{"id":62364,"date":"2009-02-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-17T15:17:49","modified_gmt":"2016-03-17T09:47:49","slug":"timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>IN mm HIGH mom or KARHATAKA  <\/p>\n<p>cmcurr nmccn asr nnmwm  &#8221; %% %&#8217; V<\/p>\n<p>DATED mm mm mm mm? or mnRuA\u00a7i?,V  3<\/p>\n<p>nmmnl\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>THE Hon&#8217;nL.=.r. MR. .m_sfr1cE- \ufb01gs. nqrfmfina  <\/p>\n<p>M.F.A. no. 1o1ii[2.oo6  <\/p>\n<p>TIMMANNA HANAMANT HA\u00a7IAG,AiIij1M&#8211;~\u00ab.] &#8221;<br \/>\nAGED ABOUT 39_}&#8217;&#8211;Y_EARS&#8221;  %  &#8216;-  ;<\/p>\n<p>OCC:C{)OLIE  &#8216;  <\/p>\n<p>R] 0 Yamwzm,&#8221;&#8221;f2m;K&#8211;\u00bb.(}QKAKL-_,,% <\/p>\n<p>9131&#8217; B,ELGAU:;\u00abr_<br \/>\n  .  .. APPELLANT<\/p>\n<p>(BY SR1 HARISH &#8216;S _\u00a7;1:Ai\u00bb{\u00a7t3j\u00a7\u00e9,VADv.)<\/p>\n<p>V.   1; . x&#8217;A\u00a7v\u00a7\u00a7AN:0QR YALLAPPA KHANPET<\/p>\n<p>* T &#8220;AGE-,_ MAJOR<\/p>\n<p> ._  R\/&#8221;c).&#8217;1a:13L\u00a70&#8243;D, TQ GOKAK<\/p>\n<p>A _ &#8216;DIs&#8217;r.B\u00a5;_3.GAUM<\/p>\n<p>K__:2 TEE &#8216;QRIENTAL INSURANCE co LTD<\/p>\n<p>.A  REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER<br \/>\n% &#8216;SHANBAG CHAMBERS, KIRLOSKAR ROAB<br \/>\n&#8216; BELGAUM<\/p>\n<p>. .RESPON[}ENTS<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri : M VISHWANATH RAI FOR R 1<br \/>\nSri: ELL. PATEL, ADV. FOR R2)<\/p>\n<p>.L<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;2<\/p>\n<p>THIS APPEAL IS FILED U\/S. 173(1) 014&#8242; AG\u00e9;1Tri3_;4&#8242;<br \/>\nTHE JUDGMENT mm AWARD DA_T.BE__ 30f&#8217;12]20_m&#8217;.I5&#8243;&#8216;~PIaSS3D&#8217;   _<br \/>\nIN we NO.2317\/02 on THE FILE 0;?&#8217; &#8220;FI~i&#8221;E 3:1&#8211;.Am&gt;;;Q1wL %<\/p>\n<p>JUDGE(SD) 85 ADDL MAC!&#8217; BELGAU1a4,*~PAR*rLY. bALLG\\HiNG<\/p>\n<p>THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPE?{$ATIONV.v2\u00a73\u00a7D sE}f\u00a7KiN(;,<\/p>\n<p>ENHANCEMENT OF CoMPEN&#8217;sAfI*;QN. &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>THIS APPEAL CO4ih:\u00bbvIVIFyiG&#8221;V&#8221;(.}R&#8217;I)ERS THIS DAY,<br \/>\nTHE comm DELI.VERE1)..T_HE F\u20ac)ALLOW.ING\u00a7;&#8221; &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The    is before this Court seeking<\/p>\n<p>enhancem\u00e913.1_:Of   as against the sum awarded<\/p>\n<p> _ by th1fg&#8217;AdLtiition\u00a7\u00e9ii Accident Claims Tribunal, Belgaum (for<\/p>\n<p> Sam; mg \u00a5Ar:\u00bb1AcT3 in MVC No.23}?\/2007.<\/p>\n<p>2,  =  the learneei Cormack for the parties and<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; H &#8216;A   &#8216; &#8221;   appeal papers.<\/p>\n<p>3. In respect of the injurkts suffered by the claimant in<\/p>\n<p> the accident which occurred on 5.9.2002, the AB\/{ACT has<\/p>\n<p>awarded the global compensation of Rs.15,0{)()\/~ .<\/p>\n<p>l<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;v<\/p>\n<p>4. While seeking enhancement of the compensa:f:iz; n,V_ the<\/p>\n<p>learned Counsel for the appellant would conteiid <\/p>\n<p>coxnpensation awarded in the mannezfes do1ke&#8217;by.:&#8221;1:a. <\/p>\n<p>inappropriate and in any event,  V.  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>under the conveniional heads .;&#8217;__g on&#8221; .&#8217;I_:v1&#8217;1&#8217;-:&#8217;~:  aide  &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>same calls for enhancement.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. The learned  u:cVT&#8217;7%r\u00a7\u00a7is;a\u00a2ndents sought to<\/p>\n<p>ius\ufb01\ufb01r the a&#8217;v_&#8217;?:\u00a7&#8217;i&#8221;}1e:e:. by &#8220;:~V&#8217;iha_&#8217;.\u00a3::&#8217; in the absence of<br \/>\n ea.\u00a7id&#8217;VVevidei:iCe;&#8217;V:the AMACT was justi\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n<p>6. the  wiiat has been centended, a perusal of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;~    that in respect of the injuries send&#8217; to<\/p>\n<p> L&#8217;  _  by the eiaimant, the documents at<\/p>\n<p>EXHSQPIQ   and P69 have been noticed by the AMACT.