{"id":60919,"date":"2009-10-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-10-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009"},"modified":"2015-04-01T14:22:18","modified_gmt":"2015-04-01T08:52:18","slug":"chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","title":{"rendered":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 15\"' DAY or OCTOBER, 2009.\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. v_E,N.u;;oPALA'  \n\nCRIMINAL PeT:1'_Igi\\i=..4Ai<_;p-.r727'3,_0'_A_\u00a7J_;o"_9_'T'   '\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri.Chandrashekar Rudrappa Me_nsin_ka.i\nAge:S3 years, Occ: Advocate     \nMangaiwar Peth, Dharwad_..." _   A  n."..._PETITIONER\n\n(By Sri:A.A.Pathan., Adv) j; '\n\nAND:\n\nManipal vFin'ancV\u00e9i,Cor'f:oratiori Ltd._,'""\n\nManipai7,House,   T -\n\nManipai  11.9    \n\nRepresented by its=Mana.ging'\n\nDirector T.Na'r.ayanVP\u00abaiC~~._   RESPONDENT\n\n " v .( R2   deieted A vide Court\n order dated 02.07.2009)\n\n Sri  e.jo._yAeg de & Assts., Ad vs)\n\n is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.\n\n_  0 ',oraying..tog_set aside the order dated 19.06.2008 passed by\n JMFCWI Court Hubii in CC No.1725\/20O4.\n\n0'   Cri.P is coming on for Admission this day, the\n\n ___*7Co'Lgrt made the following:\n\n\n\nO R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner filed a private complaint against the<\/p>\n
respondent and three others, alleging commis,sion7._of<\/p>\n
offences punishable under Sections 143, <\/p>\n
465, 467, 468, 469, 47: and 474 read with lse\u00e9:jtien–l\u00bbI14=9   <\/p>\n
Cr.P.C. The sworn statement of the’,compl.ai’na’nt:~-et__wa;s6<\/p>\n
recorded. The cognizance w’a-s__ taken_ and su’rn,rno_ns_,’\u00a7wals <\/p>\n
issued to the respondent and other,’ accuseidzpertsons. A
\ncase was registered in  NctV,132.S;’~2_0.li4,on the file of the
\nJMFC at l-Eub|i.,_ on….,.the. lep\u00a7:;1itattier$’:,,, rnade by the
\naccused\/respo.nder’it_,   bail by imposing
\nthe coAnd~.itionVsu.~.’j-.,1:”Theo:”respondent\/accused filed the<\/p>\n
app|icatio”n,__’un,de’r_”Sec:tio’nsV 295 and 317(1) of Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
_ see,k.i,:ngpern’1’ission ‘of the learned Magistrate for<\/p>\n
 .d:ispensationA”from personal appearance before the Court.<\/p>\n
  applichation was contested by the<\/p>\n
conn’plai’–nantfpetitioner. Considering the submissions made<\/p>\n
it’\ufb02v,:0n~ee.pehalf of the complainant and the applicant\/accused,<\/p>\n
.’   application was allowed and the respondent who is the<\/p>\n
 “Managing Director of Manipal Finance Corporation Limited,<\/p>\n
‘ t\u00bb<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
has been exempted from the personal appearance before
\nthe Court during the course of trial of the said case,
\nsubject to the conditions indicated in the orde_r.._:j.ji”h_is<\/p>\n
petition is directed against the said order.<\/p>\n
2. Sri.A.A. Patha n, learned; Acl_\\(oca_te”ap:pea’r’inVg.,Von_ K ”<\/p>\n
behalf of the petitioner\/complainant Iconjteinded<\/p>\n
respondent\/accused is deliberately”i’a\\roidinlg:”{g.._.a.P\u00a7eair <\/p>\n
before the Trial Court and the___a’pp_|_ica_tion.”filed” before the
\nTriai Court is untenable’:T.A\ufb02iccogrdifngjftfoihim, the cause<\/p>\n
stated in the applicationisv\u00bboijIy’–a_”;nal\u00a7e b’ev!”ieve one, which<\/p>\n
could  a:cce’pted’._WbyV’Vthe learned Trial Judge
\nand theyiffrnpugnedji.go’rdVeir:’passed. To show that the<\/p>\n
respoVndentf”~ha’s._ob|iqueI’y motivate, learned Counsel<\/p>\n
nthat’}”t’iri’e’ respondent and others had filed<\/p>\n
 in this Court seeking quashing of the<\/p>\n
pro:;’eiedings3.’i..V_  is contended that after the dismissal of the<\/p>\n
