{"id":67253,"date":"2008-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008"},"modified":"2014-04-07T11:11:24","modified_gmt":"2014-04-07T05:41:24","slug":"arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 4111 of 2005()\n\n\n1. ARUN HARI PRASAD,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE STATE OF KERALA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SIMON THOMAS, MUKALEL HOUSE, KAIPUZHA,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice V.K.MOHANAN\n\n Dated :29\/05\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                      V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n            ---------------------------------------------\n                Crl.M.C.No. 4111 of 2005\n            ---------------------------------------------\n            Dated this the 29th day of May, 2008\n\n                           O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
          The petitioner who is the sole accused in Crime<\/p>\n
No.52 of 2004 of the Kottayam West Police Station seeks<\/p>\n
an order quashing the charge sheet filed in C.P.No.3 of<\/p>\n
2005 and the entire proceedings thereto pending before<\/p>\n
the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Kottayam.<\/p>\n
      2.   Though notice was ordered and received by the<\/p>\n
second respondent, he had not chosen to appear before<\/p>\n
this Court.    I have heard the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.<\/p>\n
Initially, Crime No.52 of 2004 was registered in the<\/p>\n
Kottayam West Police Station under the caption “man<\/p>\n
missing” on the basis of the information furnished by the<\/p>\n
second respondent regarding the missing of his minor<\/p>\n
daughter on 28.1.2004. After registration of the crime,<\/p>\n
the Police undertook the investigation and finally traced<\/p>\n
out the detenue from Bangalore and produced before the<\/p>\n
Magistrate concerned and subsequently produced before<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                            :-2-:\n<\/p>\n
the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Kottayam.<\/p>\n
On finalising the investigation, the Police filed a final<\/p>\n
report before the court below. According to the Police,<\/p>\n
since the alleged detenue was a minor at the time of the<\/p>\n
registration of the crime and on subsequently realising<\/p>\n
that the girl was      kidnapped by the petitioner, they<\/p>\n
incorporated Section 363A of I.P.C.     On filing the final<\/p>\n
report, the court below took cognisance and instituted<\/p>\n
C.P.No.3 of 2005 before it. It is the above committal<\/p>\n
proceedings and the final report being challenged and<\/p>\n
sought to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    It is stated that   while the investigation in<\/p>\n
Crime No.52 of 2004 was pending, the second<\/p>\n
respondent herein had approached this Court by filing<\/p>\n
W.P.(Crl) No.49 of 2004 with a prayer to issue a writ of<\/p>\n
habeas corpus directing the Police to produce the so-<\/p>\n
called detenue. It is also stated that on 3.9.2004, the<\/p>\n
detenue was produced before this Court and on realising<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                            :-3-:\n<\/p>\n
the fact that the detenue went along with the petitioner<\/p>\n
out of her volition and free will, this Court allowed the<\/p>\n
detenue namely, the daughter of the second respondent<\/p>\n
to go along with the petitioner. In support of the above<\/p>\n
claims and averments, the petitioner has produced<\/p>\n
Annexure-2 order of this Court in W.P.(Crl) No.49 of<\/p>\n
2004. On a perusal of Annexure-2 order, it can be seen<\/p>\n
that the detenue has stated before the Division Bench of<\/p>\n
this Court that the fifth respondent who is the petitioner<\/p>\n
herein had married her and she was three months’<\/p>\n
pregnant at that time and she had attained the age of<\/p>\n
18.   It appears that the fifth respondent assured the<\/p>\n
court that steps will be taken to conduct the marriage<\/p>\n
under the Special Marriage Act. The grievance of the<\/p>\n
second respondent in this Crl.M.C., who is the petitioner<\/p>\n
in the writ petition, was that the marriage which was<\/p>\n
conducted through Arya Samajam was not proper and<\/p>\n
hence a proper marriage should be conducted. After<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                           :-4-:\n<\/p>\n
recording all the above, this Court was pleased to<\/p>\n
dispose of the writ petition and the girl was set free to<\/p>\n
live along with the fifth respondent\/petitioner herein or<\/p>\n
according to her likes.     By producing Annexure A3<\/p>\n
marriage certificate issued under the provisions of the<\/p>\n
Special Marriage Act, 1954, it is submitted that a<\/p>\n
statutory marriage was arranged and now the petitioner<\/p>\n
as well as the daughter of the second respondent are<\/p>\n
living as man and wife and now they are undergoing a<\/p>\n
happy family life and a child is born in their wedlock.<\/p>\n
      4.    On the strength of the above developments<\/p>\n
and the factual circumstances involved in the case, the<\/p>\n
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the<\/p>\n
criminal proceedings against the petitioner are liable to<\/p>\n
be quashed, otherwise it will adversely affect the marital<\/p>\n
life of the petitioner as well as the daughter of the<\/p>\n
second respondent and the continuation of the criminal<\/p>\n
proceedings will amount to abuse of process of the<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                              :-5-:\n<\/p>\n
court.    Along with this Crl.M.C., the petitioner has<\/p>\n
produced an affidavit of the daughter of the second<\/p>\n
respondent viz., Rini Arun.        In para 1 of the above<\/p>\n
affidavit, it is stated that the allegations contained in the<\/p>\n
charge sheet are absolutely baseless and she had<\/p>\n
