{"id":64029,"date":"2010-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010"},"modified":"2018-03-15T10:53:40","modified_gmt":"2018-03-15T05:23:40","slug":"vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp;<\/div>\n<pre>   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/12995\/2009\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 12995 of 2009\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nSANJAY\n@ VIJAY S\/O CHAMPAKLAL DUMASIYA\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nSTATE\nOF GUJARAT &amp; OTHERS\n \n\n=========================================================\nAppearance : \nMR\nAR SHAIKH for Petitioner. \nMS TRUSHA K PATEL, ASST. GOVERNMENT\nPLEADER for\nRespondents. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n HONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\nDate\n: 29\/03\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \n ORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n<p>\tBy<br \/>\nfiling this writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of<br \/>\nIndia, the detenu has challenged the order of detention No.<br \/>\nPCB\/PASA\/219\/2009 dated 29.09.2009 passed by the Commissioner of<br \/>\nPolice, Surat City, respondent No. 2, in exercise of powers under<br \/>\nsub-section (1) of section 3 of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social<br \/>\nActivities Act, 1985 [hereinafter referred to as the PASA Act]<br \/>\ndetaining the detenu as a bootlegger, as being illegal, invalid,<br \/>\narbitrary, void ab-initio and suffers from total non-application of<br \/>\nmind and also in violation of the provisions of Articles 21 and 22 of<br \/>\nthe Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tLearned<br \/>\nadvocate for the detenu, Mr. A.R. Shaikh, submitted that the grounds<br \/>\nof detention do not indicate any satisfaction recorded by the<br \/>\ndetaining authority that the activities of the detenu are detrimental<br \/>\nto  public order , and, therefore, the detention order is bad and<br \/>\nillegal. He further submitted that the detaining authority has placed<br \/>\nreliance on a solitary case under the Prohibition Act but the same do<br \/>\nnot indicate anything to support disturbance to  public order .<br \/>\nHe further submitted that the offence was registered as back as<br \/>\n18.09.09, the detenu was arrested on the same date,  he was released<br \/>\non bail on 21.09.09, and the detention order was passed on<br \/>\n29.09.2009. Learned advocate therefore submitted that there is a<br \/>\ndelay in passing the order of detention and on this ground also, the<br \/>\ndetention order requires to be quashed and set aside. Learned<br \/>\nadvocate further submitted that on behalf of the detenu, a<br \/>\nrepresentation was submitted by registered AD Post on 17.11.2009, but<br \/>\nthe same has not been considered by the respondents and on this<br \/>\nground also, the continued detention of the detenu requires to be<br \/>\nquashed and set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Trusha Patel, learned AGP submitted that the detention order is just<br \/>\nand proper and detaining authority has passed the order after<br \/>\nconsidering all relevant aspects of the matter, and the same needs no<br \/>\ninterference.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tHeard<br \/>\nlearned advocate Mr. Shaikh for the detenu and Ms. Trusha Patel,<br \/>\nlearned AGP for the respondents. I have also perused the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIt<br \/>\nappears that on the basis of a solitary case, viz. C.R. No. III &#8211; 861<br \/>\nof 2009 dated 18.09.2009 registered at Salabatpura Police Station for<br \/>\n744 bottles of foreign liquor against the detenu, the detaining<br \/>\nauthority held that the said activities of selling  liquor of the<br \/>\npresent detenu were harmful to the health of the public, and to<br \/>\nrestrain from carrying further illegal activities, the detenu has<br \/>\nbeen detained. It further appears that the offence was registered on<br \/>\n18.09.2009, the detenu was released on bail on 21.09.09 and the<br \/>\ndetention order was passed on 29.09.2009   almost 8 days after his<br \/>\nrelease. Hence there is a delay in passing the order of detention. No<br \/>\naffidavit is filed in this matter by any of the respondents.  The<br \/>\ndelay caused in passing the order of detention has thus remained<br \/>\nunexplained. On this ground alone, this petition requires to be<br \/>\nallowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tOn<br \/>\nbehalf of the detenu, his lawyer made a representation on 17.11.2009<br \/>\nby registered AD Post. It is the detenu&#8217;s case that till filing of<br \/>\nthe petition, he has not been replied and hence there is delay in<br \/>\ndeciding his representation and on that ground alone, his detention<br \/>\norder requires to be quashed and set aside.  No affidavit is filed by<br \/>\nany of the respondents in this matter explaining the situation. The<br \/>\naverments made in the petition has thus remain uncontroverted. It<br \/>\nthus appears that the representation made on behalf of the detenu has<br \/>\nnot been considered at all by the concerned authorities. Thus, on the<br \/>\nground of not considering the detenu&#8217;s representation alone, this<br \/>\npetition requires to be allowed.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tMoreover,<br \/>\nexcept the statements of some anonymous witnesses, there is no<br \/>\nmaterial on record which shows that the detenu is carrying on<br \/>\nactivities of selling liquor which is harmful to the health of the<br \/>\npublic. In the case of Ashokbhai Jivraj @ <a href=\"\/doc\/687998\/\">Jivabhai Solanki v. Police<br \/>\nCommissioner, Surat<\/a> [(2001) (1) GLH 393), having considered the<br \/>\ndecision of the Hon&#8217;ble Apex Court in the case of Ram Manohar Lohia<br \/>\nv. State of Bihar (AIR 1966 SC 740), this Court held as under in<br \/>\nparagraphs 22:\n<\/p>\n<p>\t So<br \/>\nfar as the cases against the detenu are concerned, they have already<br \/>\nbeen registered.  