{"id":64994,"date":"2010-11-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-06T01:21:15","modified_gmt":"2017-10-05T19:51:15","slug":"p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRCRev..No. 350 of 2010()\n\n\n1. P.S.BABU, AGED 58, S\/O. PANDARAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. G.KRISHNAN, S\/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNAN\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR)\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.JIJO PAUL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :24\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n             PIUS C KURIAKOSE & P.S. GOPINATHAN, JJ.\n             = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n                        R.C.R. NO.350 OF 2010 &\n                      = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =\n         DATED THIS, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010.\n\n                                 O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
Pius C. Kuriakose, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       Under challenge in this revision filed under Section 20 of Act 2\/65 is<\/p>\n
the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Thrissur, confirming<\/p>\n
the order of eviction passed against the revision petitioner under subsection<\/p>\n
8 of Section 11 of the Act. The need projected by the landlord in the Rent<\/p>\n
Control Petition, which is subject matter of the present revision as well as<\/p>\n
in two other Rent Control Petitions which the landlord had filed in respect<\/p>\n
of the adjacent rooms, was that he need the three rooms for the purpose of<\/p>\n
starting a hotel which will cater to the needs of the occupants of the lodge<\/p>\n
which he is conducting in the remaining portions of a three storied building<\/p>\n
as well as to general public. The above need was raised as a need for<\/p>\n
additional accommodation for personal use of the landlord who himself is<\/p>\n
conducting lodge in the other portions of the building. The bona fides of the<\/p>\n
need was disputed and it was contended that at any rate, the hardship to be<\/p>\n
caused to the revision petitioner\/tenant by granting eviction will outweigh<\/p>\n
the advantage of the respondent\/ landlord .\n<\/p>\n
       2. The evidence in the case consisted of Exts.A1 to A4 and PW.1 on<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                          2<\/span><\/p>\n
the side of the landlord and Exts. B1 and the oral evidence of RW.1 on the<\/p>\n
side of the tenant.   Court exhibits Ext.C1 commission report and the oral<\/p>\n
evidence of the Commissioner as CW.1. were also recorded.         The Rent<\/p>\n
Control court after evaluating the evidence on record, came to the<\/p>\n
conclusion that the need for additional accommodation projected by the<\/p>\n
landlord is a bona fide one. It was also concluded that the advantages<\/p>\n
which the landlord may acquire by getting an order of eviction will<\/p>\n
outweigh the hardship which the tenant may sustain, as the tenant is not<\/p>\n
conducting much business in the petition schedule premises and it had<\/p>\n
come out in evidence that other suitable buildings are available for the<\/p>\n
tenant in the locality.\n<\/p>\n
      3. The revision petitioner preferred appeal R.C.A. 67 of 2008 before<\/p>\n
the Rent Control Appellate Authority.     He also filed an application for<\/p>\n
issuance of a commission stating that the landlord has already started the<\/p>\n
proposed hotel and hence      the need as projected has been completely<\/p>\n
accomplished      and it is not necessary to confirm the eviction order.<\/p>\n
Considering the commission application, an advocate was appointed as<\/p>\n
commissioner who submitted Ext.C2 report. Ext.C2 report was to the effect<\/p>\n
that the landlord had     actually started a hotel. The learned Appellate<\/p>\n
Authority made a reappraisal of the entire evidence, which was made<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                           3<\/span><\/p>\n
available before the trial court, as well as Ext.C2. The Appellate authority,<\/p>\n
however, would confirm the findings of the Rent Control Court and<\/p>\n
dismissed the appeal.\n<\/p>\n
              4.  In this revision under Section 20 of Act 2\/65, various<\/p>\n
grounds     have been raised assailing the judgment of the Appellate<\/p>\n
Authority. Sri. Sreekumar would address strenuous arguments before us.<\/p>\n
He submitted that the one need which was projected in all the three Rent<\/p>\n
Control Petitions was that a hotel is to be started for the benefit of the<\/p>\n
occupants of the lodge conducted by the landlord. Since Ext.C2 will show<\/p>\n
that a fairly large hotel has already been started, the above need has ceased<\/p>\n
to exist. Since the need projected has ceased to exist, it is absolutely<\/p>\n
unnecessary to confirm the order of eviction passed against the revision<\/p>\n
petitioner.      Sri.  Sreekumar further submitted      that consideration of<\/p>\n
implications of the     proviso to sub-section (10) of Section 11 by the<\/p>\n
statutory authority was erroneous.      It was necessary that the statutory<\/p>\n
authorities weighed the advantages which will enure to the landlord by<\/p>\n
getting eviction against the hardship which will be sustained by the tenant<\/p>\n
and as that has not been done in this case, the impugned judgment is<\/p>\n
vitiated.\n<\/p>\n
       5.   All the arguments raised by Sri. Sreekumar were resisted by Sri.<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                           4<\/span><\/p>\n
Jijo Paul. He submitted that the need which was projected in the three Rent<\/p>\n
Control Petition was the need to conduct a hotel by utilizing the area of the<\/p>\n
three rooms which were the subject matter of the Rent Control Petitions.<\/p>\n
The biggest among the three rooms could be got vacated during the<\/p>\n
pendency of these proceedings. Once possession of that room was obtained,<\/p>\n
the landlord demonstrated that the need projected by him in the R.C.P. was<\/p>\n
bona fide by starting the hotel. But the hotel presently started does not have<\/p>\n
direct access from Kuruppam road, which is situated adjacent to the petition<\/p>\n
