{"id":66206,"date":"2009-06-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-17T15:09:02","modified_gmt":"2018-12-17T09:39:02","slug":"the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ram Mohan Reddy<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n \n\n3 NELAMANGALA TOWN MUNICIPAL c0UN_cii;\" if    \n\nNELAMANGALA 562 I63\nBANGALORE RURAL DIS'I'RIC'I'M\nREPFD BY ITS\n\nCHIEF OFFICER\n\n(BY SR1. R DEVADAS, AGA FdR1}_\n(By Sn'.: S G PANDIT, ADV FOR R23 3 _ 1%\n(BY SR1. R CHANDRANNA5-His S Mariggsn',-Aav FUR R3)\n\nTHIS wmr PE'i'I'I'IGN gs FILED UNDER -ARTIIKBLES 226\nAND 227 0? THE coNs*:f1f;*:;T:op4,_o:?~1NmA\" PRAYENG TO\nQUASH THE Er;:)QRsE'.ME:1-\ufb01rs' '=iSSUEIZ} BY THE 2ND\nRESPONDENT mt '1\u00a72_7.6.?OOi? \"'v:D'E.,ANN\u00a3--x.F. TO THE WRIT<\/pre>\n<p>PE3TFI&#8217;I()N. ~  &#8221; Q &#8221;   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>THiS__VPE&#8217;\u00a37f1&#8217;1&#8217;G\u00a7?{,, :::&lt;3MING..QN FOR PRL.I~IEAR\u00a3NC}<br \/>\nIN &#039;E&#039; (}ROU&#039;P;:_&#039;I&#039;HIS .DAY THE COURT MADE THE)<br \/>\nFGJLOW.ING&#039;:.   %<\/p>\n<p>%   RD E R<\/p>\n<p>  _   the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>&#039; &#039;c:Jt:3;:&quot;:&#039;\u20ac;Vf&#039;\u20ac?Vs-;fg\u20ac{\u00a7&quot;f)9, the foilowing order was made :<\/p>\n<p>V  .7&#039; Tixough, Mr. Pandit, lcaxncci cmmsei for<br \/>\n A. ,2;_he V\ufb01ielamangala. Piaxzzning Authority -~ 213*&#039;<br \/>\n * .._r\u20acspm:1dez;1t submits that there is a iayout plan<br \/>\n sanctioned by the ers1:Wh,i1c ixlterim Manda}.<\/p>\n<p>T Panchayath, which authority is since merged in<br \/>\nRespondent No.3, demarcating a certain area as<br \/>\ngreen area (park), nevertheless, at this stagcz, in<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>the absence of reievant material, it is_;&#039;&#039;&#039;iiottV&#039;_~.. ;. i <\/p>\n<p>possible to accept that the properties   M<br \/>\nto the petitioner under the t\\2vo&#8212;Gi;\u00a3&quot;t-{)ee&#8211;i;1s,_jn it  <\/p>\n<p>the said park area.\n<\/p>\n<p>Learned CO11I1SCIV&gt;    <\/p>\n<p>suggests that a joint  tiiie<br \/>\npar\ufb01es, of the   aiiyjdoulitioiier<br \/>\nthe identity of the   t1_i\u00abei&#8217;v:iposse_ssion of<br \/>\nthe petitionexfhto be&#8221;  area or<br \/>\noutside,  Vt1&#8243;:e&#8217;: gifted sites<\/p>\n<p>feat in ittle petitioners would have<br \/>\nnot &#8220;moors   &#8216; ~ .\n<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;eouosef for the Plannixzg<br \/>\nAuthority &#8216;v&#8211;_'[11i(:-._3V&#8221;&#8216;~i&#8221;V1&#8217;t3Sp0I1(\u00a7CI1t do not oppose<\/p>\n<p>..  isuggeslitiotge A.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8212;12&#8243;&#8221; respondent authority is clear<\/p>\n<p>iooation of the park while there is a<br \/>\n&#8220;-.__disVpute.:&#8217;oiver the i\u00e9emity of the sites gifted to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner. The suggestion of the ieazned<\/p>\n<p>At &#8216;T eounsei for the petitioner appears to be<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;ifeasonabie and fair, so as to bring about a<\/p>\n<p>resolutiori to the dispute. in that View of the<br \/>\nmatter, since the parties are Detzresented by<br \/>\nlearned counsei, they axe dzirecteci to _\u00a7oi1:1tiy hold<\/p>\n<p>a spot inspection at the location whemljttz\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>peti\ufb01oner has installed 3 borewell, on 12&#8211;06&#8211;<br \/>\n2809 at 3.00 9.111., identify the properties,  <\/p>\n<p>reference to the layout pian, supra, and _$}&#8217;ic&#8217;hA&#8217;   :_. A4 <\/p>\n<p>other records in the possession of 3&#8243;:1V&#8217;_o&#8217;V. <\/p>\n<p>zespondent and the 2&#8243;&#8221; zesponde&#8217;11&#8211;t.to  3   <\/p>\n<p>report.