 petition on 18.08.2005, the aforesaid appiication for<\/p>\n
“\u00abfipeVrn;i’anent exemption was filed. Learned Counsel by<\/p>\n
  referring to the decisions of the Apex Court in the case of<\/p>\n
L.\n<\/p>\n
.2<\/p>\n
Lily Begum Vs Joy Chandra Nagbanshi, reported in<\/p>\n
1994 Supreme court Cases (CH) 303, contenc!\u00abe’d~e,’ftgh:a’t.,’<\/p>\n
the dispensation\/exemption granted is illegal–jand.:hen’ce’,;’*sA”<\/p>\n
the impugned order is liable to be setrasidei<\/p>\n
3. Per contra, Learned Courisel a\u00bbp7peari’ng:’; on <\/p>\n
behalf of the respondent,  the
\nimpugned order, cont:e’nVded’_VAV.’th’at’:\u00ab..,_t~hV\u00e9–..TrialVxCourt has
\ncorrectly exercised   it and since
\nthe order passecl.c,,1\u00a7\\\/’Viitheh’ifriai has been
\nimpugned “passed in exercise of
\nthe   ‘court, this Court should
\nnot intelrfere  Learned Counsel submitted<\/p>\n
that, thee conditions irinposed in the impugned order have<\/p>\n
vv,,,pee’n.\u20ac’cti’mpii.ed wivtlhmdby the respondent, by filing an<\/p>\n
s–aFl’ida’vit,:”i.n.v”th’eV:_5.Triai Court. Learned Counsel submitted<\/p>\n
that.,,__Vth;e-respondent will act in terms of the conditions<\/p>\n
V’~.__V”‘irnp0sed,__A\u00abby the Trial Court in the impugned order and<\/p>\n
   this Court may decline to entertain the petition.<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
4. Keeping in view the rival contentions, the point
\nfor consideration is:\n<\/p>\n
“Whether the impugned order is illegal”?<\/p>\n
5. The Trial Court in the impugned <\/p>\n
noticed the material facts. Keeping in vievv,__th’e_factsn_and\u00ab\u00abf<\/p>\n
circumstances of the case and also the uri\u00abde’\u00a5rta~l__<ercise" i3f_t"ne*<\/p>\n
powers conferred upon him 'under Section'  fa_nd.,.3J_:37(V1) <\/p>\n
Of Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
6. In the casefuoff Ltd.,
\nVs M\/s    and Others
\nreported  the scope and ambit of
\n._ei_(‘igencies”\u00abw.h_es~1 the Court can proceed with
\nV the triai proceedings in a criminal case after
\n  d_ispens’mg with the personal attendance of an
\n._  acfcusefci-.,~’ We are not concerned with one of
\n those: fexigencies i.e. when the accused<\/p>\n
._ p_ei’sis’tentiy disturbs the proceedings. Here we<\/p>\n
,. need consider only the other exigency. If a<\/p>\n
.y _ Court is satisfied that in the interest of justice
\n‘  the personal attendance of an accused before
\n* it need not be insisted on, then the Court has
\nthe power to dispense with the attendance of
\nthat accused. in this contextk: reference to<\/p>\n
\/1.’<\/p>\n
Section 273 of the Code is useful. It says that<\/p>\n
” except as otherwise expressly provided, all_…_
\nevidence taken in the course of the trial or_
\nother proceedings shall be taken in
\npresence of the accused or, when~…_’Hi5g___’- 3
\npersonal attendance is dispensed with,~~jin th_e'<T
\npresence of his pleader. " If a Court_fe.e_ls.th~at ._
\ninsisting on the personal -a'ttendan_ceHof.yan._j_
\naccused in a particular case would t:=le"to'o_'h-ars.h~.._
\non account of variety of r\u00b0eason"s, can't–,the"
\nCourt afford relief to ssuch an"'accusedg*-inthe I
\nmatter of facing the prose'cution "proceVedin'gs"?" <\/p>\n
14. The .norma-ll”— ..ru.le*-._ is t’ha.t ..\/izhe
\nevidence shall be_tai<e7_1 in.t'h\u00abe_ p_r'e.sence of the
\naccused. However', everl theavabgsence of the
\naccused such eviderwe can be'-vta'l:en~" but then<\/p>\n
his cou~n's'e.lVggyZ'–mu\u00a2st  p're'se_nt____in' the Court,
\nprovid-ed g hef_h.a s been granted exemption from
\nattending\u00b0g.t'he~~– .Coujrt."\u00bb..V_yiTh-e -'concern of the
\ncvriyminal \u20acourt_,_"wsh~lould_ primarily be the
\n:adrni'nlls;i':ratio}n' ofacrirninai'Vjustice. For that
