{"id":66500,"date":"2009-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009"},"modified":"2016-01-16T21:15:03","modified_gmt":"2016-01-16T15:45:03","slug":"sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n
 \n\nIN 'I\"H17I HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\n\u00a7)A'_1_'EI) THIS THE 91%: DAY OF SEPTEMBE-i:\u00a7':\u00a700 9,\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'E3LE3 MR. JUST}-CE'AR_AI,I  \n\nCRIMINAL PETITION NO:}--_1A2O9\/2'CO4'~ VA \n\nBE'I'\\?'v\"I3Z EN:\n\n1\n\nSem\"1pang'i V  \n.$\/<)\u00a2J.Krish:1ap;)z~i_   V\nAgged about 38 years,  \nR\/0 San:andur"'  -  " \nvillage, 'K.a\u00a73aba._Hob1i " A _\n\/-'meka!  B:--_1;:1ga1Qref.'I7\u00a3.u1t\n\nrX;2p\u00e91;ii%"G$wda   "\n\n S\/0" C,?ij_nn\u00e9j.ppa' ' '  _'\n\n';f\\f__{Ei\u00a5d ab(;1jjt._}3<'3  '\n\u00a3}i\u00a7i2'ufag'e.r_a Village  \nAi'1"c.l_g:\u00ab;11.VTq. ._Barigg_11L0re Rural\n\n vSI'1'11ivas '=.._ _____ \n\n r,)'V+'Y\u00a7_-zllappa\n 35 years.\n\n ' -Rf\/'-.5)VA.fi~.i.bele\n\nA A11\u00e9k:\u00bb13T:"I'aluk\n\n\u00a3_'3"'cimg';1l0r\u20ac\n\nR\u00e9ghu\n Major,\n' R\/oAt't1'bcle\n\nAr1c,-Ra} 'I'aIuk\nB211 xgalore PETITIONERS\n(By Sri Basavaprabhu SP3.ti\u00a3, Adv.)\n\nC-.{""'~r-~.......y..,\n\n \n\n\n\nAND\n\n1 Ravi Shankar C R\n\nStation House Officer\nRailway Police\n\n2 Cheluvaraj\nStation House Officer\nAttibele Police Station  _\n\nAttibele\nAnekal Tq\nBangalore Rural  g\n\n3 Narayanappa T  V; .\nS\/0 late Sonnappa "  T A\nAged 40 ye'ar__s  _  - \nR\/o samaedur Villge   g    so \nAneka1--~'Fq  "     .\nBanga1or_e" Rural. D'i-st, '  . :\n\n4 State of .Karfn~atakaa.by-- C\nits Public 'Prose'c1ito_r"\u00ab \nHighfzourt B_uiIdi'n.g'\u00a7\n.~AriekaI"t"o1ice" Station.\n Ea\ufb01galoreg  \u00ab eeeee _ .  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  1   Sri C V Sudhindra for R3)<\/p>\n
“””~.Th.~jiS.  is filed u\/s.-482 Cr.P.C praying to<\/p>\n
 ‘quash ~ the entire proceedings initiated against the
\n petiationers in PCR No. 82 \/ 2003 on the \ufb01le of the Add}.
