{"id":65995,"date":"2009-12-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009"},"modified":"2014-07-12T17:25:53","modified_gmt":"2014-07-12T11:55:53","slug":"national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre> S' \"Aged\u00ab--.6'7 \n\nIN THE HEGH C(.)URT c)F1&lt;)j9_\u00ab}MS~SS.%%\n\nBEF()RE:\n\nTHE HON&#039; BLE MR. JUSTECE A.r~:Am)   A&#039;\n\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL  O&#039;i=1\u00e9u\u00ab:}8 \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nNati011a1 IE1SLll&#039;\u00a31!}C\u20ac C(I}lT1pL1RI1~_\\,jLiITli[\u20acd,=- j\u00e9 \nRegional ()ffice._  _   \nNo.\u00a744. SubEm1&#039;am1Compicx.  _  &#039;\n\nMG. Road.    .  . \nBzlngalorc ~\u00ab~\u00ab       \nRepresentecl by&#039; iE.&quot;~:__ A~ai-\ufb01gixi i:&#039;~:{1\u00a2t;=}ii*&#039;xsc &lt;L&#039;)\ufb015iV_L&#039;c3V1f &#039;\nSm. D. K2:1&#039;tIii..Ig:.1&#039;ii._f&#039;_ &quot;    ._  A APPELLANT\n( By Sim} . - See&#039;i&#039;i1;:1j;iim1&#039;  .,Ar:i-Voczzie)\n\nAND:&#039;\n\nS hri. _\\_\u00a7&quot;e i1E~:e1ta11&#039;a1:\ufb01a1A13_;:ppa1, V\n\n_ Slot -! ._;1\u00a3r3., VKeV1&#039;np&amp;~iz1_Ia.\nAF-&#039;.CSj&#039;_i-ii t&#039;1&#039;g_._a}&#039;r--: &quot;C h-ii; is; 21 Allkama h a 11 i V i 11:1 ge.\n\nB~a:1g:i:*pet T--;\u00a7&quot;Et:i&lt;}=\n\n    REESPONDENT\n\n _(}SE.a1jSiL.ML;S%&#039;1ia&lt;;} Ahmed, Adx-*()ca[&#039;c: fo1&#039;z&quot;c:SpondenE)\n\nI: 4&#039; :\u00a7* -5-&#039; -P\n, ,&#039; m .,x\n\n&#039;\u00a3\n\n\n\nThis Miseel}ane0L1s First Appezzl is f\u00e9ked under Section\ni73( 1) of {he 9\u00bb-&quot;iL)tor V&#039;ehicle;.x&#039; Act. 1988, against the judgzment and\nzlwarci dated ()5.()9.2()()7 p21h&#039;SCd in MVC N0.732l\/2006 ontfhe fiie\nof V Additional }LIdge. CoL:1&#039;t of Small Causes Member. \nBangalore. SCCH-20, zswarding ea&#039;)111pe:&#039;1szui&lt;)n of _Rs;2&#039;,f&quot;&#039;3;(}U_{&#039;}\/&#039;1.\n\nwith interest at 6% per annum from the date pveiivtie\ufb01 .t i}i \n\ndepos it.\n\nThis Appeal coming on foa&quot; (&#039;}.14&#039;(&#039;1t&#039;3\u00a3_&#039;.*&#039;.&#039;e.I~?}iS*..d\u00a3\u00e9yV;&quot;[.}1&#039;c: &#039;-.C(:31j_:&quot;{\ndeiiveredthe f0l!0wing:\u00ab~ &#039; &quot; &#039;V &quot; * *  &quot;\n\nJ U D G _T\n\nThe appeal C()l}1iI]g&#039;__(5.\ufb01,. fo1&#039;.&#039;;;td;_ni&#039;s..~&#039;:_1mi&#039;Es considered for final.\n\ndispmzzl llaving 1&quot;ega1&#039;d lo {h.(?.fi.&#039;iC-[S a._mi_Lsifeu1\u00e9*:&#039;::;&#039;{\u00a2;&#039;ices.