voluntarily gone out according to her own volition and<\/p>\n
out of love with an intention to live along with the<\/p>\n
petitioner. In para 2 of the affidavit, it is also stated that<\/p>\n
she is residing along with petitioner as a legally married<\/p>\n
wife and they had a very happy and peaceful married<\/p>\n
life. It is also stated that a male child was born in their<\/p>\n
wedlock. Therefore, according to the deponent, if the<\/p>\n
proceedings in C.P.No.3 of 2004 are allowed to<\/p>\n
continue, it will result in irreparable injury and hardship<\/p>\n
which will ultimately affect the peaceful family life<\/p>\n
which she pursues.\n<\/p>\n
      5.    Going by the materials available on record<\/p>\n
and the factual circumstances involved in the case, it<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                             :-6-:\n<\/p>\n
appears that the dispute between the parties is now at<\/p>\n
rest. As stated earlier, initially a crime was registered<\/p>\n
for ‘man missing’ and finally, the Police filed a report<\/p>\n
alleging offence punishable under Section 363 A of<\/p>\n
I.P.C. Considering the subsequent development in the<\/p>\n
matter, I am of the view that no purpose will be served if<\/p>\n
the proceedings pending before the court below are<\/p>\n
allowed to continue.       Considering the fact that the<\/p>\n
alleged detenue who is the daughter of the de facto<\/p>\n
complainant is now residing along with the petitioner as<\/p>\n
his legally married wife and a child was born out in their<\/p>\n
wed lock, the criminal proceedings if are allowed to<\/p>\n
continue, it will likely to adversely affect the marital life<\/p>\n
of the petitioner as well as the daughter of the second<\/p>\n
respondent. A perusal of Annexure A2 judgment would<\/p>\n
show that at that time, the grievance of the second<\/p>\n
respondent, the father of the alleged detenue was that<\/p>\n
there was no proper marriage.        The said grievance is<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                           :-7-:\n<\/p>\n
seen to have redressed as evidenced by Annexure A3<\/p>\n
Certificate of Marriage.\n<\/p>\n
      6.     The Apex Court, in a decision reported in<\/p>\n
B.S.Joshi v. State of Haryana (AIR 2003 SC 1386),<\/p>\n
though the case was connected with the matrimonial<\/p>\n
offences, it was held that Section 320 of the Code of<\/p>\n
Criminal Procedure will not stand in the way to exercise<\/p>\n
the powers of High Court under Section 482 to give<\/p>\n
effect a genuine settlement, and it is the duty of the<\/p>\n
court to see that such a genuine settlement is allowed to<\/p>\n
materialise. Similarly, in a decision of a Division Bench<\/p>\n
of this Court reported in Thankamma v. State of<\/p>\n
Kerala<\/a> (2006(3) KLT 846), though in that case, the<\/p>\n
offence involved was Section 498A of the I.P.C., it was<\/p>\n
held that for the ends of justice and to save the<\/p>\n
institution of marriage, a settlement can be acted upon<\/p>\n
and the inherent powers of Section 482 can be invoked<\/p>\n
to compound an offence which is otherwise non-<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                             :-8-:\n<\/p>\n
compoundable.          Those decisions are to save the<\/p>\n
institution of marriage and not to reopen the dispute so<\/p>\n
as to disturb the marital bondage. In the light of the<\/p>\n
above decision and the factual circumstance involved in<\/p>\n
the case, I am of the view that the final report and the<\/p>\n
committal proceedings instituted thereon and all further<\/p>\n
proceedings thereto can be quashed for the ends of<\/p>\n
justice.\n<\/p>\n
            In the result, the final report and C.P.No.3 of<\/p>\n
2005 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate<\/p>\n
Court-III, Kottayam are quashed.          The Crl.M.C. is<\/p>\n
allowed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                       V.K.Mohanan,
\n                                            Judge<\/p>\n
MBS\/<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                           :-9-:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                   V.K.MOHANAN, J.\n<\/p>\n
                          ——————————————–<\/p>\n
                                   Crl.R.P.NO. OF 200<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
                           ——————————————–<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                          :-10-:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                 J U D G M E N T<\/p>\n
                                DATED: -2-2008<\/p>\n
Crl.M.C.No.4111 of 2005<\/p>\n
                          :-11-:<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 4111 of 2005() 1. ARUN HARI PRASAD, … Petitioner Vs 1. THE STATE OF KERALA, … Respondent 2. SIMON THOMAS, MUKALEL HOUSE, KAIPUZHA, For Petitioner :SRI.FEBIN J.VELUKARAN For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67253","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nArun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1349,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008"},"wordCount":1349,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008","name":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-04-07T05:41:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/arun-hari-prasad-vs-the-state-of-kerala-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Arun Hari Prasad vs The State Of Kerala on 29 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67253","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67253"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67253\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67253"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67253"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67253"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}