{"id":63849,"date":"2009-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2"},"modified":"2016-11-03T07:20:41","modified_gmt":"2016-11-03T01:50:41","slug":"sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
g_NE  \u00ab.  V\n\n1:\u00bb; THE HEGH CQLERT 0? KARNATAKA, BAN(f;2\u00a31;dmj-   u  \n\nDATED THE 29\"' DAY 012'  2'<;:~.\u00ab:f\u00bb"%9 :1   \n\n\nTHE HQNBLE MR' JT;\u00a7$TICE**LV; E\u00a7AR.AYAI\u00a7A* SWAMY\nCRIMINAL \n\nBETWEEN\n1 SR1GNEi~:A\u00a2U.V"""-'._ A   y  \nRESZ9..I?\u00a5G"~!3'f'   ~  \n\u00a3:.M.}%I.R0AB   \n1NI)11a:Ab:AGA*R\u00bb.%_A"\u00bb'* M  % %\n8AI*$\u00a3'sALt3RE-3'8  '  \n - V   4'  %  APPELLANT\n(By M\/3_\u00a7)UA A$SOCIATL?s'}~-"\n\n1 M \/sA;s\u00a32oC;1\u00a5:S;s POINT\n* CARRY'"\u00a7NG[f.}N BUSINESS AT\nNi). 42\u00bb, _5ff17}* CRQSS, \u20ac3.R*S'}.'REE:T,\n_ VASAN'i'HNAGAR,\n \ufb02 BAN{};%1,QRE --- 560 352\n~ A REERESENTED BY' ITS PARTNERS\n 'mi 3.8 JAIPRAKASZ-\u00a3 A\n SRE as R\u00a7&JESH\n\n SR1 3.3 SHAELENDRA\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
” ;;’B~\u00a7; SR1; VIPIN KUMAR JAIN & C 5: RAJU : ABVOCATES }<\/p>\n
“K<\/p>\n
E\u00bb-3<\/p>\n
e1″1<:ash1'11em: but the cheque was returned 0:: theilzat.<\/p>\n
mg \u00abACCOum Ciomdaa, Thereafter, desgite se_:f\u00a7{ii<:':::?t:.0f <\/p>\n
Izcatice {he respondent fail\ufb01d {(3 pay;  Ei\u00a7::\u00a7C\u00e9VVV 'the T<\/p>\n
complainant 'filed the c0mp1aj.nt;\n<\/p>\n
3. The respondent   t:}:1a\ufb01 1:}ixer& was no
\nlegaily rceceverabie debt pay’\u00e9._’ee.leh’ ib: i:riii:vV.{:\u00a3\u00a7r;’;.fj1ainant and the<\/p>\n
cheque in qt;es\u00a3\u00a7::on:;\u00a3,*;f\u00a71::;_i3s:.i:\u00a2Ei as .a”‘se<cmi"ity for the amcmnt<\/p>\n
paid by ti\ufb01e c. \u00a7>n\u00ab5:_’Sri K K1’iShIi’1aIi1’LlI”th\u00a7?, wim<\/p>\n
Wh\ufb01ifl the “a1:\u00a5pe13a.*1{ “-\u00ab.g<.=\u00a7i;\u00e9\u00e9red into 5316 ageement for<\/p>\n
purchage ':33 301536: pf'0j;:efiy \ufb01t Bangalors: at the instance ef the<\/p>\n
 'Vre $p01\u00a7\u00a7\u20acia1':1ii\ufb01:\u00a7;. \ufb02igiltimateljg, the said iiransactign was failed and<\/p>\n
said._  301$ the proparty in favcur sf third<\/p>\n
 ;3artie;\u00e9'*~   ma amount ti: thta appeiiant, The<\/p>\n
  Ssiying that he has misplaced the cheque issued by<\/p>\n
I\u00bb  .:;\u00a3'i'f\u00a3\u20ac'AAffv\u00a2'.i" Sj}A'{i}Il{3.\u20ac3I'\u00a35CS, did not retuim the cheque, but misused the<\/p>\n
 and \ufb01isd the present complaint.\n<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
4. This appeiiant in arder is grove  \ufb02lias<\/p>\n
exanained himself as PW-1 anti gm marked  ” <\/p>\n
behalf of the respondsnts, one sf    T\n\nas, DW-1 and two witnesses gs;   \n\nmarked EXDZ to D9.  _ \n<\/pre>\n
5. Initially” the c9\u00a71p1’ain\u00a7.V’ix2a$” e:\u00a7’is};_12iss\u00e95ci~ 1335 the trial<\/p>\n
Court and on the appeal    this Court set<\/p>\n
