{"id":64131,"date":"2008-06-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-02-02T16:24:50","modified_gmt":"2015-02-02T10:54:50","slug":"nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE HIGH comm’ or KARNATAKA AT   ”<\/p>\n
DATED THIS THE 20th DA'{i{)F-{JUNE     V<\/p>\n
BEFORE  % %_
\nTHE HC)N’BLE MR. Jugricn
\nREGULAR SECQND
\nBETWEEN: V  \u00ab  V <\/p>\n
1 NAYAGAM   . <\/p>\n
SINCE 1::Is:<;=:;\u00bb av HIS LR}<\/p>\n
1(a) ANTHONIAMMA'WiD? AMRiJ.’FEi_TALKIES
\nSANEUR IN BELEARY \u00a3215″? ‘<\/p>\n
1(1)} A M N XAVI.ER.S]0
\nMAJ OR, R] KJANATHA ‘
\nOPP AMRUTHLTALKIES  ‘ V
\nSANDURVIN BELLARY DIS?\n<\/p>\n
lie) AMN momaswaml S\/0 NAYAGAM
\n MAJOR, es: fa .:AN.A’I*HA comm?
\n‘*1’I_>P\u00a7”‘ ARERUTH-T’AjLKJES
\ns;xNDuR”IN’i3EL1,jaRY DIST<\/p>\n
‘ V1V(d}_ AMN”‘MAF2’i’ ‘I>)47z)A\u00bbsAYAc;A1~4<\/p>\n
. MAJOR,’ R”\/A JANATHA COLONY<\/p>\n
~ 1 ‘ ” — .. 6?? AMRL3’i’H TALK] ES
\n‘  SAi’~\u00a5DL}R IN BELLARY mm’<\/p>\n
 my STEVENSON s\/0 NAYAGAM<\/p>\n
 MAJOR, R\/A JANATHA comm
\n_  ~ 0?? AMRUTH TALKIES
\n SANDUR IN BELLARY DIST<\/p>\n
J2.\n<\/p>\n
16} AMN ANTHINI KENNEDY S\/0 NAYAGAM
\nMAJOR, R\/A JANATI-IA COLONY
\nOPP AMRUTH TALKIES
\nSANDUR IN BELLARY DIST<\/p>\n
HQ AMN JAMES WILSON S\/O NAYAGAM
\nMAJOR, R\/A JANATHA COLONY
\nOPP AMRUTH TALKIES I ‘<\/p>\n
SANDUR IN BELLARY DIST   ;.”.\n<\/p>\n
(By Sri: S V TIL-GUL, AADVJ<\/p>\n
AND: a \u00ab _
\n1 K PRAKASH 3212:1313? Si:+icB:’I)\u00a7;i;::J  _<\/p>\n
ital sHYAMAI.\ufb01?.R??DDv’   .. ” ‘
\n3\/\u00ab:1 PRAKA.SH”i2_.EDD\u00a7’,’~.. ‘
\nMAJOR, Rm NEAR AN'{.’_BONY MARRAIGE HALL
\nOF? OLD  COWL—BAZAAR
\nBELLARY – ”\n<\/p>\n
1(3)] BAIARNJ. S\/0 PRAECASH REDDY.
\nMMQR, Rf-A NEAR imaom MARRAIGE HALL
\n  OLD MARKET.C’-OVVL BAZAAR<\/p>\n
._ * ..r\u00ab1AJ<3R.,.\u00a7A$sT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
\nA  KEB, sgmanaxag ROAD, BELLARY<\/p>\n
', 3 &;Ai\u00e9';'HAMMA w\/0 SHANPHAPPA
\n 'A T MAJOR, R\/A 22m) WARD om MARKET
\n'   1- .<:;ow1, BAZAAR, BELLARY<\/p>\n
.'  4':-V  1;}: 123 JOSEPH
\n% ELECTRICJAN IN N M D c
\nsanma  RESPQNDENTS<\/p>\n
  "  A' V (By Sri: '1' N RAGHUPATHI, ADV.)<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
a
\nno<\/p>\n
RSA FILED U\/8.100 cm AGAINST THE JU.:1Ae.N0.9\/  <\/p>\n
FILE OF THE ADDL. crvn. JUDGE (SR”.\u00ab.DN_.),’V –B_ELmu.RY,<\/p>\n
DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIVRMINGA.’I’HE._J’UDGM.ENI’1T_:
\nAND DEGREE DATED 14.2.1990 PASSED Iii O.S.N{\u00a3F.f1′?1;f 15385.<\/p>\n
ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. MUNS!F’P,__.BELlg\\_RY. V <\/p>\n
This Appeal coming; :13 fmf Court<\/p>\n
delivered the following: V __  _<\/p>\n
A  %<\/p>\n
The     the defendant in
\n(}.S.No.\u00a2IV+T1]’1–E:V3:.fA3f52′..’    in favour of the
\np}ainti\ufb01’ by  dated 14.2.2990. The<\/p>\n
dcfcndant  by the said judgment and<\/p>\n
  Vv  First Appellate Court in RA<\/p>\n
  __FiI’st Appellate Court has dismisaeti the<\/p>\n
 dated 209* March 2002. The defendant<\/p>\n
V -vthexei\ufb01nf:  to be aggrieved by the mmunent<\/p>\n
   passed by the {hurts below is before this Court in<\/p>\n
‘n<\/p>\n
2. The panics are referred in in the    M<\/p>\n
assign’ ed to them befole the trial C_ou;.rt__fo::’  “”‘-uc4_”:Vgf”.,. ‘ <\/p>\n
convenience and charity.\n<\/p>\n
3. The pzaintitif was beii31e z\ufb011e:   for
\njudwtent and decree  and for the
