{"id":67057,"date":"2008-11-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-26T13:17:46","modified_gmt":"2016-01-26T07:47:46","slug":"shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n\u00a7N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT .BA:eQALo\u00a7_E- T'   ' \n\nDATED THIS Tm; 13th DAY cg'I%71\u00a7:\u00a7v*E.\u00a7ea__BER _ \n\nPRESENT K   V %\nTHE HON'B1:.E MR. RI).  \nTHE HOWBLE _\u00a7(;\u00a7i;;.sA;3HAHiT\n\n maw Af.\u00e9PE_AL= N0A;'i's_5 1\u00a7,q{1,;mYAp_pA _\nAGED AB(}IjT_'f59 YEARS'\nR\/*0 no 595,' t3TH\"\u00a33ROSS\nM100. _ LAYGUT H \n\n_ -BANGAL_OREv476';-     .API-\"'ELLANT\n\n)\n\n% THE 's:.mTE op' KARNATAKA\n'-- BY ITS SECRETARY\n'EDHCATION DEPARTMENT\nM'.\"S.BUiLDING\n\nV AMBEDKAR VEEDHI\n\n BANGALORE-01\n\nDIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCAWOES3\nOFFICE OF COMMISSIONER\n\nPUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMEEWT\nNRUPATHUNGA ROAD\nBANGALORE~O 1\n\n\n\n3 BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER\nscum RANGE-3\nB P WADIA ROAD\nBASAVANAGUDI\nBANGALGRE~\u00bbO4 J _\n\n4 JINGLE BELLS\n6m MAiN,9'1'I-I CROSS __\nMICE) LAYOUT, BTM IISRAGE A\nBANGALORE-76 ' \n8'1' ITS PRESXDENT   *  ;\nSMT MAYURI PARMEsI\u00a2;ARA_M...'*;%.REsPoix:ma;NTs\n\nWRIT APPEAL FILE?) U.f.S;'4_ O\u00a7'\u00bb._TI-IE KARNATAKA\nHEGH COURT AC? PRAYING 'To..\u00bbsET, A$3i\u00a7\"JE THE ORIDER\nPASSED IN T.H'Ev.._WE_?IT' P\u00a7j'I'ITi~\u20ac3N N&lt;}.3?&#039;02\/O3 DATED\n01\/08\/12008.3   2 &#039;  \n\nThis  up for Preliminaxy Hearing on\nthis day,&#039; SABHAHIT. J;,._.C1c1iV;:::I:d the following.\nV. Vaggpammxr\n\n    by the fourth respondent in WP.<\/pre>\n<p>   beixzvvggzaggxietvttd &#8216;by $13.6 erder {iatsd 1.8.2008<\/p>\n<p> VV  Singlat Judge has quashed the mtier<\/p>\n<p>d\u00e9tteci  passed by the thixd respondent in the writ<\/p>\n<p> pe\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9ns\ufb01lock Edzxcatien O\ufb01ccr pmhibi\ufb01ng the Writ<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   ,peti\ufb01bner fmvm naming kinde\u00a7g:ten\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>Education Department started piessurisingii  &#8216;s.i1}:u  <\/p>\n<p>petitioner to obtain 1&#8217;egist1&#8217;atio1:1:=.A: Iind\u00e9f  <\/p>\n<p>Education Act, 1983 as a &#8216;Privffat:: E9d}i\u00a2ati0n\u00ab:&#8217;-Ii&#8217; ;;\u00a7;g\ufb01t1;:ti;3:;&#8217;  .<\/p>\n<p>and this was \u00e9one by the  &#8216;1Vj}:1\ufb01isu&#8217;:;\u00a7:nt to the<br \/>\nGovernment orcier dat\u00e9tgi\ufb01\ufb01. 1  ohtained<br \/>\nregistration fmm t&#8217;he  activities of<br \/>\ntltm petiti-131161&#8243;   a Vi\u20ac&#8217;W net to<br \/>\naritagonise   &#8216;     meanwhile, fourth<br \/>\nmspon\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01i &#8221;   ihfgn\ufb01on starteci sending<br \/>\nob}ecticv\u00a7Vi&#8211;:s&#8221;      various authorities like<\/p>\n<p>Education  Depa11;1&#8217;;.1efx_t,  Palikc, Police eta,<\/p>\n<p> &lt;   to. the&#039; V&#039;f}eii%ioVner running the \u00a7}I&#039;\u20ac~&#039;}}I&#039;i.Il1aIj,&#039; school.<\/p>\n<p>   r\ufb01spondent along with ten others<\/p>\n<p>a&#039;pp\u00a7t\u00a7ac1\u00a7\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7[i&#039;:_ court in W.P.No.2033&#039;?&#039;\/2005 impleading<\/p>\n<p> I&#039;\u20acSp&#039;(&#039;)11(1V&quot;f2;f1&quot;\u00a3\u00a7 1, 2 and Bangaiore Mahanagara Palike. The<\/p>\n<p>A C_&quot;\ufb01i&#039;:i&quot;i&quot;ioner contested the petition by \ufb01iing counter statement.