{"id":59144,"date":"2008-06-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008"},"modified":"2014-09-15T12:12:06","modified_gmt":"2014-09-15T06:42:06","slug":"m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN \"FEE may COURT OF KARNATAKA AT  \n\nDA'I'EI} THIS THE 2331?\u00bb DA): 'OF '1:.:;s:\u00bb:1\u00a7\ufb01j2.'*)t)ka\u00e95' _  H  V\n\nI3EFo:2I.%;   % '   %\nTHE HONBLE MRV.'g'fL\u00a7S'I'IVCa'&2'  5\nR.F.;_mo. 1  (Si?)  1  \nBETWEEN    \u00e9  \n\nM.sa:\u00a31jeevi   \nS\/0. Late My111i__\u00a7,r;\u00a7n  ;_  \nSince dead by     \n\nSri 1:;-.  -. \n\nS\/0. Late  \n\nAged 30 \u00a7'f:\u00e93I\"$  VA .   '\n\nN 0.2841) .N0.-II ,SUf<::1t';Road Cross\n\nS11ivajiI1f\u00a7.g;;11' _ V' _ ' . " \n\nBaJ1,<gaIOI~e."     '  Appeliaxtlt\n\n -  _ (By.\u00a7\u00a71*i"S.A..\u00a3y1uje\u00a7\u00a7i\ufb022Xr;iv.)\n\n smr,\u00a7\u00a73.G.Ram\n\n  " Ramesh (dead)\n\n   S.G.Veerabhadra Babu\n\nMajal'\n\n 4. Sundara Bai\n\nMajor\n\n \n\n\n\n5. Kum. Savitha Devi\nMajm'\nNo.3 to 5 being majors, sun and .\nDauglltem of late S.R.Govi1Mi\u00e9ia1':3ju--.& , _ V\nR\/a: No.66, Broadway Ftoagi  \nShivajinagar V  \nBangalore-I.   '\n\n6. Smt.Kusu111a Thrim  \nMajcar    "   \nWidow of late S;'G;"I_'h1?fi1I:}1thuff _ " \nTagore Mantessori-[-Schot\ufb02f _ _ ' \nIbrahim Sahsbi\ufb01tiwait " \nCivii St\ufb01ti\ufb02ft _ _  "\nsaaaxxgas\u00e9t-:\u00bb:\u00bbe.      \n\nRespon\u00a23er};$# '   \nwide Af;\u00a73fdei%'dat"esi 12.11.2002 ...Respondcnt\n\n(By   Advocatt: for R 1)\n\n _1Ti1is 'ap}peai'*  under sactiorx 96 CPO pI'ayiI1g\n\n   Eja\ufb01itie \ufb021\u00e9fVju\u00a31gme1'zt and decree dated 29.10.2001,\n'  '$11 10960\/' 1990, on tile fiie of XXVIII\n   Judge at \u00a33a1"1ga1cm:2, clismissirlg the suit\n\nfm: _$pcc:iF1\u00a7:l{)e1'i'01*Inance.\n\n AA ; " Tiie appeal coming on for \ufb01nal hearirag this day,\n\n  t;':1\u00ab::..u\u20ac.'.oi1rt dtzlivered the fuilowing:\n\nW va\u00bb\u00bb<a--~\u00bb--\n\n\n\n \n\nJQQQMELQ If\n\nT In this appeal parties would be   V. \n\narray before trial court.\n\n2. This appeal is . ?\u00a5::yf__ the' " L1_IiS1;CC-\ufb01vgfifiiiv   *\n\nin O.S.1C296O\/1990 on cue\ufb01ie.pf_2\u00a7Xx?:11\u00ab}a:id1.fC::y Civii\n& Sessions J udge,    triai Judge\ndismissed the suit fO:1'='  \n\n3.    in brief are as\n\n:mows:%%kT   . 1 1;\n\n    property belonged to 3\n\nbr\u00a7:\u00a7h\u00e91*s  G;\u00a7viI1da1'ajulu, SR. Trimoorthy and\n\n  _so11s cf late S.R.Rangaiah and each of\n\n   share. SR. Ganesh died leaving Mhind\n\n };3.11d SD11 viz defendants I and 2. TI'imc)o1'thy\n\n V'  tiieti Raving behind his widow and SR. G0vi11da.:\u00a3'a}u1u\n\n leaving behiztlci his sen and daughters.\n\nIt is the case of plaiz\ufb01iiff that late SR.\nC:oviI'1da1"ajulu~ defendailt 110.6 and defe11da11ts 1 anti \ufb02\n\u00abix\n\n\u00a2\\7% \n\n\n\nLe. 1.6.88. 