<\/p>\n<p> Tho{1g11;&#8221;\u00a7l!1e1x&#8217;e is reference to the fracture of the shoulder and<\/p>\n<p> V. the was examined as P.W.9, what requires to be noticed<\/p>\n<p> is that he is the common witness in the connected matters and<\/p>\n<p>  manner in which the disability has heen stated to the<\/p>\n<p>lumbar spine does not inspire eonz\ufb01dence. However,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>conslxicring the fact that the claimant had  <\/p>\n<p>injuries including the \ufb01acturc to the shoulazicz\ufb01 , <\/p>\n<p>recontis ought to have been consid\u00e9;;ed:.zi1\u00a7.(i   &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>have awarded the appmp\ufb01atc.cx3mpe\ufb01:A\u00a7ition  fa_:;&#8217;:t.Vti:at,<\/p>\n<p>the claimant had suffered a    cannot be<br \/>\ndisputed. Since the  su\ufb01cicnt<br \/>\npain and sufferizlg    it would be<br \/>\nappropxiatc  ai\u00e9uz\ufb01  towards pain and<br \/>\nsu\ufb01&#8221;er.ing.     V    V V<\/p>\n<p> fhat the claimant had su\ufb02isrcd<\/p>\n<p>only a   &#8216;iaospitalization was not for many<\/p>\n<p> =  d_ays,u &#8216;it  be appmprjatr: to award a sum of<\/p>\n<p> medical expenses as Well as food and<\/p>\n<p>noa\ufb01ish\ufb01\u00a2\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7t;.&#8211;;_  &#8220;That apart, though as already noticed, the<\/p>\n<p> stated to the lumbar spine and the c}a1man&#8217; t<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A x V&#8217;   injury to the shoulxier, even though the disability<\/p>\n<p>s&#8217;i:a1t ::&#8217;ci in the manner camxoi be reckoned, the disccamfort at<\/p>\n<p>T &#8221; l\u00e9\u00e9st Wouid have to he noticed. As such, under the heads of<\/p>\n<p>L<\/p>\n<p>discomfort and loss of amanities, a further sum 0i.7~\u00abE9.\ufb0151iE&#8221;7f&#8217;,;t3tf&#8217;!\u00a7V3&#8243;.&#8221;..f<\/p>\n<p>is awarded.\n<\/p>\n<p>8. Thcncfore, in all, the \u00a2om1\u00a7tn\u00a7\u00a7a\ufb01on  be&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>of R3.50,(}()O\/~&#8211;. Since the   &#8216;Va smz\ufb01.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.1S,00()\/&#8211;, the c1a&#8217;:i.1mant_&#8217;f \u00e9ii\u00a71\u00a7\u20ac\u00a71j;1i1 t.._wo1i1ci&#8221;&#8216;b(\u00e9V:en$:it1cd to<br \/>\nthe enhanced  interest at 6%<br \/>\nya. from the  The enhanced<br \/>\nportion of     deposited by the 2&#8243;&#8216;<br \/>\n1esponf\ufb02\u00e9iit~&#8217;-   a period of six weeks<br \/>\nfrom     \u00e9opy of this wder. On such<br \/>\ndeposit,  to the claixnant.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  &#8221;  _In_&#8217;af the above, &#8216;tin appeal stands disposed of with<\/p>\n<p>    35\/7*<br \/>\nIndde<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN mm HIGH mom or KARHATAKA cmcurr nmccn asr nnmwm &#8221; %% %&#8217; V DATED mm mm mm mm? or mnRuA\u00a7i?,V 3 nmmnl\ufb01 THE Hon&#8217;nL.=.r. MR. .m_sfr1cE- \ufb01gs. nqrfmfina M.F.A. no. 1o1ii[2.oo6 TIMMANNA HANAMANT HA\u00a7IAG,AiIij1M&#8211;~\u00ab.] &#8221; AGED ABOUT 39_}&#8217;&#8211;Y_EARS&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62364","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":731,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009"},"wordCount":731,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009","name":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-17T09:47:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/timmanna-hanamant-hanagandi-vs-yamanoor-yallappa-khanpet-on-18-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Timmanna Hanamant Hanagandi vs Yamanoor Yallappa Khanpet on 18 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62364","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62364"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62364\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62364"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62364"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62364"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}