{"id":66580,"date":"2007-10-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007"},"modified":"2019-03-05T10:26:17","modified_gmt":"2019-03-05T04:56:17","slug":"radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","title":{"rendered":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA No. 617 of 2003()\n\n\n1. RADHAKRISHNAN K.M., AGED 32 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. T.G.DINESH S\/O. GOPI, THRIPPEKULATH\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM\n\n                For Respondent  :SMT.SARAH SALVY\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.PADMANABHAN NAIR\n\n Dated :25\/10\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                          K. PADMANABHAN NAIR ,J.\n                      -------------------------------------------------\n                              M.A.C.A.No.617 of 2003\n                      -------------------------------------------------\n                    Dated, this the 25th day of October, 2007\n                                     JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
       The claimant in O.P.(MV) No.1137\/1995 on the file of the Motor Accidents<\/p>\n
Claims Tribunal, Irinjalakuda is the appellant.             Appellant filed the Original<\/p>\n
Petition alleging that on 5.2.1995 at about 9.15 p.m.            he sustained injuries in a<\/p>\n
motor vehicle accident. In the Original Petition it was averred that he was walking<\/p>\n
along the road which lies in front of Chalakudy KSRTC bus stand from east to<\/p>\n
west and when he reached in front of Kallarakkal Auto Service a motor cycle<\/p>\n
bearing registration No.KL-8\/D 2177 in which first respondent was riding came<\/p>\n
from behind and hit against his person causing serious injuries. Immediately after<\/p>\n
the accident the appellant was taken to the hospital by the first respondent rider<\/p>\n
and his friends. Appellant regained consciousness took conscious on the next day<\/p>\n
and informed his brother that he sustained the injuries in a motor vehicle accident.<\/p>\n
Information was given to the Chalakkudy Police by the brother and the Police had<\/p>\n
registered a case against the first respondent. It was averred that the accident<\/p>\n
occurred due to the negligence of the first respondent.          Vehicle was covered with<\/p>\n
a valid policy of insurance issued by the second respondent. Appellant initially<\/p>\n
claimed an amount of Rs.60,000\/- as compensation and subsequently it was<\/p>\n
enhanced to Rs.1,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n
       2.     First respondent filed a written statement admitting the accident. It<\/p>\n
MACA No.617\/2003                        -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
was contended that on 5.2.1995 at about 9.15 p.m. while first respondent was<\/p>\n
riding motor cycle bearing registration No.KL-8\/D 2177            very slowly and<\/p>\n
observing traffic rules and when the vehicle reached in front of Kallarakkal Auto<\/p>\n
Service the alleged accident occurred.         First respondent paid an amount of<\/p>\n
Rs.1,000\/- to the appellant by way of compensation. It was also contended that<\/p>\n
the vehicle was covered with a valid policy of insurance.               Quantum of<\/p>\n
compensation claimed was disputed and negligence alleged was denied.<\/p>\n
       3.    Second respondent insurer also filed a written statement admitting<\/p>\n
that the vehicle was covered with a valid policy of insurance. It was contended<\/p>\n
that there was violation of policy conditions. It was contended that the rider was<\/p>\n
not holding driving licence. Age,income, etc. of the appellant were denied. It was<\/p>\n
contended that no accident-cum-wound certificate was produced to prove that<\/p>\n
appellant sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident. Quantum of compensation<\/p>\n
claimed was disputed. It was also contended that the appellant did not sustain any<\/p>\n
injury in a motor vehicle accident. Hence the insurer is not liable to indemnify the<\/p>\n
compensation.\n<\/p>\n
       4.    Before the Tribunal the appellant gave evidence as PW1.             He<\/p>\n
examined a Doctor attached to Thrissur Medical College and produced Exts.A1 to<\/p>\n
A13. First respondent owner-cum-rider produced a copy of the driving licence.<\/p>\n
The Tribunal found that in the normal course the appellant is entitled to get<\/p>\n
Rs.48,300\/- as compensation; but dismissed the application          holding that the<\/p>\n
MACA No.617\/2003                         -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
appellant failed to establish that he sustained injuries in a motor vehicle accident.<\/p>\n
Challenging that award this appeal is filed.\n<\/p>\n
       5.     Learned counsel appearing for the appellant has argued that the<\/p>\n
Tribunal failed to note that the first respondent who is the owner-cum-rider of the<\/p>\n
vehicle had admitted the accident and as such the insurer cannot be allowed to<\/p>\n
contend that no such accident took place. It is averred that since the owner-cum-<\/p>\n
rider admitted the accident there was no need to prove a fact which was admitted<\/p>\n
and that is why the appellant did not adduce any evidence regarding the accident.<\/p>\n
In column No.28 of the Original Petition it was averred that the appellant was<\/p>\n
walking along the road which lies in front of Chalakkudy K.S.R.T.C. Bus stand.<\/p>\n
When he reached in front of the Kallarakkal Auto Service a motor cycle bearing<\/p>\n
registration No.KL-8\/D 2177 came from the rear side and hit against his person .<\/p>\n