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. in compliance with t;E&#8217;ie:v&#8221;or_c1er,A&#8221;per\u00a3ies&#8217;._r\u00a2I\u00a7e1*.:..t1iat<\/p>\n<p>they were present for,.joi:1t V. oi1&#8211;v.3&#8230;2,.E\u00a7.2009,<br \/>\nwhence, it was noticed  , instalied by<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner wee  ..deH1afeated as park<\/p>\n<p>in the 1a\u00a7;o:.1.t   _ et\ufb01TC}Qset1 to the report dated<\/p>\n<p>15.6.2009 &#8220;&lt;f1e&lt;,:i  respondent. The report is<\/p>\n<p> _ accepted as thefe..ie_no?; opposition.<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  \u00ab.3, counsel for the peti\ufb01oner submits that<\/p>\n<p>  tio dispute that the boreweil is installed<\/p>\n<p>  the per}: area, nevertheless, boundaries mentioned in<\/p>\n<p>    deeds in respect of the immovable property, \u00e9o<\/p>\n<p>  taliy with the boundaries of the park area :0<\/p>\n<p>uifcoxxtexzd that the petition be directed to be considered as<\/p>\n<p>an application for an alternate site to the SR1<\/p>\n<p>respondent and to pass necessary orders thereon within<\/p>\n<p>a time \ufb01name.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In the light of the submission of &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>counsel for the petitioner, as recorded t1f1e:.A_d;er_eer&#8217;   d <\/p>\n<p>dated 6.6.2009, coupled <\/p>\n<p>report, clearly indicating that the .pe&#8217;titioner .. <\/p>\n<p>borewell in the area demarcated as&#8221; &#8212;   the<br \/>\nassumption that the  g-idfteri ]&#8217;to_&#8217;w_eIe in fact not<\/p>\n<p>located  is for the petitioner to ca}!<\/p>\n<p>upon the 3-&#8216;?  identify the location of the<\/p>\n<p>  Vproper1,y____dsubject matter of the gift and<\/p>\n<p>,iEie_I;ti\ufb01ed as falling Within the park area.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore  Vfpveti\ufb01oner cannot claim that the gifted<\/p>\n<p> &#8216; &#8216;.immotreo&#8217;ie property is located in the area demarcated<\/p>\n<p>5. If for any reason the 31&#8242;&#8221; resporxdent is usable to<\/p>\n<p>iden\ufb01fy the location of the gifted property, in the<\/p>\n<p>M<\/p>\n<p>petitio:r1er&#8217;s claim for the aliotment of alteiiia\ufb01\u00e9&#8217; .<br \/>\nand pass orders as expeditiously aJ.\u00a7\u00bbVpossi_b\u00a3\u00e9&#8217;.~* &#8211; :  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>csg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 Author: Ram Mohan Reddy 3 NELAMANGALA TOWN MUNICIPAL c0UN_cii;&#8221; if NELAMANGALA 562 I63 BANGALORE RURAL DIS&#8217;I&#8217;RIC&#8217;I&#8217;M REPFD BY ITS CHIEF OFFICER (BY SR1. R DEVADAS, AGA FdR1}_ (By Sn&#8217;.: S G PANDIT, ADV FOR R23 3 _ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66206","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":630,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\",\"name\":\"The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009"},"wordCount":630,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009","name":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural ... vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-17T09:39:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-bangalore-urban-and-rural-vs-state-of-karnataka-department-on-17-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Bangalore Urban And Rural &#8230; vs State Of Karnataka Department on 17 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66206","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66206"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66206\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66206"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66206"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66206"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}