{"id":66161,"date":"2008-12-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-12-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008"},"modified":"2017-02-25T01:38:43","modified_gmt":"2017-02-24T20:08:43","slug":"d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","title":{"rendered":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
 \n\n5\nRent Act 1999, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Rent Act'\n\nin Sh{)I'E] and HRC No.26\/2001 was \ufb01led by her tinder\n\nSection 2\"f('2)(a)(r] and (0) of the Rent Act.  \n\nCourt alloweci both the said petitiezls  3;;  ..  \n\nand (9; 9f Sectrien 27(2) of the Rent Act \u00aband %A:t\u00a2;\u00bbs;c:c,~:1 ti:;\u00a2\n\npetition in I-{RC No. 26\/2OO1T'u;1clef 'c_1 ause (;~;%\"%s;V;?'   ,\n\nAct. Aggievcd by the \u00e9r\u00e9sr  200 1, insofar\nas it reiatas     V petii:i0:1 on the\nground   therein has flied\nHRRP Nd;  the pendency of\nthis re\ufb01sib\ufb01   died. Further, her\n\nmentally i'\u00e9iiar;'i::::1V '.dau.gh\u00a3\u00e9r for whom ihe possession of\n\n  Apre1\u00a7\u00a7,is\u00e9s'vwas claimed in HRC No.26\/2001\n\n :u:;;\u00a2::T% c;ause[%A(;%~; also died. Therefore, there is no\n\n,disp1\u00e9te  ~b\ufb01m9\u00e9en the parties as to the HER?\n\n\/$3006 having become infructuous. As such, the\n\n   iiabie to be dismissed.\n\nW\n\n\n\n \n\n\"F\n\n3. Since HRRP N023?\/2006 is liable t_e__ be\n\ndismissed as having become infruetuous, E 1:9\n\nproceed with HRRP N0s.233\/2805' \"\":'1.--\u00a78f22'.)\"24('_}V{}6'._V Mt\"\n\n'I'i1erefore, the arguments of Qrfi   _\n\nlearned emmsel for the petitietiier-Teh,antsA  t\u00a7e\u20acf1''tf1ese '' V\n\nRevision Petitions are  'heard \nof Sr}. 3. Nagaraj,     fer the\nRespondent-Ifartttitadyizltegbttt11:VI+}i*{RI?:\"'\u00a7i\u00a7ee'.233 \/22005 and<\/pre>\n
182\/2006.?   passed by the
\nTrial     petitions. Also
\npeI*use\u20aci\u00ab.ti1e ebtained \ufb01em the Trial Court<\/p>\n
A ” -.    heard the learned Counsel for the parties<\/p>\n
 *–ti”1e\u00e9eu.”;j~petitier2S, the points that arise for I113?<\/p>\n
g dete\ufb01\ufb01ma\ufb01en are:\n<\/p>\n
‘ tttwtt Whether the Trial court is justi\ufb01ed in<\/p>\n
: allewizlg the respective eviction<\/p>\n
petitions in beth the HRC Nes.23 and
\n.r——3″””””‘”””\n<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
26 of 2001 on the ground under clause\n<\/p>\n
(a) 01′ See.f27(2) 01′ the Rent Ace? <\/p>\n
(:1) Whether the Trial Court is
\njusti\ufb01ed in gaming eviction 5 <\/p>\n
allowing the res\ufb01eciives [e*v ieIj011’V <\/p>\n
petitions u11der’ e’ia;.1se’ “{9} 9f
\n27(2) of the Rem:   fghe
\nrespective\u00bb  ‘t1iefeiI1
\nto deliver  ;_vaea1;i'{.;:’ ef the
\nrespective  ‘ to the<\/p>\n
