{"id":64704,"date":"2008-07-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-03-22T08:26:39","modified_gmt":"2017-03-22T02:56:39","slug":"the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
 =    (age% 'i:\":\u00bb:'i__ SU\u00a3)ASi;i\u00a5\\N~,-----.'%BV.)\n\n1\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNA'fAKA_....__  \nCIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA '% :   '\n\nDATED THIS THE 23*\" BA.-'v\"OF\u00ab3t,_eL.\u00a5 2e\u00a7 8T.   \n\nBe\u00a7oas_ *   \nTHE HONBLE MR.JUS1fI\u20ac:_E 3Av\u00a2.:\u00a7r:  \nM F.A  \n\n \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nTHE B-RANCH MA:;~:.AGER - % \u00abV \nNEW INf}L*'3u5$.':'nSU:RA,f*\u00a3CZE c;0~. g;15::. \nBIJAPUR, Nsw REP. av   %\nREGIQNI-EL. MAu\\iAGE'fR,_\"'*    \n\nNew ZE\\iEiIA Ai5$U'FiA'NCE ca. 1.70.,\nFEVEGIQNAL.QFFICE__2==B,-- %\nUHITY BUiLDfP~\u00a7G~..  \nANNEXE, P%kkKAu:~5%G*AkRAo no\/an\n_BANG;ALCiR,E\u20ac2?~--._ \nA    A  AP-?ELi..ANT\n\n4%: \"\"\"KAfii*??i'S\u00a7\u20acxVE. s\/0 LALASAB KALAKERI\n NQW~AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS\n\u00a3)C\u00a72: COOLIE\n\n ~ i2kT%4%_:v1AsHAB1a\/0 LALASAB KALAKERI\n\n'--  NOW AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS\n\n%    FATIMA W\/O SAHEB PATIL\n\nNGW AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS\n\nALL R\/'0 ALAGUR,\n\n019\u00bb\n\n\n\nTALUK SINQAGI\nDIST: BIJAPUR\n\n4 EALASD, SIG KRISHNA SUTAR\nAGE: MMOR, QCC: BUSINESS    \u00e9\nR,\/O AVALI KHURD, TQ: RADHANAGARI \"  V'\nDIST: KQLHAPUR-416 005   \" \n\n  \n\nMi-'.A. IS FILED uis 39(1) '\u00e9F\"Iw.c.\"ACT\u00bb Pf<I.?a9fiIr~sg*.=;.I.'r}+Is \n\nHON?-LE COURT BE PLEASED "T9  ASIQE THE\nIIUDGMENT AND GRDER,DATED-----Z5;1.'2008 PFKSSEEQ' BY THE\nCOMMISSICENER FOR 'I*\\if}.Ri(f'iEf\u00a7i7S --.CQAM.?ENSAT'ION SUB-\nDI'v'N.i, BIJAF-'UR, IN VVCA\/SR4'3j9}*'2;G0'?I.;:I  I  _\n\ndeiivered the f\u00e9iicgwing    _ \n\n?his appaai comirag m':"f\u00e9'r=~7;\u00e9\u00a7j*1isg\u00a72~.i_g\u00a7;\u00a7".tij\u00a7:i\u00a7;" Bay, the court\n\nTfhe _ IE5  against the award in\nv\u00a2cA\/sRi39'z'a;7 w.._.\ufb01\u00e91s$\u00e9;\ufb01-Q"".::\u00bb'\u00a7r the Labour Officer 31\n\nCem\u00a7nivss\u00a7o:f\u00e9rI-fg_r"WeE%r:ni'en's Ccmpensatierrz on 25.1.2088\n\n c\u00e9mgxens\u00e9ii\ufb01n is the iegai representatives of the\n\nA '--de:';eaI$\u00e9i:\u00a7a{\u00e9rbip!.\u00e9'yee}.\n\n  .. xabgaeai has been iisted far admission, but\n\nI IV~IIf":i;:hs\u00a7der;im tine grounds uraed and by ctmsent cf the\n\n'  i\u00e9garned counsei, I have heart an merits.\n\nI 3. Anneai admitted.