{"id":63829,"date":"2005-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005"},"modified":"2018-08-07T13:06:32","modified_gmt":"2018-08-07T07:36:32","slug":"s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","title":{"rendered":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Intellectual Property Appellate Board<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_bench\">Bench: S Jagadeesan, R Singh<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<pre><\/pre>\n<p>ORDER<\/p>\n<p>Raghbir Singh, Vice-Chairman <\/p>\n<p>1. The appeal is against the order of the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks dated 10,10,2003 wherein the application of the appellant was rejected on the ground that the mark cannot be registered for the reason that the mark applied for is a conflicting mark. The grievance of the appellant is that the Assistant Registrar did not give any reason to arrive at the conclusion that the mark is not registrable except a cryptic statement in the order which is as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;The trade mark consisting of word &#8216;Solo&#8217; is identical with a number of trade marks cited in the Examination Search Report as conflicting trade marks. Therefore, the objection raised under section 12(1) of the Act on the ground of deceptive similarity is maintained and the application No.698038 in Class 24 is hereby refused registration under section 18(4) of the Act.&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. We have perused the Rules with regard to the powers of the Assistant Registrar to pass such orders. In fact, Rule 40 of the rules framed under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 which deals with &#8220;Decision of Registrar&#8221; empowers the Registrar to communicate his observations in writing to the applicant and if the applicant intends to appeal from such decision, he may within one month from the date of such communication apply on Form TM 15 to the Registrar requiring him to state in writing the grounds of, and the materials used by him in arriving at, his decision.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Admittedly, the appellant did not choose to apply on Form TM 15 and approached this Board by way of appeal. The learned counsel for the appellant, on our query in respect of non compliance of the procedure contemplated under the Act, replied that the Assistant Registrar does not comply with the requests of the applicants on Form TM 15 within any reasonable time and if such request is made, the matter is kept pending before the concerned authority for months together and this would cause further delay in the process of registration. Hence, to avoid the delay, the appellant has no other option except to approach the appellate authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. We have carefully considered the above submission of the learned counsel for the appellant. When the statute prescribes the procedure, we are of the view that the said procedure must be followed and it can not be given a go bye for the convenience of the parties. Though we agree with the learned counsel for the appellant that the order is a cryptic one, as already pointed out, Rule 40 of the Rules framed under the Act envisages such circumstances. Hence, it is for the appellant to make a request on Form TM 15 and the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks has to comply with such a request.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. As the rule stipulates a period of one month from the date of receipt of the impugned order for the appellant to make a request on Form TM 15, in view of the filing of the appeal, we direct the appellant to make the request on Form TM 15 within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and the Assistant Registrar is directed to receive the same irrespective of the period of limitation contemplated under the statute and comply with the same. It is further directed that the Assistant Registrar must avoid unnecessary delay in the compliance of the request of the applicant and furnish a detailed order within three months from the date of receipt of request on Form TM 15. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Intellectual Property Appellate Board S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005 Bench: S Jagadeesan, R Singh ORDER Raghbir Singh, Vice-Chairman 1. The appeal is against the order of the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks dated 10,10,2003 wherein the application of the appellant was rejected on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63829","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005\",\"datePublished\":\"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\"},\"wordCount\":617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\",\"name\":\"S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005","datePublished":"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005"},"wordCount":617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005","name":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National ... vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade ... on 20 January, 2005 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2005-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-07T07:36:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/s-jayabal-an-indian-national-vs-the-assistant-registrar-of-trade-on-20-january-2005#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"S. Jayabal, An Indian National &#8230; vs The Assistant Registrar Of Trade &#8230; on 20 January, 2005"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63829","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63829"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63829\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63829"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63829"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63829"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}