{"id":62387,"date":"2008-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-08-29T08:17:57","modified_gmt":"2016-08-29T02:47:57","slug":"rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: K.M.Thaker<\/div>\n<pre>  \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n \n \n\n\n\t \n\nCA\/6566\/2008\t 4\/ 11\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nCIVIL\nAPPLICATION No. 6566 of 2008\n \n\nIn\n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 7942 of 2008\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n \n\nRAJNISH\nKUMAR RAI - Applicant(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nGUJARAT\nUNIVERSITY &amp; 1 - Opponent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance\n: \nMR\nND NANAVATI, SR.ADVOCATE with MR HARIN RAWAL with MR PS CHAMPANERI\nfor the Applicant \nMR SN SHELAT,\nSR ADVOCATE with MRS VD NANAVATI for the\nOpponent \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE K.M.THAKER\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 10\/06\/2008 \n\n \n\n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\napplicant has moved a draft amendment. The same is granted. The<br \/>\napplicant shall carry out the amendment on or before 12th<br \/>\nJune, 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tBy<br \/>\nway of this Application, the applicant has prayed for various reliefs<br \/>\nin paragraph 20(a) to paragraph 20(i) which, inter alia, contain<br \/>\nprayer for relief of staying the recommendations and\/or decision of<br \/>\nthe &#8216;Suddhi Samiti&#8217; forwarded to the Executive Council and to suspend<br \/>\nthe recommendations of &#8216;Suddhi Samiti&#8217;. The applicant has also prayed<br \/>\nfor a direction to the Executive Council to supply the material<br \/>\nprayed for by the applicant and to direct the Executive Council to<br \/>\nprovide opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before taking any<br \/>\nfinal decision in the matter. It is further prayed that the<br \/>\nrespondents may be directed to declare the result of the applicant<br \/>\nfor all subjects of Second Semester.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\napplicant earlier preferred petition being Special Civil Application<br \/>\nNo.7942\/2008, wherein the petitioner prayed for the below mentioned<br \/>\nprayers in paragraphs 26(A) to 26(H):\n<\/p>\n<p>(A)\tThat<br \/>\nthis Hon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to<br \/>\nsupply the aforesaid copies of the decision taken by the Suddhi<br \/>\nSamiti of Gujarat University qua the petitioner;\n<\/p>\n<p>(B)\tThis<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the decision dated<br \/>\n25.5.2008 taken by the Suddhi Samiti of Gujarat University;\n<\/p>\n<p>(C)\tThis<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the decision of the<br \/>\nSuddhi Samiti as being illegal, void and contrary to the principles<br \/>\nof natural justice and fair play;\n<\/p>\n<p>(D)\tThat<br \/>\npending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to stay operation, implementation, further<br \/>\noperation of the decision and stay further consequential order which<br \/>\nmay be passed;\n<\/p>\n<p>(E)\tThat<br \/>\npending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to direct the University to supply the<br \/>\nvarious documents and materials asked by the petitioner in his<br \/>\nrepresentation dated 23.5.2008;\n<\/p>\n<p>(F)\tThat<br \/>\npending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to<br \/>\nplace before this Hon&#8217;ble Court and supply copy of the procedure<br \/>\nfollowed up by the Suddhi Samiti in arriving decision in respect of<br \/>\nthe petitioner in connection with the charges leveled against the<br \/>\npetitioner;\n<\/p>\n<p>(G)\tThat<br \/>\npending admission, hearing and final disposal of this petition, this<br \/>\nHon&#8217;ble Court be pleased to direct the respondents to produce the<br \/>\nrecords of the inquiry against the petitioner by the Suddhi Samiti;\n<\/p>\n<p>(H)\tThat<br \/>\nany other and further relief that is deemed fit by this Hon&#8217;ble Court<br \/>\nbe granted.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tAfter<br \/>\nhearing the parties, an order dated 28th May, 2008 was<br \/>\npassed  in the said Special Civil Application No.7942\/2008 and<br \/>\nsubsequently the time to submit the representation was extended until<br \/>\n7th June, 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\ncomes out from the application and submissions on behalf of the<br \/>\napplicant that after the said order dated 28th May, 2008,<br \/>\nthe applicant submitted two representations i.e. one on 5th<br \/>\nJune, 2008 and second on 7th June, 2008, which are at page<br \/>\n92 and at page 104.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nalso comes out from the submissions of the applicant that the<br \/>\napplicant also requested for opportunity of personal hearing and, for<br \/>\nthat purpose, apart from relying upon the principles of natural<br \/>\njustice, he also relied upon the order dated 12th May,<br \/>\n2008 passed in Special Civil Application No.7292\/2008. Besides making<br \/>\nthe request for personal hearing, the applicant also prayed for<br \/>\ncopies of several documents and other material which, the applicant<br \/>\nbelieves, are to be relied upon by the Executive Council while taking<br \/>\nthe final decision pursuant to the Suddhi Samiti&#8217;s recommendations.