{"id":60169,"date":"2009-06-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009"},"modified":"2019-01-23T12:55:19","modified_gmt":"2019-01-23T07:25:19","slug":"imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
1;\u00bb: mg HEGH caum GE' z<ARm;rA:\u00a7\u00e9\"    _ \nCRIMINAL REVISION V;9}33'1'\u00a3;::,{\u00e9 0;t}3   V\n\nBETWEEN :'\n\nimtiyaz sg:;udajigaf;\"\"~V.. >  \nAged-a?aout=.-5\u20ac}--y}::\u00abaz's, 3    \nGoo: \ufb01ii\u00e9iacg\u00e9tg, R\/ix\" _T-\u00a7'.':\"{\u00e9'. 119, \nBhut\u00e9tm Bhaf i\ufb01v\ufb01rrdes St.  ,f\n\nPanjimg\ufb01fat\u00e9.     .5.P\u20ac%:;i\ufb01oner\n\n(337 Sri 3':}o11\u00a7$1}i, \u00a7%:ib\u00a7Q--f:iat\u20ac)\n\n        \n\n ' S1'i..;Ra33d\u20ac:sh\u00ab\u00a7abu3:a0 Patti},\nA ~.. \ufb01;.ged['ab\u00e9;:1;i 48 7 years,\n\n'R,\/'s:~:' Rai\u00a7;\u00b0i:\u00a22;\u00a32$T1', 919$ \u00a70.3'?,\nBeigaum; _v  ...Res\u00a73sonde:nt\n\n {By Si\u00b0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3a11gadh31' S1 Hasakeri, Advoeata)\n\n  V.   'E\"h:is pe\ufb01\ufb01an is \ufb02ied un\ufb01er Seciion 482 \u00ab::::p.z::. pzaying\n $31: sctwasida the orxier\/judgment yassa\u00e9 by JMPC EV,\n\nEielgaum, dated 1.8.2906 \u00a33 C.(:,r~:o.104--\/' 20% and by Qrdm'\n\n '\"passe{i \ufb01y ieamad F'FC--iI and A&\u00e9i.S.J. Beigaum in\n\nQr1.A,E\\\u00a56.,1?5;'20{)\u00e9 dated 28.1,2\u00a798 am}. :0 dismiss the\nccrmpiaizlt by aiiava-\ufb02ing this peti\ufb01on'\n\nThis petition e::0mi:1g on far a\u00e9missimz this clay; {ha\nCour: mack: the fallowing:\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
There are concuntnt \ufb01ndings of the Cozifis   4_<\/p>\n
pttiitioncf has csmmitte\u00e9i. an es\ufb01s\ufb01ag put:iSi1ia\u00a7:=1\u00e9v._:;.:1fiv;sr ‘<\/p>\n
Sectian 138 of the PH, Act<\/p>\n
2, 111 View of tha cgncaifr\u00e9iif f’1I1dVi1:.g$’ 5-i5\u20acQ%\u00a7ieci by the
\nCourts below, it is 11e2%::~:ssar_\u00a7?  t\ufb01 in 3 ii\u00e9\u00e9giisibn reporttd<\/p>\n
in AIR 1999 s.:\u20aca\u20ac:c5di3,:g:~;s._f<jg_f fixefpuxjpose {sf satisfying itself as<\/p>\n
'V 1%: t:}1eV'fr::'z::1;\ufb01v:<:t1};:::ss, legaiity Q1' pmpriety of any<\/p>\n
' E'\u00a7\u00a7::;t1:Vi11{g.s, s\u20ac'i'3' t':*~:2:1ce Gr cvrdezz 81:': {ha said
\n3  T.  paws}? cannct be equated with the
\nSan \ufb01pp\ufb01\ufb01ai\ufb01 Court mar can it be tmatcd
\n\u00a2\u20ac:iI.er: " as a seco\ufb02d Appeliattt Juzisciiction.<\/p>\n
"  'therefore, it Wonk} not be appropriate
\nfor the High Court {:3 m-appmciai\u20ac 111$ ev\u00e9danc\ufb01<\/p>\n
and mm: ta its own co-1f;clusio:1 93:: the same
\nWham $113 Evid\u00e9nce has aii\ufb01adg b\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 a\u00a73pr\u20ac::=I.ate(i<\/p>\n
by the Magis\ufb01atc as W533 as {ha Sessions Judge<\/p>\n
N   cg\u00ab.Mem<\/p>\n
\ufb01g: apgealy"\n<\/p>\n
,..\u00ab-w<\/p>\n