aside    -remanded the: matter for<\/p>\n
I’ecnsiderat:i’a1%1.%~  V b0th the parties led furiher<\/p>\n
gvidancgif’ The stat\u00e9j\ufb01\u00e9nt: of the accused L1] 3 313 Cir RC was<\/p>\n
nirsc\ufb01r\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9i.  Court by the impugmd ju\u00e9gmant has<\/p>\n
 _  the complaint filed by the appeilarai;<\/p>\n
  n 6, En\ufb01fder t0 censtitute an e\ufb01\u00e9nce 11\/ S 138 ai’ N I Act,<\/p>\n
 $516 ‘”i1fi g’r\u00e9.’=Cii\u20acnf:s required ta be proved are that there 13 legally<\/p>\n
T ‘f\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01rablc C1633: due {ram the accused arid in dischaxge Gf the<\/p>\n
 same, the cheque was issued and the Same came to be<\/p>\n
\u00e9ishanoured and in spitsi of the notice issued and after<\/p>\n
aliewing the Statutory period, the respondent  <\/p>\n
cemizaly the same.\n<\/p>\n
7 ‘ The appellant Pwll ~ad1\ufb01itEed  VV”‘\ufb01%\u00e9:\u00a7s\u00a3\u00a7cti0:i’y<\/p>\n
betwsen him and K  A’ “<':Iie H\u00e9greeamerit
\nentered intc: between    He has also
\nadmitte\u00e9 the  to him by
\nstating that  V.  V.t"}:fj\u00a7N\/:\u20ac;r:gir1a1 Sale agregment,
\nwhich   hg\ufb01?\u00e9VV7r\u00e9Ceived the consitieration
\nunder  has also failad tn mentian the<\/p>\n
perio\u00e9 fag:-V v5zhi< \u00a7h  hint\u00e9r\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9it was due and what was the rate<\/p>\n
:' .0f'i111:\u00a7\u00a7fe:\u00e9tf'7'J:'Z'?ie.pr\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01i\ufb01tion unciar Section 139 of N E Act is a<\/p>\n
I'\u20ac::b\u00a2*.%1Z'\u20ac.E:f;Vbf7i{;\u00a7::V'}'}%f\u20ac%Iwi7'i;"\ufb01;\u00a7'i'.i(}I}. "}"h.e appellant has rslied upon<\/p>\n
V V' EXP} };\u00ab_&  the pircmste ~—- ccmsideratian receipts in favaur czf<\/p>\n
..1, I::}; "the camplaint it is egtated that accused gsersons<\/p>\n
_afsza\u00a7.1\u00e9{1-Aioan autherizing PW—-1 :9 give cheque in favour Sri<\/p>\n
VT  _\u00a73i1aiie:1dr3. a sum 0}? Rs.5,5G,{)\u20ac3Q\/-. But: in E\u00a7<:.P11 82; 12 K<\/p>\n
3 iiri\ufb01inlarnurthy is alga one of the parties :9 this documents,<\/p>\n
\u20ac:h:=:reb\u00a7; the appellant has givam a go by to the complaint<\/p>\n
<<\/p>\n
averments that amused authmrized PW\u00bb1 to pay <\/p>\n
threugh thequa drawra in favour of one V' S  ._<\/p>\n
8. AI’3.Gt}.’1\u20acI’ docturztsnt whigh r\u00e9”:liedT\ufb02{1f;;;:i\u00a71f;L  <\/p>\n
apgellant EXPS the report: of  heid to
\nbe not helpful to the Va?;37;;4g”)e_1l\u00e9\u00a7,:1t.j_\u00bb’_\u00bb\u00bbgr0unci that the
\nrespondents have f~3’L1{3C\u20acS:SfL1}    EXP1 was not<\/p>\n
issued for     Tfie appeilant further<\/p>\n
relitzd upon   gagtigzlexzf; of conviction betwearz the
\nsame ;::artie?\ufb01,_ 4′ In ‘\u00a3336 ~-\u00e9.ai&”–\u00e9as\u00e9 {ha accused had most Ee\ufb01 any<\/p>\n
