{"id":65983,"date":"2010-04-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-04-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-01T15:23:31","modified_gmt":"2016-12-01T09:53:31","slug":"the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madras High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT\n\nDATED: 16\/04\/2010\n\nCORAM\nTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN\n\nA.S.(MD)No.73 of 2003\nA.S.(MD)No.74 of 2003\nA.S.(MD)No.75 of 2003\nA.S.(MD)No.76 of 2003\n&amp;\nC.M.P.(MD)No.1073 of 2003\nC.M.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2003\nC.M.P.(MD)No.1075 of 2003\nC.M.P.(MD)No.1076 of 2003\n\nA.S.No.73 of 2003\n\nThe Special Tahsildhar,\nAdi Dravidar Welfare,\nPudukkottai.\t\t\t        ...Referring Officer\/\n\t\t\t\t\t     Appellant\t\nVs\n\nIbrahim Kalifullah\t\t\t...Claimant\/ \t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t   Respondent\n\n\nPrayer in A.S.No.73 of 2003\n\nAppeal filed under Section 54 of the Land\nAcquisition Act,1894 to set aside the judgment and decree passed in\nL.A.O.P.No.79 of 2000 dated 10.08.2001 on the file of the learned Subordinate\nJudge,Pudukkottai.\n\nA.S.No.74 of 2003\n\nThe Special Tahsildhar,\nAdi Dravidar Welfar,\nPudukkottai.\t\t\t        ...Referring Officer\/\n\t\t\t\t\t\t      Appellant\t\nVs\n\nRaj Mohammed\t\t\t\t...Claimant\/ \t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t           Respondent\n\n\nPrayer in A.S.No.74 of 2003\n\nAppeal filed under Section 54 of the Land\nAcquisition Act,1894 to set aside the judgment and decree passed in\nL.A.O.P.No.80 of 2000 dated 10.08.2001 on the file of the learned Subordinate\nJudge,Pudukkottai.\n\nA.S.No.75 of 2002\n\nThe Special Tahsildhar,\nAdi Dravidar Welfare,\nPudukkottai.\t\t\t\t  ...Referring Officer\/\n\t\t\t\t\t      Appellant\t\nVs\n\nAshokkumar\t\t\t\t...Claimant\/ \t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t           Respondent\n\nPrayer in A.S.No.75 of 2003\n\nAppeal filed under Section 54 of the Land\nAcquisition Act,1894 to set aside the judgment and decree passed in\nL.A.O.P.No.81 of 2000 dated 10.08.2001 on the file of the learned Subordinate\nJudge,Pudukkottai.\n\nA.S.No.76 of 2003\n\nThe Special Tahsildhar,\nAdi Dravidar Welfare,\nPudukkottai.\t\t\t        ...Referring Officer\/\n\t\t\t\t\t\t      Appellant\t\n-Vs-\n\nKaruppaiah Mazhavarar\t\t\t...Claimant\/ \t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t   Respondent\n\nPrayer in A.S.No.76 of 2003\n\nAppeal filed under Section 54 of the Land\nAcquisition Act,1894 to set aside the judgment and decree passed in\nL.A.O.P.No.82 of 2000 dated 10.08.2001 on the file of the learned Subordinate\nJudge,Pudukkottai.\n\n!For Appellant\nin all Appeals\t... Mr.M.Rajarajan,\n\t\t   Government Advocate.\n^For Respondent\nin all Appeals\t... No Appearance\n\t\t\n\t\t* * * * *\n\n:COMMON JUDGMENT\n\n\n\tThese appeals have been preferred against the  award of the Tribunal\nfixing the compensation at Rs.3,564\/- per cent.\n\t2.The facts of the case, are as follows:\n\tThe lands comprised in Survey No.36\/1 situated at Punginipatti, Illuppur\nTaluk, Pudukottai District were sought to be acquired under Section 4(1)\nnotification dated 02-12-1999, for the purpose of providing house sites to Adi\nDravidars.  The Land Acquisition Officer fixed compensation at Rs.600\/- per cent\nand it was enhanced to Rs.3,564\/- per cent by the impugned award.  The said\naward is being challenged before this Court by the Government.\n\n\t3.Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate submitted that the\nacquisition is under the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land For Harijan Act, 1978,\nby which, only 15% is required to be granted as solatium whereas, the Tribunal\nawarded 30% as solatium.  Secondly, he submitted that there is no reduction\ngiven for development charges.  In fine, he submitted that more deduction\ntowards development charges is warranted and 15% deduction has to be made from\n30% solatium granted by the Tribunal.