{"id":60283,"date":"2009-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-13T23:19:35","modified_gmt":"2016-08-13T17:49:35","slug":"armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THZE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 9??! BAY 0? JULY 2eQj9__'   A. V\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR JUSTICE K P\u00a7<KES.\u00a5tiA'-fAP\u00a7;AI%;*\u00a7.4\u00a7'z?\u00a7;N\u00a7\u00a7.~  V\n\nR.S.A. No. 602 o'f20_<_)9..-5\nnmwmmn: ' %\n\n1 ARMUGAM  \n\nS\/0 LATE swAMYm':'HAN"' - \n\nAGED 35 YEARS,   \n\nR\/AT MASJID STREET; %\nCHAMALAPURA  -_  \nNANJANGiJI.': jrewr-1: ~\u00bb~57.f1..= 301';  ,_ \n\n2 A. SELVA~.KUE'e\u00a7AR ., V  *\nS\/O'ARf9\u00a3Ui1C}AM'f  M\nAGED ABQ'U"1{'~\u00abS6' yEA;2\u00bbs,   %\nR\/ATAMASJID 'L4fE'.RE\u00a7:',_T~;{) \nCHAMALAPURA   4'  \nNANJANGUD .'r\u00a7)w%N--5~7 1 30 3\n\n5 "   .  APPELLANTS\n\n      \u00ab\u20ac31-IAR, ADVOCATE)\n\n...._--.......-.'\n\n _ 1 SR1 :;A;ze;\u00a7:\u00a7ADAsA SARVAJANIKA\n\n V}I)YA';RTHI NILAYA TRUST (REGJ\n  ..  ROAD, NANJANGUI) TOWN\n\n _ REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT\n 'SEE. K.N.NANJAIAH-571 3041.\nI  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
V’   gay SR1. Y s H mam’, ADVOCATE )<\/p>\n
THIS RSA FILED U\/S. 100 OF CPC AGAINST? THE
\nJUDGEMENT & DEGREE DTD: 16.03.2009  IN
\nR.A.N().74\/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL
\nDN.) 85 JMFC, NANJANGUD, DISMISSING THE. <\/p>\n
CONFIRMING AND MODIFYING THE JUDGEMENT  :’S-.N}3
\nDEGREE DTD:13.11.20()8 PASSED IN OS.3′?’;’v’2CIQ8″‘VON  <\/p>\n
FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL
\nADDITIONAL JMFQNANJANGUD,   ‘<\/p>\n
THIS RSA COMING ON  ADMISS<\/p>\n
THE COURT DELIVERED TI-IE  <\/p>\n
This apP\u20ac.9.~1   ”  .& 2 in 0.8.\n<\/p>\n
No.37\/2008 mi;    Judge (Jr.Dn.)
\nand Addi\ufb01dn\u00e9ii  is directed against the
\nconcmmfit  below decreeing the suit<\/p>\n
of the  directing them to vacate and<\/p>\n
“V1’i.-.=x_11d+\u00ab’:{j)\u00a7\u00a7r’A\u00a71;\u00a7..\/ tile H  schedule property to the<\/p>\n
 x  respondent] plainti\ufb02’ filed the suit for<\/p>\n
 ” f);oSSes\u00bb3ioii and far recovery of arrea1*s of rent \ufb01nm the<\/p>\n
 –djef\u00a73;}\u00a7i\u00e9ii1ts intaraiia on the gonad that the defendants are:<\/p>\n
 tenants of the plaintiff-trust in respect of the suit<\/p>\n
4scheduie premises 911 a monthly mm: of Rs.’75\/- and that<\/p>\n
1?\n<\/p>\n
(..L2. * \u00abDN;}–5’AND 1 x<\/p>\n
 DAY;\n<\/p>\n
the tenancy of the defendants in respect of the V.<\/p>\n
premises has been duly terminated by isstdzig’<\/p>\n
required under iaw and though theWnot:ice_\u00ab   , <\/p>\n
on the defendants, they have   ::;t1fie<\/p>\n
