{"id":64410,"date":"2007-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007"},"modified":"2016-08-13T09:24:06","modified_gmt":"2016-08-13T03:54:06","slug":"k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","title":{"rendered":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C) No. 28463 of 2007(L)\n\n\n1. K.M.JAYASENAN, S\/O. K.MADHAVAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,\n\n3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,\n\n4. THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.A.SHAJI\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.GIRI\n\n Dated :25\/09\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                          V.GIRI, J.\n          -------------------------\n               W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007 L\n          -------------------------\n         Dated this the 25th day of September, 2007.\n\n\n                        JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>         The petitioner is working as a Lay Secretary and<\/p>\n<p>Treasurer of the General Hospital, Alappuzha in the Kerala<\/p>\n<p>Government Health Services Department. He attained the age<\/p>\n<p>of 55 years as on 16.9.2007 and is due to retire on<\/p>\n<p>superannuation on 30.9.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>         2. The VIIIth Pay Revision Commission appointed by<\/p>\n<p>the Government submitted a report on 22.2.2006. One of the<\/p>\n<p>recommendations made by the said Pay Commission was<\/p>\n<p>extension of retirement age of the employees by another three<\/p>\n<p>years.  Apparently,    the    recommendations       have    been<\/p>\n<p>considered by the Government and Ext.P1 order has been<\/p>\n<p>passed. The petitioner specifically refers to Clause 4 of Ext.P1,<\/p>\n<p>which reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;4. The commission submitted its final report<\/p>\n<p>         to Government on 22.2.2006. After examining the<\/p>\n<p>         recommendations       of    the    Pay     Revision<\/p>\n<p>         Commission, the Government are pleased to<\/p>\n<p>         accept these in toto without any modification.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                             :: 2 ::\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          3.   Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.Shaji<\/p>\n<p>contends    that   on   the    Government      accepting   the<\/p>\n<p>recommendations of the Pay Revision Commission in toto,<\/p>\n<p>essentially, the Government has, therefore, proposed to<\/p>\n<p>enhance the retirement age of the employees from 55 years<\/p>\n<p>to 58 years. Relying on Ext.P1 order, the petitioner sent a<\/p>\n<p>representation to the Chief Minister. Apparently, it was<\/p>\n<p>forwarded to the Government and it was dismissed by Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>order, in which it is stated that no decision, as such, has<\/p>\n<p>been taken by the Government hitherto regarding the<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of the retirement age and therefore, it is not<\/p>\n<p>possible to accede to the request of the petitioner. Ext.P3 is<\/p>\n<p>another reply given from the Finance Department, which<\/p>\n<p>reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;With reference to the above, I am to inform<\/p>\n<p>          you that State Government have no intention to<\/p>\n<p>          enhance retirement age of employees.      Hence<\/p>\n<p>          Government regrets its inability to consider your<\/p>\n<p>          request.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          4. The petitioner has filed Ext.P4 representation to<\/p>\n<p>the Chief Secretary to the Government, in which referring to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                            :: 3 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\nthese factors, he requested the chief Secretary to look into<\/p>\n<p>the matter and to take necessary action to issue orders<\/p>\n<p>enhancing     the  pension  age     of  the  employees    as<\/p>\n<p>recommended by the Pay Revision Commission.<\/p>\n<p>          5. Mr.Nandakumar, Senior Government Pleader<\/p>\n<p>brought to my notice the judgment of a learned single Judge<\/p>\n<p>of this court in W.P.(C)No.8863\/06 dated 24.3.2006 and the<\/p>\n<p>judgment of a Division Bench in W.A.No.656\/06 dated<\/p>\n<p>30.3.2006, which inter alia, affirms the decision of the<\/p>\n<p>learned single Judge. A contention was raised in the said<\/p>\n<p>case that in the light of Ext.P1 Government Order, which<\/p>\n<p>purportedly accepts the recommendations of the Pay<\/p>\n<p>Revision Commission in toto, there is now, in force, a<\/p>\n<p>decision of the Government which contemplates to extend<\/p>\n<p>the retirement age from 55 years to 58 years.            