{"id":67618,"date":"2008-08-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008"},"modified":"2019-03-21T19:31:25","modified_gmt":"2019-03-21T14:01:25","slug":"komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 90 of 2001()\n\n\n\n1. KOMALAM GOPI\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. T.K.MOHANKUMAR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL\n\n                For Respondent  :K.B.SURESH [DELAY]\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :22\/08\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n                   -------------------------------------------\n                      Crl.R.P.No.90 OF 2001\n                   -------------------------------------------\n              Dated this the 22nd day of August, 2008\n\n\n                                O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>        This revision is by the accused in a case taken cognizance<\/p>\n<p>of on the basis of a private complaint alleging offences<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n<p>The trial court convicted the accused and sentenced her to<\/p>\n<p>undergo rigourous imprisonment for six months and to pay fine<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.60,000\/-. The court of session allowed her appeal on the<\/p>\n<p>question of sentence, modified it and sentenced her to pay a fine<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.60,000\/-, in default of which, to undergo simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for two months. Out of the fine amount collected,<\/p>\n<p>an amount of Rs.45,000\/- was to be paid to the complainant as<\/p>\n<p>compensation.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   The allegation against the petitioner was that she and her<\/p>\n<p>husband informed the complainant that employment opportunity<\/p>\n<p>is available in the Cochin Port Trust that could be obtained for<\/p>\n<p>her, for which purpose, an amount of Rs.45,000\/- has to be paid<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                           Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>to the accused. Believing those words, the complainant parted<\/p>\n<p>with that amount and paid it to the accused and her husband by<\/p>\n<p>borrowing it from the relatives of the complainant. No job was<\/p>\n<p>secured as agreed. The complainant wanted return of money.<\/p>\n<p>With the intervention of mediators, a cheque dated 31.10.1992<\/p>\n<p>for an amount of Rs.45,000\/- was issued by the accused in favour<\/p>\n<p>of the complainant. On presentation, that cheque was returned<\/p>\n<p>with the endorsement &#8220;payment stopped by the drawer&#8221; and that<\/p>\n<p>on enquiry, it was revealed that the accused did not have<\/p>\n<p>sufficient funds in her account to honour the cheque. Though<\/p>\n<p>the accused received the statutory notice, a reply was sent<\/p>\n<p>stating only that the cover contained only a blank paper.<\/p>\n<p>Alleging non-payment of the fund covered by the cheque, a<\/p>\n<p>complaint was instituted.       The Additional Chief Judicial<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate took cognizance of the sworn statement of the<\/p>\n<p>complainant on record. At trial, the complainant gave evidence<\/p>\n<p>as PW1. PW2 spoke of the entrust of money by the complainant<\/p>\n<p>to the accused. PW3, an officer of the bank, spoke in relation to<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                              Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>the cheque and its dishonour and also that from Ext.P5, the<\/p>\n<p>balance outstandings in the account of the accused was only<\/p>\n<p>Rs.50\/- and that the accused had written to the bank stopping<\/p>\n<p>payment of Ext.P1 cheque.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.       The essential ingredients of the issuance of the cheque, its<\/p>\n<p>presentation and dishonour not being in dispute and having been<\/p>\n<p>proved on the basis of legal evidence, the consideration of the<\/p>\n<p>court of first instance focused on the defence version regarding<\/p>\n<p>the transaction. DW1, the Assistant Manager of the Syndicate<\/p>\n<p>Bank, Kalamassery where the petitioner had the S.B. Account;<\/p>\n<p>DW2, one Watson Titus; DW3, one Lalan; DW4, Gopi, husband of<\/p>\n<p>the accused and DW5, the accused were examined on the side of<\/p>\n<p>the defence.     The version attempted to be projected by the<\/p>\n<p>defence was that the account itself was opened at the instance of<\/p>\n<p>the complainant and utilising the amount given by him on the<\/p>\n<p>basis of the evidence of PW4, the husband of the accused and<\/p>\n<p>DW5, the accused. The court of first instance, as also the court<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                             Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>of session, concluded that the receipt of the amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.45,000\/- and the issuance of the cheque by the complainant to<\/p>\n<p>discharge that liability cannot be disputed.