{"id":65392,"date":"2009-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009"},"modified":"2015-06-24T18:22:53","modified_gmt":"2015-06-24T12:52:53","slug":"smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
WVK'h)k'\ufb01H'Wl v<|k0K"0W'mFl' ~zm'MwmwHw.I Wm mwwmwmmmmm swawm %Mx\u00e9'%4.\u00e93':'f\u20ac\u00a3 WE" gmwwmz\ufb01m\ufb02. M\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 \u20ac;:m.M%"\n\n-1-\n\nIN THE HIGH $IRTCJF KAHQITAKA AT \n\nmmn was ma: mm my 01? Avatar,    L  A % \n\nBE\u00abF%\n\nTEE HOWELE MR. .JUs'r1cE AS;HA<\u00a7I{"B.; ramc3::<31ak1;1:k'k  J \n z IQ-3.1049    "\n\n\u00a7 \n1.<\/pre>\n
 SHI1 <\/p>\n
 am.\n<\/p>\n
‘ e3i’t:r.I…1\u00bbfrE <\/p>\n
W\/owrz Pm*wAH ~<\/p>\n
Aem ABOUT aoynam     %<\/p>\n
. sax. Rammf <\/p>\n
szommmmm
\nmam s.m;~m* ” V    <\/p>\n
. sax.   ”\n<\/p>\n
sgowrz
\nAc;mrABo:.r’r  % %<\/p>\n
. a1z1.s1::m-\n<\/p>\n
SIG
\nA9353)  34; mm<\/p>\n
V’ – 1. 5532- swam<\/p>\n
. axe; mm\ufb01aonmmn<\/p>\n
S] Q 5&1; \u00a2BIC <\/p>\n
 5:31:13 Msowr so mam<\/p>\n
 agi\ufb01snmrnanaxan
\n22316331. cmcm\ufb01mvmmmm\ufb01<\/p>\n
1′!;GEB ABOUT 59 YEA%<\/p>\n
SR1. \u20acHm <\/p>\n
:3\/(:2 mm nrazmwsmzz
\nAGED ABOUT 65 1%<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n.3
\nz
\nE
\nz<\/p>\n
E
\n3<\/span>
\n\u00a7
\n:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7
\nE
\n3<\/span>
\n3<\/span>
\n;%<\/p>\n
eznv mew–omva.wu, 44 aegwwm gr<\/p>\n
__wmmm mm mm<\/p>\n
-mam. \u00bb<\/p>\n
{BYSRL K.R.   ”\n<\/p>\n
ALL ARE RESIIDENT QF
\nBEHIND sammx mam,
\nREARAGEAHARA Lmrmnmamsz<\/p>\n
EB<\/p>\n
1..\n<\/p>\n
am. DODDAHONNAIAH     <\/p>\n
9.10 am. HARAIAH
\nAGED ABOUT 72 mans
\nRmammrr ox: AGRAHAM; .
\ncuannm mm.  _ <\/p>\n
. SMT. S <\/p>\n
wyomm
\nAGEnaaoUfr–.\u00a75′::.VEme;.
\nR]A’I’EEIi1′,Bl’I3 _
\nNEARAGRAH&R\u00a3\u00a7_.(BEJ\ufb02\\atlEAHE]; 5<\/p>\n
am. M    * 3
\nago
\nAGED  23 ‘r”E.ARi3 \u00ab
\nR;A’mEHmI:sHmtw’v1HAm
\nmmiaamaam <\/p>\n
 ‘sg:;’Ls\u00a7;i.f$ gH’M.ari’%’   1.n<\/p>\n
s;%aIA”m1aA;9AG1 CHICKAHANUHAIAH,
\nAGED Amm’ 45 ‘mm,
\nn1A:t: 33:11:13!) SHEHU mam,<\/p>\n
‘V NEARA{\u00a7rRAEARA (BEEDMAREL<\/p>\n
3  3 mrmwa.\n<\/p>\n
RESPOHDENTS<\/p>\n
   2 To 4 ARE Rmmcmn vms
\n  fcoyzrrrr cmmax mmn 20.3.2009)<\/p>\n
wk\u00e9ki<\/p>\n
-3″\n<\/p>\n
Tluigs Writ Petition is \ufb01led under Articles 225 and 227
\ncf the Camtitutison of Imia. prayixg to issue: a  of
\ntzertinrari quashing tm  order dated
\npassed by the Court of the Principal Civil Judge”–(\u00a2}’r.;E)vz:.)<\/p>\n
and JMFC Tumkur in 0.8. Ho.175l1999 2-,\u00a7sI*Lt_
\nAr ‘E’ and tmreby allow the app1ia1:io3.1__\ufb01led. my the ”
\npeti5m:m seeking idment af  vcri;:txez1jj’V:;t\u00a3:he’.t;::~:nt; <\/p>\n
This Petition mam’ an to:   <\/p>\n
1mdet}:1afoI1ow\u00a5q:* _
\n0 n, <\/p>\n
Though the   ..qrdm7<\u00a7af\u00a7gory, it Tm
\nmm 11;: for  of the 1mm<\/p>\n
eammel for      ~ <\/p>\n
2.   chanme to the ordex,
\ndated  the Court of Principal” ‘ Civil<\/p>\n
_ Judg\u00a7.; {J\u00a3.I3!’i.)”‘  at Tumkur an LA. far<\/p>\n
  written stnmm\ufb02; in 0.5’ Nt:a.1’75I1999.<\/p>\n
  % jV%%%gmo,1 m\u00a2c1,t;’ne amt agaizmt the peutmm-s am amm for the<\/p>\n
44    declaradan and pmsessian of the suit schedule<\/p>\n
.   Considerim may pleadirm. the Trial wart
\n H<\/p>\n
wu\u00bb..uvm~o\u00abx.w-wa.w.<w. rs..mxmH3a wwmm: WE' \u00a7"o'.49"*\ufb01a%\u00a7'cW5'"\u00a7\u00a3\u00e9"*'~\u00a7?'Mf"'i; W\ufb01wm %%JW\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7 W?"   <\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
framead the issues. Both the par\ufb01w have eory:ludM.–!:1\u00bbxei1-
