{"id":6328,"date":"2011-06-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-03T05:57:06","modified_gmt":"2017-08-03T00:27:06","slug":"mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000768\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a01,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a01,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Sachin\u00a0Sitaram\u00a0Ambre\n           H.No.C\/502\n           Bhagava\u00a0Mahal\n           B.J.marg\n           Satrasta\n           Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0011\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n           Respondents\n\n           The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer\n           Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation\u00a0Ltd.\n           Belapur\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Sector\u00a011\n           P.o.\u00a0Box\u00a0No.9,\u00a0CBD\u00a0Belapur\n           Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0614\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Siddheshwar\u00a0Telugu,\u00a0PIO\n                                     Shri\u00a0A.K.Pandharkar,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\n                                     \u00adNIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner               :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision\n                         In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                            at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000768\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.       The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.27.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Siddheshwar\u00a0Telugu,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a022.10.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0given\u00a0are\u00a0given\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         below:\n<\/p>\n<p> S.No.                    Information\u00a0sought                                          Reply\u00a0provided<\/p>\n<p>1.         Written \u00a0 examination \u00a0 have \u00a0 been\u00a0 taken\u00a0 for\u00a0 the\u00a0 The\u00a0selection\u00a0process\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0cancelled\u00a0at\u00a0any\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           post\u00a0of\u00a0CA\/P\u00a0against\u00a0Landloser.\u00a0\u00a0What\u00a0was\u00a0the\u00a0 time\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0management\u00a0on\u00a0valid\u00a0grounds\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           lapse.\u00a0 \u00a0 Who\u00a0 is\u00a0 responsible\u00a0 for\u00a0that\u00a0and\u00a0what\u00a0 ensure \u00a0 fairness \u00a0 and \u00a0 transparency \u00a0 in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           action \u00a0 have \u00a0 been \u00a0 initiated \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0 recruitment\u00a0process.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0information\u00a0regarding\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           Administration. \u00a0 \u00a0 Please \u00a0 give \u00a0 details. \u00a0 \u00a0 Under\u00a0 people\u00a0who\u00a0are\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0vitiation\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>           which\u00a0rules\u00a0it\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0delayed\u00a0for\u00a0one\u00a0year              the\u00a0process\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0on\u00a0record.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.25.11.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>         Shri \u00a0 A.K.Pandharkar,\u00a0 Appellate\u00a0 Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0 23.12.10\u00a0upholding\u00a0 the\u00a0 decision\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>         Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.1.2.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides,\u00a0\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         letter\u00a0 dt.5.4.10\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 Managing\u00a0 Director\u00a0 giving\u00a0 reasons\u00a0 for\u00a0 cancellation\u00a0 of\u00a0 the\u00a0 \u00a0 recruitment\u00a0 and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         suggesting\u00a0that\u00a0all\u00a0candidates\u00a0who\u00a0had\u00a0appeared\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0appear\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0exam\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0held\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         once \u00a0 again, \u00a0 without \u00a0 having \u00a0 to \u00a0 pay \u00a0 any \u00a0 additional \u00a0 charges. \u00a0 A \u00a0 copy \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 vigilance \u00a0 report\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         recommending\u00a0the\u00a0cancellation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0recruitment\u00a0after\u00a0invoking\u00a0Sec.10(1)\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a0if\u00a0required,\u00a0<br \/>\n          may\u00a0also\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0Information\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a01.7.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0by\u00a08.7.11.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                             (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                    Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Sachin\u00a0Sitaram\u00a0Ambre<br \/>\n         H.No.C\/502<br \/>\n         Bhagava\u00a0Mahal<br \/>\n         B.J.marg<br \/>\n         Satrasta<br \/>\n         Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0011<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation\u00a0Ltd.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Belapur\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Sector\u00a011<br \/>\n         P.o.\u00a0Box\u00a0No.9,\u00a0CBD\u00a0Belapur<br \/>\n         Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0614<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation\u00a0Ltd.\n<\/p>\n<p>         Belapur\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Sector\u00a011<br \/>\n         P.o.\u00a0Box\u00a0No.9,\u00a0CBD\u00a0Belapur<br \/>\n         Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0614<\/p>\n<p>4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000768 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a01,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0June\u00a01,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Sachin\u00a0Sitaram\u00a0Ambre H.No.C\/502 Bhagava\u00a0Mahal B.J.marg Satrasta Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0011 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Respondents The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation\u00a0Ltd. Belapur\u00a0Bhavan,\u00a0Sector\u00a011 P.o.\u00a0Box\u00a0No.9,\u00a0CBD\u00a0Belapur Navi\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0400\u00a0614 Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Siddheshwar\u00a0Telugu,\u00a0PIO Shri\u00a0A.K.Pandharkar,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority \u00adNIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decision In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/000768 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.27.9.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Konkan\u00a0Railway\u00a0Corporation.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\"},\"wordCount\":366,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011"},"wordCount":366,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011","name":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-03T00:27:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sachin-sitaram-ambre-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-1-june-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Sachin Sitaram Ambre vs Ministry Of Railways on 1 June, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6328\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}