{"id":63081,"date":"2010-10-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-01-26T23:04:23","modified_gmt":"2018-01-26T17:34:23","slug":"devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nAS.No. 620 of 1998()\n\n\n\n1. DEVANIGOTHI AMINABI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. DEVANIGOTHI AYISHA\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.S.USUPH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN\n\n Dated :14\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                    M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n                = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                   A.S. NO. 620 OF 1998\n                = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n          Dated this the 14th day of October, 2010.\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>    This  appeal      is      preferred       against  the<\/p>\n<p>judgment  and   decree      passed      by   the   District<\/p>\n<p>Judge, Lakshadweep in O.S.17\/97.              The suit is<\/p>\n<p>one for settlement of boundaries and injunction.<\/p>\n<p>It  is  the  case     of    the     plaintiff     that the<\/p>\n<p>property comprised in Sy.No.161\/24 where house<\/p>\n<p>named Devanigothi Boduge is situated belonged to<\/p>\n<p>the mother of the plaintiff namely Kaddha and<\/p>\n<p>defendant&#8217;s mother Pathumma jointly.              According<\/p>\n<p>to her they divided the property orally and<\/p>\n<p>plaint schedule portion was allotted to the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff&#8217;s mother and the other portion was<\/p>\n<p>allotted to Pathumma. The plaintiff&#8217;s mother by<\/p>\n<p>virtue of the document No.21\/72 had assigned her<\/p>\n<p>right  which    was     obtained        under    the  oral<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>partition       in favour  of   the  plaintiff   and<\/p>\n<p>therefore the plaintiff is claiming right over<\/p>\n<p>that property.      It is also contended that as per<\/p>\n<p>the proceedings in S.C.172\/77 the settlement<\/p>\n<p>officer had found that the ownership of the<\/p>\n<p>house in Sy.No.161\/24 has to be confirmed in the<\/p>\n<p>name of the plaintiff as well as the defendant&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>mother. Therefore the suit is filed.<\/p>\n<p>     2.    The defendant on the other hand would<\/p>\n<p>submit that the plaintiff is not entitled to any<\/p>\n<p>relief.       The property described in the plaint<\/p>\n<p>schedule      property belonged  to   the  defendant<\/p>\n<p>exclusively and therefore the plaintiff is not<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any fixation of boundaries.       It is<\/p>\n<p>admitted that there had been an oral partition<\/p>\n<p>between the mother of the plaintiff and the<\/p>\n<p>mother of the defendant. The property described<\/p>\n<p>in the plaint schedule property was set apart to<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the share of the mother of the defendant and<\/p>\n<p>therefore      the defendant    is entitled  to  the<\/p>\n<p>property and the plaintiff with her family are<\/p>\n<p>residing in a neighbouring plot and so the suit<\/p>\n<p>is liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.    In the trial court PW1 and DW1 were<\/p>\n<p>examined.      Exts.A1 to A3, B1 to B3 and C1 to C3<\/p>\n<p>were marked.      On an analysis of the evidence the<\/p>\n<p>trial court has dismissed the suit.           It is<\/p>\n<p>against that decision the plaintiff has come up<\/p>\n<p>in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    Heard   the  learned    counsel  for  the<\/p>\n<p>appellant       and the   young   counsel  for   the<\/p>\n<p>respondent. At the out set it has to be stated<\/p>\n<p>the suit is one for settlement of boundaries.<\/p>\n<p>So unless there is possession attached it may<\/p>\n<p>not be possible to fix the boundaries and title<\/p>\n<p>also becomes relevant.         Now even according to<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                           -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the document Ext.A2 which is relied upon by the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff to declare the joint entitlement over<\/p>\n<p>the property in Sy.No.161\/24 there is a finding<\/p>\n<p>recorded by the settlement officer that the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff&#8217;s       mother  had  been  put   out   of<\/p>\n<p>possession.      Now the crux of the matter is that<\/p>\n<p>what was the properties that were allotted to<\/p>\n<p>the mother of the plaintiff and the mother of<\/p>\n<p>the defendant in a oral partition which is said<\/p>\n<p>to be taken between those two sisters.      If the<\/p>\n<p>plaint schedule property forms part and parcel<\/p>\n<p>of the property allotted to the mother of the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff       under  the  oral  partition,   then<\/p>\n<p>necessarily the mother will get the right to<\/p>\n<p>assign that property or gift that property in<\/p>\n<p>favour of her daughter which will also entitle<\/p>\n<p>her to get right over the property.        Now the<\/p>\n<p>contention of the defendant is that there had<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                          -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>been an oral partition between the sisters but<\/p>\n<p>it   is     specifically stated  that  the  plaint<\/p>\n<p>schedule property was set apart to her share of<\/p>\n<p>the mother of the defendant and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff&#8217;s mother did not have any title to the<\/p>\n<p>property and so a subsequent gift or assignment<\/p>\n<p>in favour of the plaintiff will not confer on<\/p>\n<p>her any title.      The Court below had also found<\/p>\n<p>that there is no positive evidence adduced by<\/p>\n<p>both the sides to the effect that which are the<\/p>\n<p>properties that are set apart to these sisters.<\/p>\n<p>Only on a finding on that there would be a<\/p>\n<p>proper resolution of the dispute between the<\/p>\n<p>parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.    Now as I held earlier the whole question<\/p>\n<p>is in a liquid state and with these materials it<\/p>\n<p>may   not     be possible to  settle  the  dispute<\/p>\n<p>between the parties by fixing the boundaries of<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                           -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the property.       The very important question of<\/p>\n<p>entitlement of the plaintiff over the property<\/p>\n<p>is the larger question to be decided.      Only when<\/p>\n<p>that larger question is decided a relief can be<\/p>\n<p>granted.       Therefore the plaintiff may have to<\/p>\n<p>institute a proper suit for declaration of her<\/p>\n<p>title and for recovery of possession, if so<\/p>\n<p>advised.      Leaving open that to the plaintiff I<\/p>\n<p>dismiss this appeal for the reason that the<\/p>\n<p>relief sought for cannot be granted in this<\/p>\n<p>suit.       Parties   are directed   to bear   their<\/p>\n<p>respective costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                            M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>ul\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>A.S. 620 OF 1998<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                    -7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>                        M.N. KRISHNAN, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       = = = = = = = = = =<br \/>\n                        A.S. No.620 OF 1998<br \/>\n                      = = = = = = = = = = =<\/p>\n<p>                         J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n<p>                       14th October, 2010.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM AS.No. 620 of 1998() 1. DEVANIGOTHI AMINABI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DEVANIGOTHI AYISHA &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.P.S.USUPH For Respondent :SRI.P.K.ABOOBACKER The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN Dated :14\/10\/2010 O R D E R M.N. KRISHNAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63081","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":844,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010"},"wordCount":844,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010","name":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-26T17:34:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/devanigothi-aminabi-vs-devanigothi-ayisha-on-14-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Devanigothi Aminabi vs Devanigothi Ayisha on 14 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63081","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63081"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63081\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63081"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63081"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63081"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}