the father of the sixth respondent<\/p>\n
is critically ill with heart disease and her mother is physically<\/p>\n
challenged. Therefore, it is not a case of presence of aged<\/p>\n
parents alone, but there are special grounds for showing<\/p>\n
compassion.       So, the learned Single Judge should not have<\/p>\n
interfered with the said order, it is submitted.    The learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the first respondent\/writ petitioner, on the other<\/p>\n
hand, pointed out that, the sixth respondent though junior has<\/p>\n
been continuing at Pallom for the last several years whereas<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                              – 4 –\n<\/p>\n
first respondent has got only two years for retirement and so,<\/p>\n
at the fag end of her service, she is entitled to be given a<\/p>\n
posting in her native place. The first respondent also pointed<\/p>\n
out that she has also parents who are more aged than the<\/p>\n
parents of the sixth respondent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
           4. The Manager is bound to issue transfer orders<\/p>\n
having regard to the seniority of the incumbents involved,<\/p>\n
ordinarily. If special grounds are available, the Manager can<\/p>\n
deviate from the seniority rule, upto an extent of 25%.<\/p>\n
Regarding the said deviation, an aggrieved teacher has a right<\/p>\n
of appeal before the Director of Public Instruction. This Court<\/p>\n
while exercising the power of judicial review, can examine<\/p>\n
whether the order was within jurisdiction.       Normally, this<\/p>\n
Court should not have entertained a writ petition filed against<\/p>\n
a communication issued by the Manager. Not that no writ will<\/p>\n
lie against a Manager, but there are other forums to consider<\/p>\n
the grievance raised by the petitioner. This Court, grappling<\/p>\n
with the issue of pendency of cases, should not normally<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                               – 5 –\n<\/p>\n
entertain matters which could be effectively considered by<\/p>\n
statutory authorities and forums and should confine itself<\/p>\n
dealing   with matters which this Court alone can handle. Of<\/p>\n
course, if the learned Single Judge has found that the transfer<\/p>\n
order was effected by the Manager without jurisdiction, then<\/p>\n
the interference may be sustained.        Broadly there is no<\/p>\n
dispute that Manager has jurisdiction to order transfer as the<\/p>\n
one ordered in this case. But, while exercising that power, he<\/p>\n
may stray out of jurisdiction by considering irrelevant matters<\/p>\n
or omitting to consider relevant matters. But, we find there is<\/p>\n
no jurisdictional error in this case. Therefore, the direction of<\/p>\n
the learned Single Judge to post the first respondent in the<\/p>\n
place of sixth respondent was not warranted having regard to<\/p>\n
the limited scope of the power of judicial review exercised by<\/p>\n
this Court.    But, whether the decision of the Manager in<\/p>\n
favour of the sixth respondent is justifiable on facts can be<\/p>\n
considered by the appellate authority. The said authority can<\/p>\n
look into the factual disputes involved in the case and weigh<\/p>\n
the relevant merits of the contentions of the parties and issue<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                              – 6 –\n<\/p>\n
appropriate orders. So, the remedy of the first respondent<\/p>\n
against the refusal of the Manager to post her at Pallom and<\/p>\n
the decision to retain there the sixth respondent who is<\/p>\n
relatively junior to her, can be challenged by filing an appeal<\/p>\n
under Rule 10(5) of Chapter XIV-A, of the K.E.R. before the<\/p>\n
D.P.I.   Since the matter was pending before this Court for a<\/p>\n
long time, it is ordered that, if the first respondent files an<\/p>\n
appeal within one month from today, against the omission of<\/p>\n
the Manager to post her at Pallom, the D.P.I. shall hear and<\/p>\n
dispose of the appeal as expeditiously as possible,       after<\/p>\n
affording an opportunity of being heard to the first<\/p>\n
respondent, the Manager and the sixth respondent, without<\/p>\n
being influenced by anything said in the judgment of the<\/p>\n
learned Single Judge.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
         5. The first respondent has got a case that because of<\/p>\n
the interim order passed by this Court, the monetary benefits<\/p>\n
payable to her as per the judgment under appeal have<\/p>\n
not so far been released. If that be so, the respondents 4 and<\/p>\n
WA Nos.1060 and 1063 of 2009\n<\/p>\n
                                – 7 –\n<\/p>\n
5 shall take necessary steps to release the monetary benefits<\/p>\n
payable as per the judgment under appeal to the first<\/p>\n
respondent within two months from the date of production of<\/p>\n
a copy of this judgment. If the pay revision benefits have not<\/p>\n
so far been released, the said respondents shall also take<\/p>\n
steps to release the pay revision arrears due to her.<\/p>\n
           With the above directions, the Writ Appeals are<\/p>\n
disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                      K. Balakrishnan Nair,
\n                                             Judge.\n<\/p>\n
                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                         P. Bhavadasan,
\n                                             Judge.\n<\/p>\n
DK.\n<\/p>\n
                         (True copy)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA.No. 1060 of 2008() 1. THE CORPORATE MANAGER, CMS SCHOOLS, … Petitioner 2. THE PRINCIPAL, Vs 1. JOSEPHINE SHERLY PAUL, W\/O.P.MATHAI, … Respondent 2. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (EDUCATION) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59043","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1177,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\",\"name\":\"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009"},"wordCount":1177,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009","name":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-06T21:25:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-corporate-manager-vs-josephine-sherly-paul-on-2-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Corporate Manager vs Josephine Sherly Paul on 2 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59043","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59043"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59043\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59043"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59043"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59043"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}