\n\nv (72\naw\n\n\n\n4 \nIn this regard, he relies on the caves' policy ta show':-h'at._\u00a7t\n\nforbids the vehicie being used far hire er reys%a}'\u00e9"'=a,jS_-T\n\naaiicy was issued under Misce\u00a7iana;d;;s_ and_.'s'pe\u00e9i'ai'T\u00a7pe  '* \n\nVehieies i}G\u00a7iC'Y. Ha wauid furthe:;'\u00bb._cdr;'te.1\ufb01:d"'that jthe"re-.w'a:aaA\n\nno basic proof that the decea\u00e9edwae wdrking'V:L$'r\u00e9.\u00a7%varV\u00a7h_\u00a7\u00e9  \n\nreseendent and hence, the  fiat have\niedged the ciaim. Ait:"a'raa'tivef;\u00a3yf.,"~~V.hja.A:"aabmits that the\nciaimant had faded ta :ahVdavf:V.thefy;.a'w'erevAided\u00e9endenta of t\ufb01a\n\ndeceased an4d3._ihe%}{e\u00a3;9a_, t\ufb01e awjuardaaa\u00e9'iiaj\ufb01sti\ufb01ed.\n\nF. Thee a_bfc.sve'V':\u00e9eatea,\u00a7i--ans'i\ufb01aai naceaaar\u00e9iy faii for the\nfeiidwiff\ufb01 f\u00e9.3S'dna:'  -  '\n\nT'r:a a4ssertid;a\\af'~i:\u00a7'ze ciaimants that Mauiaii was\n\n"".a.v_dri=..r\u00a7}  the \u00e9iharea\ufb01andant who drove the tracter, has\n\n 'tr.aaafa'rr:fted'va.\u00a7ht.e acceatabia evidence as the same is\n\ne':sa\u00a7t'az\ufb01:.i'a'{?;=2dV..a$; ecdiar and dacumentary evidence. The\n\n'VV_'ciai:iia.nfa' Vacuiar evidence that the deceased was\n\n'A :~ff'*:a\u00a7'xi;\u00a7ir;yed with the 4"' respondent finds fut: support from<\/pre>\n
  frcm which it is evident that \ufb01e was under<\/p>\n
 empiaymant of the 4″‘ respondent far a period of 4 years<\/p>\n
arecadind the date of the accident. This wduid aiso shew<\/p>\n
OW”\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nprivity sf cantrac\ufb01 er reiasticnshis :1? master and ser3ia.nt<\/p>\n
between 4*” respondent and deceased. It alsa  V.<\/p>\n
as an the date c:-f occurrence, the said reia:Vt_id’n:shijpVV:\u00a7\u00a7’\u00e9s\u00bb H<\/p>\n
subsisting and the deceased in fact:v*v\u00a7\u00e9s”‘t3’r\u00a7vv\u00a74na.;\u00abt\ufb01\u00a7\u00bb\u00abt;f\u00e9vct\u00e9r <\/p>\n
in questi\u00e9r: un\u00e9er the instrutftficjns \u00e9f fi2.e c3w.\u00a7:erii’nsu’h\u00e9d–~.. ”<\/p>\n
The fact of his driving the Sai\u00e9 “t-\ufb01tter i\ufb01 fu_?ft’ne..%*;
\ninvestigation papers w?:’\u00a7::%1_ “\u00a7tate\ufb01::ent cf
\nvarieu\ufb01 witnessa.  that the
\ndeceased d;edi%w%::ia argvingwet.wam%as ‘prrmf in stseif<\/p>\n
that he was\u20ac’5ri\u00a7;9i’rg.6V’f’he  S\ufb01jc\u00e9 it is not in diszmte<\/p>\n
that th\u00e9gvve_h!\u00a2i\u00a7’waV;;’\u00abown.\u00e9d…_by the 4%’ respendent and the<\/p>\n
a\u00a7peiiant’ha d.i:’is~2.:\u00ab1?\u00ab:e;e.?j’\u00a3\ufb01e’:’s\u00e9’id vehicle, if at aii anybe\u00e9y<\/p>\n
V coui;1.;jd’is9utefV \ufb01:,..__Vit’ ‘ia~:a\u00e9 o\ufb01iy the 43’ respondent. The 4″‘<\/p>\n
   notwf\u00e9ken part in the proceeding ara\ufb01 \u00e9i\ufb01<\/p>\n
 :*:\u00a7,-t’-‘__;:\u00a7is;::Vi;i’i:2’V_  the cieceased was empisyed by him.<\/p>\n
 _ Th\u00e9fafor__.=s;,’ 5\u00a7j’rAden was msre an the insurer in estabiish the<\/p>\n
 ,VL’.’sai\u00a2fi1_d\u00e9.-fer\u00a7ce. Therefcre, the gmund urged to the contrary<\/p>\n
