{"id":65818,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-12T20:27:18","modified_gmt":"2018-08-12T14:57:18","slug":"sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH couacr or KARNATAKA AT  \n\nDATED 11-us THE 107\" DAYOF'MA'\u00a7CVH;: 2Q6'B _\";_  \n\nBEFORE  =\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JusncEA;M, VENU:(3DRA{\u00e9A\"'$Gw'\ufb01A A \n\nMlsceisaneeus Hm. Ap!.:ezeV!:A':'\u00e9--e;?.3-2 GE  (Mm\n\nsin. c. ANJANAPRA.\ns\/o CHANNAIFW,'  \nAGED ABOEJT savanna;\n\nRJAT 140.121, PAPAN\u00a7~:A t\u00e9tltnaom.\nNEHRU ROAD-,~ em GUDDAUHALLI,;\nMYS!J!-'IE amp, \u00a7ItE@GA!_;Q-RE~O26; A\n _   k    &amp; %  APPELLANT\n(av sa::1_. 'aamacmmoagf 'R.\"'NAIK, ADV.)\n\n A-RUL    \n\n' S\/'G. :':'?r-'R'I'.:~.,5'i. .k'TrS'IEI\"'r1',\n\n ' \"' TXM\/s'iwFANI TRAVELS,\n\n' \u00abN029. 3.'i'\u00ab*'i'. STREET. ULSGGR,\n\n BANGALGRE-560 ooe.\n\n2; me dnzeum. INSURANCE comwav Lm,\nnanzx, SARVAMANGALA COMPLEX,\n\n AA  HOSUR MAIN ROAD, ADUGODI,\n\" --  BANGALORE-560 030.\n\nBY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER.\n... RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>(BY SRI. N.V. POONACHE, ADV. FOR R2)<\/p>\n<p>N<\/p>\n<p>This Appeal is filed under Section 173$)  raw Act<br \/>\nagainst the judgment and ewerdeedeted .i&#8217;?&#8217;;i;2&#8217;_\ufb01f)? passed<br \/>\nIn ni&#8217;v&#8217;C \ufb01o.538i&#8217;2G&#8221;6 on the nie:  afthe 5631*&#8217;;-&#8216;.&#8217;ddi .3;i:&#8217;;;.-:3 X&#8230;<br \/>\nHenher t-&#8216;.m&#8230;, Metro-;.-oiitep e1,&#8217;\u00ab.:IA&#8221;.-:.a.nt,;s_ii_e.&#8217;:-.r&#8217;_\u00bbv\u00a7~.Qi;H;;)if<\/p>\n<p>pertiy eiiowing the claim&#8217; petition &#8220;for corn,pen&#8217;s&#8221;etion an<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;This appeei cornihine &#8220;and?<br \/>\nVENUGOPALA&#8217; GOWDQh  tie<br \/>\n  jcieim petition before the<br \/>\ntribunal, &#8216;.Aciejirnin_pd&#8217;dcorinuensetioin from the respondents for<br \/>\nthe injuries  him in a motor vehicle accident,<\/p>\n<p>uu\u00a7fi&#8217;Ich..hae  piece on 22.12.2004. Considering the<\/p>\n<p>  record, the tribune; hes eiiowed the claim<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;-i:&#8217;:ieti&#8217;t:Eer:..V&#8217;_in.i&#8217;-part, awarding m..1,12,50G;= with intere-=&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>iieissatistied with the amount awarded, he has \ufb02ied&#8217; this<\/p>\n<p> .. Veppeai seeking enhancement.<\/p>\n<p>2. Heard iearneo&#8217; counsei ppearina on both sides<\/p>\n<p>and perused the impugned judgment and award.<br \/>\n\\<\/p>\n<p>X<\/p>\n<p>3. Learned counsel for the appellant  <\/p>\n<p>the impugned award made by thetrlburlel&#8217;l&#8217;e&#8217;Thot&#8217;.&#8217;ju&#8217;et and &#8216; . <\/p>\n<p>reasonable. Learned counsel po%\u00abntedt ovuththethtiae <\/p>\n<p>has committed error In takln%\u00a7w..the Apercenptege5..of*~dleebllltvL&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>at 10&#8230; as age!