demands made therein, as suajh\u00ab,.. _t}1eVEiefenda;1;t’sA~;e;’e ‘Ii-ebie  L’<\/p>\n
be evicted fmm the schedule <\/p>\n
3) Defendant  1′    of the 211″\n<\/p>\n
defendant.    V’ were served on
\nDefendants-   V\ufb01gefendant No.1 remained
\nabsent    The 211\u00b0’ defendant
\nthough evVppeared*V~”t1ia1 Court, faiied to \ufb01le his<\/p>\n
writtenVstate1dn;eI\u00a7t “ef grant of several epportur\ufb01ties.<\/p>\n
‘V’I’heref’ei*e;,.,’thee–   proceeded to record evidence of the<\/p>\n
 T. judgement dated 13.11.2008 decreed the<\/p>\n
1 V’   suit ‘   and directed the defendants to vacate<\/p>\n
_ ..  deii’s?i::3.?__3:i’1e Vacant possession of the suit premises to the<\/p>\n
  and also directed the defendants te pay Rs.300\/-<\/p>\n
V.   the arrears of rent for the period of four months from<\/p>\n
‘V””~.Ce’::ober 2002 to January 2003. Aggvrieved by the said<\/p>\n
judgiem: and decree, Defendants — 1 85 2 \ufb01led a;\u00a7pe,e3 in<\/p>\n
RA. No.74\/2008 on the \ufb01le of the Civil <\/p>\n
Nanjangud.\n<\/p>\n
4) The Lower Appellate   <\/p>\n
sides and on reeppreciationd  ’tile era}   ‘<\/p>\n
evidence, concurred Withtlle of theitiml  The
\nLower Appellate Court  1%’-..S?jte of a\ufb01ording
\nseveral opportzgrlities,   felled to \ufb01le their<\/p>\n
written   to contest the suit, as<\/p>\n
such,   contending that they did not<\/p>\n
had suf\ufb01eient  Jeontest the suit. In that View<\/p>\n
‘V of the; \ufb01lattert  Villoxyziver Appellate Court dismissed the<\/p>\n
  the decree passed by the trial Court.<\/p>\n
 the concurrent judgments and decree of<\/p>\n
V ii the  Defendants -~ 3. & 2 have presented this<\/p>\n
 5} Sri. N. Manohar, lwmed counsel fer the<\/p>\n
  -\u00e9ippeuants contended that both the Courts below have<\/p>\n
committed serious error in decreeing the suit of the<\/p>\n
without affording reasonable opportunity to igfie  A’<\/p>\n
to file Written statement and contest,   ‘4 iltviis  ‘ ; <\/p>\n
submission that for the reasons  <\/p>\n
defendants could not \ufb01le theift  time i<\/p>\n
allowed in law and V ,.–t,lioug;_h”‘ilitI1e’ll”-\u00bbappelia;\ufb01ts-‘Vi produced
\nsufficient materials    *seAp;_xe11ate Court to
\nestablish the  foij  the trial Court
\nand for     statement before the
\ntrial   Without considering
\nthe saiiie.’  ‘ giefspec\ufb01ve, has erroneously<\/p>\n
dismissed tlie-. appei11.AA’-._i’Aeeordix1g to the learned counsel,<\/p>\n
” the   ought to have accepted the<\/p>\n
s.:b_j; the appellants for the failure to \ufb01le the<\/p>\n
i it    state\ufb01ieiit and eught to have remanded the suit to<\/p>\n
  trial  for \ufb02esh disposal in accordance with law by<\/p>\n
  further opportunity is the appellants to fie written<\/p>\n
 ‘=-swteftement and tie contest the suit. @\/<\/p>\n