<\/p>\n<p>&#039;   Hiearneti Single Ju\u00e9ge after hearing the parties allawed<\/p>\n<p>&quot; hghe Writ peiition and directed the petititmer to close down<\/p>\n<p>their activities by the end of acadamic year 2006-200? by<\/p>\n<p>u\u00bb&#039;&#039;&quot;&#039;*<\/p>\n<p>order dated 26.2.2007. The said order of  Shigl\u00e9 . <\/p>\n<p>Judge was challenged in W.A.Nc::.&#039;77\u00a3:3 \/ 2\u00a7){f\u00a7&#039;?  <\/p>\n<p>appeal is admitted. The ieam::d_ Sing1eAJ::.dge sr\u00e9}ii1&#039;\u00e9:V&quot;d&#039;ispi;\ufb02\u00e9i1:g&quot;&#039;V _<\/p>\n<p>of the writ petition (ii3&quot;\u20acCtt&#039;$\u20acii* E\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01  to<br \/>\nreconsider the app\ufb01ca\ufb01cn    f\u00e9gistration<br \/>\nalong with the objtectici\ufb01\u00e9 V  and to take<br \/>\ndecision acco\u00a7J&lt;*(ii\u00a3:\u00a2;gL:V:&#039;tr secondary school are 0113}; required to be<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;1feg1:\u00a7te1f:ci&#8217;A&#8211;\u00e9*;f1tIT:=fi9\u00a7erefcre, petitioner\u00bb-Institutien is taken out of<\/p>\n<p>_V Bf the Kamataka Education Act and Ruics. The<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V,pv3Lit,io11\u00e9r was not aware of the circular and it came: to know<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217;   same {hiring the pendency of writ aizrpeal before this<\/p>\n<p>  The third respondent issued notice to the peti\ufb01oner<\/p>\n<p>an\u00e9 the fourth respondent for the purpose of holding an<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prahibited \ufb01bm running pr!-:&#8211;pri,maxy school  _  <\/p>\n<p>30.5.2007 keeping open all th\u00e9 W!V(:\u00a7E&#8217;.&#8217;\u00a5&#8217;1&#8242;.\u00a3;&#8217;!&#8217;\u20ac&#8221;31&#8243;,&#8217;\ufb02Ii\u00a2i)\u00a71S.:A&#8217;V:uff)&#8217;i&#8217;:xVif\ufb02\ufb01\ufb02ii.<\/p>\n<p>consicicration. Accot\ufb02ingiy, {ha  <\/p>\n<p>Being aggzieved by the order   <\/p>\n<p>preferred W.P.No.3702v\/3.008  by the<br \/>\norder of the leanzed Single  this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. It is g&lt;:1rzia;*VVj&#039;_\u00a3&quot;roz1:\u00a7  order passed by<\/p>\n<p>the 1c:amed Siz} 5gl&lt;;:&#039;1&#039;1;\u00a7:1.dg\u00e9&#039;.&#039;ufv\ufb02ziis in w.P.No.29337\/2905<br \/>\ndated .1&#039;;liic:_.i%:aj:11ed Single Judge has in the<br \/>\nsaid oxtl\u00e9zx\ufb01sfliiltit  in pa1:a&#8211;33 atxd 34 of the order<\/p>\n<p>datf&lt;,\u00a726&#039;.~FZ.20\u20ac3&#039;?  that in View of the provisions of Section<\/p>\n<p>  %%e\u00a7;1e &#039;2gb; of sub&#8211;S\u20acc&#039;\u00a3i0n 22 of Secticn 2 and the<\/p>\n<p>L%&quot;dc&#039;g\u00e9ga7o:e:% \u00bb\u00a7*\u00e9fr&quot;_v.V.1;_.i1\u00a7~?.;:&quot;i\u00a7ivis3&#039;.n Beach in Vi\ufb01yavardhaka S:-mgh vs.<\/p>\n<p>Staf\ufb01 of.f}i.ar1:liatai&lt;a (ELR 2005 Karnataka 290?) hel\u00e9 that the<\/p>\n<p>  _ &#039;app\u00a2l1ai1t..is an Educa\ufb01onal institution Inquiring ragistratien<\/p>\n<p>&#039;  &#039;zmdcr the provisions of the Education Act. However, While<\/p>\n<p>  -\u00bbv(ii%sp0si11g of the W.A.N0.778\/2907 on 16.1.2008 liberty has<\/p>\n<p>V been given to the appeiiant to chalisenge the order dated<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\\.J~<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;$4<\/p>\n<p>impugned order dated 3.0.5.200&#8217;? it Was_.fc1i.i\u00a7d.V V  &#8216;age ~.. <\/p>\n<p>petitioner had not provided ne(\u00a3.5fssa:.a:y   \u00ab \u00a3315<\/p>\n<p>mmzing the pI~e-primary schr;\u00bb?