-e medleel!..&#8211;.e&#8217; \u00e9sieh.-:.  |.._m-rned<\/p>\n<p>counsel point&#8217;o&#8217; out &#8220;theta  f.t_1oV:lewe&#8221;d f*r tne loss<br \/>\nsuffered during the  that the award<br \/>\namount  llhoes of amenltles&#8217; ls<br \/>\nmeager.   1: pelleted out that there is no<\/p>\n<p>award toweVrde&#8217;:&#8217;fe.ttentleTntcheroes.<\/p>\n<p>_ , 4. l&#8221;.&#8217;ea:&#8217;rn&#8217;ed&#8217;~ covunsel for the 2&#8243;&#8221; respondent Insurance<\/p>\n<p>  p \u00a2o:mpenv..refotlno&#8221;&#8216;the contentions of the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>     contended that Ex.R1 shows that there<\/p>\n<p>\\,I the eepellent end hence the<\/p>\n<p>5. Conslderlng the rlval contentions and on perusal<\/p>\n<p>-e<\/p>\n<p>the rem-rd the hole: 1&#8242; r eeheideretleh Le, &#8220;whethe: the<\/p>\n<p>Liners is raermanent disabtiit&#8221; o<\/p>\n<p>appellant entitled to any additional <\/p>\n<p>amount?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>taken place and the appallantshas suflereti tlaiellllnjuriest<br \/>\nThe appellant, as could   facord, has<br \/>\nsuffered the foiiowinoAV:inj-axles;     <\/p>\n<p>(1) um-.;.\u00bb.%ceal at  lower 3&#8243;&#8216; oi&#8217; the left<\/p>\n<p>  A ::%\ufb01&#8217;teb\u00a7a; a   <\/p>\n<p>  as at 1i;f;&#8221;t*\ufb02ro heao&#8217; oaicjin 3&#8243;&#8216;~&#8217;;<br \/>\n A cutanuryllaa fore head;\n<\/p>\n<p> (4l)ax gaunt inj.ui*y&#8221;&#8221;lVleft chest<br \/>\n  Ithlfasion injury over the left leg and left<br \/>\nit .:l:si:oulder.\n<\/p>\n<p>has treated tits appellant and according to him,<\/p>\n<p>n.- 5 -1501. I<br \/>\nI .uz.&#8217;ru. an &#8216;ri\ufb01nau \ufb01n<\/p>\n<p> V. _eiiidanca, tribunai has taken the disability at 16%. There is<\/p>\n<p> no material enabling the tribunal to reduce the percentage<\/p>\n<p>of the disability as against medical evidence, which<br \/>\nappears to be consistent and is &#8216;supported by the<\/p>\n<p>G&#8217; ;us<\/p>\n<p>6. There is now, nosd4lsputei_tiiat ths;1i.a:\u00a2citiant.&#8221;ihatiwi?<\/p>\n<p>  azttot-ti 2 months. Hence<\/p>\n<p>A &#8230;.. &#8216;-1. , _&#8230;_ LI.&#8217; _&#8230;&#8230;..ll&#8230;..|. 1., &#8230;.<br \/>\nuocumunt. nem: , mu uppumml. I: emu<\/p>\n<p>the difference amount towards i:he&gt;_ioss_.&#8217;of&#8221;ft\u00a7t;.ire:: &gt; <\/p>\n<p>CRDGCWY.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. As could be seen from&#8221; the &#8216;r.er:crd, vtiheiitrliounialtvheei *<\/p>\n<p>not awarded any surn  Sass aufferedvvvfdurino the<\/p>\n<p>period of treetmentv. (goineltieriney nature of injuries<\/p>\n<p>sostained, the app-Veii&#8211;a:.&#8217;st\ufb01 &#8220;as aioetv itnzotne .or a-bee&#8230; 2<br \/>\nmo\ufb02thst   ..l:-&#8216;4r4&#8217;V&#8217;=*i_&#8221;&#8216;Vi.\u00a2&#8221;&#8216;Vi5&#8217;EVV-:&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;:&#8217;ience, he &#8216;nae<br \/>\nawarded n.nd-e?.;_the   amount awarded under<br \/>\nthe -iJjea__n.A&#8217;AioesVoi;&#8217;an1enitl.ee&#8217; is on the lower side. Tribunal<br \/>\nhas not1:ewarded..