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\napplicant has come out with a grievance that despite the request for<br \/>\nsupplying the requested material and\/or opportunity of personal<br \/>\nhearing, the requests have not been granted and such action of the<br \/>\nrespondent is not only against the principles of natural justice but<br \/>\nalso contrary to the order dated 12th May, 2008 passed in<br \/>\nSpecial Civil Application No.7292\/2008. The applicant has, today,<br \/>\nsubmitted an amendment whereby communication dated 6th<br \/>\nJune, 2008 is placed on record. From the said communication, it<br \/>\ntranspires that the respondent University has conveyed to the<br \/>\napplicant that \u00fdS&#8230;adverse material which has been relied are the<br \/>\ncopies of 4 statements of University Observer, Senior Supervisor,<br \/>\nJunior Supervisor and Principal.\u00fd\u00fd It is also mentioned in the said<br \/>\ncommunication that the show-cause notice contains sufficient material<br \/>\nand that the representation tendered by the applicant will be<br \/>\nconsidered by the Executive Council. The applicant has made a<br \/>\ngrievance that the said letter and the arbitrary attitude of the<br \/>\nrespondent University shows that the University is not inclined to<br \/>\nprovide opportunity of hearing and\/or the material required by the<br \/>\napplicant for his defense. In applicant&#8217;s submission, such action of<br \/>\nthe respondent University has adversely affected his right of defense<br \/>\nand rendered him unable to effectively represent or defend his case<br \/>\nand would also vitiate the order which the Executive Council is to<br \/>\npass.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMr.Shelat,<br \/>\nsenior counsel with Mrs.Nanavati has appeared for the respondent<br \/>\nUniversity and stated that the hearing as provided in the order dated<br \/>\n12th May, 2008 was afforded to the applicant before the<br \/>\nAchar Samiti\/Suddhi Samiti, and that is what was stipulated on behalf<br \/>\nof the University when the order dated 12th May, 2008 was<br \/>\npassed. Mr.Shelat submitted that the said order was passed before the<br \/>\nSuddhi Samiti forwarded its recommendations to the Executive Council<br \/>\nand that, therefore, it implies that the hearing contemplated and<br \/>\nmentioned in the order dated 12th May, 2008 was to be<br \/>\nafforded to the applicant before the Suddhi Samiti and neither the<br \/>\nstatement made on behalf of the respondent University nor the said<br \/>\ndirection would apply to the proceedings before the Executive<br \/>\nCouncil. He also submitted that as a matter of long standing policy<br \/>\nand practise, personal hearing before the Executive Council is not<br \/>\nafforded to any student before the Executive Council takes a<br \/>\ndecision. He also submitted that there is no provision or requirement<br \/>\nfor second show-cause notice and that, therefore also, such a<br \/>\nquestion does not arise.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nis stated by both the sides that the meeting of the Executive Council<br \/>\nwas to take place from 9:30 a.m. today. It was in view of the said<br \/>\nfact that Mr.Nanavati, senior advocate appearing with Mr.Champaneri,<br \/>\nsubmitted that the least the applicant can, in the background of such<br \/>\nfacts and circumstances, pray for is that if at all any decision by<br \/>\nthe Executive Council is rendered against the applicant, the same may<br \/>\nnot be implemented for a period of one week.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMr.Shelat,<br \/>\nsenior advocate on the other hand, opposed the said submission and<br \/>\ncontended that earlier when the order dated 28th May, 2008<br \/>\nwas passed, such a relief was not granted and that the present<br \/>\napplication, which is virtually repetition of the reliefs prayed for<br \/>\nin the petition, is not maintainable. He, in this view of the matter,<br \/>\nsubmitted that the relief prayed for by the applicant may not be<br \/>\ngranted. He also reiterated that the petition as well as the<br \/>\nApplication are premature, and if and when the decision is taken by<br \/>\nthe Executive Council then, if it is against the applicant, the same<br \/>\ncan be challenged by him on all available grounds.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tFrom<br \/>\nthe material presently available on record of Special Civil<br \/>\nApplication No.7948\/2008 and present Civil Application No.6566\/2008,<br \/>\nit transpires that the applicant has repeatedly requested for certain<br \/>\nmaterial which he considers necessary and relevant for his defense.