{"id":62436,"date":"2008-12-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-23T07:24:36","modified_gmt":"2017-10-23T01:54:36","slug":"premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 19481 of 2005(T)\n\n\n1. PREMARAJAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S\/O.PAITHAL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF K.S.R.T.C.\n\n3. THE FINANCIAL ADVISER AND CHIEF ACCOUNTS\n\n4. THE CHIEF VIGILANCE AND DISCIPLINARY\n\n5. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (T) KERALA STATE\n\n6. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR(A) &amp; S,\n\n7. THE WORKS MANAGER, KERALA STATE ROAD\n\n8. E.K.SASI, CHARGEMAN GRADE II(TYRE\n\n9. O.SATHIANDRAN, CHARGEMAN GRADE II,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.P.SOMAN NAIR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.CHANDRASEKHAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN\n\n Dated :04\/12\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                            S. Siri Jagan, J.\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                    W. P (C) No. 19481 of 2005\n               =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\n                 Dated this, the 4th December, 2008.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>      The petitioner entered service of the Kerala State Road<\/p>\n<p>Transport Corporation as a Tyre Retreader on 3-5-1975. He was<\/p>\n<p>promoted as 1st Grade Tyre Retreader on 11-9-1980. While working<\/p>\n<p>so, on 25-5-1985, disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him<\/p>\n<p>alleging that he was unauthorisedly absent from duty from 13-12-<\/p>\n<p>1984 onwards. After conducting an enquiry, on having been found<\/p>\n<p>guilty of the misconduct alleged against him, the petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>removed from service on 17-5-1986 as a punishment. Appeal filed<\/p>\n<p>against that order of removal from service having been dismissed on<\/p>\n<p>2-12-19887, the petitioner filed a revision before the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal for Kerala State Road Transport Corporation . The Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>after confirming the finding of guilt found that the penalty imposed is<\/p>\n<p>disproportionate to the gravity of misconduct and set aside the<\/p>\n<p>punishment imposed upon the petitioner. It was directed that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner may be reinstated in service forthwith and that he shall not<\/p>\n<p>be entitled to back wages for the period during which he was kept out<\/p>\n<p>of service. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner was reinstated in service<\/p>\n<p>on 27-2-1991. However, by Ext. P2 order, the disciplinary authority<\/p>\n<p>thereafter imposed a punishment of withholding of one increment<\/p>\n<p>with cumulative effect with a further direction that the period during<\/p>\n<p>which he was kept out of service would be regularised as leave<\/p>\n<p>without allowances. The petitioner submits that counting the period<\/p>\n<p>of absence as well, the petitioner was given further grade promotion<\/p>\n<p>as Special Grade Tyre Retreader and that in Ext. P4 seniority list also,<\/p>\n<p>his seniority position had not been changed.          However, when<\/p>\n<p>promotion to the next higher post of Chargeman Grade II (Tyre<\/p>\n<p>Retreader) was considered,     the petitioner was overlooked on the<\/p>\n<p>ground of penalty and a person junior to him was promoted, who is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.C. No. 19481\/2005.           -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the 8th respondent herein. The petitioner was again overlooked for<\/p>\n<p>promotion to the same post by Ext. P6 order on the same ground<\/p>\n<p>promoting the 9th respondent. Against such denial of promotion, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner filed Ext. P7 representation before the Managing Director.<\/p>\n<p>However, by Ext. P8 order, the grade promotion sanctioned to him<\/p>\n<p>was also cancelled. The petitioner is challenging Exts.P5, P6 and P8<\/p>\n<p>orders in this writ petition.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>retired from service on 30-11-2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. The petitioner&#8217;s contention is that although, formerly, as per<\/p>\n<p>grade promotion rules, leave without allowances exceeding 15 days,<\/p>\n<p>without medical certificate, was excluded for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>monetary benefits of grade promotion by clause 9(f) thereof, that<\/p>\n<p>clause was deleted by Ext. P9 order dated 1-3-1989 and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>period of absence of the petitioner on account of the punishment has<\/p>\n<p>to be reckoned for the purpose of grade promotion.            As far as<\/p>\n<p>regular promotion to the post of Chargeman Grade II (Tyre Retreader)<\/p>\n<p>is concerned, the petitioner submits that the promotion is on the basis<\/p>\n<p>of seniority. As is evident from Ext. P4, the petitioner&#8217;s seniority<\/p>\n<p>remains unchanged despite the absence from duty on account of the<\/p>\n<p>penalty. In so far as the promotion is by seniority only, the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>could not have been overlooked for promotion on the basis of having<\/p>\n<p>been kept out of service on account of penalty, which was later<\/p>\n<p>quashed by the Tribunal. He therefore submits that he is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>be promoted to the post of Chargeman Grade II with effect from the<\/p>\n<p>date when the 8th respondent was promoted by Ext. P5 order dated<\/p>\n<p>23-9-2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.   