periw by another 60 days on being satis\ufb01ed _4:a1i3otit~._Vvthe<\/p>\n
existence of sufficient grounds for extending *<\/p>\n
within an outer limit of 90 days, \ufb011e..defende\ufb01t  ‘ . <\/p>\n
\ufb01le his written statement. Admitte\u00e9iiy <\/p>\n
not \ufb01led within the outer  of days.  Lower i<\/p>\n
Appellate Court has notieed o7.o6.\u00ab2o0s , the case<\/p>\n
was adjourned to 30.oe.72%oostft:\u00a7:;1d:i’ie’t1a\u00a7net to 25.07.2008,<\/p>\n
18.08.2008, o1,09.2oo8;ii1i\u00a72Qie9;2o’o&xand then to<\/p>\n
04.10.2008.     ”  the plainti\ufb02’ adduced
\nevidence V.-:m.    of these days, the
\ndefendarits have  the trial Court nor made<\/p>\n
any attempt’ to tt1’i}eV’t\u00a7,_1e’.3e\\i’71*i.i”:i:en statement. From this, it is<\/p>\n
~e1_ear   A.z;:;r;;)o1’tunities were afforded to the<\/p>\n
V’c1etei:ia’ants:to”veo11test the suit. The defendants could have<\/p>\n
    trial Court on any of these days and<\/p>\n
    Court, as to why they could not file the<\/p>\n
 “statement within the time allowed under law and<\/p>\n
   eould have sought permission of the Court to \ufb01le<\/p>\n
   statement. No such attempt: appears to have been<\/p>\n
e<\/p>\n
made by the defendants. Under these  the<\/p>\n
‘Trial Court rightly proceeded to record the <\/p>\n
plaintiff and  dispose\ufb01\ufb01wof the  on ‘_t;’ne4.: of  <\/p>\n
evidence of the piaintmz In  an Edie. traa tttape-:e A<\/p>\n
defendants are admittedly tengntstx of \u20ac:he_Vsene(:VlAu.le *<\/p>\n
property and since their  t_  by
\nissuing notice as  _    Court was
\njusti\ufb01ed in orderingV’evietion. er  fmm the suit
\nSchedule      court after
\nconside\ufb01ngv     5 pnt~forth by the
\nappe\ufb02antsj  failure to \ufb01le written<\/p>\n
statement  eonteet._ suit, has rightly held that the<\/p>\n
–‘defend’a:mteV’ that they had no opportunity to<\/p>\n
\ufb01le i\u20ac?:itten._’st;aten1,_ent and contest the suit. The defendants<\/p>\n
   have tffexnsekvee for this situation. It is not as if<\/p>\n
 that  ..1e1:1d.1ord  the present eviction proceedings<\/p>\n
  defendants for the first time. It is not in dispute<\/p>\n
  ..__”t’i.iatT:the respondent\/ plaintiff commenced the proceedings in<\/p>\n
   year 1987 to evict the appellant] defendants from the<\/p>\n
e<\/p>\n
suit schedule premises. Initially, the landlord f1Ie,_’1\u00a7.:<\/p>\n
petition under Section 21(1) 0) of the   4′<\/p>\n
Control Act, 1961. Though the said 4.-i’,a\ufb0164_:jt.o ‘ ; <\/p>\n
allowed by the trial Court, the  <\/p>\n
revisional Court on the gouno   ‘-ofV;a\ufb01’io11Eime\ufb01t ‘<\/p>\n
brought to the said Act, once: the
\nsaid Act had no _;uz~:sd:ooo;f;  of eviction in
\nrespect of tho ogoooao  aj ono:~1tab1o Trust.
