{"id":59430,"date":"2011-04-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011"},"modified":"2016-02-05T18:47:24","modified_gmt":"2016-02-05T13:17:24","slug":"zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/1164\/2011\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 1164 of 2011\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n \n======================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n======================================\n\n\n \n\nZAKIRHUSSEN\nKESHARSINH RANA @ JAYMENDRASINH KESHARISINH RANA - Petitioner\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nKANJARI\nGRAM PANCHAYAT KANJARI NAGAR SEVA SADAN, &amp; 1 - Respondents\n \n\n======================================\nAppearance : \nMR\nAV NAIR FOR MR ASHISH H SHAH for the Petitioner. \nMR KAUSHAL D\nPANDYA for Respondent(s) : 1, \nNOTICE SERVED BY DS for\nRespondent(s) : 2, \n====================================== \n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 24\/03\/2011 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n<p>1.\t\tRule.\n<\/p>\n<p>Mr.Kaushal Pandya, learned advocate waives service of notice of Rule<br \/>\non behalf of respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.\t\tBy<br \/>\nway of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution<br \/>\nof India, the petitioner &#8211; workman has prayed for an<br \/>\nappropriate writ, order and\/or direction, quashing and setting aside<br \/>\nthe order dated 03\/11\/2010 passed below Exhs.1, 2 &amp; 3 in<br \/>\nI.D.Misc.Application No.15 of 2007 in Reference (LCN) No.337\/2001, by<br \/>\nwhich, the Labour Court, Nadiad has allowed the said application<br \/>\nsubmitted by respondent No.1 herein and restored Reference (LCN)<br \/>\nNo.337\/2001. However, while allowing the said application, Labour<br \/>\nCourt has not permitted the petitioner to withdraw an amount of<br \/>\nRs.1,29,264\/-, which<br \/>\nhas been deposited by respondent No.1 herein pursuant to the order<br \/>\npassed by this Court (Coram: Hon&#8217;ble Mr.Justice S.R.Brahmbhatt) in<br \/>\nSpecial Civil Application No.12017\/2009.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.\t\tFacts<br \/>\nleading to the present petition, in nutshell, are as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\tThat<br \/>\nan ex-parte judgement and award came to be passed by learned<br \/>\nPresiding Officer, Labour Court, Nadiad in Reference (LCN)<br \/>\nNo.337\/2001. That thereafter, the petitioner &#8211; workman<br \/>\npreferred Recovery Application No.54\/2007 and the said application<br \/>\nwas allowed ex-parte and respondent No.1 &#8211; Gram Panchayat was<br \/>\ndirected to pay a sum of Rs.1,29,264\/-  to the petitioner and Labour<br \/>\nCourt also issued Recovery Certificate. Subsequently, respondent-Gram<br \/>\nPanchayat preferred ID Misc.Application No.15\/2007 u\/s. 26-A(2) of<br \/>\nthe Industrial Disputes Act seeking restoration of the original<br \/>\nReference proceedings. However, in the meantime, the Collector<br \/>\ninitiated the proceedings to execute the recovery certificate. It<br \/>\nappears that since any action with regard to execution of the<br \/>\naforesaid recovery certificate was not taken, the petitioner<br \/>\npreferred writ petition being Special Civil Application<br \/>\nNo.12017\/2009, which came to be disposed of by learned Single Judge<br \/>\nof this Court (Coram: Hon&#8217;ble Mr.Justice S.R.Brahmbhatt) vide order<br \/>\ndated 15\/12\/2009 and in the said order, learned Single Judge directed<br \/>\ninter-alia that :-\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;5.\tThis<br \/>\nCourt is of the view that when the restoration proceedings have been<br \/>\nfiled and taken up, it would be in the fitness of things that the<br \/>\nLabour Court in whose favour the Demand Draft is drawn shall not<br \/>\ndisburse this amount for a period of fifteen days from today, i.e.<br \/>\n30th December, 2009 and thereafter, disburse the said<br \/>\namount on or after 1st January, 2010 in case no order is<br \/>\nobtained for restoring the matter by 30th December, 2009.<br \/>\nIn view of this, Shri. Nair seeks permission to withdraw the<br \/>\npetition. Notice discharged.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>4.\t\tIt<br \/>\nappears that the aforesaid amount in question was directed to be<br \/>\ndeposited with the Registry of the Labour Court and the Labour Court<br \/>\nwas directed to disbursed the same in favour of the petitioner, if<br \/>\nany, order was not passed in the restoration application by<br \/>\n30\/12\/2009. As any order in respect of ID Misc.Application No.15\/2007<br \/>\nwas not passed by 30\/12\/2009, the petitioner had submitted an<br \/>\napplication dated 11\/03\/2010 seeking disbursement of the aforesaid<br \/>\namount. However, the application of the petitioner is kept undecided<br \/>\nby the learned Labour Court. Thereafter and after the time limit<br \/>\nfixed by this Court, learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Nadiad<br \/>\nhas allowed the aforesaid ID Misc.Application No.15\/2007 vide order<br \/>\ndated 03\/11\/2010 i.e. almost after one year, by imposing cost of<br \/>\nRs.5,000\/- and without any other or further directions with respect<br \/>\nto disbursement. Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the<br \/>\naforesaid order dated 03\/11\/2010 passed by the Labour Court, Nadiad,<br \/>\nthe petitioner has preferred the present petition challenging the<br \/>\norder dated 03\/11\/2010 passed by the Labour Court, Nadiad in ID<br \/>\nMisc.Application No.15\/2007 as well as not passing any order on the<br \/>\napplication submitted by the petitioner to disburse the amount i.e.<br \/>\nRs.1,29,264\/-, which has been deposited by respondent No.1 herein<br \/>\npursuant to the order passed by this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.