{"id":66788,"date":"2009-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-25T04:53:29","modified_gmt":"2018-11-24T23:23:29","slug":"satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                     W.P. (S) No. 5959 of 2005\n\n          Satyendra Kumar              ...         ...     ...     Petitioner\n                                 Versus\n          The State of Jharkhand &amp; Ors.          ...     ...   Respondents\n\n          CORAM:       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.G.R. PATNAIK\n\n          For the Petitioner         : M\/s Manoj Kumar\n                                            A. Banerjee, Advocates\n          For the Respondents        : J.C. to Sr. S.C. II\n\n08\/18.11.2009<\/pre>\n<p>:                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       2.      The petitioner in this writ application has prayed for a<\/p>\n<p>                 direction upon the respondents to pay him his arrears of salary from<\/p>\n<p>                 March 2004 as well as his current salary and also to quash the<\/p>\n<p>                 impugned orders, vide letter No. 1025 dated 08.11.2004 passed by<\/p>\n<p>                 the District Education Officer (D.E.O.), Dumka, Jamtara and the<\/p>\n<p>                 letter No. 2365 dated 12.09.2005, passed by the Director (Secondary<\/p>\n<p>                 Education), Government of Jharkhand, by which a direction was<\/p>\n<p>                 issued to the concerned authorities to stop payment of salary to the<\/p>\n<p>                 petitioner and to terminate his services.\n<\/p>\n<p>                       3.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the<\/p>\n<p>                 impugned order dated 08.11.2004 (Annexure- 3), directing for<\/p>\n<p>                 terminating the services of the petitioner, appears to have been<\/p>\n<p>                 passed on the ground that the B.Ed certificate, produced by the<\/p>\n<p>                 petitioner was issued by an Institute which has not been recognized<\/p>\n<p>                 by N.C.T.E. and as therefore, such certificate being invalid, the B.Ed<\/p>\n<p>                 qualification claimed by the petitioner can not be accepted.<\/p>\n<p>                       4.      Learned counsel explains that in response to the<\/p>\n<p>                 advertisement published in the local newspaper on 20.11.1993<\/p>\n<p>                 issued by the Managing Committee of the school namely St. Teresa<\/p>\n<p>                 Girls High School, Dumka, inviting applications for appointment of<\/p>\n<p>                 science teacher (trained), the petitioner had applied for the post, he<\/p>\n<p>                 was called for interview and was selected and upon such selection<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                        -2-<\/span><br \/>\nbeing made, he was           given   the   appointment      letter   on<\/p>\n<p>05.01.1994, calling upon him to join on the post accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    The decision of the petitioner&#8217;s appointment was<\/p>\n<p>approved by the Vidayalaya Seva Board, Bihar, Patna and such<\/p>\n<p>approval was communicated by its letter dated 16.01.1996 to the<\/p>\n<p>school.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The petitioner had passed his B.Ed examination from<\/p>\n<p>Rashtriya Patrachar Sansthan, Kanpur, which is claimed to be an<\/p>\n<p>Institute recognized as a training institute by the Government of<\/p>\n<p>Uttar Pradesh. In support of the his claim, the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n<p>his B.Ed. training certificate obtained from the aforesaid institute, to<\/p>\n<p>the school management along with           his initial application for<\/p>\n<p>appointment.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    After his appointment, the petitioner was paid his salary<\/p>\n<p>which continued up to February 2004. Thereafter, the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>salary has not been paid at all, although his services are being<\/p>\n<p>continuously taken by the school authorities.<\/p>\n<p>      8.    Referring to the impugned letter of the respondent-<\/p>\n<p>D.E.O., Dumka, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the<\/p>\n<p>controversy regarding the validity of the petitioner&#8217;s B.Ed. certificate<\/p>\n<p>is totally misconceived, in view of the fact that the provisions of<\/p>\n<p>N.C.T.E. Act, 1995 which came into effect from 01.07.1995, has<\/p>\n<p>been sought to be applied with retrospective date. The petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>appointment was already confirmed by the school with the approval<\/p>\n<p>of the Vidayalaya Seva Board, Bihar, Patna in January 1994 itself.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel argues that the Act, which came subsequently,<\/p>\n<p>could not possibly have been applied retrospectively to defeat the<\/p>\n<p>benefits of his appointment genuinely granted on the basis of a valid<\/p>\n<p>certificate issued by the institute which was duly recognized by the<\/p>\n<p>State Government of Uttar Government.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      9.     Counter            affidavit has been filed on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>respondents as also by the respondent Nos. 5 and 6, namely, the<\/p>\n<p>School Management.\n<\/p>\n<p>      10.    Learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6<\/p>\n<p>submits that the petitioner&#8217;s appointment in the year January 1994<\/p>\n<p>was made after observing of the relevant rules and procedures and<\/p>\n<p>the decision of the petitioner&#8217;s appointment was also confirmed by<\/p>\n<p>way of approval by the Vidayalaya Seva Board, Bihar, Patna.<\/p>\n<p>      11.    Learned counsel for the respondent-State would submit<\/p>\n<p>that besides the stand taken by the respondent-State that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner did not obtain his B.Ed. training certificate from any<\/p>\n<p>Institute recognized by the N.C.T.E., there appears another fact<\/p>\n<p>namely that that the Institute from where the petitioner claims to<\/p>\n<p>have obtained his B.Ed. certificate was also a bogus Institute which<\/p>\n<p>was not recognized by the State Government of Uttar Pradesh at the<\/p>\n<p>relevant point of time.