\nThereafter, the attempt to evict the
\ndorondaotoovbysjjogoogonoooit  the Court of the smn
\ncauses.  {sass decreed by the trial Court,<\/p>\n
again it wss3\u00a7evo1fsg3dA~\u00ab._loy~~–“nfl3is Court in Revision petition<\/p>\n
“‘ul1’1Ade1″i_j 13 kor–s;o Small Causes Courts Act on the<\/p>\n
  Causes Court has no jurisdiction to<\/p>\n
  moss  for ejectment in the light of the law laid<\/p>\n
\u00ab  \u00abgiown by”  Bivision Bench of this Court in_Sa.mjamma,<\/p>\n
  Vs. KJK. Venkatwh [ ILR 200? KAR<\/p>\n
Vt   . This Court in the said Revision Peti\ufb01on directed the<\/p>\n
   of Small Causes to rotum the piaint to the piainti\ufb02’ to<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
present the same before the juzisdictionai.<\/p>\n
Thereafier, the respondent\/plainti\ufb01’ took returrl  <\/p>\n
plaint and re-presented the same before ”   ‘ 1. <\/p>\n
Civil Judge (Jr.D:’1.) at Nanjan\u00a7n,d,?’_A_’w:hieh <\/p>\n
numbered as 0.5}. 37\/2008} As’ui__1;   on<\/p>\n
13.1 1.2008 and the said, eapneh .a\u00a7fE’:rmed by
\nthe Lower Appellate    From this, it is
\nmanifestly clear   had a long
\ninnings    l\ufb01iga\ufb01on. Under these
\neircumst;\u00bb’..E1ee.e;    the appellants were<\/p>\n
not a\ufb01”o%r{:Eed”  o1\u00a7portunities. The appeilante<\/p>\n
had ample   therefore, they cannot be a<\/p>\n
“‘W–e–..nt of opportunity. In that View of the<\/p>\n
 m.atter;\u00bb I” “error committed by the Courts below in<\/p>\n
     of the plaintiff and directing eviction of<\/p>\n
.   appe\ufb02ejnts\/tenarlts.\n<\/p>\n
‘  ‘7;”’ I see no merit in any of the geunds urged in the<\/p>\n
T  memo or in any of the contentions raised by the<\/p>\n
 ‘  counsel for the appellants. The appeal does not<\/p>\n
%a\/<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
involve any ques\ufb01on of law muehless substantiai  of<\/p>\n
law. Therefore, the appeal is liable to be dismise:ed’.-\u00ablv:-   _<\/p>\n
8) – Learned counsel for them  for l 7 AV<\/p>\n
gent of reasonable time for the  <\/p>\n
hand-over the vacant  V. _
\nAdmittedly, the appeilariie. schedule
\npremises for more than   viiIfiiie_’.-appellants have
\nbeen contes\ufb01\ufb02g ‘  liiiigaltiiiiiii th.e.:l.\u00a7lle.st two decades.
\nLandlord hae  possession of the
\npremises;  1   Wyeare. Nevertheless, the<\/p>\n
appellants’\/l’tei1ants–   to be nmning a cycle<\/p>\n
_ shop  the  piiremises are required to be granted<\/p>\n
  time to vacate the premises. Taidng into<\/p>\n
ceiiei\u00e9ieratioi}.__’die”facts and circumstances of the ease and<\/p>\n
 the leiig  litigation between the parties for over 22<\/p>\n
_ 4;  :q,;g,%,:’:!3[‘*\u00a2”;i,e  of the opinion that the interest of justice would<\/p>\n
  if four months time is genteel to the<\/p>\n
” ~ \u00e9ippeliantsj tenants to vacate and deliver the vacant<\/p>\n
ll possession of the schedule premises. <\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
9) In View of the above, the appeal is dismissed.
\nHowever, the appellants] tenants are gnnted. feur L\ufb01onths<\/p>\n
time from today to vacate and hand-over <\/p>\n
possession cf the schedule   ‘M  <\/p>\n
respondent] plainti\ufb02”.\n<\/p>\n
KGRC’<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009 Author: K.N.Keshavanarayana IN THZE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 9??! BAY 0? JULY 2eQj9__’ A. V BEFORE THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE K P\u00a7<KES.\u00a5tiA'-fAP\u00a7;AI%;*\u00a7.4\u00a7'z?\u00a7;N\u00a7\u00a7.~ V R.S.A. No. 602 o'f20_<_)9..-5 nmwmmn: ' % 1 ARMUGAM S\/0 LATE swAMYm':'HAN"' […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60283","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nArmugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Armugam S\\\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1431,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Armugam S\\\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Armugam S\\\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009"},"wordCount":1431,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009","name":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika ... on 9 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T17:49:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/armugam-so-late-swamynathan-vs-sri-kanakadasa-sarvajanika-on-9-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Armugam S\/O Late Swamynathan vs Sri Kanakadasa Sarvajanika … on 9 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60283","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}