{"id":64858,"date":"2010-10-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010"},"modified":"2019-03-05T10:37:27","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T05:07:27","slug":"hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/7736\/2000\t 6\/ 6\tJUDGMENT \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 7736 of 2000\n \n\n \n \nFor\nApproval and Signature:  \n \nHONOURABLE\nMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n \n \n=========================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n1\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tReporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n2\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nTo\n\t\t\tbe referred to the Reporter or not ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n3\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\ttheir Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgment ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n4\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tthis case involves a substantial question of law as to the\n\t\t\tinterpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order\n\t\t\tmade thereunder ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\n5\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nWhether\n\t\t\tit is to be circulated to the civil judge ?\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n=========================================\n\n\n \n\nHEMA\nCHEMICALS INDUSTRIES - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nRAMKAILAS\nSAROJ - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================\n \nAppearance : \nMR\nVIMAL M PATEL for\nPetitioner(s) : 1, \nMR RD RAVAL for Respondent(s) :\n1, \n=========================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 07\/10\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nJUDGMENT<\/pre>\n
1.\tBy
\nway of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution
\nof India the petitioner management has prayed for an appropriate
\nwrit, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned
\norder dated 10\/04\/2000 passed  below Exh. 7 by the Industrial
\nTribunal, Vadodara in Permission Application No. 20\/1999 in Reference
\n(I.T.) No. 108\/1996 seeking approval to terminate the services of the
\nrespondent as required under Section 33(3)(b) of the Industrial
\nDisputes Act.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tAs
\nduring pendency of Reference  (I.T.) No. 108\/1996 service of the
\nrespondent were sought to be terminated and in fact an order came to
\nbe passed to terminate the service subject to the permission to be
\nobtained from the Industrial Tribunal, the petitioner submitted an
\napplication under Section 33(3)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act
\nseeking permission to terminate the service of the respondent and to
\nimplement the order of dismissal dated 11\/06\/1999.  It appears that
\nthe petitioner  wanted to withdraw Permission Application No. 20\/1999
\n  and, therefore, an application below Exh. 7 was submitted before
\nthe Industrial Tribunal permitting the petitioner to withdraw the
\nPermission Application, which came to be rejected by the Industrial
\nTribunal vide impugned order dated 10\/04\/2000 directing that the
\nPermission Application shall be decided on its own merits.  Being
\naggrieved and dissatisfied with the same the petitioner has preferred
\nthe present Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of
\nthe Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tShri
\nVimal Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner
\nhas vehemently submitted that as such it is the right and prerogative
\n of the petitioner to withdraw the Permission Application at any time
\n subject to the risk of withdrawing the Permission Application and
\nthe necessary consequences, which may follow on the basis of the
\norder of termination.  It is further submitted that suppose the
\nPermission Application is not submitted at all and the service of the
\nrespondent is terminated, in that case, necessary consequences of not
\nfollowing the procedure as required under  Section 33(3)(b) of the
\nIndustrial Disputes Act may follow.  It is submitted that merely
\nbecause the petitioner submitted  an application under  Section
\n33(3)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act and subsequently the
\npetitioner wants withdraw the Permission Application the Industrial
\nTribunal ought to have permitted the petitioner to withdraw the same.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tShri
\nRaval, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent has
\nsubmitted that  as the workman was entitled to subsistence allowance
\nfrom the date of Permission Application and\/or during pendency of the
\nPermission Application the right  is in their favour to receive
\nsubsistence allowance and, therefore, it is requested not to permit
\nthe petitioner to withdraw the Permission Application.\n<\/p>\n
4.1.\tShri
\nRaval, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent has
\nrelied upon the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of
\nJAIPUR ZILA SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK LTD. Vs. RAM GOPAL SHARMA
\nAND ORS. reported in 2002-I-LLJ
\n834 and has submitted that as
\nheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court not making application under
\nSection 33(2)(b) for approval, the order of discharge or punishment,
\nby dismissal or otherwise, of workman during pendency of industrial
\ndispute proceedings, withdraws  it are clear case of contravention of
\nstatutory requirement and, therefore, it is submitted that even if
\nthe petitioner is permitted to withdraw the permission application
\nunder Section 33(2)(b) of
\nthe Industrial Disputes Act the same would have effect of
\ncontravening the statutory requirement.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tHaving
\nheard Shri Vimal Patel, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the
\npetitioner and considering the impugned order and considering the
\nfacts and circumstances narrated hereinabove, it appears to the Court
\nthat the Industrial Tribunal has materially erred in not permitting
\nthe petitioner to withdraw the Permission Application submitted under
\n Section 33(3)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act.  Whatever
\nconsequences shall follow on terminating the service of the
\nrespondent during pendency of Reference (I.T.) No. 108\/1996, which
\nmay follow on non-compliance of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes
\nAct, the petitioner is ready to face the consequences and the risk.