\nconsequential relief of  of the
\nsuit schedule    was that he is<\/p>\n
the absolute    property bearm’ g<\/p>\n
‘I’.S.No.3i%:  measuring 7357 sq.\ufb01:
\nsituate a\u00a3”Q1de%Marke%iA’eRaa{j;’  1 Bazaar, Bellary. The<\/p>\n
  ‘teat .f}1evst1it schedule property ozti\ufb01ally<\/p>\n
 3.3;; one Sm’t;\u00a7{.’Sund1an1ma the junior aunt of the<\/p>\n
  Slmdramma got the property throng}:<\/p>\n
the  of Madras on 13.2.1933. She is said to<\/p>\n
 , Imve been  poasession and enjoyment of the 3uit_ mhetiule<\/p>\n
   since 13.22.1933 and on 13.11.1967’, she executed a<\/p>\n
  settiement deed in \ufb01nvour of the plaizntiff. The<\/p>\n
 tlzexefoxe, claiming to have acquired title to the<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘in:\n<\/p>\n
property under the sa1d’ settlement deed dated    H<\/p>\n
claims to be in possession of the    ‘the<\/p>\n
municipal taxes in respect of the   c1T[1\u00bbi1\u00a3AiA\u00e9:’~f(J-1:? <\/p>\n
the suit by the plainti\ufb01f is 4136 \u00a7iVta;f\u00a2n\u20ac$..g;V:;:-$7
\nworking in the I-“choc d\u00a2f;)a1’tmon1.;:\u00a7\u00a7s 8.. ‘ca-nst\u00e9nble in
\nSandur Police Station   _right title or
\ninterest in the said    the
\npla1’11t:i\ufb01’ and   to \ufb01le the
\nsuit.   }.  J    V<\/p>\n
4. ($n.f_l\u00a7o\ufb01ng’   summons, the dcfcmiant<\/p>\n
appealtxi gnd   oa  i;’.et.oiled written statement. The<\/p>\n
  \u00abi”ofc3i(i:i:i1ti–.”od.ci:soi\u00a7.d  \u00abthe plaintiff is the owner of the<\/p>\n
   on the other hand set up title to the<\/p>\n
—     that the property in question had been<\/p>\n
 Eyihe Mummpa’ ‘ lcolmcil, Bcllaxy on 29.11.1932 in<\/p>\n
  o\u00a2fRcven3d J. Pinto. The sand’ Resrcmd -J. Pinto ‘m said’<\/p>\n
  have executed a sale deed in flavour of the defendant on<\/p>\n
 \u00b0.3l.8.I96l. The defcndatat contends that prior to the<\/p>\n
J,<\/p>\n
o
\nN<\/p>\n
execution of the sale deed, the vendor wasin   V”  V’<\/p>\n
thema\ufb01er the defendant has been,    V<\/p>\n
property and the municipal   <\/p>\n
de\ufb01endant thcrefare not oniy dii\ufb01i\ufb02tes  igi\ufb02e  * }’<\/p>\n
but sets up title in himself andi_1 \u00a7s 1sm;gh\u00a3’\u00a3c\u00bb:~_  of
\nthe suit. A  ‘V\n<\/p>\n
5. The   contentions put
\nforth by “rV:’1a\u00e9yV aa 10 issues for its
\n:3    pmvves his va\ufb01d title to the<\/p>\n
— ,   ?\n<\/p>\n
   \\\u00a7I1&1cthex;Hj5lmn”\u00abv’ tiff proves that he is in lawful<\/p>\n
 of the suit pmpexty ‘P
\n  v_  plaJ’nt1’\ufb01’ proves that the defendant is<\/p>\n
” V  iilegally inter\ufb01ering in his possession ‘1’<\/p>\n
”  ix!) Whether defendant proves that he is the owner<\/p>\n
in possession of suit property by virtue of<\/p>\n
32<\/span><\/p>\n
rc\ufb01stcmd sale deed dated 31;i?\u00a7;1Qf?31: “‘ ‘  k<\/p>\n
contended in para 8 of st\u00a3i’1;c::1_;e.i1 t    <\/p>\n
V) Whether defendant has    ”\n<\/p>\n
he has perfected    sjby
\nadvmsc possgsjon   . -. ,. 1
\nvi} Whether mg  the suit of
\nthe
\nvb?  ;::\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;5’%\u00a3hat the valuation
\n“””     is impmpcr ?\n<\/p>\n
  proves that this Court
\n   to try the suit ?<\/p>\n
\n1}} =    is cntiticd to the reliefs prayed\n~    ..... \n\n '  or decree 7-'\n\n<\/pre>\n
6″.  order to discharge the burden cast on the<\/p>\n
    the issucs framed by the tnal’ Court the plain\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n
