{"id":66378,"date":"2010-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010"},"modified":"2019-02-02T05:57:35","modified_gmt":"2019-02-02T00:27:35","slug":"sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 20\" DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019\nBEFORE \n\nTHE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYR1A'RE:):)f\u00a3' \" %\n\nREGULAR SECOND APPEAL Ho. 1971~'0.E':2OG'\u00a7:  E'  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri. Gangappa,\n\nS\/O Late Sudugadappa,\n\nAged about 56 years,\n\nOcc: Agriculturists,\n\nR\/O Thangali Village, _\n\nKasaba Hobli,      '    \n\nKadur Taluk --- 5715-48.  I   ' \"APPELLANT\n\n(By shr':._ M. 'Shiv'aV:ij:1:;ft11y;'T'T\u00a7gd*mcate)\n\nAND:\n\n   ..... \n\n '\n\nA  Agc'[dabO1;t51 years,\n\n\n'  Aged about 46 years,\n\n-T \"Both ares\u00e9ns of late Sedugadappa,\n ' ..fAxgfie..u}turi.st,\n  *  _ 'R\/'O\u00bbMRa1leshwara Vi\ufb02age,\nE'   KadurTa1uk.\n\n\n\nix.)\n\n3, Gowramma W\/0 Govindappa,\n\nD\/o Sudugadappa,\n\nAged about 53 years\n\nOcc: Coolie,\n\nR\/o Vitalpura,\n\nYellambalse,\n\nKadur Taluk.\n\n4. Jayamma W\/o Rajappa,\nD\/o Sudugadappa,\nAged about 52 years,\nR\/o Bettadahally,\nTarikere Taluk.\n\n5. Konthamma W\/0 Shekarappa.  0 2\"\nD\/0 Sudug.at{,app.a,   \nAged about 5 \"E3\/ears.\nOcc: Cc7&gt;olie;= \"   \nR\/0_Lak_ka.ti'kd\u00abt;e, _ ,_ \nHi.1*enaIi'ur}{obIi;\"   \nKadurrfaluk \u00bb54'8._ 0 ' ...RESPONDENTS\n\n(Respondents  I  Siazfeii Sei'Ved)\n\n   is filed Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure,\n'-1908; aegainst .the[.'j'udgment and decree dated 02.06.2008, passed\n\niii\"R.}*\\._.No;'l.i5_;t2_00fi'on the file of the Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) &amp; JMFC,\nKadut, part.lya-lloiwing the appeal and setting aside the judgment\n\n ii and de'Cree--Ad3ted 14.03.2007 passed in O.S.No.434\/I997 on the\n~ 1'-v%_\"l\"il.E3 of the Rfincipal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn), Kadur.\n\n  appeal coming on for Hearing this day, the Court\n\n  __'7deli';gered the following: --\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Heard the learned counsel for the appellant. The<\/p>\n<p>respondents who are served have remained absent.<\/p>\n<p>2. The appellant was the plaintiff before <\/p>\n<p>in a suit for partition and separate possession.~&#8217;&#8212;-T_h&#8217;e.. d&#8217;e.:fencia;j2tsr <\/p>\n<p>who had entered appearance in the suit inc1u:;lelci..eertain&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>properties namely a house property and StIr&#8217;=.?&#8217;.:ey{_&#8217;N.o,282 <\/p>\n<p>Thangali Village measuring 32py%ii:gunta_s. fl&#8221;he.,tria,Ii\u00a7 Court on<br \/>\nframing the issues partly held that the plaintiff<\/p>\n<p>was entitled: to  the properties and the property<\/p>\n<p>mentioned iiinoptihe writteyni Vsytatement subject to payment of the<\/p>\n<p> ._nece._s_siary__iiCovurt fees._..__._.T&#8217;nis was challenged in an appeal by the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;hereilni insofar as the decree in respect of the properties<\/p>\n<p>mentioned. .ir1f&#8217;:-tile written statement was namely concerned, the<\/p>\n<p>ii&#8221;-&#8216;\u00ab\u00ab.__i&#8217;house property and the land in Survey No.282 of Thangali<\/p>\n<p>A   The lower appellate Court held that insofar as the house<\/p>\n<p> property is concerned, it was not defined by any boundaries and<\/p>\n<p>that no document was produced regarding the existence of the<\/p>\n<p>house and the hithaiu property and therefore? it could not&#8221;&#8211;.be the<\/p>\n<p>subject matter of partition and accordingly set aside of<\/p>\n<p>the judgment and decree. However, insofar aS_S.\ufb01fV*ey&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>Thangali village was concerned, the ioweryipappellate<\/p>\n<p>on the basis of the mutation extract certified as  l.9\u00a7\u00a76 that<\/p>\n<p>the land was transferred to Savithrariirrna &#8216;represented by her<br \/>\nmother Honnarnma as the &#8220;guardian th&#8217;eip[rr1inioyr and further it was<br \/>\nnot the case that_r&#8217;Savith1&#8217;amnia ia&#8217;11d&#8217;r..