\n\n9. T115 21p&quot;pe1ii1\ufb01f: ,is\u00a7&#039;~.jj:he&quot;-i_n&quot;s,ufe1&#039; 01&quot; an offending vehicle\n\ni11vL)lve.:i--~2;1_Vecei\u00a7fe~n{Q~wi1e\u00a7'eby the appeilzmt had suffered\n\nfour f1-ac{u1\"e--:s4_ 21nd AE1o~sVp'Efe.a:iized for at considerable period of\n\n.._Ii.Ine..~\u00a7\u00e9x c:'ie.-Em peti~I.ie0V_r1 \\2~:a$ lodged hc3f0:'e the Motor Aceideni\n\n :}a.i':*n,..si T.!_fi'{3!.!'I1vhl'1z.'THC Tl'ibLlE'EZi} l]L\"1V'il}g aiwarded :1 Eotai su:\"1'1 of\n\nR5:2,'7'f*\u00a7&amp;.()()()f;;'jjeeVztppelianl is before mm Court chzillenging the\n\n  \n\n  The counsel for the appeiizmt would point out then {he\n\n Trjbuxlal hzls awarde\u00e9l geele\ufb01\ufb01s and cx0rbita1nt amounts under the\n\n\n\nL\".\n\nseveml heads of e0mpensa1t'i0n. The iespmident has not produced\ntitty materiui to .s'Ei0w that he was an zigi'ieuEtui'ist or 3 milk yeiidtii'\n\nor that he wars earriiiig any motiey either as an agi'ieu1tL11'-is\":_ft'&lt;)m\n\nmiik vending bUSi!1t3SS. However, the Ti&#039;ibiinaE--f_has-_t:1ken.Via\n\ntmtional income of the zippeliamt as R.j;L\u00a5i;&#039;(}{}{)\/7 ;&#039;l&#039;l1{1_:\u00abh_elS&#039; &#039;.pi&#039;tie*eede&#039;&lt;;i\n\nto grant ioss of income during the hlid-&quot;.Jp&quot;&#039;{)_(&#039;&quot;5l&#039;i()d &#039;i&#039;i;'~.\u00a7t' et'i.ri'$'Vi'(i'ei\"z1b]e period. the zimount\nawarded tewziifds attteiigiziiiittqiiti.ezinveytinee charges at Rs.27,(.)(.)0\/--\n\nwas not .suppt\"i'i'te_d zmiy rti2ite1'iaE. Hence, the Same is arbitrary\n\nittzci I135' iiestiltetj in genert&gt;u:~; eoiiipeiiszititiii being granted to the\n\n2::'me\u00ab]'l;ttit;-who Eiit-.9;.--i\"itit roduceci ztiw 3i\"0t&gt;ftt&gt; the same.\n\niii'*_'m;'diti0n, the Tribunat has ztiso granted Rs.5,50()\/--\n\n \"tti_Ax&gt;v'.;.1_V1fdEs' nourishment. this 11215 not tmiy duplicated the\n\n5\n\n\n\nassuming that the :'espm1cfem has; failed in produce him in support\nof the me.cficz1| expenses, the Tribunal} ougln to have 'taken 21\n\njucficinl notice as to {he nature of the injuries unci t_h.\u00a2\"})e.':'ie.'agi\"of\n\ntreamhem that the respondent had under5_;m1e .Vi_11\"'a.Vw'af(i~ing {the b'<\/pre>\n<p>medicai expenses and that the szlxuie<br \/>\nsubsh-1r1ti;1i|}-I. V &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>7. The counsel for the   submit<br \/>\nthat in the light of the 1\\~\u00a2tV&amp;f*&#8230;_&#8221;{&#8216;:,\\.;z;[A  hashhnet filed any<\/p>\n<p>biiis, this Court :&#8221;1my 1ul&lt;e.V.:m&#8211;:.ir.::e &lt;5&quot;i&#039;T1:he &#039;c&#039;iV:fc;{i&#039;uSta1nce in deciding<\/p>\n<p>the a1wa11&#039;g:i&#039;.&quot;L1E\u00a2&#039; &#039;cl\/IlV_.