 -_ th a’i; ~\u00a7.”\ufb01\u00e9’re was rm materiai ta show that deceased Moulaii<\/p>\n
  .,y\u00a7as empleyed by the 4″” respondent is untenable.<\/p>\n
a\ufb01\u00e9<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
:3\n<\/p>\n
8. The second ereund that the vehicie was hireeete<\/p>\n
semeene eise eee therefore, death of ivieuiai\u00a7~~~~*.%\u00e9e$’._”__’riejg”<\/p>\n
eevered under the eeiiey, eise needs reject\u00a3or:_,’t :_fe<;ea'i.i$eL'4_t::e'  <\/p>\n
eppelient has edreittediy iseued \ufb01\u00a7etV  e'ee.:_':peiie$;'V"\u00a7Ve ]<\/p>\n
iseuee to meet the stetutery Vrequirefner\ufb01: to  'iee <\/p>\n
enumerated under sectien 14?""ee:f_"the Aet.~.V_  said
\nemvfsien, every vehieive:4'need_eV'"te  jebmeuieefii\u00a73 insured
\nta cever the feiiewsne risgei   L A n<\/p>\n
'147. eeq,.ear\u00a2mem' \u00a2e '\ufb01e–av:\u00a7aLes' and limits of
\nliability:   * '   <\/p>\n
(1}~–\u00bb E%s'~Ve.er5'e:r.V.te–::t.e:fneiy\u00ab..w.E\u00bb'Eh the requirements cf
\n th'i~sV_..C!j:epte;,'\u00ab~.e poi\u00e9cy :3? insurance must be a
\n'– eeiicy .\\fe..hich"+:__.–. '<\/p>\n
"*.(e}_ is *issa.;ed by a pereon who is an
\n"  Veuthcri\u00e9ed insurer; and
\n{b} "\u00ab\u00a7zf1sur:ee the person or ciesses of persons
\n speei\ufb01ed in the poiicy te the extent
\n    speci\ufb01ee in sub-sectien (2)—-\n<\/p>\n
   against any iiabiiity which may be
\n  incurred by him in reseect 0:’ death of er
\nbodily injury to any persen {inciuding
\newner of the needs are hie eutherised
\nrepresentative carried in the vehicle er
\ndamage to any ereperty ef a third party
\ncaused by er arising eut of the use of the<\/p>\n
veh\u00e9cie in e eubiic piece:\n<\/p>\n
ii} against the death or bediiy injury to any
\npassenger ef e pubiic service vehicie
\ncaused by or arising out of the use of the
\nvehieie in e eubiic piece;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
–3<\/p>\n
(2) subject to the proviso to sub~se<:tIcn (:5), a
\npeiicy ef insurance referree to in subeectien
\n{1} shail cover any iiabiiity incurred in.vre:-ipect<\/p>\n
of any aceidere, up to the fal\u00a5ew.ir.e.g'_;.ii_feite;..A<\/p>\n
namely: _<\/p>\n
a) save as erevieed in cieuse(\u00a3:;V),”_”t.\u00a7}geeiere’ee2’1\u00a7f<\/p>\n
of iiabiiity incurred; V , –\n<\/p>\n
b} in reseeet ef demege see ‘any ‘efhe\u00b0\u00ab
\nthird party, a limit :>’E’z’u\u00a7.’}ee’s six th_euse:.!i::1?1.\/.:<\/p>\n
Previeed that any poiic\ufb01 ef.V.insu}’erV:’ce ise.\u00a7j1ed;”w\u00a7t.h–‘3an\u00a7 <\/p>\n
Eimited liabiiity and in fe7rer:Ve;\u00bb immeeI_i_ete\u00a7y before the
\ncemmeecemerat ef this____A’Ct, ‘shat? eentinue to be
\neffective fer a .;ireried\u00ab”Vof”\u00a3ejur’e’menths’Aafter such
\ncommencement erVe’t.iii’-.thi2jdetexefn expiry cf such