\npurpose 'proceed__ing\u00bbs of the Court in the
\ncase \u00abshouldvregiisteir.progress. Presence of the
\naccused in ti1.e..Court is not for marking his<\/p>\n
_ atten"dance_j–.ust_ for the sake of seeing him in
\n the Cou'rt..__V It is to enable the Court to proceed
\n w-ith~vl.the triavi*–.~*–~'If the progress of the trial can<\/p>\n
be. achieved even in the absence of the<\/p>\n
a'ccus'edV"the Court can certainly take into
\n" acco,untv"t'he magnitude of the sufferings which<\/p>\n
a _pari:Ecular accused person may have to bear
\nw'ith'~l"n order to make himself present in the<\/p>\n
*~Co:.urt in that particular case.\n<\/p>\n
15. These are days when prosecutions<\/p>\n
 for the offence under Section 138 are galloping<\/p>\n
up in criminal Courts. Due to the increase of
\ninter–State transactions through the facilities of<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
\/if<\/p>\n
the banks it is not uncommon that when<\/p>\n
prosecutions are instituted in one State the.–.__
\naccused might belong to a different_State,\u00bb._*._V
\nsometimes a far distant State. Not very rarelgy’-ff,’ .,
\nsuch accused would be ladies also.”\n<\/p>\n
prosecution under Section 138 of the N1″ ., ct
\nthe trial should be that of summ_-~n~3….’:Case..V 4. _
\nWhen a magistrate feels Zthat\u00abi.nsi.ste.nce\ufb02_of-[L ‘
\npersonal attendance of the ,ac.c7usedW_i’n
\nsummons case, in a particular si–t_uation’,.,,wouli.d”
\ninflict enormous har.dsh__ip and cost'”to.__a
\nparticular accused, it iso_p’en to the ‘mag_,istr,ate’<\/p>\n
to consider how he can reIi’eve_such”an, accused
\nof the great V .~hardshi’p’s-, ,_:’-without ‘causing
\nprejudice to the p–r_o}3ecutic;;n. p’roc.e”ed_ings.<\/p>\n
16. *Sectio’n”*2.S1 ‘-  the .,Co’mmencing
\nprovision  \u00abCha_pterfXX\u00ab. ofi_”th_e_TCode which
\ndeals  w4ith;jH__~_’trivajl\u00ab_ of sufmrruons cases by
\nmagii3tra.tes.’ It enj.oE,ns’\u00abo,ii tl–1e’V’Court to ask the
\naccuvsedp”wil.ether_”h,e*p*l.gaaVdsV,,%guilty when the ”
\na’ccused;}_app’ears”,or is ‘brought before the
\nMag-istrateT’*;’V._,  _ ‘i”\u00bbhe~–._ ‘appearance envisaged
\ntherein can ‘eijth_er..be..b.y personal attendance of
\ntheaccused o”r,thro’ugh his advocate. This can<\/p>\n
be un’de_rsto_od f’r.orn”Section 205(1) of the Code
\n which says, that ” whenever a magistrate
\nissuesga surnrnons, he may, if he sees reason<\/p>\n
so. to-..Vdo, dispense with the personal<\/p>\n
 \u00a5.atter.-dannce of the accused and permit him to
\n”  appea__r’by’ his pleader “.\n<\/p>\n
 Thus, in appropriate cases the<\/p>\n
‘magistrate can allow an accused to make even<\/p>\n
the first appearance through a counsel. The<\/p>\n
 magistrate is empowered to record the plea of
\n‘ the accused even when his counsel makes such<\/p>\n
plea on behalf of the accused in a case where
\nthe personal appearance of the accused is<\/p>\n
\/(_”L<\/p>\n
dispensed with. Section 31.7 of the Code has
\nto be viewed in the above perspective as it
\nempowers the Court to dispense with the<\/p>\n
personal attendance of the accuseci (provicied_…_<\/p>\n
he is represented by a counsel in that case)’,_
\neven for proceeding with the further steps-\u00ab_’i”n–\u00bb_\u00a7”‘~\u00ab.V
\nthe case. However, on a precaution which”-thje..___i’ 5 _.__
\nCourt should take in such a situation is that the’
\nsaid benefit need be granted oni_y.__to.V an” _
\naccused who gives an undert.al<inIg to"r-I,the'._}_
\nsatisfaction of the Court ti1atd_lngej.w.oulyd'
\ndispute his identity as the pa"rtic'ula'r accused in "
\nthe case, and that a_rr:ouns'el_ in his.v'3'::ehalf
\nwould be present in Court and that h_as._"no~ <\/p>\n
objection in taking evidence in his aaibsence.