\n  Anekal, and consequently quash the FIR<\/p>\n
_ bearing Cr.N0. 23\/ 2003 on the file of 1st respondent.<\/p>\n
This Crl. Petition coming on for dictating order<\/p>\n
 \u00bb it this day, the Court passed the following:<\/p>\n
c-\u00b0-f””””~”**x__-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. Stated in brief, the undisputed facts leading to<\/p>\n
the present petition are as under:\n<\/p>\n
(a) The deceased Sonnappa,-fthe.ifatherhof\u00bb<\/p>\n
respondent No.3 Narayanappa died’ V’orv’_’abodt\u00bbu
\n6.8.2002. His dead body  <\/p>\n
This very 3rd respondent \ufb01iedthis cor:2}\u00a71aint’3’b.eforece<\/p>\n
the poiice of Baiyyaphanahalii.  On
\nthe basis of the saied—-eompiaint’ a-casei in Crime
\nNo.11 \/2002 of’-tire’ said  P.S. came to be
\nregistered against-_   the elder
\nbi’O{h3\u20ac*1″H.:'(Djf   herein and
\n of ‘ the said Muniyappa,
\n__:’_’o_r  Sections 302 and 201 IPC
\n for  the death of the deceased<\/p>\n
Eitmnappa;\n<\/p>\n
V {‘l.’:a)”-V.,fIf_hereafter, the said case came to be
\n to Attlbeie RS. on the ground of
\n  jurisdiction. Therefore, the said case
\n.  *:;to be registered as Crime No.7\/2002 of
\n z lattiheie P.S. against both the same accused
\nvnanieiy Muniyappa and Rathnarnma for the said
\n<)i'fei1<.:es. After investigation, the said police
\nsubrnitt.ed charge sheet against the said accused<\/p>\n
for the said offences. This 31" respondent<\/p>\n
\u20ac <\/p>\n
complaint that was fiied by this third resp_o_ndent~<\/p>\n
Narayanappa before the said Police, he <\/p>\n
No.82\/ 2003 alleging against petitioner-[3Nosiieiiiil..e:’\u00a3he order dated 18.11.2003 passed in the<\/p>\n
 satd~.i3C\u00a7I\u20acV No.82\/O3 by the learned JMFC, Anekal is<\/p>\n
” \u00ab f ” I?ICii’:”_1?.iC1iI’2(Ibl\u20ac.\n<\/p>\n
i3. I have perused the entire averments in the
\ncompiaiut filed by the third respondent-Narayanappa in<\/p>\n
 afx.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
17. The learned Counsel for the third reVsvr)oinr;1_ent<\/p>\n
has produced copy” of the judgment passedfyin<\/p>\n
s.c. No.114\/2004, wherein both Muniya,v\u00a7;::;ga”‘~\u00e9.nd hiss. <\/p>\n
wife Rathnamma. who were the o_’ne1yt’ aeeu.sed”‘t.h~e’re1Ln,<\/p>\n
came to be acquitted o:f*-..};.)oth–“-v.theV offent:es…nnde1*.t’<\/p>\n
Sections 302 and 201  them in
\nrespect of the murderftof  On
\nperusal of t.he_:said  seen that the
\naccused I}To  anything in her
\nstat’e1nr3.t.1t_”teeorded   313 Cr.P.C. in the
\nsaid.   sending her telegram to<\/p>\n
the p(>1ie’e-\u00ab–.s_V%ot7  intirnating them that the<\/p>\n
 pes;1t;:;(;);\u00a7m~5 h\u00e9”rej.n,….\u00ab’committed the murder of the<\/p>\n
 ‘ detrerasectt Sohnappa. If she had knowledge that these<\/p>\n
j;\u00a7etii:’i<:)r1ers:\u20ac_;3ecused had committed murder of the<\/p>\n
de(:ea~se.ti. nothing prevented her from disclosing the<\/p>\n
 before the Trial Court in the said case white her<\/p>\n
  statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. was recorded.<\/p>\n
Q-'"-('\\'\\"%—-\u00b0-\\,<\/p>\n
18. Further, copy of deposition of the third<\/p>\n
respondent herein, recorded in the said case, as<\/p>\n
is also produced by the learned counsel  V’<\/p>\n
respondent. On perusal of the said ‘.itll:c’oi1lcig<\/p>\n
be seen that he has only stated  thatlihe <\/p>\n
know how his deceased  It is V<\/p>\n
pertinent to note that as_onfL’h’e*. recording of his
\nsaid evidence, he [Sm   filed his
\npresent PCR   to be so that
\nby that time his brother\u00bb
\nMuniyappa  (who were
\naccusedliril the ”that it was these petitioners —<\/p>\n
