{"id":65840,"date":"2008-09-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-09-10T22:16:42","modified_gmt":"2016-09-10T16:46:42","slug":"b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT op' KARNATAKA AT B,A1'$\u00a7\u00ab3AL::RL'g T'\n\nDATES THIS THE 25TH my off\"\u00e9E':\u00a7f1a3M.BE;R--T2:s.6337\/2005 is \ufb02ied under Order 43 R1116 Hr} rfw\n\nM  A 204 CE\"-'C, against the order dated I1.()'?.2005, passed on EA No.5\n 'i'I1\"C}.S.ND.15179f20C33, on the file of XIII Add}. City Civil Judge,\n Mayo Hail Unit, Bangalore, akiawing {A No.5 filed und\u00e9r Order 39\n\n\" RQA CPC for attachment of properties am} to ward compensat\ufb01on\n\nfor breach of order cf ad interim temporary injunction dated\n\u00a3?.09.2003 85 etc.\n\n\n\nIN M.F'.A.N0.6439I 2005\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1.\n\n(By M] :5. ACC \nB. R . Kantha1'aju,'--Adrzocat:e\u00a7)M\n\nAND:\n1.\n\nV. Chandrashekar\nS] 0. Late Rvenkataswanly\nAged about 45 years\nR\/a; No.25, 'B' Cross,\nNa\ufb01ja Raddy Colony, HA\nBangalore\u00bb 1?.\n\nL Post .__  A.\n\nV.Va1a1akshmi \nW] 0. V.Chandrash{:ikar \nAged about 43  '_\nR\/a: 110.25, 'B' Cross    ._\nNanja Raddy Colony,}\u00e9IA.L 1 _os:t \nBa\ufb02galorc:-41:7.v.. \" 9 ' '~ A  \n\n .--  Chandrashckar :31.\n\nMiss' B}:1ush a';ag m - \nDI  Muniswamy _\n\n \"  .Aged\"ahc.ut'v~--'7n8 years \"\"\" \"\n . I06[T:\u00a3}, V], 1% Cross, 11*?' Main, Mail\ufb01swaram\n ___ l~341Jgalg'r\u00a7_%56Q \n\nS'z3a,f.\"% \n\n4'  _Aged aitxjut 46 years\n  P'\u20aco.L\u00a7,  S1:rf:6'\u00a3, 3\" Cross, Ulsoor\nBaI1g:_alore--56{) 008.\n\n__   I~3.Gm1ashekar\n ....s;\/o. Late M.Ba1an\n\nu Ag:-xi about 41 years\n\nRla: No.52\/1, 295* Cross,\nYellamma Koil Street, Uisoor\nBangalore-560 008.\n\n\n\n4. B.Kuma:r\nS10. Lats M\ufb01alan\nAged about 44 years    _  \nR\/as 340.913, 4\"' Cross, Gupta Layout uzsoa;  L\"\nBaI1gaiore--56{) G08.  a \"  = ~ {Ta \n\n5. M.Gopi\nS\/0. Late Madhavan\nAgad about 50 years\nR\/a: No.6, HI Cross,\nCar Street, Ulsoor  _ \"  \nBa11ga}0rt:--8.  _  -    Respondents\n\n{By Sri S.J.A:rist0t1e, Adv{$(:a\u00a7ej \"  \n\nMFA No.64:3'9\/ 2005 \"is7jr;1\u00a7a..'j';1;1a\u00a2r,f:%;\u00e9c:ion 104 r\/W\n\nOrder 43\"R'u1ej'::(r)  \"ag}g-ans:  5:-der dated 1 1.07.2005,\npassed 1(3)} IA  C\u00bb:S:}\u00a7\u00a7';---]6179\/ 2003, on the \ufb01le of XIII\nAdd]. any Civ\ufb02 J:\u00ab%dg:\u00a7\"eg\u00a3\"'A (2130, tc; attach the properties of\n\n r\u00e9sp\u00a711d_\u20ac:1its.Q,'\u00ab-to 5 herein and also to awartl compensation\n\nIfof order of ad interim mmperaty injunction\n\nda'ts:\u00a7;'%17.V_e9;;*{3G'3 3:. etc,\n\n'kink\n\n , \" rm twa appeals Coming on for \ufb01nal hearing this\n  (1'ajr,'~t}:c Court cialivered the following:\n\n\n\nJ U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
These two agpeais are \ufb01led against the oxtler passed<\/p>\n
by the learned trial Judge on IA No.V in O.S.No. 16;.7\u00a7’\u00ab 3<\/p>\n
013. the \ufb01le of xm Add}. City Civil Judge at ..a…….g;;….m;…\u00ab.,  <\/p>\n
Bangaiore.\n<\/p>\n
