{"id":66657,"date":"2011-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011"},"modified":"2016-01-11T09:00:19","modified_gmt":"2016-01-11T03:30:19","slug":"mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011<\/div>\n
                      CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                           Club Building (Near Post Office)\n                         Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                                Tel: +91-11-26161796\n\n                                                          Decision No. CIC\/SG\/C\/2011\/000433\/13699\n                                                              Complaint No. CIC\/SG\/C\/2011\/000433\n\nComplainant                          :      Mr. S C Gupta\n                                            335-A\/C-4\/B, Janakpuri,\n                                            New Delhi-110058\n\n\n\nRespondent (1)                      :       Public Information Officer,\n                                            O\/o the Chief Auditor,\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi,\n                                            Civic Centre, JLN Marg\n                                            Minto Road, New Delhi\n\n\n\n\nRespondent (2)                      :       Public Information Officer,\n                                            Central Establishment Department,\n                                            Municipal Corporation of Delhi\n                                            Civic Centre, JLN Marg\n                                            Minto Road, New Delhi\n\n\n\n\nFacts<\/pre>\n
 arising from the Complaint:\n<\/p>\n
        The Complainant had filed a RTI application dated 03\/08\/2010 with PIO, O\/o the Chief Auditor,
\nMCD asking for certain information. However, on not having received the information within the
\nmandated time, the Complainant filed a complaint under Section 18 of the RTI Act before this
\nCommission. On this basis, the Commission issued a notice to the Respondent PIO, on 13\/05\/2011 with
\na direction to provide the information to the Complainant and further sought an explanation for not
\nfurnishing the information within the mandated time.\n<\/p>\n
        The Commission is in receipt of the submissions of the Respondent No.1 vide letter dated
\n08\/06\/2011 wherein it has been stated that the RTI application dated 03\/08\/2010 was received in his
\noffice on 03\/08\/2010. Subsequently, the RTI Application was transferred to the Respondent No.2 i.e.
\nPIO\/CED vide letter dated 09\/08\/2010 for providing the relevant information\/record with regard to
\nQuery No. 1, 2 and 3 of the RTI Application. Further it has been stated that the reply to the RTI
\napplication pertaining to the office of Respondent No.1 has been sent to the Complainant vide letter
\ndated 03\/09\/2010. Copy of such letter was enclosed. The PIO had sought additional fees on certain
\nqueries vide this letter, the same was deposited vide the Complainant’s representation dated 30\/12\/2010.
\n Subsequently, the Respondent No.1 has shown to have provided the copy of documents vide a letter
\ndated 25\/01\/2011 to the Complainant, copy of which was also enclosed.\n<\/p>\n
        On perusal of the information provided it has been observed that in response to Query No. 4 the
\nRespondent No.1 has denied the information citing Section 2(f) of the RTI Act. However, the
\nCommission notes that the Complainant vide this query is seeking a copy of the rule\/authority under
\nwhich the staff car has been provided to Shri.Nand Kishore, the Chief Auditor, MCD, which clearly falls
\nwithin the ambit of information as per Section 2(f) of the RTI Act as the PIO should have clearly stated
\nif no such rule exists and if it exists a copy of such rule should have been provided or there should have
\nbeen an explanation as to why the PIO believes the query does not fall under the definition of
\ninformation as per the Act.\n<\/p>\n
        Further, on Query No. 6, 7 and 8 the Respondent No.1 has stated in his letter dated 03\/09\/2010
\nthat similar information has been provided to the Complainant vide different letters in answer to few
\nearlier RTI applications of the same Complainant. Subsequently, the PIO has stated to have provided the
\ncopy of such letters vide which information on similar queries was provided to the Complainant.
\nHowever, this is not an appropriate response as per the provisions of the RTI Act, the PIO should have
\nprovided clear and complete information as has been sought in the present RTI Application. The PIO
\nhas also not enclosed the copy of the letters dated 27\/05\/2008, 15\/09\/2009, 25\/09\/2009 which is shown
\nto have been provided vide PIO’s above said letter to the Complainant dated 25\/01\/2011 as proof to the
\nCommission. Additionally, on Query No.9 the PIO has stated that information is not available in
\ncompiled format; which is again not an appropriate response. The PIO should have provided an
\ninspection of the sought records to the Complainant if the same was not available in compiled format.\n<\/p>\n
        It is also pertinent to note that there is no proof of having provided the information on Query
\nNo. 1, 2 and 3 to the Complainant by Respondent No.2.\n<\/p>\n
Decision:\n<\/p>\n
The Complaint is allowed.\n<\/p>\n
       In view of the aforesaid the Respondent No.1 is hereby directed to submit before the
\nCommission as proof with regard to Query No. 6, 7 and 8 copies of the letters dated 27\/05\/2008,
\n15\/09\/2009, 25\/09\/2009 which is shown to have been provided vide PIO’s above said letter to the
\nComplainant dated 25\/10\/2011.\n<\/p>\n
        The Respondent No.1 is also directed to clearly state with regard to Query No.1 whether such
\nrule exists, if it does, copy of the rule will be provided. If no such rule exists on record, a statement
\nshould be provided to this effect to the Complainant. Furthermore, he is directed to facilitate an
\ninspection of the relevant records at the Respondent office with respect to information sought vide
\nQuery No. 9 to the Complainant on 22\/08\/2011 between 10 am to 4 pm. The compliance report with
\nregard to all the queries herein mentioned above should reach the Commission before 30\/08\/2011.\n<\/p>\n
        The Commission directs the Respondent No.2 to provide specific and complete information with
\nrespect to Query number 1, 2 and 3 of the RTI application dated 03\/08\/2010 to the Complainant before
\n15\/08\/2011 with a copy to the Commission.\n<\/p>\n
         The delay in providing the information within the mandated time as per the provisions of the RTI
\nAct appears to be without any reasonable cause on the part of Respondent No.2. Therefore he is hereby
\ndirected to submit before this Commission his written submissions to show cause why penalty should
\nnot be imposed and disciplinary action recommended against him under Section 20 (1) and (2) of the
\nRTI Act. If the information has been already provided to the Complainant, copy of such information
\nshould be sent along with to the Commission before 22\/08\/2011<\/p>\n
Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n
Any information in compliance with this order will be provided free of cost as per section 7(6) of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                                               Shailesh Gandhi
\n                                                                                                     Information Commissioner
\n                                                                                                                  27 July 2011<\/p>\n
                          (In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SP)\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Club Building (Near Post Office) Old JNU Campus, New Delhi – 110067 Tel: +91-11-26161796 Decision No. CIC\/SG\/C\/2011\/000433\/13699 Complaint No. CIC\/SG\/C\/2011\/000433 Complainant : Mr. S C Gupta 335-A\/C-4\/B, Janakpuri, New Delhi-110058 Respondent (1) : Public Information Officer, O\/o the Chief […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66657","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\"},\"wordCount\":901,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011","datePublished":"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011"},"wordCount":901,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011","name":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-11T03:30:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-sc-gupta-vs-mcd-gnct-delhi-on-27-july-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Sc Gupta vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 27 July, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66657","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66657"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66657\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66657"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66657"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66657"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}