accused. wh’o..,vcom”mitted the murder of his deceased<\/p>\n
.  iiiiothing preylented him from deposing anything<\/p>\n
agaijnslt-.th.epsc.A:’petitioners and also from producing the<\/p>\n
 _ releVant,.__”doe\ufb01ments in respect of the murder of the<\/p>\n
H ”   ‘ = Vpdeceased’.\n<\/p>\n
19. As could be seen from the complaint in PCR<\/p>\n
u:f1\\To.82\/2003, the averrnents therein do not disclose any<\/p>\n
‘___m___\u00a3””*<~a–',-s<\/p>\n
help to the complainant to show that it was these
\npetitioners who conspired together and murdered-~-__the<\/p>\n
deceased–Sonnappa.\n<\/p>\n
23. Placing reliance on the decision of   3<\/p>\n
Supreme Court in the case of  <\/p>\n
or’ UTTAR PRADESH AND oIHEREs.__r3e-perteti’V_-ih’ \u00bb(2~0e\u00e9}~a <\/p>\n
Supreme Court Cases 409, t11e”‘iearned._c0Li.ns\u00e9e1’tor the
\nthird respondentco1aipiain.airit’ that the
\nMagistrate can order a   and take
\nsuitable steps” fo’ij.c:i1pr0peripirii\/e’stiga’tion.:Aby invoking the
\nproVisior1s*–of .Se\u20ac'{i:i.,:o11.’v4it-5:6{3)’Cr.P.C. In the said case<\/p>\n
before theeflonthle\u00e9dSupreme Court, the son of the<\/p>\n
 was .’fo’u\u00abr1.d_..dead on 23.08.2003 and a report<\/p>\n
 ~st1br’I1i.tted-.,0n 29.08.2003 to the effect that the<\/p>\n
deathdof  deceased was due to accident or suicide<\/p>\n
 rtotmhomicidai one and therefore the appellant<\/p>\n
  “:dt’i1erei:fi, aggrieved by the said report, approached the<\/p>\n
  Court by filing a Writ Petition and the said writ<\/p>\n
ifpetition was dismissed. Oh those facts, the I-Ion’b1e<\/p>\n
\u00a2……f”””””‘”\n<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
Supreme Court observed at para Nos.11 and 17 as<\/p>\n
under:\n<\/p>\n
11. “In this connection we would like to S115\u00a5.t…6._”<\/p>\n
if a person has a grievance that the police  <\/p>\n
is not registering his FIR _1_l.17ld_e1″   <\/p>\n
Cr.PC, then he can approach=,the-.Sii\u00bbp4erin.tendentV  S
\nof Police under Section _ 154{.3]”‘VCr.P,C’.l,  S’ an <\/p>\n
application in writing.  thatdoes
\nany satisfactory result  iseinsel t’ha_t either
\nthe FIR is still not\u00ab-register2:eci,”that even after
\nregistering itono  held, it is
\nopen to tlgpipepiol-_  to \ufb01le an
\napplica\u00a7tiori<\u00ab..V1ii11Ci,eIt  'l._55_(3) Cr PC before
\nthe' concerned. If such an
\napplication' Section 156(3) is filed before
\nthe l\\\/Iagiistr-a.te',: the Magistrate can direct the FIR
\n  regis't'ere_d…and also can direct a proper
\nA  to be made, in a case where,
\n the aggrieved person, no proper
\nA  was made. The Magistrate can also
\nuncier the same provision monitor the<\/p>\n
S 'S investigation ensure a proper investigation."<\/p>\n
–   “In our opinion Section 156(3) Cr PC is wide<\/p>\n
enough to include all such powers in a
\n;-….(“”””\u00b0”‘~–“”‘<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
Magistrate which are necessary for ensuring __a<\/p>\n
proper investigation, and it includes the poweritoh.<\/p>\n
order registration of an FIR and of  <\/p>\n
proper investigation if the Magistrate is ‘satisfied<\/p>\n
that a proper investigation ha.s””not\u00e9 <\/p>\n
is not being done by the police.;’_”tS’ection <\/p>\n
Cr PC, though brie\ufb02y worded,  our opinion,
\nVery Wide and it will include’ all st1ch”‘incid’enta1
\npowers as are neCe.ssaI’.f”ior:”ensuringVa’ proper<\/p>\n
investigation.”<\/p>\n
\n\n24. Sufficiepgit  observations\nmade by    cannot be made\napplicavblelvto'    case, inasmuch as,\nthe   having filed his\n\n<\/pre>\n
complaint beforethe ‘police concerned against his own<\/p>\n
llvbrotherlulanVd\u00abi_sister;in–law alleging therein that they<\/p>\n