V.   himself as P’W.1 md examined two witnesses as<\/p>\n
‘  ;PWs.2 and 3 and also marked documents at E:-:h.P1 to P11.<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
The defendant examined 113133’ sex; as Dw.z m1f\u00a7\u00abl:_f ‘ – 7   H<\/p>\n
witnesses at \u00a3)ws.2 to 4 and marked:-d\u00e9cumcigts  <\/p>\n
D50.\n<\/p>\n
7. The trial    sgridcncc
\ntendered by the pal\ufb01ees  ?  u  contentions,
\nd\u20acC’.!BE=d the suit if;   and the
\nappeal \ufb01led    15$ judgment
\ndated RA”   ‘by judgment datnd
\n  is before this Court in<\/p>\n
this   ‘ ‘  ”  hereunder:\n<\/p>\n
.’ V.  \u00abV   Grgurt  admitting the appeal on 19.9.2002<\/p>\n
  :e;2 ‘n;:(i   V’ ‘ _’_g substantial quemtians emf law which read<\/p>\n
  as he33:un(l\u00a21″[ AT<\/p>\n
 i] ” T~W1~;ether the Courts below eeuid have deemed
\nV ” the plaintiff ‘s suit when eamiuedly the plahati\ufb02”<\/p>\n
who has come to the Court seeking declaration<\/p>\n
3:.\n<\/p>\n
judgment rendered by the tr1a’ 1 Court would    M<\/p>\n
tzdal Court has assessed the evidence “available  <\/p>\n
that context.\n<\/p>\n
12. As noticed above, the   registered
\nsettlement deed dated’   :’  to Iaaae been
\nexecuted by VA  aunt of the
\nplairj\ufb01\ufb01 who Vbeizin   \u00abenjoyment of the
\nproperty   deed is marked
\nas  ” 1    right under which
\n pmperty in favour of the<\/p>\n
p1ai11t;iff,_vit isLi$c-1V1 i:e31d:-edAVthe property was granted by the<\/p>\n
 of Maaia;-you 13.2.1933 vide tara No.49(}8\/32.<\/p>\n
  g;ra:nt order nor any document executed by<\/p>\n
the  avaiiable at this juncture, the document:<\/p>\n
 . ‘.911  plain\ufb01\ufb01 places Ieliazlce is the extract of the<\/p>\n
  “.Sur\u00a7rey Register which is marked as Ex.P2. The other<\/p>\n
 =\u00abT.’aia(g1a1’1;enI3 at Ex.P3 to P11 are no doubt the zevenue<\/p>\n
  such as the other extraets and the tax paid’<\/p>\n
< A receipts. Against the said case put forth by the plainti\ufb01; the<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
I3<\/p>\n
defendant has contended that the pmpcrty in queetien:   M<\/p>\n
initially gamed in favour of Revelnd’ ‘J.F’–inIA:o”_<by_:  <\/p>\n
Municipality on 29.11.1932 and nmgma<\/p>\n
has said the pm-petty to the  a
\ndeed dated 31.8. 1961  is  \u00a7S_ EX..].)"1;"-I.\ufb02..\u20ac.;Id\u20ac}f' to
\nstate that the pmpertyv   vendor, the
\ndefendant has  en    which 'E
\nat Ex.D4l.   the other
\n eeries are the extract
\nof the f receipts. The suit of the<\/p>\n
plain\ufb01\ufb02 im.':;:ee%p:ea\u00e9ui,'-c\u00a7gi;sceV"'s\u00a7$as instituted on 2.11.1935.<\/p>\n
The1*eii:&'e, _the' ti%3ve  reli\ufb01 on by the pLa1'nti\ufb01' as<\/p>\n
  vi?ell  \u00e9ie-Cttfje &'eienda1v1Him'et Ex.P1 and D1 were nearly two<\/p>\n
file dete of institution of the suit and it is<\/p>\n
  not  document had come into existcmre<\/p>\n
 just  the \ufb01\ufb01ng of the suit. in that bacl-rye-uxxd, no<\/p>\n
  <iLe_t:13_tD4I would state that it is a memo wheleunder the<\/p>\n
  engineer is rinfcrmed that Revernd J.Pinto has<\/p>\n
  the amount and the engineer is lequesfed fa<\/p>\n
E.\n<\/p>\n
..,4.s<\/p>\n
handover the plots. However, there is no other  M
\nindicate that the property has themafter\u00e9  u<\/p>\n
the name of Revezmcl Pinto <\/p>\n
