{"id":65069,"date":"2009-01-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-31T04:30:12","modified_gmt":"2017-10-30T23:00:12","slug":"state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>               IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                           CHANDIGARH\n\n                                        Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008\n                                             Date of Decision: 15.01.2009\nState of Haryana\n\n                                                                   Applicant\n                                   Versus\nDayanand\n                                                                 Respondent\n\nCORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH\n        HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH\n\n\nPresent:    Mrs.Neena Madan, Addl.A.G. Haryana for the applicant\n                       .....\n<\/pre>\n<p>Jasbir Singh, J.(Oral)<\/p>\n<p>            Vide judgment dated 22.8.2008, passed by Additional Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge, Gurgaon, the respondent was acquitted of the charge framed against<\/p>\n<p>him.\n<\/p>\n<p>            By filing this application under Section 378 (3) Cr.P.C., it has<\/p>\n<p>been prayed by the State of Haryana that liberty be granted to file an appeal<\/p>\n<p>against above said judgment.\n<\/p>\n<p>            Heard learned counsel for the applicant.\n<\/p>\n<p>            It was allegation against the respondent that on 8.7.2007, he had<\/p>\n<p>hit Krishan Kumar (PW5) from behind, with a Car and had caused injuries to<\/p>\n<p>him. Prosecution&#8217;s story, as noticed by the trial Court in judgment under<\/p>\n<p>challenge, in paragraph No.2, reads thus:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;On 8.7.2007, one doctor&#8217;s ruqqa Ex.PE from Pushpanjali<\/p>\n<p>            hospital, Gurgaon was received in the police station regarding<\/p>\n<p>            admission of patient namely Krishan Kumar in the said hospital<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008                             2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>          on account of road side accident, on the basis of which, Mohd.<\/p>\n<p>          Hussain Head Constable P.S.Pataudi reached the hospital and<\/p>\n<p>          moved application Ex.PK regarding fitness of the patient to<\/p>\n<p>          make the statement. The doctor on duty declared the patient<\/p>\n<p>          unfit to make statement vide opinion Ex.PK\/1. On 9.7.2007, ASI<\/p>\n<p>          Jagdish Chand was present at Narhera turn on Bilaspur-<\/p>\n<p>          Pataudi   Road    alongwith    other   police   officials   when<\/p>\n<p>          complainant Mahender met him and submitted the complaint<\/p>\n<p>          Ex.PB with the allegations that on 8.7.07 at about 9 A.M. his<\/p>\n<p>          brother namely Krishan Kumar had gone to their fields to serve<\/p>\n<p>          tea to the labourers working in the fields. When he started for<\/p>\n<p>          the home and reached in front of the house of Sumer son of<\/p>\n<p>          Mohan Ram, he saw accused Daya Nand sitting in his Maruti<\/p>\n<p>          Alto Car while coloured. On seeing him, said Daya Nand came<\/p>\n<p>          out of his car and told him that he is purchasing the disputed<\/p>\n<p>          land of Laxman and asked him not to interfere in the deal failing<\/p>\n<p>          which he will teach hilm a lesson and kill him by crushing him<\/p>\n<p>          under his car.    He further alleged that similar threat was<\/p>\n<p>          extended Daya Nand four days ago when both of them had an<\/p>\n<p>          exchange of words. On hearing their noise, Sumer Singh came<\/p>\n<p>          out of his house and Daya Nand started abusing his brother<\/p>\n<p>          Krishan and Sumer pacified both of them as both belonged to<\/p>\n<p>          the same village. Krishan went towards his Gitwar and Daya<\/p>\n<p>          Nand also went away. After ten minutes, Daya Nand returned<\/p>\n<p>          while driving his car at a high speed and hit Krishan from the<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008                                3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             back side with an intention to kill him. On hearing the noise,<\/p>\n<p>             Sumer came out of his house, while he himself was already<\/p>\n<p>             present in his Gitwar.     Both of them came at the spot, but<\/p>\n<p>             accused Daya Nand fled away from the spot along with his<\/p>\n<p>             vehicle.   He as well as Sumer arranged a vehicle and took<\/p>\n<p>             Krishan to Narender Hospital, Pataudi, where he was given first<\/p>\n<p>             aid and was subsequently referred to Gurgaon for treatment.<\/p>\n<p>             They brought Krishan Kumar to Pushpanjali Hospital,<\/p>\n<p>             Gurgaon, where he is undergoing treatment. It has been further<\/p>\n<p>             alleged that accused Daya Nand tried to crush Krishan Kumar<\/p>\n<p>             under the speeding car with an intention to kill him.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             Injured was medico legally examined by Dr.Parbhat Kumar<\/p>\n<p>(PW4) on 8.7.2007 at 10.00 AM. Following injuries were found at his<\/p>\n<p>person:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             &#8220;1.   Facial laceration and lacerations over scale (right thigh<\/p>\n<p>                   parietal region forehead and left occipital region and<\/p>\n<p>                   right of upper lip lateral surface.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>             2.    There was crepts positive deformity positive over left<\/p>\n<p>                   lower leg, chest clear, CVS S1 and S2 normal per<\/p>\n<p>                   abdomen soft.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             As deposed by Dr.Sajender Kumar, Radiologist, on X-ray,<\/p>\n<p>fracture of fibula at mid soft region was found.<\/p>\n<p>             On receipt of intimation (Ex.PB\/2), formal FIR (Ex.PB\/1) was<\/p>\n<p>recorded against the respondent. In the meantime, the investigating officer<\/p>\n<p>ASI Jagdish Chand (PW8) went to the spot, got prepared rough site plan of<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the place of occurrence (Ex.PG). He went to the hospital to record statement<\/p>\n<p>of the injured, however, injured was declared unfit to make a statement.