&#8217;A&#8217;e:n\u00a7i:Su:m towards attendant charoes,<br \/>\nthough the aVpVne&#8217;i&#8217;Iant was an inpatient and was out of work<\/p>\n<p>ettendeet ehereee will have _o<\/p>\n<p>F<\/p>\n<p>ii .. giviconsidering the &#8220;record, I deem it just and<\/p>\n<p>in addition t-\n<\/p>\n<p>(L) L-ee of future earning on account of 7,920\/-<br \/>\npermanent disability. &#8216;<br \/>\nK<br \/>\n\/3<\/p>\n<p>!<\/p>\n<p>, 41&#8243;intim\u00a7t!oh:i&#8217;ta__the appeiiant in the tribuhai, within 3 man<\/p>\n<p>(ii) Loss of amenities and enjoyment of life:    <\/p>\n<p>(ill) Attendant chargas (2 montnsyw  isgmid  &#8221; A<\/p>\n<p>(iv) Loss of earning during the p\u00e9riodii &#8221; _ _ A g .<br \/>\nof treatment (2 months)     . 6&#8242;,\ufb01&#8217;c&#8217;i\ufb01;.\u00ab&#8217;.. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>in the resuit,  \u00e9y\ufb01\u00e9fuia\u00e9iiawed in part and<br \/>\nimpugned driimj is  to the amount<br \/>\nawarded\u20ac.bs;&#8221;  is awarded which<br \/>\nshaii,i.cadrr_yf  iciii-h,fi&#8217;:t&gt;m the data of petition till<br \/>\nthe irdatd  We 2&#8243;&#8216; respondent insurance<\/p>\n<p>c-mper:hy,_whidghddihgs  fixed with the liability by the<\/p>\n<p> =  costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ill.-&#8220;J<\/p>\n<p>H V &#8216;3f&#8217;i*i&#8217;E ii l&#8221;.&#8217;I&#8217;Ii&#8217;EcLuu t<\/p>\n<p>i<br \/>\n:2.\n<\/p>\n<p>-I<br \/>\n0:\n<\/p>\n<p>E:\n<\/p>\n<p>f!&#8217;<br \/>\n:r<br \/>\nan<br \/>\n:i<br \/>\nc:\n<\/p>\n<p>E&amp;<br \/>\n:3<br \/>\nii<br \/>\nan<br \/>\n:&#8217;E<br \/>\n5!<br \/>\n:\n<\/p>\n<p>KSJ\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH couacr or KARNATAKA AT DATED 11-us THE 107&#8243; DAYOF&#8217;MA&#8217;\u00a7CVH;: 2Q6&#8217;B _&#8221;;_ BEFORE = THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JusncEA;M, VENU:(3DRA{\u00e9A&#8221;&#8216;$Gw&#8217;\ufb01A A Mlsceisaneeus Hm. Ap!.:ezeV!:A&#8217;:&#8217;\u00e9&#8211;e;?.3-2 GE (Mm sin. c. ANJANAPRA. s\/o CHANNAIFW,&#8217; AGED ABOEJT savanna; RJAT 140.121, PAPAN\u00a7~:A [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65818","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":716,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":716,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008","name":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-12T14:57:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-c-anjanappa-vs-sri-arul-raj-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri C Anjanappa vs Sri Arul Raj on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65818"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65818\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65818"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65818"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}