{"id":60729,"date":"2009-01-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-11-08T17:48:34","modified_gmt":"2017-11-08T12:18:34","slug":"ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE EUGH COSRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY\n\nBEFORE} \n\nTHE HQIWBLE MR. .j:z4Sr1Cfi;A.:sI'.\"ANAr;\u00bb1\u00a7A;   1.\n\nCRIMINAL PETITiOl\\Iv:v:41LN4Vf):_.5\u00a738\"O'1\"35 2i)Oi3\u00a7\nBETWEEN:  'V  A\"\n\n1 M\/S EXECUTIVE APPAREL'pRk3c'ESsR.}53~5?'..\n\nF'ROF':\"i.\\J3  APPAREL PROCESSORS,\nS:\u00a7i'I'E_ NO. ii}, ..I_2'T.'H 'i~\u00a3M',~_'I'UME(UR ROAD, _\n\nOPP TO PEEi\"3.Y'A T\u00bbE',LF:.-?\u00a7f'I5i{)NE EXCHANGE,\nPEENYAA DASAEEAHAVLLIV; ' B'LORE--57.\n\n3 _ -J T DALLAL' -  -\n, MANAGER; \/8 EXECUTIVE APPAREL\n P\u00e9\u00e9-QCESSORS;\"'Si\"FE N010, 12TH KM,\na 3 TUM{3'.1.IR_ ROAD, 09? TO PEENYA 'TELEPHONE\n T  _)3:;:\u00ab:4r;:'1~:,ANjc;3::, PEENYA DASARAHALLI,\n I B'--:\",,.C>RI:;--V57._--v\"\n    PETITIONERS\n\n3 {By  3:: V NAGESH, ADVOCATE 3\n\nK 'V ' A xA;~a:;:s. 4_:\n\n'   M\/S KARNATAKA STATE\n\nPOLLUTIOR\" CGNTROL BOARD\n\nNOS 63,8 AND 9TH FLOOR,\n\nPUBLIC UTILITY BUILDING,\n\nM G ROAD, B'L.CiRE-1,\n\nR\/'BY ITS DY ENVIRONMENTAL OFFICER.\n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
(By Srti BRNAIK FGR Sri. U NAGARAJ, ADVOCATES )<\/p>\n
.’ V.  _ V’ \u00e9:2.V’1’hey\u00e9_ ha.vev”‘\u00e9i\u00e91\u00a7V1)roached this court to quash the<\/p>\n
Ae’–pI”oCeed:i:2gs, VA’.e’-inter alia, contending, the learned<\/p>\n
   Cf’.’\u00a7:C. mfore issuing summons to the accused. It
\n    contended that complainant had 110 loans standi<\/p>\n
   present the complaint and procedure adopted for<\/p>\n
GIRL? men U,\/S. 432 CR.P.C. PRAYENG TO REVERSE<\/p>\n
AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER oar. 22.1.93 passer.\u00bb E3Y.._’I’I-.IE
\nC.M.M., emcee IN cone. 83\/98, n1sEcT1m–o’–V__m”s
\nRE(3iSTRA’I’iON op’ A ease AGAINST THE PE*s;2s.V.__ANo’w.s
\nORDERING PROCESS AGAINST THEM Res A ‘THEIR—.e
\nAPPEARANCE BEFORE THE’. COURT PRESUMABLY ‘\ufb01NI3[QUASH* 1.