\n\t4. The respondents who were served, did not choose to appear either in\nperson or through their counsel.  Therefore, based on the evidence and the\nmaterials available on record, this Court proceeds to decide the matter on\nmerits.\n\t5.Section 4(1) notification is dated 02-12-1999 and the purpose of\nacquisition of land  is to provide house sites to Adi Dravidars.  The Tribunal\nrelied upon the admission of RW.1 that Punginipatti Village is situated in the\nborder of Iluppur village.  Therefore, the acquired land as well as the lands in\nthe Iluppur village have got same potential and advantages.  Moreover, the\nTribunal noted that the lands which are situated on the western side of the\nacquired land, were already plotted out and sold to various persons.  The data\nland relied upon by the Land Acquisition Officer is situated about half\nkilometres away from the acquired land and moreover, no document with regard to\nthe land comprised in Survey No.46\/6, data land, was produced before the\nTribunal.  Therefore, the Tribunal rejected the value of data land.\n\t6.Ex.P1 is the award passed in L.A.O.P.No.51\/92 dated 02-01-1995 in\nrespect of the land comprised in Survey No.187\/11. By the said award, a\ncompensation of Rs.1,980\/- per cent was awarded.  Subsequently, for the land\ncomprised in Survey No.51\/96, the Land Acquisition Officer passed an award\nawarding a sum of Rs.700\/- per cent as compensation and against which, an appeal\nsuit was filed before this Court. By order dated 26-04-2001, in A.S.No.362 of\n2000 this Court determined the value at Rs.3,300\/- per cent relying upon Ex.P5\ndated 11.12.1991 and Ex.P7 dated 02-08-1992, filed therein  and after deducting\n40% towards development charges a sum of Rs.2,000\/- per cent was awarded as\ncompensation.  The land which is a subject matter of the above said appeal suit,\nis also situated in Iluppur village which is situated closer to the land\nacquired.\n\t7.As far as the other documents viz., Exs.P3, P4 and P5 to P10 are\nconcerned, they are in respect of Survey Nos.186\/12,181\/10, 131\/13,185\/12,\n188\/6, 181\/5, 25\/4 and 171\/9 and they are situated in Punginipatti village.  The\nTribunal rejected Exs.P3 to P11 on the ground that they conveyed only a smaller\nextent of land.  Therefore, the Tribunal relied upon Ex.P1, the award passed in\nL.A.O.P.No. 51\/92  dated 02-01-1995, and fixed the value.\n\t8.The Tribunal committed a grave error in taking the compensation of\nRs.1,980\/- per cent as per Ex.P1 especially when Ex.P2  judgment passed by this\nCourt  in A.S.No.362 of 2004 on 26-04-2001 is available and it relates to\nacquisition of land comprised in Survey Nos.159\/2 and 160\/4 Iluppur village.  As\nper the said judgment, this Court determined the value at Rs.3,300\/-.  As\nalready noted DW.1 himself admitted that Iluppur village and Punginipatti are\nsituated side by side.  Therefore, considering the location of the villages side\nby side, this Court has to follow the judgment passed in A.S.No.362 of 2000\ndated 26-04-2001, marked as Ex.P2.\n\t9.The Compensation determined by this Court in A.S.No.362 of 2000 for the\nlands acquired under Section 4(1) notification dated 12-11-1994, is Rs.3,300\/-\nper cent relying upon Ex.P5 dated 11.12.1991 and Ex.P7 dated 02-08-1992 filed in\nA.S.No.362 of 2004. After eight years, Section 4(1) notification was issued on\n02-12-1999 in this case.  Therefore for the interregnum period between\n11.12.1991 (date of Ex.P5 in A.S.No.362 of 2004) and Section 4(1) notification\ndated 02-12-1999 viz., eight years, appreciation is required to be added to\nvalue of Ex.P5. As per the judgment of this Court and the Honourable Supreme\nCourt in  V.R.Venkatesalu and others -Vs- Special Tahsildar, Land Acquisition,\nHousing Scheme-II, Coimbatore-18 and another reported in 2010 (2) MLJ 153 each\n15% has to be added as appreciation.  