2. In these appeals, 1′.)811.fi\u20ac_’S
\narray before the trial Court. 0  V. V V.   S<\/p>\n
3. The suit was    o1″Vv’M1:>et1nanent<\/p>\n
i11ju11ct:i<on.   _i23st:ituted. an application for
\ngrant of A'tempor\u00a2::jr"  was \ufb01led. The tria} Court<\/p>\n
granted .311 ot\u00e9et of injunction on 17.09.2003. On<\/p>\n
  ii\u00e9efexat\u00e9\u00e9iiitsv i to H1 appeared through their<\/p>\n
 Atii\ufb01efendant \ufb01led objections to IA No.1 on<\/p>\n
 ad interim order of temporary izljunotion<\/p>\n
V0"-,.,_0'oon.tinueet'1ti]1 07.02.2004. 011 07.02.2004, trial Clotzrt: heand<\/p>\n
\u00bb By order dated 09.02.2004, order of temporary<\/p>\n
 _._.j'V0"'i13j\u00a7\u00a71nctio11 was extended till the next ciate of hearing. 03<\/p>\n
uu:=22.0'?.2{}04, neither Counsel for plain\ufb01ff nor ylainti\ufb01 was<\/p>\n
present. No application was \ufb01led for extension of interim<\/p>\n
  2<\/span><\/p>\n
orcier. At the first instance, the iearned trial Judge has <\/p>\n
a note in the order sheet that IA \ufb01led for extensiQ\ufb01.:\u00abef  .<\/p>\n
allowed. Later, realising the mistake  s11eIr1’a:1~-eippiiea\ufb01o1:_ u ” ” 2<\/p>\n
had not been \ufb02ied, the order was    ceSe:”e’a;ae;_:\u00ab
\nposted to 13.08.2004.\n<\/p>\n
and 13.08.2004, defendantsl to sale
\ndeed in favour of or1e<_ f'5f   wife
\nGfslaxaiakshmi. The  under Order<\/p>\n
39 Rule 2A     defendants for<\/p>\n
disobedience.  o\u00a7.e i;e11;po1'ary ixqjunction granted on\n<\/p>\n
17.O9.20O3.V_2–ind  to time.\n<\/p>\n
5-1,\u00bb The”  Judge heard the gax\ufb01es. The<\/p>\n
  _ V. \u00a7;i&\u00a7V’\\’J1i\u20aci\u00a7e  held even if an order of te\ufb01lpmal\ufb01’<\/p>\n
;3u_Vot:’eXtene\u00a5e\u00e9, it wiii not lapse automatieaiiy on<\/p>\n
its own. T\u00a7,1e_ Said order does net cease to operate on its own<\/p>\n
by e\ufb02lu\ufb01cef time. Therefore, the learned trial Judge was of<\/p>\n
  ‘fj}\u20ac’ Qxeieion “unless ex pa1″s;:e order of temporary injunction is<\/p>\n
V. \ufb01raciated by a censidered onier, it was in force though it was<\/p>\n
., got extended on the relevant date. N. C>Q’\/x____\ufb01vw”C,L I<\/p>\n
5. The leamed trial Judge has relied on a dedsion<\/p>\n
reported in AIR 2001 ALLAHABAD 155 (in the  3<\/p>\n
Butt Sharma and etc. Vs. Regional J0irzt””‘Direci:r\u00a7vi*   <\/p>\n
Education, Agra and etc), wherein  <\/p>\n
has dealt with Rule 14 of the Anaha\ufb01ad\n<\/p>\n
6. The learncjsd tria} has  n0t _  ‘ t;hc<\/p>\n
provisions of Order 39 RMQBA  rea;E1\u00e9”\ufb021’1i;r.:-<\/p>\n
“3A. Court \u00a36 $\u00a2f:_i’s37’a’\u00a2’x–s:\u00e9*:::of_:\u00a7ii%Q2\u00a7.\u00a7\u00a7ation for<\/p>\n
injunctigm iiiithiiu f_t1nrty”~va1ays — Wham an
\ni\ufb01j;;nctiei:%’%%%;:a\u00a7”~ ..g:\ufb01nted without giving
\nnoticx:  tx_3 thc    the Court shall
\nmake  a11V ‘cn.d’c,aVo1ir” Vto \ufb01nally dispose of the
\n ‘~\u00a7’::1p}:):iica;tioi1AAi;vifj1i11.\u00bb thirty days from the date on<\/p>\n
  wliintih  injunction was gmnted; and when: it<\/p>\n
   an ax parts: order of temporary injunction. A\ufb01er<\/p>\n