}:5f.IIl\u00a31&#039;1:\u00a7;iVi&quot;1\u00a31.}&quot;i}j1i\u00a3.)L\u00a3I}f_&quot;3&#039;WLEI&#039;d\u20acd is :1: the discretion of<br \/>\nthe T1&#039;ibuh:1i.\u00ab Any &quot;tj_hveT1*&#039;\u00ab.;iTi&#039;1d4.-&#039;a1b0ve amount that has been<\/p>\n<p>CLll&#039;]&#039;}Ll]i&#039;\u00a7{.\u00a7\\&quot;&#039;t&#039;i_\\g&#039; (gz&quot;u;1.11Ecd .&#039;~w=dui(&#039;lT he .&lt;;et-ouE by this iow amouni of<\/p>\n<p> iiiedithai e3{;j)e1is\u00a3:As than is z1wz=n&#039;ded and therefore would submit&#039; that<\/p>\n<p>the LI&#039;!&#039;}&#039;1()iL|I&#039;iI$&quot;gI&#039;Ll are in order and does not warram interference<\/p>\n<p>_ &lt;)f&#039;1I1i\u00a7&quot;~CT&lt;)Lii&#039;f. * <\/p>\n<p>.&#039; . _ 8. &quot;Given the above fzlcis and ciaunmstzmces. the Tribunai<\/p>\n<p> -_\\-v9a._sV&#8217;m)&#8217;t jL1stEfied in zzchwptinlg R.&lt;;_4,()(}()\/\u00ab as income in caiculating<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(3<\/p>\n<p>compen..\\&#8221;a1t&#8217;i0n towards loss of future earning, in {he absence of<\/p>\n<p>evidence. However, given the data: of accident and ;1ssI.4&#8217;m..i:i&#8217;:g&#8217;Eh:-it<\/p>\n<p>t.h&lt;~: appellant was an ubl&lt;:&#8211;b0died man though he \\~=.&#039;;1;\u00a7&#039;&#8211; :t&#039;i&quot;;&lt;3 &#039;<\/p>\n<p>income has to be reduced ailcast to Rs-.&#039;3;&#039;5&#039;{)()\/&#8211;, fin w_\\ii1 3c!\u00a7_ evem; 1}}:<\/p>\n<p>loss of future earning would ha   12&quot;\n<\/p>\n<p>22%) by adopting appropriate 111L:!i&#8217;%p lic&#8217;1&#8242; wl1iCh_w1:.ici be 7 instead<\/p>\n<p>of 9.\n<\/p>\n<pre>9. f~'L1a'ti1 'e1'.1 El1je    laid--up period\nComputed for?  Notwithstanding the\n   it is appmpriate 10 gram\n<\/pre>\n<p>loss of iz{c\u00bb:A);{1aa {hr  months. Hence, the .~_;ame shali<\/p>\n<p>siand r\u00e9.(,1uced io Rs; .1.&#8217;-&#8220;.E\u00ab,(.)A()&#8221;{.)\/V&#8211;A&#8221;\ufb01lxtezaci of Rs.56,(&#8216;)(&#8216;)()\/&#8211;.<\/p>\n<p>l&#8217;\u00b0().a._&#8217;-~. IV-nx:sc.&gt;fa1r \u00e91$&#8221;&#8221;c0mpensation towards attendant and<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;VC-a)riyf.:_s?zin\ufb01fe,C&#8217;hi1&#8217;a=g\u00e9.s is also without xnat&amp;::&#8217;ia! placed before the<\/p>\n<p>cm1i&#8217;t&#8221;~..__z1nd&gt;th_\u00a7i)$a1;11c stands reduced to Rs.E(),(__){_)()\/&#8211; instead of<\/p>\n<p>K V 2,! m&lt;&#039;;,r&#8211;\u00a7L<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Insofar as medical expenses is etmeemed. t&#8217;hot.zgl1 it is on<\/p>\n<p>the lower $ide the 1&#8217;1111()LEnl granted t()Wt11&#8242;(I&#8230;\\&#8217; pain and s.uf7tfet\u00ab*.i_ngVV at<\/p>\n<p>Rx.65.