{"id":65120,"date":"2009-01-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-01T17:07:24","modified_gmt":"2016-06-01T11:37:24","slug":"the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALVKJRE\n\nDATED THIS THE 5\"' DAY or 3ANUAR\\jV.,2.')(J_A$t9__'__*:'f  \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE . : :.R,KoMARA'ssM.nM\ufb02?...._7\n\nMISC. FIRST APPEAL.\u00bbi\\:.Q,22A3A1V_\"OF   l\n\nBETWEEN\n\nThe Divisional Manager; _  > V  AA \nThe New India AssuranceCo.,' Ltd\u00ab._,V'<[f~. \nJLB Road, Charr2undlou'r'arf'l, " 1 f\nMysore.   2;   " "\nBy its Reg__ional f),f.fic'e,_'    ..  V .\nI\\lo.2--E3, Un_itYjBuilding's\u00bb'.'An'rveAxe';'\u00bb. \nP. Kaii_n.ga__R'a_o 'R<:')_.ao,~\u00bb._'  l  \n(Missiaon Roao_),_A     E\n\nBa ngal\u00e9-ore\u00a5550"O:'2A.7A  _  " __\nR\u20ac[3|"\u20acS\u20ac\ufb02.t\u20acd by'-it"s" ..  '\nRegional |Vranagel:.   Appellant\n\n *  _ ('By B  Rajo ,"a"dv.)\n\n1.   Naik,\nS\/o Srlshivanak,\n\n* "Aged about 33 years,\n ' ..jn'V\u00bbRes":\u00ab.:;ling at Sindhuvalli village,\n " " _ ' =!\\\u00a3a~n;'anagudu Taluk,\n'  Mysore District.\n\n5\/\n\n\n\n2. Sri Krishna,\n\nS\/0 Sri Naganaiak,\nResiding at\n\nSindhuvaiii viiiage,\nNanjanagudu Taiuk,\nMysore District,\n\n(owner of the iorry bearing\n\nRegistration. No.Ji<A-30\/22). i\u00e9espowoerurys = in\n\n(By Sri Nagaiah for R~1,  .\n\nThis Misceiianveous _'Fir_s:t*~..._Ap'p.eaI fiied under\nSec.30(1) of WC. Act ,ag'a_ir}:si; fhfenwjudgment dated\n26\/12\/2007 passed in"WCA\/i\\[FC\/'-CR5No.17\/2007 on\nthe fiie of La'bourfOff'icer.,"and -Commissioner for\nWorkmen C2oni';iie'ns.a'tioin," |V_I'yso*rei*----~~f;)istrict, Mysore,\nawarding 5'3 \u00ab.com':peri-s\u00a3I,_ti'on"7_of .Rs.1,63,3-44\/-- with\ninterest at 1.2"'?\/.o;r',p.a; '    \n\nT.his_ J\\x4xis'ce.\u00a5.5_an,eo.4,js~.._First Appeal Coming on for\n\nadmission' this_day:,.Vtihe_:i'C,o;.:rt delivered the foiiowing:\n\n  gmji o G M E N T\n\n'iMiis\u00a7_eilaneous First Appeai is fiied under\n\nSeAct_i_Vonv_.~3C_)!'('.V'1Ai) of the Workmen's Compensation Act\n\nR"'"us:"agains.tr.-the Judgment dated 26\/12\/2007 passed in\n\n4'_',._'W:CrA.,i'NFC\/CR No.17\/2007 on the me of the\n\nA -Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Mysore\n\n2\/\n\n\n\nawarding compensation "of Rs.1,63,344\/-- with interest\n\nat12% per annum.\n\n(2) With the consent of learned \n\nappellant as well as learned counsel fci'rV''res;jfondents,.t 2'\n\nthis matter was heard on  \ufb01e'\n\nplaced before the Court are--s't}~ff\u00bbicie'ntV..to--dlispVos4e' 'of': the 2'\n\nmatter at this stage, \n\n(3) Parties w\u00e9fl  referred ttQ_it--h_'.:Vrle'ference to the\n\nstatus.~i'ri'i'*tliA\u00e9; Clio"-\u00a7t;::e*--t'. "off-Comrn\u00e9svsioner for Worl<men's\n\nC0mpeVn.satiori..   V\n\n VTAheA'"c'a~sel of the ciaimant before the\n\n Workmen's Compensation is as\n\nunder:,.'2\n\n 22 '"a__Cla\u00e9mant was working as a Hamafi under the\n\n'  elmpioyment of Respondent No.1. On 27.12.2006 near\n\n Eiigigere on Nanjangucl-Ooty-Mysore Road, the lorry\n\n(7.\/\n\n\n\nbearing l\\EO.\u00a7<A--18--9999 met with an acciden.t'.',:.'_"_V1n\n\nthe lorry the claimant was discharging \n\nHarnali under the employment of Res--ponfjent:::No.1:l  \n\nDue to the accident, the c!a_im:a'n..t' hasjwstlizi-.i.n't2:4:i;\n\ninjuries. Claimant was aj_e*:l_about' 33 &,?.eaVr_s\u00ab---and her."\n\nwas drawing salary of Rs.4,A(_3..\u20ac)uVCAi;'.: per mor'.--th. \n\n(5) Respondent  vehicle in\nquestion,  fi:EedX_a"ny.j_4'e:t\u00a7jxe'c'tions to the claim\npetition   for Worl<men's\n\n  \n\n_(v6) i"'TheV.V",secvoridiV respondent -- Insurance\n\n 'has i'ile'd'"the objections statement in the\n\nt...Cc\\urtc' oi?-\u00ab._cCoVrarnissioner for Worl<men's Compensation\n\nderi-ying'the?'averments made in the claim petition.\n\nit Vh"~\u00ab_i(7) The sum and substance of the findings of\n\n  the learned Commissioner for Wor\u00a5<men's\n\n Compensation are as under:\n\n6\/!