\nThis precaution is necessaw for the-\ufb01Jrt.l'ier
\nprogress of 'the._ .proce"eciinvVgs.d including<\/p>\n
examination of the' wiaiinessegi.   ~<\/p>\n
181  "dues-iii'an"–.c.oui';l "legitimately be
\nasked rn"ig_ht "ha_ppVe'in if the counsel
\ne~'ngaVg'ed;}_by1'j tbe\\_accus_ed" (whose personal
\na?ppea~raynce*i-s 'didspenised with) does not appear
\nor-that t-hescoun.se'l,does not co–operate in
\nproceedingwitiri t–he}.case ? We may point out
\nthat the 'iegi,slat_ur'e' has taken care for such<\/p>\n
ddjevventualities. Section 205(2) says that the
\n"'m,_a.gis.trate can in his discretion direct the<\/p>\n
perso.na\u00ab~l._ attendance of the accused at any<\/p>\n
'"stage\u00bb."c_,he proceedings. The last limb of
\n"._;Sect'ion5317(1) confers a discretion on the<\/p>\n
magistrate to direct the personal attendance of<\/p>\n
 the accused at any subsequent stage of the<\/p>\n
proceedings. He can even resort to other<\/p>\n
 *  steps for enforcing such attendance.<\/p>\n
:9. The position, therefore, boils down
\nto this: It is within the powers of a magistrate
\nand in his judicial discretion Kdispense with<\/p>\n
\/'<\/p>\n
g.\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
the personal appearance of an accused either
\nthroughout or at any particular stage of such
\nproceedings in a summons case, if the<\/p>\n
magistrate finds that insistence of his personal
\npresence would itself inflict enormous,
\nsuffering or tribulations to him, and
\ncomparative advantage would be less.\n<\/p>\n
discretion need be exercised only in’-rarevv,.””‘-l ”
\ninstances where due to the far di_st_a_nce\\a’t,
\nwhich the accused reside.s~.or c:arriesTVo’n._’_g <\/p>\n
business or on account of any phy’sica_l or otheig _ A
\ngood reasons the magistratedliifeeasr ‘,t.r”‘atw
\ndispensing with the personal a’tten–dance\u00bb~”;:;f, the  ”
\naccused would only ‘b.e”=..in they intei’ests_”of <\/p>\n
justice. However, the nriagtlstrate’~who-igrants
\nsuch benefit to _.the accu_sed’*–.must “take_the
\nprecautions enumerated a_bov_e,, “as a matter of
\ncourse. We may;.rei,te;rate”<that*\u00bb\u00bb when an
\naccused makes an ap_piEcatfior:"~.toc–afv magistrate
\nthrough his__duiy""a'u'dfaor'ised counsel praying
\nfor affording' the =: l3'enefi,t'\u00a5o\u00bbf.___..his personal
\npresence b\u00e9_i.r;'g "d.i':_pe.nse.d with . the magistrate
\ncan consider all a'spectsV..lan"ol 'pass appropriate
\no,rders"th'er'eon_ "o-efore proceeding further.<\/p>\n
  S.V.Muzumdar and Others Vs<\/p>\n
 V'  State ffe'rti'i'i2ter Co., Ltd., and another reported
\n 2436, considering the purport and the
\ninte..ntio_n'df:\u00a7'.V'making the provision in the nature of Section
\n of'v(S,f.P.C., the Apex Court has held that, while dealing
\n application in terms of Section 205 of the Code,<\/p>\n
 Court has to consider whether \ufb02y useful purpose<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
1}<\/p>\n
would be served by requiring personal attendance of
\naccused or whether progress of trial is likely,y.V'to:*.i;;e<\/p>\n
hampered on account of his absence.\n<\/p>\n
8. In the decision cited by–the–learned.”CoLlnse–lTforg<\/p>\n
the petitioner, i.e., Lily Begum (sx’upra.A),z’the”petition<\/p>\n
been filed by the respondent thlerein in  for ‘V<\/p>\n
quashing of the criminalzproce-e’dVi..n:gs””i\u00bbni’tiate’d’against him
\nfor the offence punishable\ufb02u’nd’e.r.\u00a7’:’S:ec.t’io:n*;3v75, 417 and 506
\nof 1pc. Whiledisrnisgsing’fthejjg”p’etition;.~V’lithe High Court
\ndirected     the personal
\nattenda’nce”  him to appear by
\nhis advocalte,  the submissions made,<\/p>\n
that the petit~Eone.r_t.hei*_ein”was a social worker and known<\/p>\n
‘”‘\u00bb,t_o  cgililage peo’p’ie;” Since the reasoning of the High<\/p>\n
 with the personal attendance of the<\/p>\n