\npelicy whichever is em-:ee,r;*:  ”\n<\/p>\n
Thereff:>r’e’,* ‘::ei\u00a7\u20aci;2ief”*ef’*t\ufb01e ‘see\u00e9everevision, the insurance
\ncempei\ufb01yj \ufb01e  risk against the death :2?\n<\/p>\n
eodiiy injti\ufb01-.5 ..fevtii’e_’e?-:1eie’9iee ef the insuree which inciudes<\/p>\n
-“‘~._V_dri32_e\u00a7’r ;.i h;*i{_ ieeeer: ….  when the statute has provided<\/p>\n
 ‘ce\ufb01ea;2;;ivee’ry_'<\u00a7.:*\u00a7eu.rence eeverage in respect of bodily injury<\/p>\n
er. e'eeth'efj?i\u00e9e eriver, the insurerxce cemeany canrzet put<\/p>\n
veite fetce  wriggie out of the situaticm eniy er: the basis<\/p>\n
 "X_'~eAf 'it'e.pieedieg witheut eroef that it was hiree to semebeey<\/p>\n
'  egise.\n<\/p>\n
{\ufb01fe<\/p>\n
8 n\n<\/p>\n
9. The meet euestiere that needs cer*:sicieret\u00a7errg’_”;i_;=,,<\/p>\n
whether er the time :3? the accident, the victim. _<\/p>\n
emeieyrnent ef the insured and whefrraer he or  <\/p>\n
discharging duties assigned te hire b}!e’\u00a7ivirr4me -.bf*-<\/p>\n
emeieyment. It becemes imreeteriei.v\ufb01hether’V’%’1;;f;.;\u00a7-__Vjvefiiele <\/p>\n
was hired or used for private ssr::se\u00a2%Aer&\u00a2rtn%\u00a7rw:se . In the
\ninstant case, the undisae\ufb01ree er>nere’es frem the
\nrnateriai propesitien in \u00a7:he:–pleeeirr2e’sv:..eer\u00a7_—eeunter is that
\nwrziie ieedirre  ‘the”ea1rrier’:’xri’orti:en ef the tractor,
\neeceesee  1rrei’rer”cepsi2ed. He was at
\nthe reigeverrt Such injury and
\ncenseqLren_t”eeetrrreirs’-~s\u00a7u\u00e9re!y within the eefinitien of<\/p>\n
’eme\ufb01eyryjerrf V-.vi_rgj’ury’ V’er1d therefore, the ciairn was<\/p>\n
16..  Tr:’e’.V*”3i%3V.T’?irnissiener for workmerrs Cemeensetien has<\/p>\n
recere.eie.:.eV”\ufb02n\u00e9ine on fact on these aspects which is<\/p>\n
 “w.jej’\u00bbsieeperted by the materiai on recerd. The evidence<\/p>\n
‘  rgferrderee was erziy by the ciairnents and rm evieenee has<\/p>\n
 mfeeen rendered by the insurer er insured. Such \ufb01nding, I<\/p>\n
am satis\ufb01ee, rreeds FIG interference. Therefore, it has ‘re<\/p>\n
5315<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a7
\nbe ef\ufb01rrnee that the ciairnarsts hae estabiished the<\/p>\n
deceased was empioyed by the 43′ respondent and hedied<\/p>\n
during discharge of duties assigned to him.<\/p>\n
3.1. As reaards the conterxtien that the eie.\u00a7rhehi\u00a3\u00a7.7\u00a7vefe\u00ab.’ *<\/p>\n
not eeeen\ufb01ihe en the deceased,_the_4eiei.trieri’te’jv\u00bbhe’ve;_or:_ RV’<\/p>\n
their part terieered evidence ta s:tn\u00a7:w’:’_A_thet ‘they.:’wer\u00a7e:_,\/gj$t.i.<\/p>\n
eniv’ iiareximateiy’ retested te th.e”‘~tiece’e’s\u00e9:\ufb01 a_ruf:.:e\\tet.{“ieto5 the * L’<\/p>\n
ceteaery of deeeheehte. ae ae\ufb01iiea um: the_AAv’r5rki11en’s