pse3\u00a3iti\u00a7f\u00a7’I’1eI’s'”therei11__.\u00a2_ ;
\n5,. ——–    ciause {a} of Seetien
\n2?(2)   :ii1\u00a7:.eVer111eI1ts made by the
\ndeceaeed u’;:etitieV1;1er\u00a5i;\u00e9mui’1ady Smt. Padma, in both the
\n v    \u00abaxe under:\n<\/p>\n
V’    feependent paid rental upto the end of
\n..  te the petitioner hem} and
\n ehz\ufb01ii\u00e9iinged valid receipts for all such
\n_ iiagfmerits. He abruptly stopped paying rents
\nV ‘ ‘j_\u00abto her Without any cause er reason and thus
\nH he became defaulter in the matter of<\/p>\n
payment of Z'(‘:i1t am he has met paid the
\nrents from 1.5.2000 onwards. The pe\ufb01tioner<\/p>\n
0—S*”\\”‘-“\\…..\n<\/p>\n
33<\/span><\/p>\n
get issue\u00e9 legal notice dated 6.9.2000 to the
\nrespoxzziem tenants demanding arreale of<\/p>\n
rem: of i~2s.2,0()0\/- for the period from May
\n2000 an the and 01′ August 2000. nesm-;–: [
\nreceipt of the said notice, the resp0r3;’ie1\u00e9.1;’~’..’._:  A’
\ntenant did not reply to the same nee    ‘ <\/p>\n
paid the said rent. Agar; the em  or<\/p>\n
petition, the ‘teI1\u00e9i:;1tA_ wee.   petifioiier
\na sum of Rs.4,0G{)   of rent
\nfrom May 1 ‘ ‘2QO0i ‘     -of. Vi\ufb01eeem her<\/p>\n
6.    of the landiady in<\/p>\n
respo1″:de1;11;   .  \ufb01led their respective<\/p>\n
 stateg\ufb01ae\ufb01ts cf Glzjeetioits corzten\u00e9irigas under:<\/p>\n
\n   respondent was inductm as a<\/p>\n
V    the petition premises by 6116<\/p>\n
‘A   Vasa111_;haPI3*”\\, who was owner<\/p>\n
meeeef. A\ufb01ter his death, the p\u20ac{i”tiOI”1\u20acI’<\/p>\n
V ” * _def}:1a;1ded payment of rem, the respendent<\/p>\n
V’ ” ebliged her and made payment cf the rents<\/p>\n
to her but latexgen, one Smt. Rajamma, W\/0.<\/p>\n
(___$””w\\..—\\_,_,-\n<\/p>\n
A’ __ pe\ufb01tiens, the respective<\/p>\n
  _   \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7=;1<;='i in {\ufb01S\u00a7}"E_2.\u00a7f\u00a7 ma: i}:3'\u00a3\u00a7;: {\u20ac516 :i<:22a::":{.:'=5 in $532123<\/p>\n
 rf::%'S;}&;;::\u00a7\u00a7*:\u20ac:_ g\u00e9s\u00e9iziaieass C\u00e9iiii\u00e9i  E33 \u00a71E{'i'L%;C\u00a7;i\u20aci{\u00a7 \u00a333; \u00a3335: .<\/p>\n
vf}E'%\u00a71}Ii\u00a7S\u20aciS in $31322': 335:5 :;%a553 .-img\u00e9 21:: E\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb01, ::::\u00e9:2%:":  22:3<\/p>\n
 ii\u00e9isgmt\ufb01 as :0 \u20ac\u00a7;'1\u20acfI'\u20ac:f bs\ufb01iig _"\u00a7iiE'\u00e9\u00a7.E I'\u20ac;'1Eifi{3E'i:"~\u00a7\u00bb\ufb01i\u00a73 {if \u00a7a11:"%i<:::'\u00a3i<\/p>\n
E1<\/p>\n
:*@=.31_:e9\u00a7:\u00ab:;E$2*:{ 31;; E'\ufb01E'*1\u00a7\u00a7ii}:\u00a7 pa;-'$226111, sf 1'5'-:3'}.*t".: <\/p>\n
H\ufb01ilif\ufb01, \u00a7.\u00a7.}:fi' pr3:\u00a7:.i:::z"1 %_EIiC\u00a7\u20ac:E' $\u00a7{:{\u00e9i:\u00a7;_ <\/p>\n