&lt;:1__a13d &quot;tt:4\u00e9&quot;concii&quot;\u00a3:\u00a71t};:\u00a7.$&#039;_im\ufb01c\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9d  ,<\/p>\n<p>While gzanti\ufb02g certi\ufb01cats of    had<br \/>\nnot been compiitci witil:-&#039;_.&#039;F=he   a pre-<br \/>\nprixnary school V since  order dated<br \/>\n306.200&#039;? as;&quot;iLi&#039;1&#039;\u00abt.*:A;_c}x&quot;cie1::;._  Single Judge<br \/>\nhas been  lixokiing that it maynot be<br \/>\nappmp 14i.\u00e91&#039;fe&quot;_v   to 1131} without any<br \/>\ndescri\ufb01\ufb01vf\u00e9   in the Large interest of<\/p>\n<p>kindcxfga\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01. s&#039;t13;c\u00a3\u00a211tAAs&#8211;._b&#039;by &quot;:&lt;)1wc1c;&#039; dated 25.9.2008 passed in<\/p>\n<p> u  _  Alih\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01l\ufb01, unless the said defects as not\ufb01d in<\/p>\n<p> L&#039;  ir;:pzig;&#039;\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9:TG;Eder dated 3{}.:&#039;&quot;S,200&#039;? am recti\ufb01cd intsrest of<\/p>\n<p>I&lt;;l13.\u00a3ii&lt;%e\u00a3rgai&quot;ti:Vtr;V.;=51:1V,z&lt;:!e11ts it would not be appmpriatcs: to permit<\/p>\n<p> the fxc\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01t\u00e9r to run the prwp\ufb01maxy school. Accerdingly, we<\/p>\n<p> ~ Ah:a:ii(1..\u00a2&amp;t\u00a71:Vas\u00a2t the petitioner shauld be permitted 2:0 mm a pit&#039;<\/p>\n<p>  school only a\ufb01sr the defects as Iloticed in the order<\/p>\n<p>u Wdattzszi 30.5.2{)O?&#039; am zwectifmesi and till then. the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>not entitled to run the ;3re~primary schcml.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">15<\/span><\/p>\n<p>With the above said modi\ufb01ca\ufb01ozas   ordg\ufb01ti&#8221; .. <\/p>\n<p>passed by the learned Single Ji11u{ig\u00a7t.,.4 t;i1\u00a3$&#8217;:i\u00a5-V3&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>disposed of accordingly. &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> Chief T113110?\n<\/p>\n<p>.  .,\u00a7,_351.&#8217;3~{f5i: Yes} HQ):  .V J<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit \u00a7N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT .BA:eQALo\u00a7_E- T&#8217; &#8216; DATED THIS Tm; 13th DAY cg&#8217;I%71\u00a7:\u00a7v*E.\u00a7ea__BER _ PRESENT K V % THE HON&#8217;B1:.E MR. RI). THE HOWBLE _\u00a7(;\u00a7i;;.sA;3HAHiT maw Af.\u00e9PE_AL= N0A;&#8217;i&#8217;s_5 1\u00a7,q{1,;mYAp_pA _ AGED AB(}IjT_&#8217;f59 YEARS&#8217; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67057","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":827,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008"},"wordCount":827,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008","name":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-26T07:47:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-m-nagaraja-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-13-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri M Nagaraja vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67057","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67057"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67057\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67057"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67057"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67057"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}