memo has been acted upoo.  Vot};1eAr”‘:._;re:re\ufb01ue
\ndocuments relied on by the    of the
\nassessment register and “which are \ufb01ozm
\nthe year 1971 onwal\ufb02e.-“*  “Eix.D42 would
\ni:1d:iate that     the year 1971
\nthough the  fmhamd in the year
\n1961.  iejeveli though the revenue
\ndoemnelo\ufb01   had been aesessed in<\/p>\n
the name of  his purchase, there is: no<\/p>\n
 V’ to Show  to the document at Ex.{)41<\/p>\n
 2.12.1932, the vendor of the defendant<\/p>\n
woe’   possession as indicated therein and the<\/p>\n
Vvv\u00e9as assessed in his name  . If these
\n   are kept in view, the document relied on by the
\n  at Ex.P2 to complement the aettlelnent deed at<\/p>\n
 “uEx.P1 would assume certain evidenlziary value even though<\/p>\n
J3<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
no title deed as such of S:mt.K.Su11da:ramma   <\/p>\n
This is so because the contention Zctfw\ufb02zze. ‘:t}i_tttt’
\nproperty was allotted in favour of
\nbe fortzi\ufb01ed by the entzy jg
\nrecerds whemin the   73
\nfound in Ex.P’2. Though’   \u00abi3 an extract of
\nthe register    “a’:lli;hO1’ity, it is
\nnot a case    been obtained
\nsubsequent    ‘m favmlr of the
\nplain\ufb01\ufb01   around the date of \ufb01ling of
\nthe suit.   wouid indicate that the saw
\nextraet has ‘isguad’~\u00a7\ufb01’~:a;6.1o.1967 which is pliin’ to the<\/p>\n
-“\ufb01tititc     deed which was executed on<\/p>\n
 fl\ufb01teiefore, the said document at Ex.P2 not only<\/p>\n
  V cstab\ufb021iahes’tt;\u00a7-ittttthenticity but would also itzdicaiie that the<\/p>\n
   was aequ1red’ by Szztt.K.Sundam1nma as<\/p>\n
  entaezed in the land survey records. which<\/p>\n
 ‘iindieate that the grant as claimed has been ac-ted<\/p>\n
Vt  and the settler of the plainti\ufb02’ had acquired title and<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
was in posscsslon’ of the pmperty. Though  Iemned_     H<\/p>\n
counsel for the appellant relied on E;(‘.B-\u20ac20, aft  <\/p>\n
sa1d’ to have been issued by the om <\/p>\n
dispute the said document at  __”to {he
\nlearned counsel when 1333!?’ Iicf1″:V;’?l$hlV:-T\u00a7iv-_$’0″‘\u00bb’L,311t. ‘fbI’vvfh\u00a2.3 \u00a7cxuact
\nas at Ex.P2, he was not    same. This
\ncontention cannot\ufb02gsttqy’   Ex.P2 since
\n\ufb01rst and famg\u00e9wg\ufb02   issued by the
\no\ufb01ice of the   states is that it is
\nnot avaiIf;#blc_!  a\u00e9qi\ufb01i-..V_\u00a7uch endomcment was issued
\non 17.4.1 9a9′  :\u00a71;\u00a7=;1″‘az:\u00a7\u00a2:i\u00a7.uent at Ex.P2 as already<\/p>\n
139-\ufb01csedj. *a’oxavc 1’a.   cgttract which was issued in or<\/p>\n
  \ufb01fe; of  thc suit but as far back as in the<\/p>\n
Va,:\u00a7_i.~such the said endorsement cannot take<\/p>\n
  aevxiy  of Ex.P2. These being the relevant<\/p>\n
 in a case of this nature, it would have to be<\/p>\n
  .;g;uc:u.aed that the pla’mti\ufb02’ has established a better title<\/p>\n
  3}} crther documents as ahead}: observed are the<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
7:\n<\/p>\n
exlracts of the tax paid receipts which are  .   <\/p>\n
both in the case ofthc plaintitfmad t}:’;t\u00e9”‘ti\u00a2:f4=:1&1(i’\u00a7111t_V;.”   A:  <\/p>\n
13. Apart fmm the
\napprcciatring the said  .Iii’?l’fI’\u00bb.!3F'(:.vv\u00a34\u00a3t)E3},”}i1}g
\nin View the facts   and also the
\nassessment of     Court both