\nsides nfevidexweam\ufb02wmattm is aetdownfor <\/p>\n
At that stage, the petit\ufb01onara made: an    <\/p>\n
 t ef the writtnn atahamezlt   _ <\/p>\n
pha of adverse pmseasion. Thc   <\/p>\n
ma’ LA. by its order dated 91.03.2999. _ M A<\/p>\n
by tin sazm, thk petition <\/p>\n
4. Shri     3.13:? the petitioners
\nsubmits   can be \ufb01ied and
\n:.mt::rta11′   that the Trial Court
\n2.5 mt   the LA. homing am the<\/p>\n
j       i: with the Trial Court in the speedy<\/p>\n
 ..    win mica the axne\ufb01\ufb01nt at’ the pleadizw<\/p>\n
  mm ofthse vial has to was two rats:<\/p>\n
EEK<\/p>\n
_ 5 _\n<\/p>\n
(a) dmpite the exerc\ufb01e of due dilgexxee, appllm\ufb01en far
\n t could mt be tram <\/p>\n
ocrnmememmt of the trial and<\/p>\n
controversy between the <\/p>\n
6. I am maid in the insmnt   <\/p>\n
no pmitinn to pass any of  __ 51′ <\/p>\n
a\ufb01davit \ufb01lm: in aupportpf     the
\nmm.-.;.m\u00b0 afdue d1″hgem:e’     The<\/p>\n
  of discussions. they<\/p>\n
%ed’  19$ ‘  fuck are Iaa\ufb01: mzt in the<\/p>\n
 ‘a1:_ate& V  Dike  ‘ ‘ nae means persistent &rt<\/p>\n
1’-“\u00ab”V’~’*i   ‘N-111118;’  “” reaso ”  liable in a prudent manner.<\/p>\n
2  _7.  A\u00e9f adverse poaweaien mm contrary ta the<\/p>\n
 joint mmhip and posmsion made in the<\/p>\n
 statammt. nam\ufb01am, the same is irmomm with<\/p>\n
T   What in atntw in the written statemen1:..<\/p>\n
FIE!<\/p>\n
WWW HWWH Mrww\ufb01ww ‘wee :zw%wa=A\u00bb3;mym.rrwm &fM~WM tewwwma WE” \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01k\ufb01 WIWW kww\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
8. ‘The stage at which this LA. is \ufb01led, di3cnt3tLeg–.__t1’w<\/p>\n
penmxmm get it albwed. In the 1:’er::1.e:m: judgmgg-f;\u00a7\u00a7V:\u00a7\u00a7’s\u00a7’t1:ieV
\nSupreme Court in the ma <31' vmvasar Am)  &
\nPAI}MALA'I'HA mm ANOTI-ER   x
\n399, it is new that the Trial j
\namaezzdment am mt su\ufb01er  ;gm~@ =   or A %<\/p>\n
er:-ax' at' Law and that the    such
\nan ordm is impropm*. In  \ufb01lsn\u00e9.    '\u00a315m petitzinxa.
\nNo order as to co;its}gf"      V. <\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
IUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri WVK’h)k’\ufb01H’Wl v<|k0K"0W'mFl' ~zm'MwmwHw.I Wm mwwmwmmmmm swawm %Mx\u00e9'%4.\u00e93':'f\u20ac\u00a3 WE" gmwwmz\ufb01m\ufb02. M\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02 \u20ac;:m.M%" -1- IN THE HIGH $IRTCJF KAHQITAKA AT mmn was ma: mm my 01? Avatar, L A % BE\u00abF% TEE HOWELE MR. .JUs'r1cE AS;HA<\u00a7I{"B.; ramc3::<31ak1;1:k'k J z IQ-3.1049 " \u00a7 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65392","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSmt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":683,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009"},"wordCount":683,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009","name":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-06-24T12:52:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-ramakka-vs-sri-doddahonnaiah-on-20-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Ramakka vs Sri Doddahonnaiah on 20 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65392","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65392"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65392\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65392"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65392"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65392"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}