\nCempensetien Act, bat i\u00e9reire e\u00abie:i\u00a7–.t;-.:>teiVi3g\ufb01eeehding er: him.
\nSuch eseertieh ir;a*e__het:i5eer::Theeet.ee  thsurer in any<\/p>\n
rrtersrser e:\u00a7c!:e;\u00a7it–“.Vfe_r’wfe’eh’ie__ suggestions made in cross-
\nexemihatteti. -Th’e–y’V “ithtV.beeh ehie te sah\/ace 3\u00a5”lY’\ufb01’:ii”s\ufb01<\/p>\n
in c\u00bbrese\u00abeexereit:eti’6’n or these witnesses to shew that the<\/p>\n
 V:’ste;teme’rite_vi”made by them were either feise er<\/p>\n
I tif\u00e9iihce their statements have trahsferrnee<\/p>\n
inte””–.ieeei’ etiidence to act when, the Corrirriissiener was<\/p>\n
 J’ri..eht ih”a\u00e9ceptihe their eiee that they were eetaeridents of<\/p>\n
 e.1’1tAi:\u00a7e”e’eceesed and were thus entitled te maintain the ciairn.<\/p>\n
3%??-\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
12.. Fer the reasons aferesaici, I find that the.’.\u00a7:\u00b0z?:i;}i.i\u00a7;j:1:e5:<\/p>\n
order is just, ereper and suffers from rm izifirrsi\ufb01y,   <\/p>\n
otherwise. Censeeuentiy, the egg:-;:ea\u00bb%–.is  -‘The-, V’<\/p>\n
impugned order is cersfirmed. In t i’2Ve\u00a3:.i_i*iium1s’?.;a ‘n<:es, <\/p>\n
is \u00a5'H3 erder ea te casts.\n<\/p>\n
vgh*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 Author: B.S.Patil = (age% ‘i:”:\u00bb:’i__ SU\u00a3)ASi;i\u00a5\\N~,—–.’%BV.) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNA’fAKA_….__ CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA ‘% : ‘ DATED THIS THE 23*” BA.-‘v”OF\u00ab3t,_eL.\u00a5 2e\u00a7 8T. Be\u00a7oas_ * THE HONBLE MR.JUS1fI\u20ac:_E 3Av\u00a2.:\u00a7r: M F.A BETWEEN: THE B-RANCH MA:;~:.AGER – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64704","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\\\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1263,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\",\"name\":\"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\\\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\\\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008"},"wordCount":1263,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008","name":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-22T02:56:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-branch-manager-vs-karimsab-so-lalasab-kalakeri-on-23-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Branch Manager vs Karimsab S\/O Lalasab Kalakeri on 23 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64704","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64704"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64704\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64704"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64704"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64704"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}