{"id":63930,"date":"2009-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009"},"modified":"2014-10-26T20:11:31","modified_gmt":"2014-10-26T14:41:31","slug":"mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n<pre>3% THE HIGH CQURT OF KAMJATAKA AT BAN%LOR.E W,?.}=}.2724 OF 2908\n1\n\n \n\n1N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATE!) THIS ms 16\"! rm? 0:' APRIL, 2009,\n\nBEFORE\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PAT\u00a5L\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nMR J 8 RAW SHANKAR V\n330 JJQBASAPPA \nAGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,\u00a53'ROPFZiETOR;  \nM33 GRIPS ENDUR, CONCORD BUS!NESS ' ._\nCENTER, NS.-\"s60f20i1, 30TH CF+?Ot:\"-.'\u00ab$.4TH '\nBLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE 'if,\n\n V. _   \u00e9iamfzgug\u00e9\u00e9\n{By 3:: ; 3 RAJENDRA PRASAD,'--Ai7'VDCiAT\u00a3\u00a7 ; . \" \"     ~ . \n\nAM}:  \"\"\"  'A  . ..\n\n8T\ufb01iTE BANK 0:: ;:~4w._    '. '\n3752533513 ASSE1?S'RE&amp;.'\u00abQL'\u00e9.\u00e9}'i.E)N CENTER:\n: aooaz, BANGALO\u00a5?.E c;:w_a:2A:4cH,\nJ.{3R{}AE\u20ac, _BANGA\u00a3_.\u20ac&gt;F.E 2;  .~\n\n RESPONDENT\n\n . _ \"(By 3%\": ngE\u00e9 m{ ; \u00ab .$BV\u20ac)CATE)\n\niii\n\n ._ '*-j'.1\u20acgf:~z:S'w\u00a3I';r+_:;.f{ t=\u00a7';'fsT:oN ss BLED UNBER ARTRSLES 226 AND 227 or\nma ;::r;\u00a7:\u00ab:sr:f::;\u00a7r\"m or mom PRAYSNG TO mac? ma SE3' A3195 THE\n\n 'VEMPUNGEQ \"Q3529 aT.m::.ua, PASSES' BWHE LEARNEB JUDGE, am\",\n\" \" -~ 1 f -- ..\u00a53L5.!\u00a7!3ALGR'E.?---- sis: :.R.:~4&lt;::.95&amp;r9&#039;z, wag ANN-A,\n\n&quot;  &#039;V  341$ W1&quot;-253&#039; PETITKEN COWNG ON FGR PRELIMINARY HEARING 1N\n\n   &#039; 93* GROW, ms um: &#039;ma coma&quot;: MADE &quot;ma FOLLOWING:\n\n19% &quot;mg \ufb01\u00a3&#039;1,i\ufb01\u00a71(}lJR.&#039;!&#039;&lt;)f i&lt;_.A&#039;i{N\u00a3:&#039;E&#039;AKA AT BAN\u20ac5AL,(}R3:: w&#039;p,m.2224 ms was\n\nmzrr PETITION No.2724 or 2003 1 Gl&amp;_\u00a2:T1i2T_:}..&#039;..j:     _\n\n\n\nIN THE IIIGII COURT 0}? I&lt;&#039;_P.RNATA\u00a7&lt;LA AT BANGALORE &#039;\u20ac&#039;r&#039;.?.N&#039;o.2 &#039;?24 OF 2008\n4&#039;!\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Pe\ufb01tioner in this; petition has sought for s\u00e9fting _  <\/p>\n<p>the impugned arder dated 30&#8243;&#8216; Jahi\u00e9\u00e9ry&#8217;A <\/p>\n<p>the ieamed Judge, Debt Reno;\/_ery ;f&#8217;r.ii$&#8221;uriai,  &#8216;V  -&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>z.R.Mo-95az2m7 Vida Annexure\u00e9\u00a7_  <\/p>\n<p>2. The petitic:1e:9: _:F\u00a7zrsrei&#8217;_\u00a7i&#8217;    an H \u00e9;:\u00a7%3iication<br \/>\nuncier Secticm __&#8217;i7(1) _&#8230;   and<br \/>\nRecanstruc\u20aci_o\ufb01..&#8217;:,\u00a7f:?;\u00a7&#8217;%  Enforcement of<br \/>\nSecurity   Act&#8217; for short)<br \/>\nbefore   &#8220;Tribune! at Bangaiore,<\/p>\n<p>questionin\u00a7g&#8221;&#8221;th&#8217;e_ of the possession notice<\/p>\n<p>_._\u00a2ate;;%:3{j&#8221;&#8216;F&#8217;a.4;;:rc\u00a55% &#8220;2G\u00a3_)_4.