<br \/>\nHe has also repeatedly requested for opportunity of hearing. On the<br \/>\nother hand, it is the case of the respondent University that the<br \/>\nmaterial which is to be taken into consideration and relied upon, has<br \/>\nbeen supplied to the applicant and the opportunity of hearing before<br \/>\nthe Achar Samiti was also afforded to the applicant and that,<br \/>\ntherefore, opportunity of hearing as prayed for is not provided for<br \/>\nin the rules nor warranted.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tAs<br \/>\nof now, the Executive Council does not appear to have passed any<br \/>\norder and, in any case, the same is not on record. It is, therefore,<br \/>\nnot possible to presume, in the first instance, that it would be<br \/>\nagainst the petitioner, and secondly it is also not possible to<br \/>\nexamine the same and\/or to ascertain what facts and details have been<br \/>\ntaken into account by the Executive Council. Under the circumstances,<br \/>\nit would not be, in my view, just to make interim order as prayed for<br \/>\nmore so when the hearing of the Special Civil Application<br \/>\nNo.7942\/2008 has been scheduled for 24th June, 2008 by<br \/>\norder dated 28th May, 2008 which was passed after hearing<br \/>\nthe parties. On overall view of the matter it would not be proper, at<br \/>\nthis stage, to pass any order staying the implementation and<br \/>\noperation of an order which is yet to be passed and on presumption<br \/>\nthat it would be against the applicant. Further, if it is against the<br \/>\napplicant, he would have the opportunity to challenge the same on all<br \/>\navailable grounds including the grounds and grievance ventilated in<br \/>\nthis application. If and when the order by the Executive Council is<br \/>\npassed, the same shall be immediately placed on the record of the<br \/>\npetition by the respondent University and that would be subject to<br \/>\nfurther orders that may be passed in the petition after the Court<br \/>\nperuses the order passed by the Executive Council.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nis clarified that merely because the implementation and operation of<br \/>\nthe order is not stayed at this stage, it would not preclude the<br \/>\napplicant from requesting the Court to consider the prayer for<br \/>\nstaying its implementation and operation after the same is passed and<br \/>\nis placed on record, as directed hereinabove, by the University.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tOn<br \/>\nthe facts of the present case and the averments made in the<br \/>\nApplication and considering the fact that the Executive Council<br \/>\ncommittee is being convened today and decision might have been taken<br \/>\ntoday and considering the submissions made by Mr.Shelat, learned<br \/>\nsenior advocate to the effect that the respondent University will not<br \/>\nhave any objection if the hearing of the petition is preponed, the<br \/>\nrequest of Mr.Rawal for preponing the hearing is granted.<br \/>\nAccordingly, the next date of hearing of Special Civil Application<br \/>\nNo.7942\/2008 would be 16th June, 2008, instead of 24th<br \/>\nJune, 2008 as originally ordered.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThough<br \/>\nit would be a repetition, it is clarified and stated that if, in the<br \/>\nmeanwhile, the order is passed, the respondent University will<br \/>\nimmediately place it on record.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nis also clarified that it would be open to the applicant to approach<br \/>\nthe Court even before 16th June, 2008 if further action on<br \/>\nthe basis of the decision of the Executive Council is taken against<br \/>\nthe applicant.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tCivil<br \/>\nApplication to be heard with Special Civil Application No.7942\/2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>(K.M.Thaker,<br \/>\nJ.)<\/p>\n<p>\/moin<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 Bench: K.M.Thaker CA\/6566\/2008 4\/ 11 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD CIVIL APPLICATION No. 6566 of 2008 In SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7942 of 2008 ========================================================= RAJNISH KUMAR RAI &#8211; Applicant(s) Versus GUJARAT UNIVERSITY &amp; 1 &#8211; Opponent(s) ========================================================= Appearance : MR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62387","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1807,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008"},"wordCount":1807,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008","name":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-29T02:47:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rajnish-vs-by-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rajnish vs By on 10 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62387","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62387"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62387\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62387"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62387"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62387"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}