‘  u is  to do, it shall record its reasons for
\nV A ‘such <\/p>\n
::;1.__{he case on hand, the ieamed trial Judge had<\/p>\n
4._…..–*<\/p>\n
‘ apio\ufb01arancc of defendants, intmrim order was extended from<\/p>\n
 to time. The learned trial Judge after appcaranoc of<\/p>\n
defendants shouid have heart! the objections of defendants
\nW  K  I’M<\/p>\n
and should have endeavouzed to \ufb01nally dispoiee’ ‘  <\/p>\n
application. The ieamed tnlal Judge on   ” ‘A V. <\/p>\n
application and objections on merife,   f<\/p>\n
ex parte order absolute or vacated tviheex   ae <\/p>\n
warranted by the situation.  touthi S,’-  trial
\nJudge has extended    on the
\napplications made by    Judge has
\nnot held enqui;y”\u00a7eVZ’  iatega  that there was<\/p>\n
willful disobeeiie_@IieeV.  by defendants I to<\/p>\n
H1. The  “also yroceeded against one<\/p>\n
V.Chandre\u00a7h_ek:-1:   \u00e9x\u00e9eife G.Vara1akshmi, who axe<\/p>\n
 state\u00a2i}l 1:.oe’.be pineiiasefs of suit schedule property \ufb01om<\/p>\n
V.   under a registered sale deed.\n<\/p>\n
H 2 ‘ES’-tleediess to state, consequences of disobedience<\/p>\n
-V or   order is primitive in natuie. The party<\/p>\n
H ‘    ofbzeach of injunction could be impxtisoned. The<\/p>\n
  trial Judge should have held an enqugiry before<\/p>\n
VT  V’ paesing the impugned order. The learned tria} Judge has<\/p>\n
” committed an error in placing reliance on a decision reporte\ufb01<\/p>\n
 –\n<\/p>\n
in AIR 2001 ALLAHABAD 155 (in the case of <\/p>\n
Sharma, and etc Vs. Regional Joint Director of  .<\/p>\n
Agra and etc), wherein the High  of ‘hag: .4 ‘* <\/p>\n
dealt with the provisions of Rule 1%; of A31\u00e9hah;\u00a7ciV;H\u00a7 1:, 7<\/p>\n
Court Rules. Therefore, i   th\u00e9i ;\u00a7:{iI1sid\u20ac:if\u00a7{i_A
\nimpugned order cannot be susta;1;’13VL’L’e_ci. _ — V ‘ 1\n<\/p>\n
8. In the result, I    <\/p>\n
 ,9RbER “‘% <\/p>\n
Tiic     impugned cmicr is set
\naside. The ;n’a1:tcr  the learned trial Judge for<\/p>\n
Ieconsidera\ufb01\u00e9n _i:1vt1ie “of observations made herein and<\/p>\n
 ‘~    ‘V In<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH COURT op’ KARNATAKA AT B,A1’$\u00a7\u00ab3AL::RL’g T’ DATES THIS THE 25TH my off”\u00e9E’:\u00a7f1a3M.BE;R–T2:s.6337\/2005 is \ufb02ied under Order 43 R1116 Hr} rfw M A 204 CE”-‘C, against the order dated I1.()’?.2005, passed on EA No.5 ‘i’I1″C}.S.ND.15179f20C33, on the file of XIII […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":788,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\",\"name\":\"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008"},"wordCount":788,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008","name":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-10T16:46:42+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-nandini-vs-bhushanam-on-26-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B Nandini vs Bhushanam on 26 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65840\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}