(){)()\/~ wotticl batlttnce the same anti tI1e:~c&#8217;:a&#8217;i&#8217;:~_tfe&#8217;7 tht\ufb01fe-:&#8221;i&#8217;f~f:.&#8217;I&#8217;i\u00a3)<\/p>\n<p>WLl1&#8217;E&#8217;a11l for ittte:&#8217;1&#8243;e:&#8217;ence in respect of ()H1&#8243;t\u00a7I&#8221;21lTl()tt11[$Vtltit.(::)1&#8217;tt::3}\u00a7n\u20ac\u00a7c\u00a7.<\/p>\n<p>II. The ztvvtttxi stands 11&#8217;l()d\u00a7\ufb01t;&#8217;vL4}t_i1:&#8217;:&#8217;~_l\u20acl&#8217;mS.&#8217;\u00a3}S&#8221;L2bc1)V;C_..&#8221;T\u00a7&#8217;tC_V<\/p>\n<p>tesponcient wouid thus be e&#8217;:tti&#8221;t!ed ft)&#8221;.VC&#8217;\u20ac),t0f2]j)\u20ac.ET&gt;S\u00a31tVtC)n of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.l,64.!8()\/&#8211; (00,000 + ft0..000.=4}5;Stt&gt;tt&#8217;jf+_10,000 at 14000 +<br \/>\n64,68(&#8216;)) instead of Rs.2,73,VQ(_)(&#8216;)\/._&#8211;V tlterettn as awarded<\/p>\n<p>by the Ta&#8217;ibun;tl.%,,\/V       <\/p>\n<p>Tithe&#8221;  pei.-tihif, stat tiei at lit) ;1.t;&#8217;t:0;~tt i n g! y.<br \/>\nTheittzttottttt ineietms_it&#8217;-..\u00e9h.&#8211;~excess of the entitlement to the<\/p>\n<p>i'(3SpL)11d.\u20ac_E&#8217;l[ \\2veul,gt bet.&#8217;-reft.1nAded to the appeilztnt and the amount<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;t*e.tna&#8217;i&#8221;nihgf&#8217;shz1&#8243;ii.\u00abbe w\u00e9tthtdtttwn by the clttimttnt \/ respondent.<\/p>\n<p>Sdf-3:\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy S&#8217; &#8220;Aged\u00ab&#8211;.6&#8217;7 IN THE HEGH C(.)URT c)F1&lt;)j9_\u00ab}MS~SS.%% BEF()RE: THE HON&#039; BLE MR. JUSTECE A.r~:Am) A&#039; MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL O&#039;i=1\u00e9u\u00ab:}8 BETWEEN: Nati011a1 IE1SLll&#039;\u00a31!}C\u20ac C(I}lT1pL1RI1~_\\,jLiITli[\u20acd,=- j\u00e9 Regional ()ffice._ _ No.\u00a744. SubEm1&#039;am1Compicx. _ &#039; MG. Road. . . Bzlngalorc ~\u00ab~\u00ab Representecl [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":567,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\",\"name\":\"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009"},"wordCount":567,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009","name":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-12T11:55:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/national-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sri-venkataramanappa-on-18-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"National Insurance Co Ltd vs Sri Venkataramanappa on 18 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}