{"id":67672,"date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010"},"modified":"2017-06-30T11:22:24","modified_gmt":"2017-06-30T05:52:24","slug":"state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto<\/div>\n<pre>E\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 05\"' DAY OF OCTOBER \n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K SREEDEARE   E.\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.JUSTIc:_E+I3.V;\u00a7{1r~J'fo   '\n\nCRIMINAL  OF   \n\nBETWEEN :\n\nSTATE OF    ._\nTHE POLICE INSPECTOR~;ADC;'.  1- \"\ncoD,:EAN_Vc;ALcgRE.    ...APPELLANT.\n\n\n\n1. sR1.'EALA1&lt;R1sHNA RA1, G,\nS\/SR1. NAR;&#039;5YA1\\IA RALG.\n- 1. AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS,\nRa:s;&#039;D1NG.Aj1jg&amp;:\\IAvUTHADI HOUSE.\n\n ?--sImAMBA1L, PANAJE VILLAGE,\n.. PU&#039;i&#039;I_&#039;UR TALUK.\n\n - jD.AKs&#039;i:I_:&#039;r_\u00a7A KANNADA\n\n&#039;  s1isi;1E;ELA @ SHEELAVATHL\n\n&quot;W\/&#039;O SRI.G.NARAYANA RALG,\n&quot; _A1GEE ABOUT 32 YEARS,\n\nRESIDENCE AT ANAVUTHADI HOUSE,\nSURAMBAIL, PANAJE VILLAGE,\nPUTTUR TALUK,\n\nDAKSHINA KANNADA.\n\n3. SUJATHA RALG.\nD\/O SRI.G.NARAYANA RAI.\n\n\n\n2\n\nAGED ABOUT 26 YEARS.\n\nRESIDING AT ANAVUTHADI HOUSE.\nSURAMBAIL. PANAJE VILLAGE,\nPUTTUR TALUK.\n\nDAKSHINA KANNADA.\n\n4. ANITHA RALG,\nD\/O SRLGNARAYANA RAI,\nAGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,  ----  -L.\nRESIDING AT ANAVUTHADI HOUSE, _  &#039; &#039;\nSURAMBAIL, PANAJE VILLAGE-._ &#039; &quot;\n\nPUTTURTALUK,      &#039;  \u00ab\nDAKSHINA KANNADA.  &#039; .;;RESI=ONI;ENrIS.\n\n[BY SRI.R.B.DESHPANi3&#039;E:FL*3W FOR V E\nAND SRI.vENKg\\TESHi_I\u00e9_.D\u00bbA__LAwAI f&lt;&#039;OR_R3_,?R4.\n\ncRL.A. FILED U\/S TF89(1_}_&amp;_&#039;f{3)*__CR.P.C. BY THE\nSTATE P.P FOR &#039;FHE&quot;&#039;S&quot;TATEP.RAYI1&#039;~$G&#039;T,1&#039;%;AT THIS HONBLE\nCOURT MAY&#039; &#039;BE-PLEASE!)  LEAVE TO FILE AN\nAPPEAL _A.GAE;NS&#039;I&#039;.. &#039;THE JUDGEMENT DT.:I5.I0.20o-4\nPASSED=i&#039;BY,THE&#039; &#039;S.J\u00a7&#039;;~{D..K,.__MAI*ONDEI\\\u00a7TS\/ ACCUSED FOR THE\nOEEEN'cESj;p\/U';;a'Ss.'\"-TQEA. 3'04wB\" R\/W 34 OF IPC.\n\nTHIS eRL,A'~_c'OI\u00a7a*ING FOR HEARING ON THIS DAY.\nSREEDHARRAO J '- DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING.\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>00 E.  1 to 4 are accused NOS} to 4 before<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  TrIAI&#8221;\u00a7:o\ufb01rt (for Short Ad to A-4]. A4 is mother of A&#8211;}.<\/p>\n<p>A-3  A-4 are Sisters of A~1. One Bhavya the deceased<\/p>\n<p> x _b_iS&#8221;A_InaI*ried to A-1 on 10.2.00. In the wediock, th.e deceased<\/p>\n<p> had a male child by name Kruthesh. One Koragappa Raf<\/p>\n<p>PW~1 is the brother of the deceased and the complainant one<\/p>\n<p>Ramakrishna Rai PW-3 is also the brother of the<br \/>\ncomplainant and the deceased. PW&#8211;8 is the mediator.<\/p>\n<p>2. It is the case of the prosecution that the<br \/>\naccused persons were pestering and harassi.n&#8221;g,g the<\/p>\n<p>deceased to get money from her parents&#8217;V.g..ho.use;~..<\/p>\n<p>deceased during her visits to her parents&#8221;&#8216;A.&#8217;__&#8221;ho&#8221;u.se&#8217;but <\/p>\n<p>informing the said fact to her&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;mothe;r  bxrothevrs. b<\/p>\n<p>Sometime before the incident, A\u00bb  \u00a3i;.gig&#8217;de\u00a2eas\u00bb\u00a7a.