{"id":67259,"date":"2007-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007"},"modified":"2015-12-01T17:33:45","modified_gmt":"2015-12-01T12:03:45","slug":"ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nST Rev No. 300 of 2007()\n\n\n1. M\/S PUTHANANGADI FLOUR &amp; OIL MILLS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :23\/11\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                        H.L. DATTU, CJ. &amp; K.M. JOSEPH, J.\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                              S.T.Rev. No.300 of 2007\n                      - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2007.\n\n                                            ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>H.L.DATTU, CJ,<\/p>\n<p>               Petitioner is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Kerala<\/p>\n<p>General Sales Tax Act (hereinafter, for the sake of brevity, referred to as &#8216;Act,<\/p>\n<p>1963).\n<\/p>\n<p>               2. Petitioner is engaged in the manufacture of coconut oil and oil<\/p>\n<p>cake. According to the petitioner, he is entitled for sales tax exemption for the<\/p>\n<p>period from 7.10.1996 to 6.10.2001 in a sum of Rs. 5,51,346\/-. This claim is based<\/p>\n<p>on the exemption certificate granted by the District Industries Centre.<\/p>\n<p>               3. The assessing authority, for the assessment year 1997-1998,<\/p>\n<p>has completed the assessment by its order dated 12.9.2001 granting the benefit of<\/p>\n<p>exemption of a sum of Rs.57,002\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>               4.    Petitioner had also applied for exemption of a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.4,80,000\/-, which according to him represents the investment made in Diesel<\/p>\n<p>Generator set and Copra Drier. The claim so made is rejected by the District<\/p>\n<p>Committee.     Aggrieved by the said order passed by the District Committee, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had carried the matter before the State Level Committee.<\/p>\n<p>               5. The State Level Committee while rejecting the claim made by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner for exemption in a sum of Rs.4,80,000\/-, which represents investment<\/p>\n<p>made in Diesel Generator set and Copra Drier, has observed that the earlier<\/p>\n<p>exemption granted by the District Level Committee is also irregular and illegal.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">S.T.REV.300\/2007.                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>               6. Aggrieved by the orders passed by the State Level Committee, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has filed W.P.(C) 29429 of 2004.\n<\/p>\n<p>               7. The learned Single Judge has rejected the writ petition. Aggrieved by<\/p>\n<p>that order passed, the assessee was before this court in W.A. 1910 of 2007. This court<\/p>\n<p>by its order dated 15th November, 2007 has allowed the writ appeal and has remanded<\/p>\n<p>the matter to the learned Single Judge for a fresh disposal in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>               8. During the pendency of these proceedings, the Deputy Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>of Commercial Taxes has invoked his powers under Section 35 of Act, 1963 to revise<\/p>\n<p>the orders of assessment passed by the assessing authority for the assessment year<\/p>\n<p>1997-1998. The Deputy Commissioner, by his order dated 13.12.2004 has set aside<\/p>\n<p>the orders of assessment passed by the assessing authority for the assessment year<\/p>\n<p>1997-1998 and further remanded the matter before the assessing authority for a fresh<\/p>\n<p>disposal in accordance with law. Aggrieved by the said oder passed by the revisional<\/p>\n<p>authority, the assessee has carried the matter by way of second appeal before the<\/p>\n<p>Kerala Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Additional Bench, Palakkad in T.A. No.254 of<\/p>\n<p>2005. The Tribunal, by its order dated 10th May, 2007 has rejected the appeal filed by<\/p>\n<p>the assessee. That is how the assessee is before us in this Sales Tax Revision Case.<\/p>\n<p>               9. The assessee has framed the following questions of law for our<\/p>\n<p>consideration and decision. They are as under:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>               &#8220;A. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,<\/p>\n<p>       has not the Appellate Tribunal gone wrong in confirming Annexure B<\/p>\n<p>       provisional order?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>               B. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, has<\/p>\n<p>       not the Appellate Tribunal gone wrong in failing to render a finding on the<\/p>\n<p>       additional grounds D and E raised before it as per Annexure C petition?<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">S.T.REV.300\/2007.                             3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                C. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case,<\/p>\n<p>        has not the Appellate Tribunal gone wrong in failing to note that even if<\/p>\n<p>        exemption is cancelled, such cancellation can have only prospective<\/p>\n<p>        effect from the date of cancellation?&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                10.   Sri. Harisankar V. Menon, learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n<p>assessee would submit that the Tribunal went wrong in confirming the orders passed by<\/p>\n<p>the revisional authority. Therefore, he requests us to modify the said order.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>                11. Sri Muhammed Rafiq, learned counsel appearing for the revenue<\/p>\n<p>justifies the impugned order passed by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>                12. The Tribunal, while sustaining the order passed by the assessing<\/p>\n<p>authority, has taken into consideration the orders passed by the District Industries<\/p>\n<p>Centre and also the State Level Committee. The State Level Committee has rejected<\/p>\n<p>the claim of the assessee for exemption from payment of sales tax.<\/p>\n<p>                13. In fact, at the time of completion of the assessment proceedings, the<\/p>\n<p>assessing authority had granted exemption to the petitioner industry in a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.57,002\/-. This had been done by the assessing authority in view of the orders<\/p>\n<p>passed by the District Industries Centre.\n<\/p>\n<p>                14. In view of the orders passed by the State Level Committee in the<\/p>\n<p>appeal filed by the petitioner, the Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes has<\/p>\n<p>invoked his powers under Section 35 of the Act to revise the orders of assessment<\/p>\n<p>passed by the assessing authority for the assessment year 1997-1998 and thereafter<\/p>\n<p>has remanded the matter to the assessing authority to re-do the matter in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with law keeping in view the orders passed by the District Industries Centre and State<\/p>\n<p>Level Committee. Since the petitioner industry is not exempted from payment of tax, the<\/p>\n<p>assessing authority is justified in rejecting the claim of the petitioner for grant of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">S.T.REV.300\/2007.                            4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>exemption. This has to be done by the revising authority in view of the orders passed by<\/p>\n<p>the State Level Committee. This aspect of the matter is taken note of by the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>while rejecting the appeal field by the assessee against the order passed by the Deputy<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner in exercise of the powers under Section 35 of Act, 1963. In view of the<\/p>\n<p>above, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal has not committed any error while passing<\/p>\n<p>the impugned order dated 10.5.2007, and therefore the said order need not be<\/p>\n<p>interfered by us.   Accordingly, the Revision Case requires to be rejected and it is<\/p>\n<p>rejected. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to make a proper application, if<\/p>\n<p>for any reason he succeeds in the writ petition filed by him before this court.<\/p>\n<p>               Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                              H.L. DATTU,<br \/>\n                                                             CHIEF JUSTICE<\/p>\n<p>                                                              K.M. JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                                 JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sb\/DK.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ST Rev No. 300 of 2007() 1. M\/S PUTHANANGADI FLOUR &amp; OIL MILLS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.ARIKKAT VIJAYAN MENON For [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67259","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\"},\"wordCount\":987,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007","datePublished":"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007"},"wordCount":987,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007","name":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T12:03:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-puthanangadi-flour-oil-mills-vs-state-of-kerala-on-23-november-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Puthanangadi Flour &amp; Oil Mills vs State Of Kerala on 23 November, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67259","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67259"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67259\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67259"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67259"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67259"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}