{E26 \u00a7{az:::a:2::i:) <2? 331$ aizi A\u00e9ji. \u20ac3E3i ii}{}\u00a7i". ix: _\u00ab *\u00a71'\u00e9i\u00a7z:\u00a7%:\u00a7:.\u00e9;':'::<;\u00a7'…
\n \u20ac31': a;;;3;::"::c\u00e9ai\u00e9:3a ::::=:'A1'{.%z7::._?:':\u00a5i<;E\u00e9'::\u00e9:::.,i.:::;",i2:%.:;?:3:?{;i<\/p>\n
a\u00e9ii 21:33:} by E931 \ufb01g: ;33:*ii5?3:;"":%;:: }:<:?:–:.~';:*f':.":':-;'x<.T.\u00a7T'_"..%~'_;:':i\u00e9;_:%. V<i:'!t:s:u;*{ %'1aE~;:<\/p>\n
\u00a7's:E\u20ac;\u00b0:{31'ii&"i Ks; i\u00a7:"i{3}:11;\u00a7" \u00a332': \u00a73f;75\u00a7\u00a7'ii,J' :59'-2'3,E–.\u00a7\u00a7Z\u00a75\u00a7f{'~f;?\u00a7i\u00a7i"3;}\u00a7E'"E\u00a3i3Ei'3iE1g ta:<\/p>\n
<;':\u00a7\u20ac1%.1S\u20ac (3.) sf' S\u20ac:C\u20ac31<'m"1a3f"~.;j}:\u00a2' ..%Eit*3;";'\u00a7; ac": ii} \ufb01at:<\/p>\n
',\u00ab%;'I';'f%:'z:1a=;i*s,\u00bb*\u00e9%i*.'V'  i:~*2'\u00e9'23;z?=::%;;'\u00a7:a* i_\u00a7'\u00a7:'A.';t.%'i'r:%" '="z=:{\u00a7;'zf}';33;T::r:::' \u00a7:x::\u20ac{Ei}i:"? {\ufb01at<\/p>\n
x<\/p>\n
73<\/span><\/p>\n
(“E<\/p>\n
3:36: r\u20ac5p\u00e9::s.::2i\u00e9%&;\u00bb’;:2:$\u00a7”=Ga1{i::3:Ei\u00a5\u00a5”{<i:3ei\u00a7?.iS in '':;:'::t}:: 3138 Sai\u00e9
\n\u00e9xsezzsaj ::s3:2i::iii:"\u20ac\u00ab\u00a7:.=;{i;':_ zgaakizzg {$9.3-='::1\u20ac:s\u00a7. cf  {sf<\/p>\n
E'\u00a7E"i?; \u00a7:;._ tii\u00e9 \u00a7'}=:-?':{:E%;'\u00e9{3:%;%\u00a7:}1'.._\u00a73i1iIi1\u00a3\u00a7.d3-' ami '{h\ufb01'1"\u20ac\u00a7}f={ ii: \u00a7:i}<}:a.'=f3::i<\/p>\n
  :'zi::;=::"j;3f:'\u00a7.:i\ufb01;:}:';:::; :31: 33:5 :::ai:\u00a7 gmzzzzzi.<\/p>\n
%%1$:2:'i:i1a13p3_, 81$ <}?:\u00a7;gir:aE {3sa:*1'";\u20acz"- <35 ziim gi\ufb01tiiizsig<\/p>\n
a;::':d *;:*:=11:az1i \u00a7}\u20ac\u00a73:%;"\u20ac\ufb01E"i \u00e9aie ':z'asa1\u00a7ti":appa anii \u00e9im<\/p>\n
<_,____S"""'\\.—-\\_,~–"\n<\/p>\n
in mm me \u00a3-IRC.Nc-$.23 & 26 of 2001. Therefo;f\u00a2; :.:\u00a5\u00a7Qf\u00a3h<\/p>\n
the erciers insofar as they relate to the g*ant__   _<\/p>\n
under Clause (0) have been challe\ufb01ged u v <\/p>\n
of 2005 and :32 of 2006 by the mm\u00bb:;m\u00a2ag;}ts.% <\/p>\n
pertinent to 110116 that botI1V’i1’12%:_Vevi?\u00e9t\u00a7\u00a7”r1 pCiitiQ;1S_VViI1…\u00a7tl1V(3  *<\/p>\n
said cases were \ufb01led Lmger tile \ufb01ro\ufb01isigns ‘i)’f”‘t:hi: Old Act ?<\/p>\n
sf 1961, which was in     f\ufb02mg cf the
\nsaid petitiaxm…  Act 1999 came
\ninto face,  tmder clause
\n(0) of ‘  her pleadings in
\nthe  tile averments cozxstituting<\/p>\n
the   ..a.T’-136..  ‘I’\u00a71\u20ac: said averments which are<\/p>\n
 V’  Ht}i\u00e9”13\u00e9titi0I1s read as under :<\/p>\n
  ‘V  “\ufb01\u00a2tf\u00a3\u00a7OI16T submits that thsugh the
\n‘_””%resp<:&i:3\u00e9nt is tenan, is under her and having
\n paiazi iiiie rem up ta and of April 2000 UL) her<\/p>\n
 ~ ;  119 .$.now in his reply\/ statement of objscticns