<\/p>\n<p>her parental home did not_c&#8217;o.me to   to his&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>house. PW&#8211;1 and others approac&#8221;hed&#8221;\u00ab&#8230;A~1 &#8216; it his wife<br \/>\nwith him. A-1 told they ctouidg  wife to his house.<\/p>\n<p>Accordingly, PW&#8211;_1 and deceased to the<\/p>\n<p>house of 1&#8242;:a&#8217;nd_V3ieft&#8217;\u00abhe1*._T11e accused persons continued<\/p>\n<p>to peste&#8217;r.__the  giving proper food and she<\/p>\n<p>was; il1&#8211;treatVed.&#8217; &#8216;Oh iO.9x.03 the deceased informed PW~1 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>.  th&#8217;ro{ug&#8217;\u00bbh&#8217;~ phone  she is being harassed and was not<\/p>\n<p>    by the accused persons and requested<\/p>\n<p>them to.  and take her.\n<\/p>\n<p>PW&#8211;3 who is another brother of the deceased,<\/p>\n<p>onu&#8221;2.1.9.03 visited the house of accused to bring his<\/p>\n<p>  sister to his house .To his surprise, he found that his sister<\/p>\n<p>was not found in the house. Aw} on the phone told<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\nhim, the deceased has left the house saying that she will<br \/>\ngo to her parents house. A-1 and PW&#8211;3 together made a<br \/>\nsearch to know the whereabouts of the deceasved;:&#8217;ll&#8221;\u00a5fgW~3<\/p>\n<p>also gave a missing Complaint with the is<\/p>\n<p>marked at Ex.P&#8211;27. PW~3 ultimately m&#8217;th_the&#8221;assis.tance  <\/p>\n<p>the Fire Service people traced the &#8216;deadbody: <\/p>\n<p>thrown in the tank on the outsl{irts&#8217;&#8211;of thelfv_illage. l5&#8243;Vl.7\u00a7J:a<\/p>\n<p>lodged the complaint befo&#8217;re.l&#8221;&#8216;&#8211;the 1.:&gt;oli._ce&#8217;-  Ex.P~1l<\/p>\n<p>making the abovg sxaid gallegaj\u00e9tiloiisg of \u00abharassing and<br \/>\ntorturing against the  is said to be<br \/>\nthe cause of  deceased. The post<br \/>\nmortem   of the deceased was<\/p>\n<p>deconiposed:&#8217;lviTherefore:,b&#8221;no definite opinion is given by the<br \/>\ndoctorllinlihel   However. it is observed that<\/p>\n<p>there can he giossilbility &#8220;of asphyxia death by smothering.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  Thelaccused persons are charged for committing offence<\/p>\n<p>  arias :j:s;%,\u00a2-.\u00e9iss}1.A, 304-13 r\/W 34 IPC and Secs.3,4 and 6 of<\/p>\n<p>t1*;ealllDowryi&#8217;i?1&#8217;ohibition Act. The Trial Court has acquitted the<\/p>\n<p> accus&#8217;ed.1 The State is in appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>   3. It is submitted that A-1 is dead. Hence, the case<\/p>\n<p> against; R\u00ab~1(A~1) abates.\n<\/p>\n<p>l l  &#8211; yfactllin-&#8220;FIR.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>4. On a careful perusal of the evidence and allegations<br \/>\nin the complaint, it discloses that PW&#8211;1, PWWS and PW&#8211;8<\/p>\n<p>have indulged in embellishments and prevaricatioii;..f*eg:close<\/p>\n<p>scrutiny of FIR allegations discloses  a<\/p>\n<p>persons were demanding the deceased&#8217; tollget&#8217; m&#8217;o.ney&#8217;i&#8217;f_orl&#8217;e. l<\/p>\n<p>expenses. The FIR does not  cle_&#8217;a1&#8217;ly <\/p>\n<p>purpose and the quantity &#8216;o_f_v&#8217;iieInand,  not!&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>also disclose the payment ofyat thlgtttimpe  rriarriage.<br \/>\nIt is only in the course&#8217;&#8211;.zof_  3 1, PW-3 and PW-<br \/>\n8, allege that  \u00abcashed?  gold of 80 gms.