\n\n\n\nThe Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation\n\ntaking the wages of the claimant at Rs.3,0Q0}f=..i_:'_p.er\n\nmonth and considering his age as \n\nadopting the relevant Factor of__i2..O.1,66:'a"nV'd*:'asses'sing_V \n\nthe loss of earning capacity at-i4Ef_%" \n\ncompensation of Rs.1,63,VLl'%:4E\u00a5\/4:\u00bb  x l' V\n\n45\/100). _\n(8) Feeling aggrillei\/_ed"i3.y;"the appellant\n\n, Insurance :(Zohjp.an3i?_A  thils appeal.\n\n   learned counsel for the\n\nappeliant ?9=IIf_iVsLI.iT.'c*inC'vE' 'Company as well as the learned\n\n"'\u00ab..,cQLgitplses\/i..oifor_Res'po'ii'd'ent No.1 i.e. claimant, Though\n\nll'-_n"ot.ic'e on the Respondent No.2, he\n\nrem..aine~d absent.\n\nit  x_;l"'*~\u00ab_i(10) Learned counsel for the appellant submits\n\n that it is in the evidence of the doctor that the\n\n claimant has suffered disability of 32.5% to the whole\n\n2\/\n\n\n\n(1\n\nbody. Whereas the Commissioner for Workmen's\n\nCompensation has assessed the loss \n\ncapacity at 45% instead of 32.5%.\n\n(11) Learned counsel for'-.V_A.theC.'v_--v_.Aresp'.ontfi'ent'~,\n\nsupports the impugned V.\n\n(12) I have V  the records\nincluding the ej\\:iid_enc;:e1i;;'e'arned counsel\nfor the  the evidence of\nthe doctor.'V.tt:;Vat;\u00e9:'the  suffered disability of\n32.50\/iitof the  Whereas the Commissioner\n\nfor Workm'"'enV_"s Comperisation has assessed the loss of\n\n c'a.oacity"""'a'tV 45% eventhough the disability\n\n doctor is 32.5% to the whole body.\n\nThere i__s'for*ce in the submission of the learned counsel\n\nthe-Cagapeliant. It is not in dispute that the\n\nrc_:ia'imant has suffered disability of 32.5% tothe whole\n\n "body. Therefore since the disabiiity suffered by the\n\n5\/\n\n\n\n V.  _yfoIioCrvi:j-g:  A.\n\nclaimant is 32.5% to the whole body, in my \n\nioss of earning capacity wiii be equal to \n\nage of the ciaimant is 33 years and there\u00bbfojf'~e:'iieieyanitv \n\nfactor appiicabie is 201.66. Th_erefofe'tith'.e..'\u00a2ii3'i"rnja.nt~is\n\nentitieci for a compan_sa_tion"'-i.'ofV \n\n(Rs.1,800 x 201.66 x 32.5\/iota).i.ct_niis*\u00abcampensation\namount bears interesbat from one\nmonth fromynthe   by the\nCommission\u00a7e\ufb01_Viior:7__\\i\\i:oit.i{r*nen'yfsi\u00ab'c_;C%comVpensation tiil the\n\ndate 53.;   '\n\n_(13i''I-nV'vieVw o'f:ti3"e above discussion, I pass the\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 1. uThisa.M.iVs.ceiianeous First Appeal is aiiowed in part.<\/p>\n
 “‘T.he” compensation amount of Rs.1,63,344\/– as<\/p>\n
iiiaiyvarded by the Commissioner for Workmen’s<\/p>\n
Compensation is reduced to Rs.1,17,971\/–.
\ne,\/<\/p>\n
Lr<\/p>\n
” .\n<\/p>\n
The claimant is entitled for interest at :;.>\u00b0,?:.\u00a7f~.\u00a7;5’e.r<\/p>\n
annum from one month from” the <\/p>\n
adjudication till the date of pa”y>ment\u00ab.”‘”= –:.1f_~, <\/p>\n
The excess amount, if,any,’t*sAn’a._!.! <\/p>\n
the Insurance CompanqY*….4,:”‘~..e\u00bb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALVKJRE DATED THIS THE 5″‘ DAY or 3ANUAR\\jV.,2.’)(J_A$t9__’__*:’f BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE . : :.R,KoMARA’ssM.nM\ufb02?…._7 MISC. FIRST APPEAL.\u00bbi\\:.Q,22A3A1V_”OF l BETWEEN The Divisional Manager; _ > V AA The New […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":102,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\",\"name\":\"The Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009"},"wordCount":102,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009","name":"The Divisional Manager The New ... vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-01T11:37:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-manager-the-new-vs-sri-nagendra-naik-on-5-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Divisional Manager The New … vs Sri Nagendra Naik on 5 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}