They were against persons mentioned therein which<br \/>\nis stated in the grounds of detention by the detaining authority.<br \/>\nRegarding two statements having taken into account, the law laid down<br \/>\nby the Supreme Court in Ram Manohar Lohia v. State of Bihar, AIR 1966<br \/>\nSC 740 and reiterated from time to time including decisions referred<br \/>\nto by us hereinabove, the case falls under the maintenance of  law<br \/>\nand order  and not  public order .  The subjective satisfaction<br \/>\narrived at by the detaining authority, therefore, cannot be said to<br \/>\nbe legal, valid and in accordance with law. Since in the facts and<br \/>\ncircumstances, an order of detention could have been passed by the<br \/>\ndetaining authority for maintenance of  public order , the order<br \/>\ndeserves to be quashed and is hereby set aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tIn<br \/>\nthe case of <a href=\"\/doc\/271008\/\">Collector and Dist. Magistrate v. S. Sultan<\/a>  reported in<br \/>\nAIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2096 the Apex Court held as under:-\n<\/p>\n<p> The<br \/>\ncrucial issue, therefore, is whether the activities of the detenu<br \/>\nwere prejudicial to public order. While the expression &#8216;law and<br \/>\norder&#8217; is wider in scope inasmuch as contravention of law always<br \/>\naffects order. &#8216;Public order&#8217; has a narrower ambit, and public order<br \/>\ncould be affected by only such contravention which affects the<br \/>\ncommunity or the public at large. Public order is the even tempo of<br \/>\nlife of the community taking the country as a whole or even a<br \/>\nspecified locality. The distinction between the areas of &#8216;law and<br \/>\norder&#8217; and &#8216;public order&#8217; is one of the degree and extent of the<br \/>\nreach of the act in question on society. It is the potentiality of<br \/>\nthe act to disturb the even tempo of life of the community which<br \/>\nmakes it prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order. If a<br \/>\ncontravention in its effect is confined only to a few individuals<br \/>\ndirectly involved as distinct from a wide spectrum of public, it<br \/>\ncould raise problem of law and order only. It is the length,<br \/>\nmagnitude and intensity of the terror wave unleashed by a particular<br \/>\neruption of disorder that helps to distinguish it as an act affecting<br \/>\n&#8216;public order&#8217; from that concerning &#8216;law and order&#8217;. The question to<br \/>\nask is : &#8220;Does it lead to disturbance of the current life of the<br \/>\ncommunity so as to amount to a disturbance of the public order or<br \/>\ndoes it affect merely an individual leaving the tranquillity of the<br \/>\nsociety undisturbed&#8221; ? This question has to be faced in every<br \/>\ncase on its facts.\n<\/p>\n<p>13.<br \/>\n&#8220;Public order&#8221; is what the French call &#8216;ordre publique&#8217; and<br \/>\nis something more than ordinary maintenance of law and order. The<br \/>\ntest to be adopted in determining whether an act affects law and<br \/>\norder or public order, is : Does it lead to disturbance of the<br \/>\ncurrent life of the community so as to amount to disturbance of the<br \/>\npublic order or does it affect merely an individual leaving the<br \/>\ntranquillity of the society undisturbed ? <a href=\"\/doc\/1378263\/\">(See Kanu Biswas v. State<br \/>\nof West Bengal (AIR<\/a> 1972 SC 1656).\n<\/p>\n<p>\tApplying<br \/>\nthe ratio of the above decisions, it is clear that before passing an<br \/>\norder of detention of a detenu, the detaining authority must come to<br \/>\na definite finding that there is threat to the  public order  and<br \/>\nit is very clear that the present case would not fall within the<br \/>\ncategory of threat to  public order . In that view of the matter,<br \/>\nwhen the order of detention has been passed by the detaining<br \/>\nauthority without having adequate grounds for passing the said order,<br \/>\nit cannot be sustained and, therefore, it deserves to be quashed and<br \/>\nset aside.\n<\/p>\n<p>\tThe<br \/>\npetition is allowed. The impugned order of detention dated 29.09.2009<br \/>\npassed by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, respondent No.2,<br \/>\nagainst  the detenu is hereby quashed and set  aside.   The detenu is<br \/>\nordered to be set at liberty forthwith,  if  not  required  in  any<br \/>\nother case.    Rule is made absolute accordingly.  Direct service is<br \/>\npermitted.\n<\/p>\n<pre>mathew\t\t\t\t\t[\nH.B. ANTANI, J.]\n\n    \n\n \n\t   \n      \n      \n\t    \n\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n\t   \n      \n\t  \t    \n\t\t   Top\n\t   \n      \n\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gujarat High Court ========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 Author: H.B.Antani,&amp;Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/12995\/2009 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12995 of 2009 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE H.B.ANTANI ========================================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64029","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1359,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\",\"name\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010"},"wordCount":1359,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010","name":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-03-15T05:23:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vs-ms-trusha-k-patel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"========================================================= vs Ms Trusha K Patel on 29 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64029","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64029"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64029\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64029"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64029"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64029"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}