3. The irszain\u00e9zd Cotmsei for peti\ufb01onm:  <\/p>\n
fe\ufb01owmg \ufb01ubmissions;\n<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
i3’et;it.io;’1er di\u00e9 got hiavci-.m\u00a7nSac.i’\u00a7:iGn with <\/p>\n
complainant. H: had :i$:S:1\u20acd  <\/p>\n
cheque as secuzV’it\u00a7,\u00a7 ir; o}:1e”o1_:” big; i’1\u00e9\u00e912 \u20aci7s”‘\ufb01ame13a<\/p>\n
‘I’c::13.k:ari in m1atio;1___L:fe..v$on_;m ciii\u00a7.tf\u00a72ns_\u00e9ic{ion and
\nthe Chequ\u00e9ftrzaa  com@iaman\u00a3 had
\ncelludcd   their present
\nCOmP1\u00a71intr .._ . u 7 ._,<\/p>\n
J. _ A”‘1’\ufb01c’:j3e:\u00a7:itio:9\u00a7\u00a2r.V}1:–}e;s”1~,::s\ufb01: residing in Goa frem the
\n._ —  xiotice Jge\u00e9 under Seciion<\/p>\n
”  iifof “Act sent to
\n= ,;ps’*E:Zti\u00a7)’;\u00a7:1e,i~, ‘ ‘a~:;’: Belgaum, is invalid. In the<\/p>\n
6 address :33?’<\/p>\n
c:ifcum\u00a7t;m\u20aces, ze3pond<:~13.t~comp1ainant ha\u00e9<\/p>\n
 'fgzilsd ta prove that petitiermr is guiity of an<\/p>\n
  * 4V\u20acr\u00a3'f\u00a7i;1ce punishaizrie under Section. 138 of tbs E'-5.}.
\n' "AE:t,<\/p>\n
.4… 'Regar\u00e9irzg first SZ1b3S\u00a31.iSSi0\ufb02, if is necrassary is mfer<\/p>\n
  ,\u20ac:;;\u00ab._c \u00e9r'\u00a3\u00e9\ufb01\u20acd cap}? cf eieciroi 131$: pmpamd duiixzg the year
\n    in this docummzt it is 33:10am that petitiarxzer is a<\/p>\n
resident of Beigaum, The netice under Seciien 138(5) 91' the<\/p>\n
\u00a7\\\u00a7 .1. Act was $63.1: to fesi\u00e9ezztiai ad(iZ'f:SS cf pctitianer. The<\/p>\n
petitionar had drawn we \ufb01isputeci Chcque 9:1 ("Samara Ba\ufb01k,<\/p>\n
  5 <\/span><\/p>\n
:4:<\/span><\/p>\n
Belgaum Camp Br331:::h,’3(~:’1g311I11. The peiitia:1sr.\u00abji1\u00e9z:$–._ bi\u00e9;\u00a2n<\/p>\n
opara\ufb01ng the said bank account. Hf: has HO\u00a7.”\u00a71}fQ:f1:’f;:{iEi <\/p>\n
Banker about chazige: cf his adclregsw. <\/p>\n
5:3. The ieax\ufb02e\u00e9 Ceunsei f01*. 1p\u20acf}.fi\u00e9iT:mfT’\u00a7:v;Afe:-;fg*1.’f.zg”<\/p>\n
\ufb01vidence: 0f respondent w01ii\u20ac1vL4″S1_;bn1ii  f\u00e9s\u00a7;.g\u00a7’i:”<ie;i\u00a7t. has" V<\/p>\n
admi\ufb01\u00e9d that petitioxz\ufb01r haS——1;i\u20acft\ufb01"*\u00bb-.r\ufb01Si\u20ac1iiigv…\u00e9i\u00a7vE303: T116
\nan.:1mis;sion is net :113t5c<;\ufb01:i?Jc:\u00a3:\u20ac:7;_  c\ufb01i\ufb01eg\u00e9tiegi by the learned<\/p>\n
Ceu\ufb01sai for ps:titir;:1er.; "\n<\/p>\n
:’–jTh\u00a2 r::VVsV*,V;’;’:.:V:1:\u00a7i \u20ac%;;tt”13\u00a7{s…ad{::itted that petiticner E1213 basin
\nx\ufb01sici\ufb01zg  B\u20ac}:g&\u20ac1V\ufb011LV8\u00a31\u00e9\u00a7”-ffl\ufb01t\u00e9\ufb01b\ufb01sh\ufb01d busimzss at Goa<\/p>\n
j ‘ ” ‘E.’he abgbir\u00e9 d\u00e9rumants ‘\u00a3335-‘(}1.1iii”}. pram that geiifioney is<\/p>\n
 .;;;.Be1ga1:m. Thcmferc, isguance sf lsgai naiic\ufb01 to<\/p>\n
I   \u00e9deifess of petitioner at Belgaum canmfrt b\ufb01 found<\/p>\n