\n* . Jana with a mala\ufb01dc intention has denied the<\/p>\n
ownegship of the petitioner over the petition
\nschedule property. The I*\u20acS13\u20ac}I"id\u20acIlI'S
\n,-w-\u00abr-"-"""*\\..—6<\/p>\n
ffi<\/p>\n
the 03d Act, for depositing the rents in respect of the
\nrespective premises and as such, may never gV%\u00a7id,\u00a2d<\/p>\n
payment of rent.\n<\/p>\n
18. It is not in dispute   <\/p>\n
wife 91′ late Landlord BM in ‘V ‘<\/p>\n
OS.N0.8186 of 1995 v:::Eax;’1I1i172g”i*’Q\u00e91f’\u00e9x{;\u00a7usi\u00a3r\u00e9’*i:iti\u00e9 to the
\npetition premises in  the deceased
\nSmt. Padina 31$’-\ufb01g’   the tenants
\nand   respective petitions
\nin   2\u20ac\u00a7\u00a5}(}’V’1}iLnder Sectican 19 of the
\nOld  cf the Court to depesit rent:\n<\/p>\n
31, I’ff;Sp6jCt Gf _:th’.3 petition premises for the<\/p>\n
  11,:If “%–_May’:  and onwards and that they<\/p>\n
  in the said petitions.\n<\/p>\n
 134.;  the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
 mesa HRRP Nos.2s3 of ‘2i)O6 and 1822 of<\/p>\n
A    p_iac1\ufb01,x;g rciiance on the decisiarz of the Hoifble<\/p>\n
  ..S{1premc Ceurt in the case of Sr-LC. Chandr-aarzwhan. Vs.<\/p>\n
V sengottagyan reported in Am .2000 SC 568 equivalent 1:0<\/p>\n
.\u00bb_:g”-\/w’-r\\..__,,___”,__<\/p>\n
:3
\ntherefere, the Trial Court rightly” ailcmsed the eV_ie\u00a7:iaz1
\npetitions under clause (0) ef Section 2712) of
\nAct and as such both the impumied V4:\n<\/p>\n
do net call for any    ._
\nrevisions. in the decisien   A . T Av ‘<\/p>\n
c. Chcmdramohan vs;  LRs &
\nOthers reported in  the Horfble
\nSupreme   17 therein as
\nunder:\u00ab-   V . A  ‘
\nx\u00e9aa-51\u00a2-;’\u00a7s1′?r   of title 01″ the
\nzandioni, 3% Shouid renounce his
\ncheiaetee 213:  set up title or right<\/p>\n
; ineeneistent ivit h the reiationship of landlord
\n 1’:e;1_ant,_. “eiiher in himself er in a third<\/p>\n
   In case of derivative title of the
\n the absence of a notice of ‘<\/p>\n
  of title :1: favour of the landlord or
\nn T zitt\ufb01irnment of tenancy, a tenant’s assertion
\n the landlord “is 3 cc:-owner dares net
\n“amount-. to denial of his title,_ umess the
\ntenant has also renounced his relationship
\nas a tenant The principle of equity that a<\/p>\n
-2:’~–~,,-.._.,__~__*_~\/,
\nrw-…,.J<\/p>\n
as
\ntenants have paid rents to the decmsed Smt. Padma<\/p>\n
after demise of the omna: Lanczigizwcx  i <\/p>\n
B.N.Vasanph_appa for a considerable.   K V’<\/p>\n
2000 and.  View of the    <\/p>\n
bona\ufb01dely approached the forA\ufb01icp\u00a73eit311g\u00b0I\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i’its”:for  %<\/p>\n
furtgher pericd. In this sgicw 4of'”iI.i\u00a7?:;  um r\u00e9rie laid
\ndown by the i-IoI1’ble  above said
\ncase aptly    ,V V presez1t cases.\n<\/p>\n