\nTHE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS. ~    <\/p>\n
This petition, coming hes1ing,.\ufb01xis”:\u00a7i\u00e9y, ‘ t.he ‘V
\nCourt, made the following:  — ” \u00ab. <\/p>\n
vun-.——-\n<\/p>\n
The     Nos. 1 to 3<\/span>
\nin C.   for offences
\n   26 I’\/W. Sections 44
\nand    \ufb01le of Chief Metropolitan<\/p>\n
Magif.s1;rate.’ 4 ”\n<\/p>\n
IS\/ie1g\u00ab’i5tI.’.’__<itG not foilowed the provisions of Section<\/p>\n
collecting samples of water is eor1t.1'a:'y to Section '21 of<\/p>\n
@gVeWa,e<\/p>\n
the Water Act. N~<\/p>\n
I.\u00bb<\/p>\n
3. I have heard Sri.C.V.Nagesh,  <\/p>\n
appearing for petitioner and   ., <\/p>\n
counsel appearing for respondelit,<\/p>\n
4. It is seen from reccifds, ori ‘pfesenfgitiQn..V.(}Vf..3\ufb011e  *<\/p>\n
complaizxt the lear11ec1:_ MagisVt_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7te_’pe;fssed
\norder which reads  j _   <\/p>\n
‘Complai\ufb01 ‘ –pfese\u00a7nte;\u00a31’:pf\u00a7 ‘   :’Register as CC
\nand issue     <\/p>\n
5,.  by a pubiic
\n  _, fieerned Magistrate could<\/p>\n
dispense V'”v=.:r_ii;h, swom “st\u00a7tement. Hewever, the learned<\/p>\n
 \u00ab_ Ma.gi.st1fg}1teVv sheu]d_____not have issued summons to<\/p>\n
  taking cegnizaslce of offences and<\/p>\n
z-3p1ji}?’ing& iiiie \ufb01iind to averlnents of complaint.<\/p>\n
  *f;. ‘u’g’_1′}V1is court in a decision reported in 1m 2001<\/p>\n
A 51’ {in the ease efPRAShAN’1’H ILTHAKUR as.<\/p>\n
‘   1\u00a7;Ae3uNATHxoD1:xAL) has heid,<\/p>\n
“5. On a perusal of the certified copy of
\nthe czrder-sheet of the case maintained by the
\nlearned Magistnzte, it is found that the
\nteamed Magistrate has not taken cognizance<\/p>\n
 I \ufb01nd that the impugned order<\/p>\n
V’ ” *  tdthe learned Magistrate for fresh disposal in<\/p>\n
the respondent was remanded to the
\ncustody under the {awful orders
\ncnfme No.66\/1995 by the same Court,     A’ ~
\nout whether there are any grgunds   _ V
\nagainst the pedtrbner and    . e
\nfor the offences under ‘A’34’2x
\nsec azzeged in the
\nlearned Magistrate   <\/p>\n
question  to
\nto pmsee;4re’*  ether Police
\n0\ufb01?cers,r%w\u00a7z:a;;;;z  my opportunity to alt
\n ea; in the matter.\n<\/p>\n
__  to have been left
\n :4:  by the com mez-\n<\/p>\n
_givirrQ'< ail the accused to submit
\n  '—win______the matter at a Later stage.
\n \u00abregard to the facts and circumstances<\/p>\n
  pdssediay the learned Magze were is liabie to
\nbegsevt aside and the matter is to be remanded<\/p>\n
 aeaordazme with law, by foltowing the correct<\/p>\n
procedure. "\n<\/p>\n
7. In a decision reperted in 2001 {3} Kar.L.J. 518<\/p>\n
(in the case ef PARAVA TAGOUDA as.<\/p>\n
REVANASHIIIDAYYA this caurt has held, fr’:
\n 7 }”\n<\/p>\n
‘r’\\,-=’ .\n<\/p>\n
grotmds to proceed against the accused. Thereforc\ufb01he<\/p>\n
impugned order caimot be sustained.<\/p>\n
9. In the result, petition is acoe;>’i;f\u00e9:d..:Ar:V,: V’ M<\/p>\n
impugned order is set aside. ‘I’11\u00e9”1’11at_t:\u00e9:r is <\/p>\n
to the learned Magistrate for re~c$on;\u00e9;i_d’erat}iQr1 ‘from  <\/p>\n
stage of presentation of ccrn\ufb01iairit ta  of the<\/p>\n
obsenza\ufb01ons made hersin   law.\n<\/p>\n
         sd\/-2.\n<\/p>\n
cm\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009 Author: N.Ananda IN THE EUGH COSRT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05TH DAY OF JANUARY BEFORE} THE HQIWBLE MR. .j:z4Sr1Cfi;A.:sI’.”ANAr;\u00bb1\u00a7A; 1. CRIMINAL PETITiOl\\Iv:v:41LN4Vf):_.5\u00a738″O’1″35 2i)Oi3\u00a7 BETWEEN: ‘V A” 1 M\/S EXECUTIVE APPAREL’pRk3c’ESsR.}53~5?’.. F’ROF’:”i.\\J3 APPAREL PROCESSORS, S:\u00a7i’I’E_ NO. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\\\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":591,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\\\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\\\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009"},"wordCount":591,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009","name":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution ... on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-08T12:18:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-executive-apparel-processors-vs-ms-karnataka-state-pollution-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Executive Apparel Processors vs M\/S Karnataka State Pollution … on 5 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60729"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60729\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}