Aiconin1it’ted.,Vpinilivider of the deceased Sonnappa, could not<\/p>\n
V _ mair”i–tai:.i,. during the pendency of investigation on his<\/p>\n
 coinplaint, his subsequent private complaint<\/p>\n
.l   in respect of the same incident of murder of the<\/p>\n
” “deceased, against the present petitioners alleging that it<\/p>\n
was not his brother and sister~in~law who committed<\/p>\n
r’\u00b0*~\u00bb–\u00bb-{P”‘””‘””””\n<\/p>\n
criminal proceedings during investigation stage merely<\/p>\n
on the premise that one or two ingredients have-=___r1ot<\/p>\n
been stated with details. It is further observed<\/p>\n
therein that for quashing an FIR [a   <\/p>\n
permitted only in extremely rarefcases) l_t}i1e -:information<\/p>\n
in the complaint must be so bereftldof eve\u00bbn;cthe” <\/p>\n
facts which are absolutely nec’essary foi’..tn’a}f:-in,\u20acDfv;:o1iVt the
\noffence.\n<\/p>\n
26. Even follovdng ::Val_3’p\u00a7.je{3′.v.observations of<\/p>\n
  considered opinion that the<\/p>\n
avermentsV’c_ornpl.aii1t (in PCR 82 \/ 03] of the third<\/p>\n
.—.ppvrespogndenticornplainant do not disclose even least<\/p>\n
rn.ianim_urr1″ifactsconstituting any of the offences alleged<\/p>\n
against thexfpeltitioners herein. Therefore. the above said<\/p>\n
lidecisionllof the Hon’b1e Supreme Court does not support<\/p>\n
  of the 3″‘ respondent –\u00ab complainant.<\/p>\n
(‘M-~–\u00a7”\\”””””””\n<\/p>\n
(1) 2009 AIR SCW 60 (Nirmal Singh Kahlon Vs.
\nState of Punjab and others with J.P.StnglVa–.and<\/p>\n
others Vs. State of Punjab and others)__”‘: <\/p>\n
(2) (2008) 5 sec 730 (B. Nagabhus’h:ar:amS”‘  <\/p>\n
State of Karnataka)<\/p>\n
(3) A.I.R. 2000 so 2988 (staa\u00e9qf Wes’t.”_,F3engaz:.:t\/’st’V’-,<\/p>\n
Mir Mohammad Omararld othezfs”ee1ie.et&:, V
\n(4) A.I.R. 2001 S:(,’~..143l3″”V(Sti:;ha’SinghvVVs\u00a7x State of
\nPuryab)     S S A<\/p>\n
(5) 1978tC;\u00a2L’koz.5.}tA1:388i ‘4-V A;3i;R_.ss\u00bbi’1976 so 1672 {<\/p>\n
Devarapalli   and
\nothers Vs. Narvayoartat
\n(6) 1980 Crl.  s 12S0’-:V{Su;oretr1e..t3ourt) (State of
\n  sgcaamggnd Shankar)
\n(7}.. A.I.R.  Bala Vs. Suresh<\/p>\n
Kumar anotothefs} ”\n<\/p>\n
V  (8)   753 (Sam Mittal Vs. Government of<\/p>\n
S’ ” . ‘I*ZaI’nCLtaka; H<\/p>\n
,_,,___\u00a7”””‘*-“”‘\\….-………<\/p>\n
his earlier complaint in Crime No.11\/2002 of the said
\nRailway P.S. [ which subsequently came to be numbered<\/p>\n
as Crime No.9\/2002 of Attibele RS. on being<\/p>\n
transferred from Railway R8. of Attibele P.S.) in,<\/p>\n
of the same incident of death of the same. ~<\/p>\n
Sonnappa.   y<\/p>\n
34. The facts in the said  <\/p>\n
Supreme Court Were; ” lwvhen a.”i\\\/linister to ” V<\/p>\n
inaugurate the evening branehtrf la-._Co–olperatiive bank<\/p>\n
at Kannur in the State” of,.l3K;eralagiptwo incidents<\/p>\n
occurred =at—-places and, during the said
\nincidents.flunderrlthelordersl of the Executive Magistrate
\n “St1.p_ervintendent of Police, the police did
\n  they also fired and consequently, five
\n several persons suffered injuries. Two
\nlgcrimes~  to be registered in respect of the said
\n   Crime No. 353\/ 1994 in respect of the<\/p>\n
 incident at one place for the offences under sections<\/p>\n
 143, 148, 332, 353, 324 and 307 read with section<\/p>\n
{ <\/p>\n
43<\/span><\/p>\n
charge of a police station, shall be reduced to
\nwriting by him or under his direction, and be<\/p>\n
read over to the information; and every such
\ninformation, whether given in writing or reduced <\/p>\n
to writing as aforesaid, shall be signed by
\nperson giving it, and the substance thereo,f”s’hali._’_ ‘A ;.