\t\tIt<br \/>\nappears that the explanation was sought by learned Single Judge of<br \/>\nthis Court from the concerned Labour Court why the order and<br \/>\ndirection passed by this Court prescribing time limit to pass the<br \/>\norder in ID Misc.Application No.15\/2007 on or before 30th<br \/>\nSeptember,2009, has not been complied with and why the amount was not<br \/>\ndisbursed in favour of the petitioner. Learned Presiding Officer,<br \/>\nLabour Court, Nadiad submitted his report dated 07\/03\/2011 by<br \/>\nsubmitting that there was non-compliance of the order passed by this<br \/>\nCourt by his predecessor and in fact he has resumed his duty on 1st<br \/>\nJuly,2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.\t\tHaving<br \/>\nheard Mr.A.V.Nair, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the<br \/>\npetitioner and Mr.Kaushal Pandya, learned advocate appearing on<br \/>\nbehalf of respondent No.1 and considering the impugned order passed<br \/>\nby Learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Nadiad in ID<br \/>\nMisc.Application No.15\/2007 in allowing the said application and<br \/>\ndirecting to restore Reference (LCN) No.337\/2001, it appears to the<br \/>\nCourt that no illegality and\/or error has been committed by the<br \/>\nLabour Court in allowing the said application and restoring the<br \/>\nReference (LCN) No.337\/2001. A cogent reasons have been given by the<br \/>\nLabour Court while allowing the said application and restoring the<br \/>\nReference on file, and, therefore, no interference of this Court is<br \/>\nrequired in exercise of power under Articles 226 and 227 of the<br \/>\nConstitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.\t\tHowever,<br \/>\nconsidering earlier order dated 15\/12\/2009 passed by this Court in<br \/>\nSpecial Civil Application No.12017\/2009, some order is required to be<br \/>\npassed with respect to an amount of Rs.1,29,264\/-, which has been<br \/>\ndeposited by respondent No.1,  pursuant to the earlier order passed<br \/>\nby this Court. Considering the earlier order passed by this Court, it<br \/>\nappears to the Court that if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw<br \/>\n50% of the amount, which is deposited by respondent No.1, on<br \/>\nUndertaking that if he fails in the main Reference, he will repay the<br \/>\nsame within time that may be prescribed by the Labour Court and<br \/>\nremaining 50% amount will be deposited in the Fixed Deposits in any<br \/>\nNationalised Bank initially for  a period of one  year, it will meet<br \/>\nthe ends of justice and it will protect the interest of both the<br \/>\nparties.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.\t\tIn<br \/>\nview of the above and for the reasons stated hereinabove, the<br \/>\npetition succeeds in part. The impugned order dated 03\/11\/2010 passed<br \/>\nby learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Nadiad in not passing any<br \/>\norder with respect to disbursement of the amount of Rs.1,29,264,<br \/>\nwhich has been deposited by respondent No.1 pursuant to the earlier<br \/>\norder passed by this Court, is hereby quashed and set aside and the<br \/>\npetitioner is hereby permitted to withdraw a sum of Rs.64,632\/- (50%<br \/>\nof Rs.1,29,264\/-), which is deposited by respondent No.1, as stated<br \/>\nhereinabove on furnishing Undertaking by the petitioner that in case<br \/>\nhe fails in main Reference, he will repay the amount within time,<br \/>\nthat may be prescribed by the Labour Court and on such Undertaking,<br \/>\nLabour Court, Nadiad is hereby directed to pay a sum of Rs.64,632\/-<br \/>\n(50% of Rs.1,29,264\/-) to the petitioner on proper identification and<br \/>\nverification immediately but not later than 15 days from the date of<br \/>\nfiling of such Undertaking.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\tSo<br \/>\nfar as a sum of Rs.64,632\/- (50% of Rs.1,29,264\/-) is concerned,<br \/>\nLabour Court is directed to invest the same in the Fixed Deposits in<br \/>\nany Nationalised Bank initially for a period of one year with<br \/>\ncumulative interest thereon, so that whoever succeeds in the main<br \/>\nReference, the same may be given to them.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\tSo<br \/>\nfar as impugned order dated 03\/11\/2010 passed by Labour Court in<br \/>\nrestoring the main Reference is concerned, for the reasons stated<br \/>\nhereinabove, the same is hereby confirmed and another order passed by<br \/>\nLabour Court in ID Misc. Application No.15\/2007 is dismissed to the<br \/>\naforesaid extent only. Labour Court is directed to decide and dispose<br \/>\nof the main Reference (LCN) No.337\/2001 at the earliest but not later<br \/>\nthan 31\/12\/2011. All concerned are directed to co-operate the Labour<br \/>\nCourt in early disposal of the main Reference. Rule is made absolute<br \/>\nto the aforesaid extent. No costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t\tDirect<br \/>\nservice is permitted.\n<\/p>\n<p>[M.R.SHAH,J]<\/p>\n<p>*dipti<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 Author: M.R. Shah,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/1164\/2011 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 1164 of 2011 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ====================================== 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59430","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1317,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\",\"name\":\"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011"},"wordCount":1317,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011","name":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-02-05T13:17:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zakirhussen-vs-kanjari-on-6-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Zakirhussen vs Kanjari on 6 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59430","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59430"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59430\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59430"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59430"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59430"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}