{"id":61447,"date":"2008-07-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008"},"modified":"2016-06-25T20:04:33","modified_gmt":"2016-06-25T14:34:33","slug":"the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
1N THE HIGH coum' 0? KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD 2' T' Q \nDATED mss THE 9%! DAY 01+\"   F\" \nBEFORE~~ \u00e9 u    %\nTHE HOWBLE MR.JUsT1C;.'.\u00ab; \nCRIMINAL A1==P;'*?v=:\u00a7L,'\u00a7G.::';:3*\u00e9I'20..Q'\u00a7'?}%J.'%   \"\nBETWEEN:  J . AT 'H\n\nThe State ofKamata:l{a 1)yA  _ V  AA \nR.F.P., Banavasi.  V     \n\n(By Sri Anm,_a:;, ;\n\nRama; 'S_i<\u00a7:) --  \u00e9 ' V .\n\nR\/Q: " ...Resp-ondent\n    Advocate)\n\n as at 1\u00bb\n\n. '   appeal is \ufb01led under Section 378(1) 55 (C1)\n(ELF. 'bythe State praying to grant leave to \ufb01le: an appea}.\n\nagain\u00e9t the judgment dated 18.10.2002 passed by II\nAdd1.J.MFC, Sirsi in C.C.No.4i96\/2001, acquitting the\n\nV. x respandenvaccused for the o\ufb01ences pi u\/s.'24{g),(I1)(j) and\n'  "?3A(\u20aci) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and 427 and 447 1.13.0.\n\nThis criminal appeal coming on \u00a301" heaziug this day,\n\n the court delivered the following:\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
The State has preferred this appeal cha\ufb02cngjng the<\/p>\n
judgment and onicr of acquit\u00a3a1 of mspondcnt~\u00ab.in_&’1;c_$u\ufb01cct of<\/p>\n
chargcs for offences punishable under   {‘\u00a5:i)’,\u00bb: <\/p>\n
anci 73(d) of The Kamataka Fo2fc\u00a7{b’Act,  i. V<\/p>\n
caiicd as the ‘Am and violation \u00a7i*R{:1\u00a2A#42 of’v_’fI3h’c <\/p>\n
Forest Rules, 1969 and S\u00e9cfion  ‘anki  of The<\/p>\n
Karnataka Forest Oonscrvatioii Act,  A ”<\/p>\n
2. The facts rwc1cfLz:2a1::i_t’–fo1;._V*;nc  this appeal are<\/p>\n
 cos:  prosecution that on 17.8.1998, the<\/p>\n
fgr\u00e9gs; to 3 visited the resexved _3and<\/p>\n
A ; bcarin_g’~S3r,\u00abNo_._80 of Una: Village and found that there was<\/p>\n
H ‘-  house by the respondent by encroaching<\/p>\n
noon  of land out of mvision survey No.80, which<\/p>\n
  ” bclonvgcd to the forest department. In the circumstances, the<\/p>\n
 mahazar-\u00abcx}:1ibit P. I was drawn and a case came to be<\/p>\n
 regjistcred and the F.I.FE.-\u00abexhibit R2 was sent to the<\/p>\n
Magsnatc. They also drew skctch of the scene of occtnrence<\/p>\n
and secures}. the preperty extract–ex]:1ibit PA, 3.: ~~. c>f
\ngazettee neti\ufb01ca1:i.on–~exhibit P:5 and es\u00a5;i111atioz1__~e\u00a7Vt.”A..1’\u00a3):e’:~f..
\nexhibit Re submitted a repon-exh;3g;:’_P.7 fee “the: ” ”
\nDuring trial, the prosecution
\nmarked documents exhibits -1_ to  efie
\naccused was Iecozded under    the
\ntrial, the accused took;::4_.c’i’efen;:;Ve “denial  did not
\nhear} any evidence. On  on recorti,
\nthe trial eougf    of the charges
\nlevelled   “file acquittal, the State<\/p>\n
has pzefeiied   _ <\/p>\n
_3. I l\ufb01ve hexajd Athe 1eau:ned Government Advocate and<\/p>\n
– ” v  aIs0′: \u00a71e;_(\u00a7ou:1se1 far  respondent.<\/p>\n
V   contention of the Iearned Government<\/p>\n
  Pleegder iiespite su\ufb01eient material on record, the trial<\/p>\n
   aeqziiited the aecuseci and that the onder impugned is<\/p>\n
   perverse. K<\/p>\n
. V.  * the”o$3cia1\u00e9 of  hdepartxnent. There is nothing to prove<\/p>\n
    had enoroached 6 guntas of land out of<\/p>\n
 spot mghazar, there is no materia} placeci on record to prove
\nv”~V’_AAenc}foachment. Mere era} statement of PWS. I to 3 that there<\/p>\n
  {gas encroachment of 6 guntas, in Sy.No.80 itself is<\/p>\n
5. The perusal of evidence of PWS. 1 to 3 reveal
\nthe date of mahazar–exh;ibit P.1, they went
\nfound encroachment of 6 guntas of.1an_d  Vt
\nVillage and drawn the spot
\nof cross–~exa131.inat1’on revealethet  wasbV:v’ne”:\ufb011.iI\\zey
\ndemarcation of Sy.No.\u00a3\u00a7O.    material
\nplaced by the    the encztoachment
\nand the house {the land bearing
\nregional    __je2es””v.’encfoachment, it was
\nnecessaxy ifor  to hold the survey,
\ndemaivcate  htrther to prove that there is
\nencroachment  In the cross–~examination,<\/p>\n
none’ ofAthe’4eeV.:\u00a7=\u00a77it13esees etate that there was any survey by<\/p>\n
1evieion~S3f.tEJo;80. Except proeiucing the property extract and<\/p>\n
inslzf\ufb01cient When there are competent authorities to<\/p>\n
oC_<\/p>\n
dcmarcate the boundaries, the ixzvcstigatjng  was<\/p>\n
bound to prove the eracmachment by surveying<\/p>\n
and demarcate the bcmndaries. In the  ‘M  <\/p>\n
material, the “trial court was _;;is\ufb01\u00a7iea._  -1aec’1_i1ifc:i;i”gV’V <\/p>\n
respondent.\n<\/p>\n
6. In the circ1i1:11_sta;1ces_,___}:IV”‘d:o apt   \ufb01ierit in the
\nappeal. Hence, I pI’OCtV”:(i.’.3: \u00a30′ };\u00a7as:3b’tv1′;:1\u00e9&:’V\u00abf\u00a7>\u00a7\u20acL3″aI;iz1g order;<\/p>\n
_.The  :;j_s._disi11i_ ss\u00e9d–‘…_H_ <\/p>\n
sal-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 Author: A.S.Pachhapure 1N THE HIGH coum’ 0? KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD 2′ T’ Q DATED mss THE 9%! DAY 01+” F” BEFORE~~ \u00e9 u % THE HOWBLE MR.JUsT1C;.’.\u00ab; CRIMINAL A1==P;’*?v=:\u00a7L,’\u00a7G.::’;:3*\u00e9I’20..Q’\u00a7’?}%J.’% ” BETWEEN: J . AT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-61447","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\\\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":568,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\",\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\\\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\\\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008"},"wordCount":568,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008","name":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo ... vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-25T14:34:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-state-of-karnataka-by-rfo-vs-rama-so-kariya-naik-on-9-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The State Of Karnataka By Rfo … vs Rama S\/O Kariya Naik on 9 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61447","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=61447"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/61447\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=61447"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=61447"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=61447"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}