\nbe entered in a book to be kept by such offiCer,ini’
\nsuch form as the State Governrrie.”:t::j~..ni;:1_y\u00ab.A<\/p>\n
prescribe in this behayf<\/p>\n
(2) A copy of the informationyfas
\nunder subsection {1} shall be given j’orti2\u00a7tv2’th, <\/p>\n
free of cost, to the informant,”\n<\/p>\n
{3} Any p\u20acTSOfi::.CiggTi:\u20ac3t)\u00e9dVa-1fefuSt3llHOl;l the
\npart of an officer in-ch–arg_e\u00a7Q’F a’-po..l_ice_ station to
\nrecord the information refe_rred.–=to’irt:sub–\u00bbsection<\/p>\n
{1} may .seno’:\ufb02_thfe ‘substance of such information,
\nin writing .and by post, ‘t’o-the,Superintendent of
\nPolir:e..,,concer#?ied 5’ ‘i,-f..,.SCitisfied that such
\ninformation, discloses the commission of a
\ncognizable  “either investigate the
\ncase’ ,Vhirr%zse{f_ or”-dir.ec’t”an investigation to be
\nmade by any policerof\ufb01cer subordinate to him, in
\nthe yymanrierlproviiiied by this Code, and such<\/p>\n
 shali”ha.v_e\u00ab’ail the powers of an officer in
\n_ “charge_ of the police station in relation to that<\/p>\n
   the above discussion it follows
\n“that under the scheme of the provisions of<\/p>\n
Sections 154, 155, 156, 157, 182, 169, 170 and<\/p>\n
 ‘A  CrPC only the earliest or the first
\n_  information in regard to the commission of a
\n ‘cognizable offence satisfies the requirements of<\/p>\n
Sections 154 CrPC. Thus there can be no
\nsecond FIR and consequently there can be no
\nfresh investigation on receipt of every
\nsubsequent information in respect of the same<\/p>\n
(…_…_SI”””‘”-1\u00bb–…\n<\/p>\n
45<\/span><\/p>\n
before the police immediateiy after the occurrence of the<\/p>\n
incident of murder of the deceased and another in___PCR<\/p>\n
N082\/2003, about one year three months after<\/p>\n
his said Complaint before the police and that ”<\/p>\n
the investigation on his earlier complaint <\/p>\n
progress. When the investigationddofdthe cas-e.regi.stered’v.<\/p>\n
on his own complaint was pe1i.di”ng in Crime
\nof Attibele P.S., third \u00a5i’espond’eIit,:’ heing con1piainant-
\ninformant therein, could hiaxre recording<\/p>\n
of his further~’statement  V161 Cr.P.C. by<\/p>\n
the  _heVmcou1d have approached
\nthe learned _ Nfagidstrateiih”seeking direction to the<\/p>\n
Investigating’ Officer  record his further statement if<\/p>\n
his reqtlinestx for recording such statement was rejected<\/p>\n
 theft  Investigating Officer. He did not chose<\/p>\n
V dd _ to do so.–..”Bes’ides this, he did not say anything against the<\/p>\n
 _petitior1er’s herein when he was examined as PW 20 in the<\/p>\n
  case No. 114\/2004 wherein charge sheet was<\/p>\n
  submitted by the Police after investigation in Crime<\/p>\n
“_______\u00a7”\\.r’–…’~—–\n<\/p>\n
46<\/span><\/p>\n
No.9\/2002 ol’Attibele P.S. which had been registered on the<\/p>\n
basis of his said earlier complaint before the police.<\/p>\n
Therefore, I am of the considered opinion that <\/p>\n
said private complaint by the third respondent isjc’lea.r*e V’<\/p>\n
of the process of law.   –\n<\/p>\n
37. As on this date, the said I-ssesstehs…’case}-shesT<\/p>\n
already been disposed of a:r-‘d’the acciised   <\/p>\n
been acquitted of both the off_eVnces.._pund’er:sections 302
\nand 201 of let: with whteh ‘Aethsyjitwsieeherged for the
\nalleged murder ‘Ca’fv’.th\u20ac: –  Under<\/p>\n
these circumstaricese.v\u00e9\u00e9yifjtheh investigation in Crime<\/p>\n
No.23\/20(53–._VofV Ba-iyVyapp:.anahalli Railway Police Station<\/p>\n
 ‘~   to he ‘rvegistered pursuant to the order dated<\/p>\n
 in PCR No.82\/2003 filed by the 3rd<\/p>\n
re’sp.odndentr:’1.Vhierein is allowed to be proceeded with.<\/p>\n
