{"id":64207,"date":"2010-10-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010"},"modified":"2018-12-11T06:44:58","modified_gmt":"2018-12-11T01:14:58","slug":"r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMat.Appeal.No. 303 of 2009()\n\n\n1. R.JAYAN, S\/O.P.RAVEENDRAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.JAYASREE, D\/O.M.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKAR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :27\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                           R. BASANT &\n                   M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n             -------------------------------------------------\n                 Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C\n             -------------------------------------------------\n           Dated this the 27th day of October, 2010\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
Basant,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      This appeal is preferred by the appellant – father of a minor<\/p>\n
female child aged above 7 years aggrieved by the rejection of his<\/p>\n
petition for custody of his daughter. When the appeal was filed,<\/p>\n
the child was in the custody of the original respondent i.e., the<\/p>\n
mother of the child.      During the pendency of this appeal, the<\/p>\n
mother of the child expired and the child continued to be in the<\/p>\n
custody of the additional 2nd respondent i.e., the maternal<\/p>\n
grandfather of the child.          Interim arrangements regarding<\/p>\n
custody were sought and this Court by order dated 18\/8\/09 as<\/p>\n
modified by order dated 30\/9\/09 has made arrangements to<\/p>\n
ensure the visitorial rights of the appellant i.e., the father of the<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                               -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
child.       That arrangement has been continuing in force.<\/p>\n
Directions were issued from time to time regarding custody of<\/p>\n
the child during intervening vacations also.<\/p>\n
     2.     We have heard both counsel on merits in the appeal.<\/p>\n
The dispute now is as to whether the child must continue in the<\/p>\n
custody of the maternal grandfather i.e., the additional 2nd<\/p>\n
respondent or must be left in the custody of the father of the<\/p>\n
child i.e., the appellant.\n<\/p>\n
     3. On this crucial aspect we find no evidence has been<\/p>\n
adduced by either side before the court below.    The impugned<\/p>\n
order is one passed along with several other connected matters<\/p>\n
all of which have now become irrelevant.         On the precise<\/p>\n
question that arises for determination in this appeal now we<\/p>\n
found that there is crucial and vital lack of evidence\/materials.<\/p>\n
We requested the counsel and they also accepted that there is<\/p>\n
need to adduce evidence on the disputed questions for a proper<\/p>\n
consideration and disposal of the issue that has been raised in<\/p>\n
this appeal now.\n<\/p>\n
     4.     Accordingly, as directed by us, both sides have filed<\/p>\n
affidavits in lieu of chief-examination of the witnesses whom<\/p>\n
they want to examine.          Both sides have also produced<\/p>\n
documents in support of their respective contentions.      Both<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                               -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
counsel now agree that they do not want to adduce any further<\/p>\n
evidence than the chief affidavits and the documents produced.<\/p>\n
However, both sides request that the deponents\/witnesses who<\/p>\n
have    filed chief affidavits may be permitted to be cross-<\/p>\n
examined<\/p>\n
      5.   We are satisfied that for proper consideration and<\/p>\n
disposal of the issues raised in this appeal, which were not<\/p>\n
contemplated at the time when the court below passed the<\/p>\n
impugned order, parties must be permitted to adduce proper<\/p>\n
evidence.\n<\/p>\n
      6. What course is to be followed by this Court is the next<\/p>\n
question.   The learned counsel for the appellant submits that<\/p>\n
the court below may be directed to record the evidence in cross-<\/p>\n
examination and on the basis of such materials, this Court may<\/p>\n
dispose of the appeal.   That would mean that virtually on new<\/p>\n
materials the appellate court will have to take a decision.<\/p>\n
Having rendered our anxious consideration to the issue, we are<\/p>\n
satisfied that the appropriate and ideal course to be followed is<\/p>\n
to direct the court below to dispose of O.P.No.458\/07 afresh in<\/p>\n
accordance with law after considering the materials which the<\/p>\n
appellant\/father of the child and the additional 2nd respondent –<\/p>\n
the maternal grand father of the child want to rely on.     The<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                               -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
court below, we are satisfied, must be directed to dispose of the<\/p>\n
matter afresh on the materials after due cross-examination of<\/p>\n
the deponents\/witnesses. Aggrieved party can later come before<\/p>\n
this Court, if necessary. We are further satisfied that the court<\/p>\n
below must be given time bound directions to dispose of<\/p>\n
O.P.458\/07 afresh.    We are further satisfied that the interim<\/p>\n
arrangement stipulated as per the orders dated 18\/8\/09 and<\/p>\n
30\/9\/09 must continue to remain in force until O.P.No.458\/07 is<\/p>\n
disposed of afresh.\n<\/p>\n
     7. In the result:\n<\/p>\n
     (a) This appeal is allowed in part.\n<\/p>\n
     (b) The impugned order is set aside.\n<\/p>\n
     (c) The court below is directed to dispose of O.P.No.458\/07<\/p>\n
afresh on merits in accordance with law considering the nature<\/p>\n
of the contentions which the appellant and the additional 2nd<\/p>\n
respondent herein want to advance.\n<\/p>\n
     (d) As agreed by both sides, we direct that the evidence<\/p>\n
placed before this Court in the form of affidavits in lieu of chief-<\/p>\n
examination of the witnesses and the documents produced alone<\/p>\n
need be considered as additional evidence by the court below, of<\/p>\n
course, after giving parties opportunity to cross-examine the<\/p>\n
deponents\/witnesses.\n<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                               -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
     (e) The parties shall appear before the court below on<\/p>\n
15\/11\/10.   The court below shall proceed with the matter day-<\/p>\n
to-day and shall dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible –<\/p>\n