\u00e9vidence’ which is_r\u00a71-‘ft: s\u00e9  the present case. Therefosra, the<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7a3;<';';2   ha reiied upen ta canvict the<\/p>\n
:s'\u20ac:S}}or:;1;e7:1\u00a5: $'–,:n  present case. \u00a3')W–2 has stated. in her<\/p>\n
'depcrsiEia11,___*if::;1t~"the amused was not aumarized ta isaue EXP}<\/p>\n
H  \ufb01es\u00bb-the bank account of the parimersliip flf\ufb02iw SW43<\/p>\n
 'EA;'\u00a7;s \u20ac1i<:;p(';sed that the cheque was returned 011 the ground that<\/p>\n
T  payment was Stepped by the drawer.\n<\/p>\n
<<\/p>\n
tiistnir\u00e9ssd  A ~_ , A' *<\/p>\n
9. in the circumstances, I am 0f the View  <\/p>\n
court has ecmsidered all aspects 0:” thr\u00e9i \u00bbiif1\u00e9;tut3r”–\u00aband  <\/p>\n
come to the concluaion that \ufb021e\u00a73.ppe1iaui’–has  to ‘7g’fi’a~$}\u20ac:._VV<\/p>\n
the guilt of the accused. Cm <\/p>\n
have rebutted the ;)re$u3:i3.:a.1’::ti.0n:”A;1@  ‘Eat. The
\ningredients that are \u00e9ifance 1.1\/3 138
\nof N I Act are n_Qt_.:V\u00e9;\u00e9’:\u00a7.<\u00a7\u00a3I\u00a7;1i$;i*1e<33  is justi\ufb01ed in
\npassing the"  for no iI1t\u20ac:I"f\u20acI'\u20acI}.Cf:<\/p>\n
from this   <\/p>\n
}{\u00a7_i I:"1u .%:i1eVz*'e;s_tV_.:i11';1, 1:313… appeal fails and it is ascerciingly<\/p>\n
S&!ae
\nTu\u00e9q\u00e9<\/p>\n
AKD<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy g_NE \u00ab. V 1:\u00bb; THE HEGH CQLERT 0? KARNATAKA, BAN(f;2\u00a31;dmj- u DATED THE 29″‘ DAY 012’ 2′<;:~.\u00ab:f\u00bb"%9 :1 THE HQNBLE MR' JT;\u00a7$TICE**LV; E\u00a7AR.AYAI\u00a7A* SWAMY CRIMINAL BETWEEN 1 SR1GNEi~:A\u00a2U.V"""-'._ A y RESZ9..I?\u00a5G"~!3'f' ~ \u00a3:.M.}%I.R0AB 1NI)11a:Ab:AGA*R\u00bb.%_A"\u00bb'* M % % […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63849","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri G N Raju vs M\\\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":838,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Sri G N Raju vs M\\\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri G N Raju vs M\\\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2"},"wordCount":838,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2","name":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-03T01:50:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-g-n-raju-vs-ms-process-point-on-29-june-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri G N Raju vs M\/S Process Point on 29 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63849","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63849"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63849\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63849"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63849"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63849"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}