 ‘i.Virtua1lyA’1;t amounts to rednvestigation of the case in<\/p>\n
   of murder of the deceased Sonnappa which is<\/p>\n
 not permissible under law as held by Hon’b1e Supreme<\/p>\n
it Court in Mithabhai Pachabhai Patel & Others Vs. State<\/p>\n
< <\/p>\n
47<\/span><\/p>\n
of Gujarath reported in (2009) 6 SCC 332(D).  is<\/p>\n
observed in the said case as under:\n<\/p>\n
“D. Criminal Procedure Code, 197:3;   ~<\/p>\n
Reinvestigation — Perrnissibility.~—\u00ab\u00ab~<__:~..  <\/p>\n
investigation and reinvestigation; \u00ab,d'i_stinqu'ishedV <\/p>\n
Held. both stand on different footitig. <\/p>\n
distinction exists betvv-even a hreinvevst-igation and " V<\/p>\n
further investigation –V____Supi*e_Vr1'1e..C–ourt  High
\nCourt can     offence
\ninvestigated and\/ .'\/_'.:\u00ab4j.j:nvestigated W.
\nHowever;  forbidden in law,<\/p>\n
no superiorl[_cou'rtZwou1d.3'ordinariiy issue direction<\/p>\n
of :v'4..dConstitution of India — Arts.32
\nand 226. }nt'e\u00abrferenee in criminal matters –~
\ninves'ti.gation._–k'3Vcope of power with respect to"<\/p>\n
  the above observations, E am of the<\/p>\n
 that investigation in Cr.No.23\/O3 of<\/p>\n
 the said"V.Rai1vvay P.S. cannot be allowed to be continued<\/p>\n
\ufb02fas  amounts to reinvestigation which is not<\/p>\n
'  permissible in law.\n<\/p>\n
48<\/span><\/p>\n
39. Further, Sri. Basava Prabhu Patil, the learned<\/p>\n
Senior counsel has also relied on the decision <\/p>\n
case of BA. Srinivasa Guptha and others    <\/p>\n
Karnataka by Superintendent xof “Politic .; <\/p>\n
reported in ILR 2002 Karnatai\u00e9a 1’3is5.’@_’n.eed<\/p>\n
discuss in detail the rinci”}es”i.1aid dow*n.’-in’\u00b0the said
\np p  _ <\/p>\n
judgment.\n<\/p>\n
40. F’ or Vvthet\ufb01resent petition
\nis allowed.   No.82\/2003 on the
\nfile of’   Bangalore Rural
\nDistrictzand.  in Crime No.23\/2003 of<\/p>\n
BaiayyappanahailiVE:aiiWay”‘.P.S. which came to be registered<\/p>\n
 ~..purs\u00a7an;;.r,:to’the orderdated 18.11.2003 passed in PCR No.<\/p>\n
  filed by the third respondent herein are<\/p>\n
heieh\ufb01  The respondent No.3 Narayanappa shall<\/p>\n
spay cost  Rs.2,000\/- to each of the petitioner Nos. 1 to 4.<\/p>\n
it  P1*J’E’\/tsn*<\/p>\n
301\/ ‘5
\nIuc;Tg’3*;\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 Author: Arali Nagaraj IN ‘I”H17I HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE \u00a7)A’_1_’EI) THIS THE 91%: DAY OF SEPTEMBE-i:\u00a7’:\u00a700 9, BEFORE THE HON’E3LE3 MR. JUST}-CE’AR_AI,I CRIMINAL PETITION NO:}–_1A2O9\/2’CO4’~ VA BE’I’\\?’v”I3Z EN: 1 Sem”1pang’i V .$\/<)\u00a2J.Krish:1ap;)z~i_ V Agged about 38 years, R\/0 San:andur"' – […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66500","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2404,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\",\"name\":\"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009"},"wordCount":2404,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009","name":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T15:45:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sampangi-vs-ravi-shankar-c-r-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sampangi vs Ravi Shankar C R on 9 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66500","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66500"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66500\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66500"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66500"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66500"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}