<br \/>\nwas paid at   noii mentioning of this<br \/>\nmaterial   the payment of dowry<br \/>\n  evirlgenlcelof 1,3 &#8220;and 8 suspicious. it is only<br \/>\nfor the first   they come up with the<\/p>\n<p>theory of  of dowry and there is no mention of the<\/p>\n<p> :}:s;._y:t&#8221;llie.j_1n the evidence of PWs.l. 3 and 8 that the<\/p>\n<p>accused. insisting the deceased to get Rs.50.000\/&#8211;<\/p>\n<p> some tirne before the incident and in that regard. she was<\/p>\n<p> vs_i_1h_&#8217;;&#8221;ected to harassment. However, this fact is not stated<\/p>\n<p>l  in the FIR at the earliest. The FIR allegations discloses that<\/p>\n<p>A-1 was telling that the deceased was not good looking.<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\nTherefore, he wanted to marry another lady. This theory of<br \/>\nA&#8211;1&#8217;s intention of marrying another lady has given Clear<\/p>\n<p>go&#8211;bye in the evidence and the case is projected&#8221;:as:.:th:ough<\/p>\n<p>the deceased committed suicide only for  \ufb02<\/p>\n<p>harassment. The theory of .devn1._and.&#8221;.o&#8217;fdvi  not &#8216; p. <\/p>\n<p>mentioned in the FIR. Thei%efo:r:e,&#8221;&#8216;lV the<br \/>\napplicability of Sec.304\u00ab~B  does not  d it<\/p>\n<p>6. The payment of  &#8212; and 80<br \/>\ngms. of gold as do  FIR and it is by<br \/>\nway of preVarication..\u00abwstatedViriitheitleyiddendce. Therefore, the<br \/>\nquestion of 4   the offence under<br \/>\nSec.3,4    Act also become<br \/>\ndoubtvfuliv 7.&#8217; V  it t _ in p <\/p>\n<p>,__It&#8217;is  in the FIR that the deceased<\/p>\n<p>wasbeinghharassledt&#8217; The FIR discloses that A-1 had<\/p>\n<p>. it  &#8211; pirit-entioin  of  another lady on the ground that the<\/p>\n<p>   good looking. Perhaps it is for this reason,<\/p>\n<p>tile dec-easieddn might be dejected and committed suicide.<\/p>\n<p> Therevvis no categorical medical evidence to show that the<\/p>\n<p> d_ec&#8221;eased was killed by smothering and later on thrown in<\/p>\n<p>the tank. It maybe an unnatural death of suicide but<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><br \/>\nhowever, there is no clinching evidence to show regarding<br \/>\nharassment for dowry consideration.<\/p>\n<p>8. On a careful consideration of facts and evidence,<\/p>\n<p>we \ufb01nd that the Trial Court has properly appreciated the<\/p>\n<p>evidence in coming to the conclusion that <\/p>\n<p>has not proved the evidence beyond &#8216;in <\/p>\n<p>that View of the matter. the appe\u00e9d  ht  <\/p>\n<p>Sri Venkatesh P Dalawai, learned Counsel: fidlesjtgpower,<\/p>\n<p>for R-3 and R-4 _<br \/>\n           sa\/-3<\/p>\n<p>Self-E<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 Author: K.Sreedhar Rao B.V.Pinto E IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 05&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF OCTOBER PRESENT THE HON&#8217;BLE MR JUSTICE K SREEDEARE E. THE HONBLE MR.JUSTIc:_E+I3.V;\u00a7{1r~J&#8217;fo &#8216; CRIMINAL OF BETWEEN : STATE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":946,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\",\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010"},"wordCount":946,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010","name":"State Of Karnataka By The Police ... vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-06-30T05:52:24+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-karnataka-by-the-police-vs-sri-balakrishna-rai-g-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Karnataka By The Police &#8230; vs Sri.Balakrishna Rai, G, on 5 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67672\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}