<\/p>\n<p>3.      The short issue that ultimately raises for decision is as to<\/p>\n<p>whether the issuance of Ext.P1 cheque by the accused could be<\/p>\n<p>treated as one in discharge of a liability.         The argument<\/p>\n<p>advanced on her behalf is that there was no debt or liability that<\/p>\n<p>the accused owe to the complainant and debt, if any, was that of<\/p>\n<p>her husband, DW4. It needs to be noticed that Section 138 of<\/p>\n<p>the N.I. Act comes into play in relation to cheques issued by a<\/p>\n<p>person to another person for the discharge, in whole or in part,<\/p>\n<p>of any debt or other liability. The explanation at the foot of that<\/p>\n<p>section provides that &#8220;debt or other liability&#8221; means a legally<\/p>\n<p>enforceable debt or other liability.          Neither does that<\/p>\n<p>explanation, nor the charging provision in Section 138 confines<\/p>\n<p>its operation to be only in relation to cases where cheques are<\/p>\n<p>issued in discharge of debt or liability of the person issuing the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                             Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>cheque. The law provides for discharge of debt by a person,<\/p>\n<p>even if it is a debt of another. Such transactions, where one<\/p>\n<p>discharges debt of another, is an instance of discharge of debt or<\/p>\n<p>other liability. If &#8216;A&#8217; discharges a legally enforceable debt or<\/p>\n<p>other liability of &#8216;B&#8217;, by making a payment to &#8216;C&#8217;, then, if that is<\/p>\n<p>done by &#8216;A&#8217; issuing a cheque to &#8216;C&#8217;, it becomes a cheque issued in<\/p>\n<p>discharge of the legally enforceable debt or other liability of &#8216;B&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>and is therefore, debt or other liability for the purpose of Section<\/p>\n<p>138 of the N.I. Act. So much so, the arguments on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>accused that she issued the cheque for discharge of liability of<\/p>\n<p>her husband DW4 would not save her from the penal provision of<\/p>\n<p>Section 138 of the N.I. Act.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      On to the question of sentence, the court of session has<\/p>\n<p>been extremely benevolent in vacating the sentence of<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment and imposing only a sentence of fine with a default<\/p>\n<p>sentence of simple imprisonment.\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>         For the foregoing reasons, I find no ground to interfere<\/p>\n<p>either with the conviction or sentence. The revision petition<\/p>\n<p>fails.     The same is accordingly dismissed.  The accused will<\/p>\n<p>appear before the court of first instance on 31.10.2008 to suffer<\/p>\n<p>sentence. Otherwise, the appropriate court will take necessary<\/p>\n<p>steps for due execution of the sentence.<\/p>\n<p>                                                Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                          THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                               Judge<br \/>\nkkb.26\/8.\n<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.90\/01<\/p>\n<p>                 Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>                 =======================<\/p>\n<p>                 THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J<\/p>\n<p>                             Crl.R.P.NO.90 OF 2001<\/p>\n<p>                                   O R D E R<\/p>\n<p>                              22nd AUGUST, 2008.\n<\/p>\n<p>                 =======================<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 90 of 2001() 1. KOMALAM GOPI &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. T.K.MOHANKUMAR &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.N.K.MOHANLAL For Respondent :K.B.SURESH [DELAY] The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Dated :22\/08\/2008 O R D E R THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67618","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":996,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008"},"wordCount":996,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008","name":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-03-21T14:01:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/komalam-gopi-vs-t-k-mohankumar-on-22-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Komalam Gopi vs T.K.Mohankumar on 22 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67618","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67618"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67618\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67618"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67618"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67618"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}