11; was also ageed that  :\u00a3<}i'-\nregistmtioll shall be borne: by   "   ' . '4\n\nThe suit. schtzdule      L\u00bb\nbrothem. S11bsequc1:1t1yV was V.  S \nTrimoorthy. The  LES of\nSR. Gaxaesh. had  share of their\nIiability uI'1c1'e1':\u00abAA\u00a3the  no.6. The\npiaintiff   Vamount payable by\n  ti} defendant 110.6\n\nwidow 0f SR.  \n\n   .:a:nd 2 were: Jziot mady to perfarm\n\n\u00bbA  'the contract tiimugh piainti\ufb01' was ready and\n\nH V -1'  his part of 0<)I'1tra(:t. 'l'I1erefo1'\u20ac,\n\n   a suit ibr speci\ufb01c pviz1da1'aju1y and    t.1'1t-::m had I\/3m\nSfiai\ufb01' in the '\u00e9lld 2 admitted\nthat \ufb01'1ey..at\u00a7;2   G81'i{3S3f}.. They\nhave     .'\u00a7'1'hn00'1\ufb01\"1y died leavirlg\n }1is1\ufb02i:).6 and SR. Govitaci\u00e9al\u00e9ajuiu\ndied l\u00e9aV'\u00a71g   3 to 5 as his legal\n\nrepijeSt311tati\\\u20ac\u20ac3's. A  H _\n\n   -  have coxztended that they were not\n\na\ufb01t\ufb01re _.\u00ab;=;f  deed executed by defe1:da11t in respect 0f\n\n   her 1%%;'s%v slam in the suit px\u00b0ope:m:y and also about \ufb01ring\n\n \u00a7;s\u00a7.. :-\u00a7i_1i't agaixmt defantiants 3 to 5. Defe11daI'1ts have\n\n   ..._.*_ienit':d that they' had ageed to sell their 1 \/ 31\"\" share to\n\npIa;i:'1tiiT for Rs.53,333\/ --. T1163?' havte also  6d they\n\nIV -  '  17$-\\\u00bb--0x.T-~ 4\n\n \n\n\n\n3.,\n\n AT the impugned\n\n1i\n\n (1\nW1'1\u20ac:the1' piai1'1i:iff has proved that Defezlaiagfza\n\nhad ex-muted an agreeme11t cf sale datedff}  \n\nfor Collsidelatiorl of RS.53,-333.],-__iI1  E51'   K 2\n\nsham in suit sclleduie p1'0pe1F\u00a7_y.  A. .3\n\nWlxether piailiitiff E1a\u00a7--.,_i;S1:s;vedV' =t;I1atT  e3f \n\nRs.i35,()0iZ}\/ ~ was paid  \u00e9id.vi311_<::e cd\u00a3=1$id\u00a7:faii0n to\n\nDeft::nda1%1ts- 1 anti'\u00ab\u00abi2iT'?' \n\nWhether'    piailitiif had\n\ndischarg\u00e9d   \n\n proved that he has been\nealw-\u00a35355"zx3ati\u00a7"a\u00e9j'i\u00a2i"w_i1\ufb01.Iig to perform 111:5 part of the\nc:Q11t:ra(:'t.?'V _  V "V\n\nV"L"J;?113v\u00e9\u00e9'i.i1\u00e91.'A'_ \u20ac116" "" Mg\ufb01iaigtltiif is entitled for speci\ufb01c\n\n pezrfoigilaimc\u00e9?\n\njudglzlent Calis fer\n\n x T i1'1tc.rf<:reI1ct2 1-'\n\nV'  $2) Plaintiff has cotltended that the entire suit\n\ndc:ai:h his 550113 namely,\n\n \n\n%    \u00e9chedme property belorlged to SR. Raghavalu, after his\n\nSR. Govinda1"aju}.u, 8.1%.\n\n\\\n\nN\n\n\n\npaper was sold. Even it does not contain   ' \n\nof stamp vendor and his license   " "\nof document ---~Ex.P1 does not Stete er; \nexecuted.\n\n20) The . '_ \u00e9_ 1_nac1e*-ix\ufb02g .Patfa--12 of the plaint\nwould lead that, late  ."G:\u00a7r1ea1:~..1~;jad executed an\nagreement iI1"f3\u00a7LKfQiH' ef  01.0\u20acs.1988 and\nIi\u00e9efendanteg  Win"  Qimd son are bound to\npezfor\ufb01e   _ .:\u00a7eIigations in terms of\namememe Adatgfd 1988. Even as per the\naveruzezgts "c;r.f'h   *aii1.e:m:led plaint, plaintiffs had\n\n.' V.    