<\/p>\n<p>Statement of the injured was recorded on 12.7.2007. Statements of other<\/p>\n<p>witnesses were recorded on 13.7.2007 and 15.7.2007. Respondent-accused<\/p>\n<p>was arrested on 17.7.2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>             On completion of investigation, final report was put in Court for<\/p>\n<p>trial. Respondent pleaded not guilty and claimed trial. The prosecution<\/p>\n<p>produced oral as well as documentary evidence to prove its case.<\/p>\n<p>             On conclusion of prosecution&#8217;s evidence, statement of the<\/p>\n<p>respondent-accused was recorded under Section 313 Cr.P.C. Incriminating<\/p>\n<p>material existing on record was put to him, to which he pleaded innocence<\/p>\n<p>and false implication.     He took up a different stand by stating that an<\/p>\n<p>altercation had taken place between the injured and the accused, the<\/p>\n<p>respondent was sitting in his car and when he started moving the same,<\/p>\n<p>injured tried to pull him out of the car and in that process, he had fallen down<\/p>\n<p>and received injuries.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The Court below on analysis of evidence on record found<\/p>\n<p>defence version more probable and accordingly, acquitted the respondent of<\/p>\n<p>the charge framed against him.\n<\/p>\n<p>             After hearing counsel for the applicant, we are not inclined to<\/p>\n<p>interfere in this matter. Finding given by the trial Court is perfectly justified.<\/p>\n<p>By taking note of injuries on the person of PW5, the trial Court has rightly<\/p>\n<p>opined that he could not have suffered the injuries, in the way, in which those<\/p>\n<p>were shown to have been caused in FIR. It was observed as under:-<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008                             5<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>          &#8220;As per version of PW5, once co-villager Sumer Singh<\/p>\n<p>          separated them after they had an exchange of words, he started<\/p>\n<p>          going towards his house while accused also went away, but<\/p>\n<p>          accused returned in his car and hit him from the back side when<\/p>\n<p>          he was walking on the kaccha portion of the road. PW6 also<\/p>\n<p>          deposed that accused came in his car driving it at a high speed.<\/p>\n<p>          PW5 also deposed that accused hit him from the middle front<\/p>\n<p>          portion of the car and he fell on the ground with his face<\/p>\n<p>          towards the ground and he suffered injuries on his forehead,<\/p>\n<p>          middle of head near eye, leg back of right shoulder and right<\/p>\n<p>          hip. As per MLR Ex.PD, PW5 suffered fracture in left lower leg<\/p>\n<p>          besides lacerations on face, scalp forehead right parietal<\/p>\n<p>          region, left occipital region and upper lip. Stand of the accused<\/p>\n<p>          is that they had an altercation and exchange of words while he<\/p>\n<p>          was sitting in the car and when he started moving the car, PW5<\/p>\n<p>          tried to pull him out of the car and fell in the process resulting<\/p>\n<p>          in the injuries in his left lower leg and face. However, I am of<\/p>\n<p>          the view that PW5 must have suffered injuries of greater<\/p>\n<p>          magnitude and he would have certainly been crushed under the<\/p>\n<p>          car, had the car hit him from behind at a high speed with its<\/p>\n<p>          front middle portion, whereas, he suffered fracture in the left<\/p>\n<p>          lower leg which shows that his left leg must have come under<\/p>\n<p>          the tyre of the car, when he was running alongwith car in order<\/p>\n<p>          to pull out the accused. The seat of injuries suffered by PW5<\/p>\n<p>          Krishan thus probablise the defence version.&#8221;<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008                               6<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>              The trial Court has also noticed that there was a delay of 32<\/p>\n<p>hours in lodging the FIR, which the prosecution has failed to explain. It is<\/p>\n<p>true that initially, PW5 Krishan Kumar, the injured was not fit to make the<\/p>\n<p>statement, on certificate given by the doctor, his statement was recorded on<\/p>\n<p>12.7.2007. As per prosecution&#8217;s version, PW6 Mahender had also seen the<\/p>\n<p>occurrence.    Admittedly, he brought the inured to the hospital and was<\/p>\n<p>available throughout. However, he did not make any attempt to report the<\/p>\n<p>matter to Police. It has also come on record that when the injured was<\/p>\n<p>admitted in the hospital, it was intimated to the doctor that it was a case of<\/p>\n<p>vehicular accident. PW6 has specifically stated that he had seen the police in<\/p>\n<p>the hospital, despite that his statement was not recorded. The trial Court has<\/p>\n<p>also noticed that motive to cause injuries was not very strong. There is no<\/p>\n<p>independent corroboration to the prosecution&#8217;s story.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>              Counsel for the applicant has failed to show any misreading of<\/p>\n<p>evidence on the part of the trial Court, which may necessitate any<\/p>\n<p>interference by this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n                                            (Jasbir Singh)\n                                               Judge\n\n\n\n15.1.2009                                    (Jora Singh)\ngk                                              Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc. No.579-MA of 2008 Date of Decision: 15.01.2009 State of Haryana Applicant Versus Dayanand Respondent CORAM:- HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE JORA SINGH Present: Mrs.Neena Madan, Addl.A.G. Haryana for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65069","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1409,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009"},"wordCount":1409,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009","name":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-30T23:00:12+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-vs-dayanand-on-15-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana vs Dayanand on 15 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65069","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65069"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65069\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65069"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65069"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65069"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}