{"id":63324,"date":"2010-01-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-07-22T14:35:02","modified_gmt":"2015-07-22T09:05:02","slug":"khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                                       (Judgment reserved on 11.12.2009)\n                                                      (Judgment delivered on 25.01.2010)\n\n\nCourt No. - 29\n\nCase :- WRIT - A No. - 35327 of 1998\n\nPetitioner :- Khalil Ahmad And Another\nRespondent :- Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And Others\nPetitioner Counsel :- M.S.Haq,Km. Anjum Haq\nRespondent Counsel :- C.S.C.,K.M.Garg\n\n\n\n\nHon'ble Sibghat Ullah Khan,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>       This is tenants&#8217; writ petition. Landlord respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.2, Hori Lal filed suit against tenants petitioners for<\/p>\n<p>eviction and recovery of arrears of rent in the form of<\/p>\n<p>S.C.C. Suit No.47 of 1993. The main question involved<\/p>\n<p>in the suit was regarding applicability of U.P. Urban<\/p>\n<p>Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act,<\/p>\n<p>1972. Case of the landlord was that shop in dispute was<\/p>\n<p>constructed in July, 1983, hence the Act was not<\/p>\n<p>applicable as the suit had been filed within ten years<\/p>\n<p>from the date of construction, i.e. on 21.04.1993.<\/p>\n<p>       The trial court\/ J.S.C.C. Bijnor held that the Act was<\/p>\n<p>applicable. No ground for eviction as provided under<\/p>\n<p>Section 20(2) of the Act was alleged to exist by the<\/p>\n<p>landlord.         Accordingly,             suit       was       dismissed           on<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                            1<\/span><br \/>\n 14.05.1998.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Against the said judgment and decree, landlord filed<\/p>\n<p>S.C.C. Revision No.89 of 1998. III A.D.J. Bijnor allowed<\/p>\n<p>the   revision   through    judgment    and    order   dated<\/p>\n<p>26.09.1998 and decreed the suit of the landlord holding<\/p>\n<p>that the Act was not applicable on the building in dispute<\/p>\n<p>and tenancy had been validly terminated through notice.<\/p>\n<p>The judgment and order of the Revisional court has<\/p>\n<p>been challenged through this writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>      It is admitted case of the parties that at the place of<\/p>\n<p>the shop in dispute, there was an old shop, which was in<\/p>\n<p>the tenancy occupation of the tenants petitioners since<\/p>\n<p>1976. Landlord respondent asserted and tenants<\/p>\n<p>petitioners admitted that the said shop was quite big and<\/p>\n<p>by agreement between the parties, the said shop was<\/p>\n<p>vacated by the tenants, demolished by the landlord and<\/p>\n<p>eight shops at the site of the old big shop were<\/p>\n<p>constructed by the landlord. The tenants asserted that<\/p>\n<p>meanwhile landlord had given them another shop<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              2<\/span><br \/>\n belonging to him. There was litigation in the form of<\/p>\n<p>proceedings under Section 145, C.P.C. in between the<\/p>\n<p>parties. Ultimately, shop in dispute, which was newly<\/p>\n<p>constructed, was given to the tenants and they vacated<\/p>\n<p>other shop, which was meanwhile given on rent to them<\/p>\n<p>by the landlord. Copy of the written statement filed by<\/p>\n<p>the tenants petitioners is Annexure-II to the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>Tenants asserted that under the oral agreement entered<\/p>\n<p>into at the time of vacation of old shop, the<\/p>\n<p>understanding was that one shop would be constructed<\/p>\n<p>at the place of the old shop, however landlord<\/p>\n<p>dishonestly constructed eight new shops. Even if this<\/p>\n<p>version is accepted, it will not make much difference. As<\/p>\n<p>far as the question of date of construction is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>in Para-4 of the written statement where assertion<\/p>\n<p>regarding oral agreement has been made, it has not<\/p>\n<p>been stated that it was also agreed between the parties<\/p>\n<p>that on the new shop, the Act would continue to apply.<\/p>\n<p>The fact of constructing eight (or four) new shops at the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             3<\/span><br \/>\n place of the old shop has been stated in Para-6 of the<\/p>\n<p>written statement. In the same para, it is also mentioned<\/p>\n<p>that on 15.05.1983 kirayanama was executed by the<\/p>\n<p>defendant.   Thereafter,   in   Para-7   of   the   written<\/p>\n<p>statement, it is mentioned that parties compromised the<\/p>\n<p>matter on 13.07.1983 (in respect of vacation of<\/p>\n<p>alternative shop which had been provided by the<\/p>\n<p>landlord to the tenants). In Para-7 of the written<\/p>\n<p>statement, it is also mentioned that, the agreement<\/p>\n<p>dated 13.07.1983 was to the effect that three newly<\/p>\n<p>constructed shops would be converted into one shop<\/p>\n<p>and given on rent to the tenants for Rs.225\/- per month<\/p>\n<p>and in pursuance of the said agreement, landlord<\/p>\n<p>converted three new shops into one and gave it on rent<\/p>\n<p>to the tenants.\n<\/p>\n<p>    The trial court had held that it was not proved that<\/p>\n<p>the new construction was so substantial that it could<\/p>\n<p>amount to altogether new construction. This finding was<\/p>\n<p>utterly wrong and rightly set aside by the Revisional<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                            4<\/span><br \/>\n court. Altogether new construction was clearly admitted<\/p>\n<p>by the tenants in their written statement.<\/p>\n<p>    Under the facts and circumstances of the case, it<\/p>\n<p>can not be held that the Act would continue to apply<\/p>\n<p>even after the new construction. In the written<\/p>\n<p>statement, there is no allegation that there was any<\/p>\n<p>agreement at the time of vacation of the old shop by the<\/p>\n<p>tenants that the newly constructed shop would be given<\/p>\n<p>on same terms and conditions to them by the landlord.<\/p>\n<p>There is also no such allegation that the old shop was in<\/p>\n<p>dilapidated condition. The only allegation in paragraph-4<\/p>\n<p>of the written statement is that the previous shop was<\/p>\n<p>old. There is no such presumption that every old<\/p>\n<p>building is in dilapidated condition. Accordingly, I do not<\/p>\n<p>find any error in the judgment and order passed by the<\/p>\n<p>Revisional court.\n<\/p>\n<p>    Certain authorities have been cited regarding date<\/p>\n<p>of construction as provided under Section 2(2) of the<\/p>\n<p>Act. However, new construction is admitted by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             5<\/span><br \/>\n tenants and they claimed to have occupied newly<\/p>\n<p>constructed shop for the first time in July, 1983 (Para-7<\/p>\n<p>of the written statement).\n<\/p>\n<p>      Accordingly, there is no merit in the writ petition,<\/p>\n<p>hence it is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order Date :- 25.1.2010<br \/>\nNLY<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             6<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010 (Judgment reserved on 11.12.2009) (Judgment delivered on 25.01.2010) Court No. &#8211; 29 Case :- WRIT &#8211; A No. &#8211; 35327 of 1998 Petitioner :- Khalil Ahmad And Another Respondent :- Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":860,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010"},"wordCount":860,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010","name":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And ... on 25 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-22T09:05:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/khalil-ahmad-and-another-vs-iii-addl-distt-judge-bijnor-and-on-25-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Khalil Ahmad And Another vs Iii Addl. Distt. Judge, Bijnor And &#8230; on 25 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63324"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63324\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}