Ganesh and Defendants 1 and 2\n  part of contract, but they have not done\n\nso.*-._\n\nu 221} 'Hams on a careful consirgieration of the\n'  &i'fJ61'H1\u20acI1tS of plaint, it is not clear as to whether SR.\n\n'4 Ganesh had executed an ageement in favour of\n\n[V . (:3\u00a2Lx- [3-~ "#54 ~-----\n\n \n\n\n\n22) Dtiririg CI'0SS'-\u00ae}\u00a3aII1iI1&tiOI1, FW. 1   \nthat he had seen defendants 1    K " \nis no ;{};1()1'\u20ac. When he wee    \ndefendant, he was not able'i;o"--ideidttiijfdi    L'\nHe has deposed, the ;_other  of  T-edglitdproperty\nhave delivered the  to him.\n\n23) It   was a litigation\nbetween   his brothers nemeiy,\nSR.  The suit for\nparii\ufb01oix   of 2007 by s.R. {3at:1esh in\n1'espe::t. eff elld subsequently, \ufb01nal decree\n\n V.   be \ufb01led by Defendants 1 and :2\n  No.6. During the pendency of this\n Ajthe rexaeonsnip of 3.12. Gajnesh with\n\n 1 and 2 was not cordial. In these\nVA    the wee of plaintiff that Defendants 1\n   2 and the above said Govinclarajuiu together\n\nagreed to Se}! the suit schedule property for total\n\nI\\_}_  (,Aeu-\u00a3.\u00a3}:\u00ab._.\n\n \n\n\n\nconsidczatriozrx of Rs.1,60,000\/~ looks impmbabi-3.' on\n01.06.1988<\/pre>\n
 said ‘I’hI’imo0rthy and Ganes\ufb01
\nalive. It looks impmbable  K 2
\nobtaillcd decree in 0.8. No.
\nand separate possession of the:  ‘
\nsuit property and 113d
\ntogether had agreed    1\/31″‘? share<\/p>\n
to plaintiffs for’:   $50,000 \/ ~.\n<\/p>\n
 V   if is avermd that. the
\n R~S.25,(}O0\/– to SR. Gan\ufb01sh.\n<\/p>\n
It is net’:z1j%%d:sp::ieo’ on 01.05.1933, 3.12. Ganesh<\/p>\n
wa:5_\u00a7f’i1o’t. alive.’ ~  Pa\ufb01*a– 12(1) of the plaint, it is averred<\/p>\n
V.   ?a\ufb014vA’agreetn1ent of saie dated 01.06. 1988, signed<\/p>\n
 of late SR. Ganesh , he<\/p>\n
-V   sell his 1\/3*” share in the Suit schedule:<\/p>\n
K V’ V  prugqcx\ufb01r for 3 31.1111 of Rs.53,333\/– and defendants 1 and<\/p>\n
   bound to execute and register the sale deed in<\/p>\n
 Hi\u20acZ’II}5 of the agreement and deliver the vacant<\/p>\n
XL? A.-~ .{;’I.-~~–\u20ac1. W.\n<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
poseessiolz of the property. Subsequexltly, the
\namexided to include LE3 of SR. Ganesh
\nparties. Thus the averments of Zpiaizat   ” 2
\n1:2(ii) would establish that amt
\nby SE. (}a1’1e3h and  1   V
\ncf the plaint it is averted  3130 a
\nparty to the $1,1it agreei\ufb01eiexe.  averments<\/p>\n
of the plaint   V’\n<\/p>\n
25)   emit property belonged
\nto 8.1%.  ‘I’hrim()orthy and SR.\n<\/p>\n
(}anesI1′.A   referred to above had<\/p>\n
  1:0 eel} ~  fjndivided 1\/31″” slmre in the suit<\/p>\n
  –4;Hq)\u00a7srever in the suit agreement dated<\/p>\n
   stated the (iefe1″1daI1tS 1 and 2 haci<\/p>\n
–V ag1;\u00e9ed”‘*V!;g  and deliver the vacmat possession of the<\/p>\n
‘A I\/T31? eshare within three 111011613 from 01.06.1988.<\/p>\n