\u00a7ssued under Sectitm 13(2) ad&#8217; the<\/p>\n<p>  _AI::mg with the appiicaticzn<\/p>\n<p> %.R;&#8217;i92_(3.&#8217;95 8if\u00e9&#8217;\u00a3}\u00a7i53&#8242;;V petifimer had fiied !.A.No.2&#8242;??&#8217;6I2007&#8242;,<\/p>\n<p> my manning the daisy in filing the E.R.No.958i20G7 an<\/p>\n<p>   :31&#8242; the Debt Rmavery Tribunai at Bangaiore<\/p>\n<p>V.  &#8212;..&#8221;V'{:&#8217;j&#8217;;_=_\u00a7.\u00e9.)una\u00a5&#8217; for brevity). The said applicatian had come up:<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01r consideration before the Tribunaf on 30%&#8217; January<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\/<\/p>\n<p>\u00a334 &#8216;i&#8217;:~1::f HE(\u00a7_H_ c_:&lt;_n;:\u00e9;&#039;;&#039; 03+&#039; 1\u00a7A1~eg~2A&#039;:m&lt;_A A1&#039; BANGALUKE wy,No&#039;2?24 OF 2998<\/p>\n<p>31% THE 311331 CGERT Q}? K.?u&#039;{}&#039;\u20acAT:&#039;&amp;KA&#039; AT BA}~3GAl\u00a3}RE W.Pf&quot;x\u00a70.2?1&#039;.4 OF 2888<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2008 and the Tribunei after hearing beth e\u00e9dee, diernfesed<\/p>\n<p>the appiieaticm fiied by petitioner on the sate V V.<\/p>\n<p>there is he vatid and bone tide reasons as    <\/p>\n<p>the petitioner for condoning the   <\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01tiener. Further, the Tribueei__&#8217;obee\ufb01?ed   V.<\/p>\n<p>is not ditigen\ufb01y proceeded in prxueferfisjg the eipeeetfgner he<br \/>\nhas Shawn euf\ufb01cient ceuee fet Lth.je&#8217;end eccerdingiy,<br \/>\nthe petition for eetjdene\ufb01es\ufb01ef&#8217;  dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>Subeequentty,   est ifjvv defrtiesai ef the<\/p>\n<p>  was eiee dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Being agigaievedh   impugned passed by the<\/p>\n<p> Tribu;};ei&#8221;v\u00a7.de \u00a7r*:ee:iesreV:A, as stated supra, petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>    &#8216;petition.\n<\/p>\n<p> r    heard teamed eeuneei appearing fer<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216;Vpetttierserten\u00e9dfteamed eeunsei appmring for respondent -&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>4. After earefui evatuetien ef the en\ufb01re originai<\/p>\n<p> Drmerde eveiiabie en \ufb01le, &#8216; emerges that, in fact,<\/p>\n<p>_:s.\u00bb\u00bb&#8211;\u00bb-~\u00b0-&#8220;W&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>it: &#8216;\u00a3&#8217;b1\u00a7:i tiiiiti {:c)t.;1e.&#8217;:*:~&#8217; 1&lt;_m{ea&#039;1&#039;Am ass: BANGALORE: W.P,No.2?2\u00ab\u00a3 0:: 2:31:25<\/p>\n<p>E2\u00bb? T2113 Iiliifl COURT BF K.r&quot;xR}\u00abiATAi(A AT BAEQALORE W.P.No.2?24 CF 2038<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb02tiener&#8217; has \ufb02ied the %.A.Nr:1.2?76i2OG7 under <\/p>\n<p>the Debt Recovary Tribunal (Pmcedure)  <\/p>\n<p>seeking ccnciona\ufb01on af deiay :3)&#8217; three and &#8216;.y\u00e9&#8217;\u00e9&#8217;r$_:iVn  &#8216;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>fi\ufb01ng the i.R.No.9581200? an the \ufb01rethe1&#8217;re\u00a7u:izij%%%\ufb01L<\/p>\n<p>cha\ufb02enging the possession<br \/>\nis$ued by the r&#8217;&amp;p0r:dent_ &#8212; Ban\u00a7;%A:kcng  deiay<br \/>\napghlica\ufb01cn, petitianer    praducing<br \/>\nalong with this intemai page<br \/>\nNos.56 to     the reascans for<br \/>\ndeiay  Tribunai. The<\/p>\n<p>pe\ufb01tioner\ufb01af\u00e9 expiai\ufb01\u00e9gd f\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9lay in detail giving the: facts;<\/p>\n<p> of \ufb01113_;f&#8217;\u00a2;*a3.e 3%  r\u00e9\ufb01sorxs from paragraphs 6 &#8216;ca 14.<\/p>\n<p> assigned for expiairaing the daisy in<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01L\u00a7fin\u00a7.&#8217;are v&#8217;Vry in nature. Hence, the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216;fribut\ufb01z\u00e9,  ta have accepted the explanation affered<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;\u00abf\u00e9&gt;:&#8217; t:L&#8221;es:}dc&#8217;\u00a5ning \ufb02ue daisy in \ufb01iing by impcxsing same<\/p>\n<p>V&#8217;  ..__&#8221;V&#8217;:.?e\u00e930nabie mat. instead sf \ufb01x.-at, tha Tribunai has wme<\/p>\n<p>  fit: the ccmcius\u00e9an that on verification cf the pieadings pm:<\/p>\n<p>%  <\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>LN &#8216;Hit: H;1:;::: z,:z_\u00a7L:;.:~:o.2&#8243;r24 or 291:3<\/p>\n<p>IN THE IIEGII CGURT OF KARNATAKA AT EMEGALGRE W.P.}&#8217;s\u00a70.2 724 OF EGGS<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>has expiained the reagons for deiay at paragraphsV $ &#8216;tg<\/p>\n<p>14. The said reascms emerge fram the facts eff.  <\/p>\n<p>There is no intentional or deIiberat_e&#8230;deg\u00a7ay pf &#8220;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner in filing the appiicai%on::&#8217;_A_&#8217;alr\u00a7d lt:&#8221;*&#8217;.1e&#8221;&#8216; <\/p>\n<p>bnna \ufb01de in nature. This  tli\u00e9 \u00a7:1.atf\u00a7a\u00a7\u00a7;:&#8217;\u00e9l\u00e9.13&#8243;h;as<br \/>\nnot been looked Emir;  gar  1a&#8217;\ufb01:\u00a7._  nut<br \/>\nappreciated by the Tribu&#8221;:;ia:t-J. that eariier,<br \/>\nthe parties have    gaefore the Civii<br \/>\nCaurt and    V V<\/p>\n<p>5.   int\u00e9g VVV\u00a3$$nsideration at! these<\/p>\n<p>reievant f\u00e9gtbrs,&#8217; E\u00bb.  ecmsidared view that, the<\/p>\n<p> order_;ir&#8217;npug:{ed.. by the Tribunai Gama! be<\/p>\n<p>  .e-:.:\u00a7}t$&#8221;\u00a3::a;x\u00a7:t&#8221;:e$ iiabie is be set aside.<\/p>\n<p> r  vv&#8217;f5:?.&#8217;fSif&#8217;L:ti*\u00a7\u00e9&#8217;iI&#8217;..regoing reasons, the writ petition \ufb02ied<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; by pt&#8217;%*4\u20ac&#8217;\u00a7&#8217;i:\u00a7ze\u00e94sr.;:-rhi\u00e9; disposed of as foilcms:<\/p>\n<p> g The writ pefition filed by petitiorzer is<\/p>\n<p> aimed in pan&#8217;;\n<\/p>\n<p>5,&#8221; BEBE i&#8221;Ei{_H:\u00a7 (j\u20ac}EjRf\u00a7&#8217; Q!