{"id":59984,"date":"2010-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010"},"modified":"2018-07-14T20:18:24","modified_gmt":"2018-07-14T14:48:24","slug":"subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAS.No. 181 of 2001(A)\n\n\n\n1. SUBHADRA\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. P.I.CHERIAN\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.RAJIT\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.T.P.VARGHESE\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :07\/07\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                       M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n                   ...........................................\n                        A.S.NO.181 OF 2001\n                  .............................................\n              Dated this the 7th day of July, 2010.\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>     This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and<\/p>\n<p>decree of the Subordinate Judge&#8217;s Court, Kottayam in<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.264\/1995. The suit is one for realisation of the<\/p>\n<p>amount. It is the case of the plaintiff that the deceased first<\/p>\n<p>defendant had borrowed a sum of Rs.15,000\/= on 28.9.1993<\/p>\n<p>and Rs.7,500\/= on 14.7.1994 and had issued two cheques<\/p>\n<p>to him acknowledging the receipt of payments.                    In spite of<\/p>\n<p>notice the amount is not paid, hence the suit. Before filing of<\/p>\n<p>the written statement, the first defendant died. His legal<\/p>\n<p>representatives are impleaded as supplemental defendants<\/p>\n<p>2 to 4. They had denied the entire transaction and further<\/p>\n<p>contended that no amount is due to the plaintiff from the<\/p>\n<p>defendants and therefore prayed for dismissal of the suit. In<\/p>\n<p>the trial court after examining all the materials, the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>has been granted a decree and it is against that decision, the<\/p>\n<p>defendants have come up in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants as well<\/p>\n<p>as the respondents. The learned counsel for the appellants<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             : 2 :<\/span><br \/>\nA.S.NO.181 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>had brought up several glaring inconsistencies which had<\/p>\n<p>been properly adverted by the court below. According to<\/p>\n<p>the learned counsel, the deceased first defendant never<\/p>\n<p>used to write in English and he always writes in Malayalam.<\/p>\n<p>He has pointed out that whenever the man signs, the name is<\/p>\n<p>only written in Malayalam. So far as PW1 is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>though in the chief examination he makes an attempt to<\/p>\n<p>state that Ext.A1 is in the handwriting of deceased first<\/p>\n<p>defendant, in the cross examination he would depose that<\/p>\n<p>Exts.A1 and A2 are not in the handwriting of the deceased<\/p>\n<p>first defendant. It has also to be stated that, according to<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff, there was one George who had evidenced the<\/p>\n<p>transaction, but   he is not     examined as a witness. The<\/p>\n<p>defendants have also categorically denied the signature of<\/p>\n<p>the first defendant   in Exts.A1 and A2. According to them<\/p>\n<p>the second defendant had joined a kuri conducted by the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff and towards the kuri security bond the first<\/p>\n<p>defendant had also joined as a signatory and making use of<\/p>\n<p>that signature, signatures in Exts.A1 and A2 are created<\/p>\n<p>and a suit of this nature is filed. The learned Subordinate<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              : 3 :<\/span><br \/>\nA.S.NO.181 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>Judge had attempted to weigh the case of the defendants<\/p>\n<p>rather than that of the plaintiff. It is an incorrect procedure.<\/p>\n<p>When the whole transaction is denied and execution of the<\/p>\n<p>documents are     denied,   the burden is squarely upon the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff to prove the execution and then only one can shift<\/p>\n<p>the burden to the other side. It is not available in this case.<\/p>\n<p>When     faced with such a difficult     situation, the learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the respondents would submit before me that if<\/p>\n<p>an opportunity is     given, the   signature can be sent for<\/p>\n<p>comparison which will reveal the truth.<\/p>\n<p>      3. In a case of this nature since the person whose<\/p>\n<p>admitted signature is not available and the materials<\/p>\n<p>available does not help the court to straight away accept the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW1, in order to have real appreciation of the<\/p>\n<p>mater, it is desirable to get a scientific report regarding<\/p>\n<p>comparison of signature which will enable the court in a<\/p>\n<p>better position to appreciate the materials. It is true that<\/p>\n<p>the first defendant is no more. But it has come out that the<\/p>\n<p>first defendant had   received summons in the suit. He had<\/p>\n<p>also acknowledged the notice issued by the plaintiff and it is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              : 4 :<\/span><br \/>\nA.S.NO.181 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>also the contention of the first defendant that he had singed<\/p>\n<p>in the bond executed by the second defendant to the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>concerned,.    So admittedly there are admitted signatures<\/p>\n<p>available before the court.     So the    admitted signatures<\/p>\n<p>can be sent along with the disputed signatures in Exts. A1<\/p>\n<p>and A2 for comparison so as to get a report regarding the<\/p>\n<p>genuineness of the signature. Thereafter the parties can be<\/p>\n<p>permitted to adduce evidence and the matter can be<\/p>\n<p>disposed of in accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4. Therefore the judgment and decree under challenge<\/p>\n<p>are set aside and the matter is remitted back to the trial<\/p>\n<p>court with a direction to permit    the plaintiff to send the<\/p>\n<p>disputed  signature   for   comparison      with the admitted<\/p>\n<p>signature and after obtaining a report, the parties be<\/p>\n<p>permitted to adduce both documentary as well as           oral<\/p>\n<p>evidence in support of their respective contentions and then<\/p>\n<p>dispose of the matter in accordance with law.      Parties are<\/p>\n<p>directed to appear before the       trial court on 30.8.2010.<\/p>\n<p>Being a very old matter, let attempt be made to dispose of<\/p>\n<p>the suit as expeditiously a s possible. Needless to say that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                            : 5 :<\/span><br \/>\nA.S.NO.181 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>expense for the expert has to be borne by the plaintiff and<\/p>\n<p>ultimately everything will depend upon the result of the<\/p>\n<p>suit.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Disposed of accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                 M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>cl<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                      : 6 :<\/span><br \/>\nA.S.NO.181 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>                         M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                         &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.<br \/>\n                         A.S.NO.181 OF 2001<br \/>\n                         &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;<br \/>\n                         7th day of July, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>                         J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AS.No. 181 of 2001(A) 1. SUBHADRA &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. P.I.CHERIAN &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.RAJIT For Respondent :SRI.T.P.VARGHESE The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN Dated :07\/07\/2010 O R D E R M.N. KRISHNAN, J. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;. A.S.NO.181 OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59984","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":850,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010"},"wordCount":850,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010","name":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-07-14T14:48:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/subhadra-vs-p-i-cherian-on-7-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Subhadra vs P.I.Cherian on 7 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59984","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59984"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59984\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59984"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59984"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59984"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}