\nd0cumcnm|y.a_s\u00a7’-;L\u00a7fe\u00a7iL%a!\u00a7 (~;-;f_al__,A::  vvt:1i\u00e9VV’posscsaion of the
\npm-pelty    Vthc judgment would
\nindicate  “1:a.’ss m\ufb01trred to the cvidcuoa<\/p>\n
tendered    through his witnesses and<\/p>\n
dcfendgr\ufb01t _   ws\u00e9itnesscs and insofar as thc<\/p>\n
:’th\u00e9:~tr1J_ ‘  has come, in a \ufb01nding of fact.<\/p>\n
‘A   First Appellate Court thczeaftcr while<\/p>\n
~  ‘..__C~&nsiic\ufb0111g3 the oorrcctzzess or othclwise of the \ufb01nding<\/p>\n
   by the um’ I Court has mferred to the evidence<\/p>\n
  by the parties and an re-appmcriatian of the<\/p>\n
V   jcvidcnoe has dctemlined the be\u00a3:tc1’titlc of the plainti\ufb01’i1:t the<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
manner stated above and the F113′ t Appcilatc  ha\u00e9\ufb01  <\/p>\n
a\ufb01med the: \ufb01nding of fact: mndc1;:\u00a3i”‘by  <\/p>\n
Thcrcfom insafar as the eoncurrcnt “c rf <\/p>\n
the possession of the
\nintclfarcnce in 3 second  ashfziievquqea:-i\ufb01on of
\nlaw miscd, as alneaciy   a case when:<\/p>\n
\nthe plai11ti\ufb01' has     at all. The\ndiscussions    relied on by\n<\/pre>\n
the pzamci\ufb02f  13.11.1957 and in
\nolder   the plaiu\ufb01\ufb01 has derived
\ntitle unde\u00a74*:1;\u00e9   the absence of the pawn:<\/p>\n
docum\u00a7mt\\ LA    wounds based on its<\/p>\n
  l1″‘v1″A3._}J6e1\u00ab:tvV’cxa1n “””  incsd to omz\ufb01nn as to whether the<\/p>\n
   1.1967 in without basis or net ? While<\/p>\n
 said exercise, the plaint1’\ufb02’ establishing a<\/p>\n
 ti\ufb02c\ufb01was enli\ufb02xad to the judgment. and dtacrce and as<\/p>\n
   Courts below have not e<:)mmit:l3cd any crmr in that<\/p>\n
  1102' is t!:1\u00a2;-we any pclvcrszity in appmciatiug the<\/p>\n
V V   \ufb02cvidenoe tendered before them.<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
'a<\/p>\n
I9<\/p>\n
15. That being so, the  <\/p>\n
raised in this appeal are answc1ed’\u00bb’:’3g.\u00a7_ii\u00e9%t <\/p>\n
Accordingly, the appeal fails and <\/p>\n
no smdcr as to coats.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH comm’ or KARNATAKA AT ” DATED THIS THE 20th DA'{i{)F-{JUNE V BEFORE % %_ THE HC)N’BLE MR. Jugricn REGULAR SECQND BETWEEN: V \u00ab V 1 NAYAGAM . […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64131","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":2161,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008"},"wordCount":2161,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008","name":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr ... vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs ... on 20 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-02T10:54:50+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nayagam-since-decd-by-his-lr-vs-k-prakash-reddy-since-decd-by-lrs-on-20-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nayagam Since Decd By His Lr … vs K Prakash Reddy Since Decd By Lrs … on 20 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64131","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64131"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64131\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64131"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64131"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64131"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}