Although a counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 to 7, nothing is mentioned therein as to the rules based<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.C. No. 19481\/2005.            -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>on which the petitioner has been overlooked for promotion and his<\/p>\n<p>grade promotion was cancelled. All what has been stated is that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was punished for unauthorised absence and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is not entitled to either regular promotion or grade<\/p>\n<p>promotion.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. I have considered the contentions in detail.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. It is a sad situation that a statutory authority that the Kerala<\/p>\n<p>State Road Transport Corporation is, is unable to place before me the<\/p>\n<p>relevant service rules applicable to the case.        In so far as the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has stated in his writ petition that the promotion to the post<\/p>\n<p>of Chargeman Grade II is by seniority and by virtue of Ext. P9, leave<\/p>\n<p>without allowances should also be counted for the purpose of grade<\/p>\n<p>promotion, which has not been denied by respondents 1 to 7, I have<\/p>\n<p>no other go but to accept the same as true and correct. If for the<\/p>\n<p>purpose of grade promotion, leave without allowances was also to be<\/p>\n<p>counted as service, there is no justification for respondents 1 to 7 to<\/p>\n<p>cancel the grade promotion given to the petitioner. That being so,<\/p>\n<p>Ext. P8 order is liable to be quashed. I do so.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7. Next comes the question of eligibility of the petitioner for<\/p>\n<p>promotion as Chargeman Grade II. As I have already stated, I have<\/p>\n<p>accepted the contention of the petitioner that the promotion to the<\/p>\n<p>post of Chargeman Grade II is purely by seniority alone in so far as<\/p>\n<p>the Kerala State Road Transport Corporation has not chosen to<\/p>\n<p>controvert the averment of the petitioner and they have not chosen to<\/p>\n<p>produce the Rules regarding such promotion. If that be so, as is clear<\/p>\n<p>from Exts.P5 and P6, the petitioner was senior to respondents 8 and<\/p>\n<p>9. As such, by virtue of the seniority, the petitioner was entitled to be<\/p>\n<p>promoted in preference to respondents 8 and 9.       In so far as it is not<\/p>\n<p>a selection post, the punishment imposed on the petitioner is not a<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.C. No. 19481\/2005.          -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>relevant factor for denying him promotion in the absence of any rules<\/p>\n<p>to that effect unless he has been imposed with the punishment of<\/p>\n<p>barring of promotion. Therefore, I find that the petitioner is entitled<\/p>\n<p>to be promoted to the post of Chargeman Grade II (Tyre Retreader)<\/p>\n<p>with effect from the date when the 8th respondent was promoted to<\/p>\n<p>that post. However, I am not inclined to direct the Corporation to pay<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner arrears of salary from the date of such notional<\/p>\n<p>promotion to the date of retirement. But, the petitioner&#8217;s pay shall be<\/p>\n<p>fixed as if he had been promoted on the date when the 8th respondent<\/p>\n<p>was promoted        and his pensionary benefits      shall be re-fixed<\/p>\n<p>accordingly. Orders in this regard shall be passed and arrears of<\/p>\n<p>retirement benefits be paid to the petitioner along with any amount<\/p>\n<p>recovered from him on account Ext. P8 order within three months<\/p>\n<p>from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The writ petition<\/p>\n<p>is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        Sd\/- S. Siri Jagan, Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>Tds\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 19481 of 2005(T) 1. PREMARAJAN, AGED 52 YEARS, S\/O.PAITHAL, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT &#8230; Respondent 2. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF K.S.R.T.C. 3. THE FINANCIAL ADVISER AND [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-62436","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1144,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\",\"name\":\"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008"},"wordCount":1144,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008","name":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-23T01:54:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/premarajan-vs-the-kerala-state-road-transport-on-4-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Premarajan vs The Kerala State Road Transport on 4 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62436","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=62436"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/62436\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=62436"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=62436"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=62436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}