\nHowever, when the petitioner is ready to face such a risk and
\nconsequences, the Industrial Tribunal ought to have permitted the
\npetitioner to withdraw the Permission Application.  Take a case in
\nwhich an employer  has not approached the Industrial Tribunal for
\npermission under Section 33(3)(b) of the Industrial Disputes Act and
\nterminates the services of the employee during pendency of the
\nReference and\/or dispute before the Industrial Tribunal and\/or Labour
\nCourt, in that case, such an action of termination during pendency of
\nthe Reference can be challenged by the respondent-workman.  In the
\npresent case, merely because the petitioner submitted Permission
\nApplication seeking permission to terminate the service of the
\nrespondent during pendency of the Reference and when subsequently the
\npetitioner wants to withdraw the said Permission Application with
\nwhatever risk that may follow in appropriate proceedings to be
\ninitiated by the workman challenging his termination on the ground
\nthat the same is in breach of Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes
\nAct and\/or on the ground that the Tribunal ought not to have
\npermitted the petitioner to withdraw the Permission Application
\nand\/or  on the ground that the respondent  might have some right of
\nsubsistence allowance etc. on that ground the prayer of the
\npetitioner to withdraw the Permission Application  cannot be
\nrejected.  As stated hereinabove, what would have been the position
\nin case where the petitioner had not submitted Permission Application
\nat all and terminated the services of the workman during pendency of
\nthe Reference.\n<\/p>\n
6.\tNow
\nso far as the reliance placed upon the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the
\ncase of JAIPUR ZILA SAHAKARI BHOOMI VIKAS BANK LTD. (Supra)  is
\nconcerned, as stated hereinabove, whatever be the consequences of
\nwithdrawal of Permission Application the same shall follow and it is
\nthe petitioner, who is taking the risk of such consequences.  The
\naforesaid decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court can  be relied upon
\nby the respondent at appropriate stage. However, the petitioner
\ncannot be restrained from withdrawing the Permission Application,
\nwhich it wants to withdraw unconditionally.\n<\/p>\n
7.\tIn
\nview of the above and for the reasons stated hereinabove, the present
\npetition succeeds and the impugned order passed by the Industrial
\nTribunal, Vadodara below Exh. 7 dated 10\/04\/2000 in Permission
\nApplication 20\/1999 in Reference (I.T.) No. 108\/1996 subject to the
\nconsequences that may follow on terminating the service of the
\nrespondent during pendency of the service, which may follow  under
\nSection 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act and without prejudice to
\nthe rights and contention of the workman challenging the order of
\ntermination\/action of the petitioner terminating the service of the
\nrespondent during pendency of Reference (I.T.) No. 108\/1996 is hereby
\nquashed and set aside.  Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid
\nextent.  No cost.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(M.R.\n<\/p>\n
SHAH, J.)<\/p>\n
siji<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 Author: M.R. Shah,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/7736\/2000 6\/ 6 JUDGMENT IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 7736 of 2000 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH ========================================= 1 Whether Reporters of Local Papers may […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64858","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nHema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1124,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010"},"wordCount":1124,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010","name":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-05T05:07:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/hema-vs-ramkailas-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Hema vs Ramkailas on 7 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64858","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64858"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64858\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64858"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64858"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64858"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}