This<\/p>\n<p>contention was considered and the Division Bench held as<\/p>\n<p>follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;The recommendations of the Pay Revision<\/p>\n<p>         Commission remains as recommendations and<\/p>\n<p>         even though the Government has accepted it in<\/p>\n<p>         toto, unless consequential changes are brought in<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                              :: 4 ::\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>\n          the Service Rules, it may not be possible for the<\/p>\n<p>          petitioners  to  contend   that  automatically the<\/p>\n<p>          retirement age of an employee is to be deemed as<\/p>\n<p>          different than that was laid down by the statutory<\/p>\n<p>          rules. The Government Pleader also points out that<\/p>\n<p>          any other view may not be possible to be adopted.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>           6. In my view, the substantial question raised in<\/p>\n<p>this writ petition, based on Clause (4) of the Government<\/p>\n<p>Order, stands covered by the decision of the Division Bench.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri.Shaji further contends<\/p>\n<p>that a decision taken by the Government to accept the<\/p>\n<p>recommendations of the Pay Revision Commission should<\/p>\n<p>be translated into an amendment in the statutory rules,<\/p>\n<p>especially Rule 60(a) of Part I Kerala Service Rules. After all,<\/p>\n<p>it is for Government to amend the said Rule. According to<\/p>\n<p>him, this aspect has not been correctly understood by the<\/p>\n<p>Government while passing Exts.P2 and P3, wherein the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner&#8217;s    request   was     rejected.   Essentially,  the<\/p>\n<p>government has not taken a policy decision as such.<\/p>\n<p>           7. I am unable to accept this contention. In my<\/p>\n<p>view, even if Ext.P1 order reflects that the recommendations<\/p>\n<p>of the Pay Revision Commission inter alia, as regards the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                              :: 5 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\nenhancement of the retirement age of the employees is to be<\/p>\n<p>accepted by the Government, it does not ipso facto result in<\/p>\n<p>enforcement of the decision to enhance the age from 55 to<\/p>\n<p>58 years. The prescription of the age of retirement in the<\/p>\n<p>statutory provision, obviously, must have preceded the<\/p>\n<p>decision of the Government to fix the age of retirement at 55.<\/p>\n<p>The prescription of the retirement age must have also been<\/p>\n<p>preceded by recommendations made by appropriate<\/p>\n<p>authorities and consideration of the same and deliberate<\/p>\n<p>decision by the Government to prescribe the retirement age<\/p>\n<p>of 55 years.    The acceptance of the report of the Pay<\/p>\n<p>Revision Commission by itself cannot be treated as a final<\/p>\n<p>decision taken by the Government to enhance the retirement<\/p>\n<p>age from 55 to 58 years. If Ext.P1 is, therefore, not treated<\/p>\n<p>as a final decision by the Government deciding to enhance<\/p>\n<p>the age from 55 to 58 years, there is no other material to<\/p>\n<p>indicate that there is a decision of the Government which will<\/p>\n<p>afford an enforceable right to the employees.<\/p>\n<p>          8. No doubt, Exts.P2 and P3 proceeded on the<\/p>\n<p>premise that the Government has not taken a policy decision<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C).No.28463 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>                             :: 6 ::\n<\/p>\n<p>\nto enhance the age from 55 to 58 years. In my view, the<\/p>\n<p>absence of felicity of expression in the order issued by a<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Secretary, obviously, cannot be laid at the door step<\/p>\n<p>of the Government.\n<\/p>\n<p>          For all these reasons, I find that there is no merit in<\/p>\n<p>the writ petition and the same stands dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                                      Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                (V.GIRI)<br \/>\n                                                 JUDGE<br \/>\nsk\/<\/p>\n<p>                    \/\/true copy\/\/<\/p>\n<p>                          P.S. To Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C) No. 28463 of 2007(L) 1. K.M.JAYASENAN, S\/O. K.MADHAVAN, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, 3. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, 4. THE DIRECTOR OF [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64410","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\"},\"wordCount\":976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\",\"name\":\"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007","datePublished":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007"},"wordCount":976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007","name":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-13T03:54:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-m-jayasenan-vs-state-of-kerala-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.M.Jayasenan vs State Of Kerala on 25 September, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64410","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64410"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64410\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}