However, considering the nature of the\ncase, this Court awards 10% appreciation for eight years 80%.\n\n\tValue as per Exs.P1,P5 and\n\tP7 in Appeal Suit No.362 of 2000                        =Rs.3,300.00\n\t\n\tAdd:Appreciation @ 10% for\t)\n\t\t8 years \t\t)\t                = Rs.2,640.00\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t============\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t=Rs. 5,940.00<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t============<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the value per cent is Rs.5,940\/-.  Since the purpose is for providing<br \/>\nhouse sites, 30% deduction is made for development charges.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\tValue determined by this Court\t                        Rs.5,940.00\n\t\tLess:30% deduction  \t\t\t        Rs.1,782.00\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t===========\n\t\tCompensation fixed\t\t               Rs.4,158.00\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t===========\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>\t10.As rightly pointed out by Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate,<br \/>\nthe acquisition is for the purpose of providing house sites for Adi Dravidars.<br \/>\nTherefore, as per Section 7(2) of the Tamil Nadu Acquisition of Land For Harijan<br \/>\nAct, 1978, only 15% is required to be given as solatium, whereas, the Tribunal<br \/>\ngranted 30%.  Hence, the solatium is reduced to 15%.\n<\/p>\n<p>\t11.The Tribunal did not award any interest on solatium.  A Constitution<br \/>\nBench of the Honourable Supreme Court in  Sunder -Vs- Union of India reported in<br \/>\n2001 (7) SCC 211 granted interest on  solatium on par with compensation.<br \/>\nTherefore, the claimants are entitled to interest on solatium also.  Except the<br \/>\nabove modification, in all other aspects, the award of the Tribunal is confirmed<br \/>\nand the<br \/>\nappeals are disposed of in the above terms.  No costs.  The appellant is<br \/>\ndirected to deposit the entire award amount before the Tribunal within a period<br \/>\nof eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and thereafter,<br \/>\nthe Tribunal is directed to pay the entire award amount to the appellants within<br \/>\na period of two weeks.  Consequently, connected C.M.P.Nos.1073 TO 1076 of 2003<br \/>\nare dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>gsr<\/p>\n<p>To<br \/>\nThe Subordinate Judge,<br \/>\nPudukkottai.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madras High Court The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16\/04\/2010 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.KIRUBAKARAN A.S.(MD)No.73 of 2003 A.S.(MD)No.74 of 2003 A.S.(MD)No.75 of 2003 A.S.(MD)No.76 of 2003 &amp; C.M.P.(MD)No.1073 of 2003 C.M.P.(MD)No.1074 of 2003 C.M.P.(MD)No.1075 of 2003 C.M.P.(MD)No.1076 of 2003 A.S.No.73 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\\\/ on 16 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":238,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\",\"name\":\"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\\\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\\\/ on 16 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010"},"wordCount":238,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010","name":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah ...Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-04-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-01T09:53:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-special-tahsildhar-vs-ibrahim-kalifullah-claimant-on-16-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Special Tahsildhar vs Ibrahim Kalifullah &#8230;Claimant\/ on 16 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65983"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65983\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}