According to the appellant immediately after the accident he became unconscious.<\/p>\n
He was taken to hospital by the first respondent rider and his friends. They tole the<\/p>\n
Doctor that the appellant sustained injuries due to a fall in the bathroom. Such an<\/p>\n
intimation was given to the Doctor by the first respondent to escape from the<\/p>\n
criminal liability.  According to the appellant he regained consciousness only on<\/p>\n
the next day and immediately thereafter he informed his brother about the motor<\/p>\n
vehicle accident and thereafter only the Doctor prepared the accident-cum-wound<\/p>\n
certificate. As already stated the first respondent owner-cum-rider had admitted<\/p>\n
the accident. It is also to be noted that there is nothing on record to show that the<\/p>\n
MACA No.617\/2003                       -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
insurer had obtained permission to contest the matter on merits.     The case put<\/p>\n
forward by the appellant was that he sustained injuries at about 9.15 p.m. on<\/p>\n
5.2.1995; immediately after the accident he became unconscious; he was taken to<\/p>\n
the hospital by the first respondent and his friends and after admitting him there<\/p>\n
they gave the wrong information as regards the cause of injury. Ext.A6 is the<\/p>\n
accident-cum-wound certificate in which it was recorded that the Doctor examined<\/p>\n
the patient at 5 p.m. on 6.2.1995. But in the column provided for showing the<\/p>\n
cause of injury it was stated that he was admitted with the history of a fall in the<\/p>\n
bathroom and now the patient says that fall from a bike at 9 p.m. on 5.2.1995. In<\/p>\n
the details a number was written as 97955 and one more number was written as<\/p>\n
39547. The appellant was referred to Ortho. Ext.A9 is the discharge summary. A<\/p>\n
reading of Ext.A9 shows that the appellant was admitted on 5.2.1995 and<\/p>\n
discharged on 1.3.1995. That shows that the O.P.Number was 97955 and that was<\/p>\n
converted as I.P.Number as 39547. Appellant has produced a treatment-cum-<\/p>\n
discharge certificate also. That also shows the date of admission as 5.2.1995 and<\/p>\n
he was discharged on 1.3.1995. But in that document the O.P.Number was written<\/p>\n
as 39547 and I.P.Number was written as 97955.      Appellant was admitted by Dr.<\/p>\n
Prasad Varkey. Ext.A9 was also issued by that Doctor. There is some confusion<\/p>\n
regarding date of admission, treatment, etc. in this matter. As I have already<\/p>\n
stated before the Tribunal the owner-cum-rider of the vehicle         admitted the<\/p>\n
accident. That being the position there is much force in the argument advanced by<\/p>\n
MACA No.617\/2003                         -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n
the counsel for the appellant that the appellant never thought of proving an<\/p>\n
admitted fact. There was variance between O.P. and I.P. Numbers and further it<\/p>\n
is seen that the first history given was that it was a fall in bathroom and secondly it<\/p>\n
was written as fall from bike. In view of the unsatisfactory evidence given by the<\/p>\n
appellant it is not possible to accept his argument that since the owner-cum-rider<\/p>\n
had admitted the accident compensation is to be paid by the insurer. Considering<\/p>\n
all aspects of the matter I am of the view that the appellant be given another<\/p>\n
opportunity to clear the doubts in the mind of the Tribunal and adduce further<\/p>\n
evidence, if any. It is open to the appellant to file petitions to adduce further<\/p>\n
evidence, if so advised.\n<\/p>\n
       In the result, appeal is allowed. Award passed by the Tribunal in O.P.(MV)<\/p>\n
No.1137\/1995 is hereby set aside in toto. Case is remanded to the Tribunal for<\/p>\n
fresh disposal in accordance with law. Both sides will be given an opportunity to<\/p>\n
adduce evidence, if so advised.       Parties shall appear before the Tribunal on<\/p>\n
10.12.2007.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                      K. PADMANABHAN NAIR,
\n                                                                   JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
\ncks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA No. 617 of 2003() 1. RADHAKRISHNAN K.M., AGED 32 YEARS, … Petitioner Vs 1. T.G.DINESH S\/O. GOPI, THRIPPEKULATH … Respondent 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE For Petitioner :SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM For Respondent :SMT.SARAH SALVY The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66580","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRadhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\"},\"wordCount\":1256,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\",\"name\":\"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007","datePublished":"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007"},"wordCount":1256,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007","name":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-10-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-05T04:56:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/radhakrishnan-k-m-vs-t-g-dinesh-on-25-october-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Radhakrishnan K.M. vs T.G.Dinesh on 25 October, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66580","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66580"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66580\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66580"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66580"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66580"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}