Therefore,  tgpmion, that the Trial
\nCourt  _   eviction on the
\ngmumugags :Se<.:tion 27(2) of the Act. As<\/p>\n
such   "\u00e9rders insofar as they relate to<\/p>\n
  wound in respect of both the<\/p>\n
 p\u00e9ititi\ufb01llg deserve to be set aside.<\/p>\n
2.2;; .1T1i\u00a7: submission of Sri,P.I'.). Surazla. ieamed<\/p>\n
V' \ufb01ztiliziscl for the revisipn petitiezler—tc:I1a11ts, that the Trial<\/p>\n
   he directed to take into account ail the clepssits<\/p>\n
 " made by the resgective Tenants into the 00111': While<\/p>\n
(——3hV""""*x.._,_..\n<\/p>\n
xi<\/p>\n
2.6<\/p>\n
quarmifying the arrears of rent payable by them:
\naccepted, beca11se,it is for the Tenants
\nTriai Court that the said deposits were ‘u
\nthem and I1{}tiCC of the same Jvtoij  ._<\/p>\n
and that the said, deposits Werremade. towaziivs  of ‘V<\/p>\n
rent in eemplianee with  girder  under
\nclause (a) of Section 27(2)..ef    therefore,<\/p>\n
they (te11aI1ts)\u00a7V 11ot  in terms cf the<\/p>\n
 %F’er. \u00a5:’}1\u00a7;+-.. ‘aforesaid, While answering
\npoint Ne…1__ :i1’1 the’ and point No.2 in the
\n‘Negative’, I  page the following,<\/p>\n
 ,””.._HR\u00a7fi\u00a7._Ne’s\u00a7’233 of 2005 and 182 of 2006 are<\/p>\n
hefehy”  in part. Beth the impugned orders<\/p>\n
  rme.Nes,;g3 of 2001 and 25 of 2001 by the<\/p>\n
 Le.[e;:=\u00a7ar::\u00a2s-4:1 XII Additional Small Causes Judge (seen 8), L
\n_  — Eafig\u00e9iiere, are hereby set aside insofar as they rebate to I
\n‘T  ” -{he grani: of eviction in favour of the petitioner-iandlady<\/p>\n
(–~n_.\u00a7”””‘x\/~*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 Author: Arali Nagaraj 5 Rent Act 1999, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rent Act’ in Sh{)I’E] and HRC No.26\/2001 was \ufb01led by her tinder Section 2″f(‘2)(a)(r] and (0) of the Rent Act. Court alloweci both the said petitiezls 3;; .. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nD John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1484,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\",\"name\":\"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008","datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008"},"wordCount":1484,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008","name":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-24T20:08:43+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/d-john-peter-vs-r-padma-padmamma-on-11-december-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"D John Peter vs R Padma @ Padmamma on 11 December, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66161"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66161\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}