at any rate, prior to 10\/12\/10. Compliance shall be reported to<\/p>\n
this Court.\n<\/p>\n
     8.    The Registry shall forthwith send back the records<\/p>\n
including the oral and documentary evidence placed before this<\/p>\n
Court by the rival contestants in the form of affidavits in chief<\/p>\n
and documents.      They must reach the Family Court prior to<\/p>\n
15\/11\/10.\n<\/p>\n
                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                              R. BASANT
\n                                                 (Judge)<\/p>\n
                                                 Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
                                      M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS
\n                                                 (Judge)<\/p>\n
Nan\/<\/p>\n
                      \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n
                                                 P.S. to Judge<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                                  -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
                           R. BASANT &
\n                  M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n<\/p>\n
            ————————————————-\n<\/p>\n
                Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C\n<\/p>\n
            ————————————————-
\n           Dated this the 8th day of October, 2010<\/p>\n
                               ORDER<\/p>\n
Basant,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     We have heard both counsel. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
appellant prays that time may be granted to the appellant to<\/p>\n
adduce further evidence under Order 41 Rule 27 in the form of<\/p>\n
affidavits of witnesses.       We do certainly feel that further<\/p>\n
evidence may be necessary to resolve the controversy between<\/p>\n
the parties. In these circumstances, we permit both sides to file<\/p>\n
whatever further evidence they want to adduce of witnesses in<\/p>\n
the form of chief-affidavits before this Court by the next date of<\/p>\n
posting. Parties can request that such affidavits be received in<\/p>\n
evidence under Order 41 Rule 27              in view of the changed<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                           -: 7 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
circumstances.\n<\/p>\n
     2. Call on 18\/10\/10.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                         R. BASANT
\n                                           (Judge)<\/p>\n
                                  M.L. JOSEPH FRANCIS
\n                                           (Judge)<\/p>\n
Nan\/<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                                  -: 8 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
                          R. BASANT &
\n                     M.C. HARI RANI, JJ.\n<\/p>\n
            ————————————————-
\n               Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C\n<\/p>\n
            ————————————————-
\n           Dated this the 24th day of July, 2009<\/p>\n
                               ORDER<\/p>\n
Basant,J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
     The parties were referred to a Mediator; but after lunch,<\/p>\n
the Mediator has sent back a failure report to inform us that the<\/p>\n
mediation has not succeeded.\n<\/p>\n
     2. Parties are assisted by sublime counsel and the learned<\/p>\n
counsel agreed that it will be worthwhile for the Court to further<\/p>\n
pursue the efforts for a harmonious settlement.               We have<\/p>\n
therefore interacted with the parties separately and together<\/p>\n
and in the presence of their counsel.         We are happy to record<\/p>\n
that the parties have now come to some understanding about<\/p>\n
the interim arrangements for the next four weeks.            They have<\/p>\n
agreed as follows:\n<\/p>\n
     (1)  The    child    shall    be    taken     to   the  house  of<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                                  -: 9 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
Sri.T.B.Velappan Nair, the brother-in-law of the sister of the<\/p>\n
appellant on 26\/7\/09, 2\/8\/09, 8\/8\/09 and 16\/8\/09 by the<\/p>\n
additional respondent or his representative. She will be left at<\/p>\n
that house along with Leela – a maid attending on the child. The<\/p>\n
child shall be permitted to interact with the appellant herein as<\/p>\n
also his relatives till 5 p.m. on such dates.<\/p>\n
     (2) The child shall not be taken out of the residential<\/p>\n
compound of Sri.T.B. Velappan Nair and the child shall be<\/p>\n
returned to the additional respondent or his representative at<\/p>\n
5 p.m. on those dates.\n<\/p>\n
     3. Call this appeal again on 18\/8\/09 for further directions.<\/p>\n
The parties shall be present with the child on that date.<\/p>\n
                                           R. BASANT
\n                                             (Judge)<\/p>\n
                                          M.C. HARI RANI
\n                                              (Judge)<\/p>\n
Nan\/<\/p>\n
Mat. Appeal No. 303 of 2009-C
\n                         -: 10 :-<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Mat.Appeal.No. 303 of 2009() 1. R.JAYAN, S\/O.P.RAVEENDRAN NAIR, … Petitioner Vs 1. P.JAYASREE, D\/O.M.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKAR … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.GEORGE POONTHOTTAM For Respondent :SRI.THOMAS ABRAHAM The Hon’ble MR. Justice R.BASANT The Hon’ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS Dated […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64207","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1306,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\",\"name\":\"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010"},"wordCount":1306,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010","name":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-11T01:14:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-jayan-vs-p-jayasree-on-27-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R.Jayan vs P.Jayasree on 27 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64207","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64207"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64207\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64207"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64207"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64207"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}