}ionnarrima were residing<br \/>\nseparately frorrr'&#8221;theA:..p.laint.iffs__and j&#8217;ust_&#8217;hecause the change of the<br \/>\nname of1.kat}1edairifrorn&#8217; other na&#8217;me of the plaintiff to his daughter&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>name by maki_rfg.a11appliciation to the revenue authorities, it could<\/p>\n<p> = ._not  that therevwas&#8217; a transfer, which took away the right of<\/p>\n<p>persoirsr  said land. The lower appellate Court has<\/p>\n<p>proceeded yoinirtthe footing that since the land apparently was<\/p>\n<p> granted &#8220;&#8216;to__the family as service inarn land, the same could not be<\/p>\n<p>it   as the exclusive property of the plaintiff and it could only<\/p>\n<p>he   be treated as the property of the family and has proceeded to hold<\/p>\n<p>that the defendants right in respect of the same would not stand<br \/>\nextinguished by a mere transfer of katha in favour of the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>daughter and held that the same was available forvpppartiition.<\/p>\n<p>Incidentally, the lower appellate Court itself has fof;_indl<\/p>\n<p>was no order of regraat produced in respect ofthe ~sajid ll&#8217;and,_ It is&#8221; . <\/p>\n<p>this finding of the lower appellate &#8216;Cpouzprtthat&#8217;\u00bb.is&#8217;~sot1ght*~..to*1.pe<br \/>\nassailed in the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The substantial quesptionfoi&#8221;V].aw that.wpou,lid arise for<\/p>\n<p>consideration ist-\n<\/p>\n<p>thei i&#8217;n&#8217;lSurvey No.282 which<\/p>\n<p> to   Could be claimed as<\/p>\n<p>E. &#8212; .. jpintilavtriilyilprolperty notwithstanding that there<br \/>\n a,,was&#8217;i&#8211; no r\u00e9garant order in respect of the said<\/p>\n<p> 4. .&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;..&#8217;I&#8217;he&#8217;Vv&#8217;va&#8217;nswer straight away would have to be in the<\/p>\n<p>V _ affirmative.&#8217; Since even according to the lower appellate Cottrt<\/p>\n<p>l:&#8217;ethere&#8211;.waslllno order of regrant in respect of the said land, it could<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\nnot be held as part of the joint family property and would not be<\/p>\n<p>available for partition.\n<\/p>\n<p>5. Therefore, the appeal is allowed to the limited .._extent<\/p>\n<p>of setting aside the finding that the land in <\/p>\n<p>Thangali village was not available for partitionmas-..the:r:e~  no <\/p>\n<p>order of regrant made in respect of the;.lsaid:Alaad&#8217;;\u00ab_Tj   &#8221; V <\/p>\n<p>6. The appeal is allowed  saidsv.lelxteint&#8217; afl.di&#8217;tlie&#8221;\u00bbs\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree of the C0urtlb~eil0\\.vV is not  in other<\/p>\n<p>respects.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 20&#8243; DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON&#8217; BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND BYR1A&#8217;RE:):)f\u00a3&#8217; &#8221; % REGULAR SECOND APPEAL Ho. 1971~&#8217;0.E&#8217;:2OG&#8217;\u00a7: E&#8217; BETWEEN: Sri. Gangappa, S\/O Late Sudugadappa, Aged about 56 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66378","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":617,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010"},"wordCount":617,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010","name":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-02T00:27:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gangappa-vs-ramanna-on-20-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Gangappa vs Ramanna on 20 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66378","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66378"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66378\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66378"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66378"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66378"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}