schedule room and the hotel presently has only the frontage of a lane. To<\/p>\n
prevent the landlord from getting possession of the room which is the<\/p>\n
subject matter of the appeals pending before the Rent Control Appellate<\/p>\n
Authority and the schedule room,      it is absolutely necessary to show that<\/p>\n
the landlord has accomplished the need projected in the three Rent Control<\/p>\n
Petitions fully and finally.    The learned counsel submitted         that the<\/p>\n
operation of the proviso to sub-section (10) of Section 11 has been correctly<\/p>\n
considered by the statutory authorities and accordingly, found against the<\/p>\n
tenant and there is no warrant for interference with those findings.<\/p>\n
      6.   We have very anxiously considered the various submissions<\/p>\n
addressed with reference to the judgment of the Appellate Authority as well<\/p>\n
as the order of the Rent control Court.       We have also considered the<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                            5<\/span><\/p>\n
pleadings to which our attention was drawn by the counsel.            As the<\/p>\n
jurisdiction in which we are presently sitting is revisional in nature, this<\/p>\n
Court does not normally reappraise the evidence for the purpose of<\/p>\n
deviating from the conclusions arrived at by the statutory authorities.<\/p>\n
Having gone through the judgment of the Appellate Authority, we are of the<\/p>\n
view that the reasons given are cogent and the findings are based on<\/p>\n
evidence available on record. True, as submitted by Sri. Sreekumar, it is not<\/p>\n
stated in so many words in the R.C.P. that unless there is direct access from<\/p>\n
Kuruppam road on which the petition schedule building is situated, it will<\/p>\n
not be possible for the landlord to conduct the proposed hotel. But then,<\/p>\n
when the landlord instituted three rent control petitions including the one in<\/p>\n
respect of the petition schedule building, the only one room which abuts<\/p>\n
Kuruppam road directly, it has to be taken that the landlord’s case is that<\/p>\n
unless he gets possession of the petition schedule building abutting the<\/p>\n
Kuruppam road, he will not be able to conduct the proposed hotel in the<\/p>\n
manner he needs. We notice from the judgment of the Appellate Authority<\/p>\n
that the said authority has critically analysed Ext.C2 commission report and<\/p>\n
found that merely because the landlord has started the proposed hotel, it<\/p>\n
cannot be said that the need has become completely accomplished. By<\/p>\n
getting possession of the room where the hotel is now functioning, the need<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                           6<\/span><\/p>\n
projected in the R.C.P. has become accomplished only in part. The said<\/p>\n
need will become completely accomplished if the landlord get possession of<\/p>\n
the present room also.\n<\/p>\n
       7. As regards the grievance voiced by Sri. Sreekumar that the proviso<\/p>\n
to sub-section (10) of Section 11 has not been considered, we are of the<\/p>\n
view that the above grievance is not at all relevant as Rent Control Court<\/p>\n
has considered all the aspects of the matter and the Appellate Authority has<\/p>\n
confirmed the findings of the Rent Control Court. The above discussions<\/p>\n
will lead necessarily to the dismissal of the Rent Control Revision Petition.<\/p>\n
       8. Since the learned counsel for the revision petitioner sought for<\/p>\n
grant of an entirely long period for surrendering peaceful possession of the<\/p>\n
petition schedule premises, we direct the execution court to keep in<\/p>\n
abeyance all proceedings for delivery, for a period of one year from today<\/p>\n
till 30.11.2011, subject to the following conditions:<\/p>\n
              The revision petitioner shall file an affidavit     before the<\/p>\n
execution court within a period of three weeks from today, undertaking to<\/p>\n
give peaceful surrender of the petition schedule premises to the respondent<\/p>\n
on or before 30.11.2011, undertaking further to discharge the arrears of<\/p>\n
rent, if any, within a period of one month and that he shall continue to pay<\/p>\n
occupation charges at the current rate without any default.      We make it<\/p>\n
RCR 350\/2010                            7<\/span><\/p>\n
clear that the revision petitioner will get the benefits of this order only if he<\/p>\n
files the undertaking within the stipulated time and the undertaking is<\/p>\n
honoured.    We further clarify that we have not expressed any opinion<\/p>\n
regarding the Rent Control Appeal pending before the Appellate Authority.<\/p>\n
                                                         PIUS C KURIAKOSE,
\n                                                                      (JUDGE)<\/p>\n
                                                          P.S. GOPINATHAN,
\n                                                                       (JUDGE)
\nknc\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RCRev..No. 350 of 2010() 1. P.S.BABU, AGED 58, S\/O. PANDARAN … Petitioner Vs 1. G.KRISHNAN, S\/O. LATE GOPALAKRISHNAN … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) For Respondent :SRI.JIJO PAUL The Hon’ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE The Hon’ble MR. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-64994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nP.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1437,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\",\"name\":\"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010"},"wordCount":1437,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010","name":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-05T19:51:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/p-s-babu-vs-g-krishnan-on-24-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"P.S.Babu vs G.Krishnan on 24 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=64994"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/64994\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=64994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=64994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=64994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}