\n<\/p>\n<p>      12.    Learned      counsel     for   the   petitioner   counters   the<\/p>\n<p>statement, by referring to Annexure- 10 to the I.A. No. 3545 of 2007<\/p>\n<p>and explains that Annexure- 10 is a copy of the Circular issued by<\/p>\n<p>the Higher Education Department, Government of Uttar Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>dated 06.09.2000 which declares that the Institute, namely, the<\/p>\n<p>Rashtriya Patrachar Sansthan, from where the petitioner has<\/p>\n<p>obtained his B.Ed. degree, was duly recognized by the State<\/p>\n<p>Government of Uttar Pradesh. The Circular was issued by way of<\/p>\n<p>clarification by the concerned department of the Government of<\/p>\n<p>Uttar Pradesh, in pursuance to the order of the Supreme Court in a<\/p>\n<p>case filed before it.\n<\/p>\n<p>      13.    Learned counsel further submits that pursuant to<\/p>\n<p>subsequent amendment carried out in the year 2006 in the N.C.T.E.<\/p>\n<p>Act, it has been declared that certificates obtained by the<\/p>\n<p>candidates, prior to the promulgation of the N.C.T.E. Act, from any<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                           -4-<\/span><br \/>\ninstitute     which    may    not have been recognized by the N.C.T.E.,<\/p>\n<p>shall continue to be treated as valid. Learned counsel submits that<\/p>\n<p>under such circumstances, the certificate produced by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>cannot be treated as invalid and his appointment cannot be<\/p>\n<p>terminated.\n<\/p>\n<p>        14.    From the rival submissions and the facts as appearing<\/p>\n<p>in the case, the only ground on which the District Superintendent of<\/p>\n<p>Education, Dumka, and the Director, Secondary Education had<\/p>\n<p>directed the Management of the school to terminate the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>appointment is that the petitioner&#8217;s B.Ed. certificate is not valid.<\/p>\n<p>        15.    This ground is apparently misconceived for the three<\/p>\n<p>reasons. Firstly, the petitioner&#8217;s certificate was obtained from the<\/p>\n<p>institute much prior to the promulgation of the N.C.T.E. Act and the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of the N.C.T.E. Act cannot be applied retrospectively.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, as demonstrated by the petitioner by reference to the<\/p>\n<p>Circular of the concerned department of the State Government of<\/p>\n<p>Uttar      Pradesh    (Annexure-      10)   and    which     has    also   been<\/p>\n<p>acknowledged by the respondent Nos. 5 and 6, it appears that the<\/p>\n<p>Institute from where the petitioner had obtained his B.Ed.<\/p>\n<p>certificate, was duly recognized by the Government of Uttar Pradesh.<\/p>\n<p>Thirdly, even as per the amendment carried out by N.C.T.E. Act,<\/p>\n<p>such certificates certificate shall have to be treated as valid.<\/p>\n<p>        16.    In the light of the above facts and circumstances, I find<\/p>\n<p>merit in this writ application. Accordingly, this application is<\/p>\n<p>allowed.      The    impugned   orders,     vide   letter   No.    1025    dated<\/p>\n<p>08.11.2004 passed by the District Education Officer, Dumka and<\/p>\n<p>letter No. 2365 dated 12.09.2005 passed by Director (Secondary<\/p>\n<p>Education), Government of Jharkhand, are hereby quashed.<\/p>\n<p>        17.    As it appears notwithstanding the impugned order of<\/p>\n<p>District      Education    Officer,    Dumka,      the      respondent-School<\/p>\n<p>Management has been continuously taking services of the petitioner,<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -5-<\/span><br \/>\n         though      not    paying    him salary from March 2004 onwards till<\/p>\n<p>         date. Learned counsel for the respondent-School Management<\/p>\n<p>         acknowledges this fact.\n<\/p>\n<p>               18.      In this view of the matter, the petitioner&#8217;s claim for the<\/p>\n<p>         payment of salary for the services rendered by him is a legitimate<\/p>\n<p>         claim and cannot be denied to him. I direct therefore that the<\/p>\n<p>         respondent-School Management shall forward a letter to the<\/p>\n<p>         concerned department of the State Government, informing the<\/p>\n<p>         amount of arrears which is payable to the petitioner, as also the<\/p>\n<p>         amount of current salary, within one month from the date of this<\/p>\n<p>         order and within two months from the date of receipt of the letter,<\/p>\n<p>         the concerned authority of the respondent-State Government, shall<\/p>\n<p>         release the required funds to the School Management to enable<\/p>\n<p>         payment of the amounts due and payable to the petitioner.<\/p>\n<p>               19.      With   these   observations,   this   writ   application   is<\/p>\n<p>         disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>               20.      Let a copy of this order be given to the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>         of the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                         (D.G.R. Patnaik, J.)<br \/>\nManish\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jharkhand High Court Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 5959 of 2005 Satyendra Kumar &#8230; &#8230; &#8230; Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. &#8230; &#8230; Respondents CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE D.G.R. PATNAIK For the Petitioner : [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1285,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009"},"wordCount":1285,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009","name":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T23:23:29+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/satyendra-kumar-vs-state-of-jharkhand-ors-on-18-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Satyendra Kumar vs State Of Jharkhand &amp; Ors. on 18 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66788\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}