resrpondevr\u00e9atxiaccused) by invoking the powers under<\/p>\n
‘z,,,..\u00ab,’x$ection~’E205 of Cr.P.C. was found to be untenable,<\/p>\n
‘5.e3peci\u00abally in a case of the nature, wherein serious<\/p>\n
 …_”g””allegations are made against the respondent (accused), it<\/p>\n
\u00a5\/<\/p>\n
X}
\nx<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
was held that if such a privilege is given to an accused in a<\/p>\n
case of the nature, people will lose their confidenceV_fi\u00bbn’_:’the<\/p>\n
administration of justice. Hence, the Apex CoLart”s’et_’;asi.d.e _<\/p>\n
that direction and directed the respond~er1t–:’::t_o: it<\/p>\n
before the Trial Court on all hearin-gv datesl <\/p>\n
9. The facts in th\u00bbqs.,.,,,’,:’i.,a.,stant v..ca:\u00a7:-._,girewtotally if<\/p>\n
different from the one-,._which””ca,_fr:e\u00b0’tip for ‘c’ons’ideration
\nbefore the Apex Courtlilinythet-case  (supra).
\nHence, the decision  case’-_:QfvV’Li’ViyV’v’Begum has no
\napplication’ V”when.,.examined in the light
\nof th<\u00a7e'i"rati'oV..:io.fv  Apex Court in the
\ncase   Ltd., (supra), it is clear<\/p>\n
that the Iearnedt,Ma\u00a7;istr'rate while passing the impugned<\/p>\n
order has-.not con'i'm'i'tted any illegality. The impugned<\/p>\n
 passed in exercise of the judicial<\/p>\n
dis_cretion'r%;efsted with the Magistrate. The learned<\/p>\n
Magistrate has not acted illegally or arbitrarily while<\/p>\n
gyralriting the exemption, care has been taken to impose<\/p>\n
 appropriate conditions to ensure that the exempted<\/p>\n
t<\/p>\n
\/9<\/p>\n
accused appears before the Court, as and when there is a<\/p>\n
need.\n<\/p>\n
10. Since the impugned order having  _<\/p>\n
in exercise of the judicial discretion vest_e.d..,i_n~,t’h’e::   <\/p>\n
below and the interest of the co’mpla.i4na.nt.sghas’=a’l’so~…\u00a7\u00a7eeni’<\/p>\n
safeguarded by imposing thee.4_approp’riate  <\/p>\n
case is made out for interfere’n’eev’ofVVthls’Court lnfiexercise
\nof the jurisdiction   Q-‘p,C_
\nConsequently, the   dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
Needless   the conditions
\nimposed  are violated by the
\nresponvdyen’-t\/eA\u00a7{e”rnpt.ed\u00bb,’V””‘a.c’t-useid, it is open to the<\/p>\n
complainant to rnovetne::_”_i’=4agistrate for appropriate orders<\/p>\n
 or  learned”–..Mva_gAi\u00e9strate himself may suomoto pass<\/p>\n
 \u00bbappropria\u00abte.yor*d_ers to ensure that the accused appears in<\/p>\n
‘p~ers-on “an{:i;\u00bb–fa’c.es the trial.<\/p>\n
  accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7\u00a7\ufb02}\u00a7.\n<\/p>\n
jlxdg\u00e9<\/p>\n
T * ‘”*b9n\/–<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15″‘ DAY or OCTOBER, 2009. BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. v_E,N.u;;oPALA’ CRIMINAL PeT:1’_Igi\\i=..4Ai<_;p-.r727'3,_0'_A_\u00a7J_;o"_9_'T' ' BETWEEN: Sri.Chandrashekar Rudrappa Me_nsin_ka.i Age:S3 years, Occ: Advocate Mangaiwar […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nChandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2531,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\",\"name\":\"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009","datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009"},"wordCount":2531,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009","name":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-10-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-01T08:52:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chandrashekar-rudrapa-mensinkai-vs-manipal-finance-corporation-ltd-on-15-october-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chandrashekar Rudrapa Mensinkai vs Manipal Finance Corporation Ltd on 15 October, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60919\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}