~  3-“:h’11’s, evidence of plajniiii’ is not cor1sistent. PM\/.1 has<\/p>\n
 Wfiepose\u00e9 that SR. GOVi\ufb02d3I”dU1H, SR. Thririloortlzzy and<\/p>\n
ax’? _ (\\M$\/\\_\u00bb&.\u00a7”w”~”0l”””\n<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
plaintiff that Defe11daI’1ts \u00ab-1 and 2 arid  .
\ntogether had ag1’ee\u00a31 to sail T1163′; if _31″d  sham K V’<\/p>\n
in {ht-;: suit rscheduie p1″‘ope1″ty, is  ‘A1’a1e\u00a7f5:;A. :’ A<\/p>\n
33} PW J. in his ev’id\u00e9i’\u00a7r\u20ac\u00e9.\u00bb\u00a51as; fizt\ufb01; as to
\nw’11<'~:ti2e1'1'1e was Q11   t.I:1e \u00e9{gi'\u00e9E\u00a7meI'1t. It
\nis also f{)\u00a3lI'1f.i 'U131 \ufb01le  \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9rxdors nazliely,
\nSR. G0viI1cla\u00a7;*~aj'a:gi \u00a7,   SR. Raznesh<\/p>\n
have not Lseeltg  1.i1\u20acI'Iii{112ltf::Li  \u00e9\u00e9uii; 8.gL{'6(iII1&i'IlL The<\/p>\n
copy      the acknowledgement
\nprtzvduc\ufb01ii by  110$: estabiish that the Iegai<\/p>\n
Iloticztzs ij1ad"bec:1"x~S'e1"(\u00e9*eci. on Deft':1'1d:ani;s – 1 and <\/p>\n
A V' "  (3-4}4)"a  View 0f the discr&1;ra\u00a211t and i1"1he1'eI'1tly
\nii11.i):\u00b00b\u00a3i.bi&i'j\ufb01ii\ufb01iezice, I hold {I131 plai11'ti\ufb01's failed to prove:<\/p>\n
 the: \u00e9ig1*\u00e9t{11ie11't. of sale dated 01.06. 1988.
\nV' '  "i'he lea3:'11e(i trial court; on propel' appmciatioil<\/p>\n
_H__@xv*- id ~—–\n<\/p>\n
”  -mi’ \u20acViCl\u20aciI1(;'(:”i, hats a1″1″:iv{:(i at right Corlciusion.
\nf\\aV C ‘4″-‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN “FEE may COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DA’I’EI} THIS THE 2331?\u00bb DA): ‘OF ‘1:.:;s:\u00bb:1\u00a7\ufb01j2.’*)t)ka\u00e95’ _ H V I3EFo:2I.%; % ‘ % THE HONBLE MRV.’g’fL\u00a7S’I’IVCa’&2’ 5 R.F.;_mo. 1 (Si?) 1 BETWEEN \u00e9 M.sa:\u00a31jeevi S\/0. Late My111i__\u00a7,r;\u00a7n ;_ Since dead by […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59144","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":487,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\",\"name\":\"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008"},"wordCount":487,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008","name":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-09-15T06:42:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-sanjeevi-vs-smt-s-g-rani-on-23-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M Sanjeevi vs Smt S G Rani on 23 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59144","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59144"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59144\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59144"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59144"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59144"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}