&#8217; i\u00a71\\;RNA&#8217;i&#8217;.?s!\u00a7A A1&#8242; BANGALORE WJ&#8217;,.&#8217;*\u00e90.2&#8242;?&#8217;24 OF 2008<\/p>\n<p>EN Tif\ufb01 HEGZI COURT 0? I{.A4&#8217;Z}\u20acAT:%.KA AT B.=&#8217;s.}$GAi.C-&#8216;RE W.P.}\u20ac&lt;:-.2 ?24 OF N08<\/p>\n<p>if] The order impugned dated 303&#039; <\/p>\n<p>January 2008 passed on I_A.No_27?6z&#039;20O:;2..f\u00a7}A&quot;&#039; <\/p>\n<p>:_R.No-95az2oo7 by the Debt AF?ec;)_:tg\u00a2,;\u00a7f3}.,::: <\/p>\n<p>Tribuna! at Bangalore vide:=:A:An_::7\u00e9)kti}%e. &#039; A&quot; _i\u00a7&#039;;<\/p>\n<p>hereby set aside_:\n<\/p>\n<p>Iii] For fife  si_v&#8217;*Lart;\u00a2.- :&#8217;:.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>affidavit accump\u00e9hgg\ufb01g<br \/>\n\ufb02ied und_e:&#8217;_ 1 ;Rz_:ie   1  .&#8217; ii-i&#8217;\u00a72!covery<br \/>\nTribune!&#8217;   the said<br \/>\nand delay in filing fhe<br \/>\n;.R.;Q\u00a25.95ar.2fGa%7k%%     c:ondoned subject to<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8216;c_es.\u00a7 \u00abof Rs-5000\/~ (Rupees Five<br \/>\n% T   Qnfy) to be deposited b\u00e9fare the<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211; Bank within a period of two<\/p>\n<p> n T  fmm the date of receipt cf capy of this<\/p>\n<p>x &#8220;\u00ab. \u00a7i&#8217;da::\n<\/p>\n<p>{V7 The Tribune] is directed to dispose<\/p>\n<p>of the l_R.95&amp;\/2007 an nits, after a\ufb01crding<\/p>\n<p>-._&#8230;._..,.,.,_,,,__,_\\__+M______W_<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a354. &#8216;gm: iiiij\ufb01 f..'()UR&#8217;i&#8217; as m1&lt;,:=m&quot;:iA1<A>\u00a7{;;:. w .\u00a7&#8217;.3Z\\\u00a3e.&#8217;2?24 53:: 2:333<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil 3% THE HIGH CQURT OF KAMJATAKA AT BAN%LOR.E W,?.}=}.2724 OF 2908 1 1N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATE!) THIS ms 16&#8243;! rm? 0:&#8217; APRIL, 2009, BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PAT\u00a5L BETWEEN: MR [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63930","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":869,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009"},"wordCount":869,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009","name":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-10-26T14:41:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-b-ravi-shankar-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-16-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr J B Ravi Shankar vs State Bank Of India on 16 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63930","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63930"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63930\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63930"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63930"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63930"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}