f\u00e9zuit *.\u00a7?ii\u00a71\u00a7. \u00a7;E’\u00a7\u20ac2\u20ac:1 in the causa ‘title of C\ufb01mpiaini \ufb01lc\u00e9 before<\/p>\n
 n\ufb02\ufb01l\ufb01 fi’i:31\u00ab:'{‘\/au\ufb01, p\ufb01fiti\ufb02n\ufb01f is shown as r\ufb01sidezzi of Nabi\u00e9t Shae<\/p>\n
  i\u00e9aaialkargaiii, B\u00e9igamm’ In fact, summens isguve\u00e9 hy<\/p>\n
”  Chart. was \ufb01\ufb01fv\ufb01\ufb01 6:; \u00a3116 said address, Thsmfemg<\/p>\n
pstificizmr 93:11:01: ha heard ta say that \u00a71\u20ac hag C\ufb01\u00e9i\ufb01\ufb01d ti: be 21
\nV’<\/p>\n
residezzi 0f Beigaum and notiss sent to his ad\u00e9regs at<\/p>\n
E\ufb01\u00e9igazzm ix izzvaijd. J\\p_ Q<\/p>\n
7. The Ieanled Cbu\ufb02ssi for pg:f\u00a7.ti0ncr* hag; . <\/p>\n
the said Tmukazi ta prove that f.)\u20ac;ii’!’.i0}’:1\u20ac3.1’ZT.  -.\u00a7i\u00a7iV1’C:’L\u00a7
\nblank cheque to said ‘I’0u1<st~4'1'i.__\u00a71}
\ntransaction. The pe'\u00a3itio:1::1#;VL'L"'V..iE;a3u IT1 Qf' '._\ufb02@_.\u00a7\u00a5ab:1fished the
\ncixeumsianccs uneier  \u00a2ame'H\u00a7\u00a7:  possessirm
\n0f the chsquei In. -. i}:1\u20ac presumgationf,
\navailable anger 213$  "\u00a7:a9..:\u00a7f the rm. Ac: are mt
\nrebzl\ufb01rrd   d\u00e9 net \ufb01nd any grounds<\/p>\n
{:3   jii\u00e9gment.\n<\/p>\n
A<:::~o.:"d%inv;g\u00a73*,.  \u00a323 dismisseci',<\/p>\n
  V Sd\/…\n<\/p>\n
  …..  JUDGE<\/p>\n
St?\n<\/p>\n
L,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 Author: N.Ananda 1;\u00bb: mg HEGH caum GE’ z<ARm;rA:\u00a7\u00e9” _ CRIMINAL REVISION V;9}33’1’\u00a3;::,{\u00e9 0;t}3 V BETWEEN :’ imtiyaz sg:;udajigaf;””~V.. > Aged-a?aout=.-5\u20ac}–y}::\u00abaz’s, 3 Goo: \ufb01ii\u00e9iacg\u00e9tg, R\/ix” _T-\u00a7’.’:”{\u00e9’. 119, Bhut\u00e9tm Bhaf i\ufb01v\ufb01rrdes St. ,f Panjimg\ufb01fat\u00e9. .5.P\u20ac%:;i\ufb01oner (337 Sri 3′:}o11\u00a7$1}i, \u00a7%:ib\u00a7Q–f:iat\u20ac) ‘ S1’i..;Ra33d\u20ac:sh\u00ab\u00a7abu3:a0 Patti}, A […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60169","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nImtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":747,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009"},"wordCount":747,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009","name":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-23T07:25:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/imtiyaz-soudagar-vs-sri-ramesh-baburao-patil-on-24-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Imtiyaz Soudagar vs Sri Ramesh Baburao Patil on 24 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60169","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60169"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60169\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60169"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60169"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60169"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}