{"id":67811,"date":"2010-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-10-09T21:17:57","modified_gmt":"2015-10-09T15:47:57","slug":"yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                                   R.P.No.564\/2010\n20.01.2011\n         Shri\u00a0Vipin\u00a0Yadav,\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner.\n         Heard\u00a0on\u00a0I.A.No.11698\/2010,\u00a0an\u00a0application\u00a0for\u00a0condonation\u00a0of\u00a0\ndelay.\n         From \u00a0 the \u00a0 reasons \u00a0 stated \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 application, \u00a0 which \u00a0 is \u00a0 duly\u00a0\nsupported\u00a0by\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0we\u00a0find\u00a0that\u00a0sufficient\u00a0cause\u00a0for\u00a0condonation\u00a0\nof \u00a0 delay \u00a0 is \u00a0 made \u00a0 out. \u00a0 \u00a0 Accordingly, \u00a0 the \u00a0 delay \u00a0 in \u00a0 filing \u00a0 the \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 is\u00a0\ncondoned.\n         I.A.No.11698\/2010\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0allowed.\n         Heard\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0question\u00a0of\u00a0admission.\n         This\u00a0review\u00a0petition\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0filed\u00a0for\u00a0review\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a0\n5.8.2010\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0in\u00a0Writ\u00a0Petition\u00a0No.641\/2010.\n         Facts<\/pre>\n<p>\u00a0giving\u00a0rise\u00a0to\u00a0filing\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0review\u00a0petition\u00a0briefly\u00a0stated\u00a0are\u00a0<br \/>\nthat \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 was \u00a0 engaged \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 post \u00a0 of \u00a0 Sub \u00a0 Engineer \u00a0 on\u00a0<br \/>\ncontract \u00a0 basis \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 period \u00a0 of \u00a0 one \u00a0 year \u00a0 by \u00a0 order \u00a0 dated \u00a0 22.12.2007.\u00a0<br \/>\nThereafter,\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0extended\u00a0from\u00a0time\u00a0<br \/>\nto \u00a0 time \u00a0 upto \u00a0 30.4.2010. \u00a0 \u00a0 A \u00a0 show \u00a0 cause \u00a0 notice \u00a0 was \u00a0 issued \u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0committed\u00a0certain\u00a0irregularities\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0work\u00a0performed\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0petitioner\u00a0submitted\u00a0a\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nshow\u00a0cause\u00a0notice,\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0found\u00a0satisfactory.\u00a0\u00a0Thereafter,\u00a0by\u00a0an\u00a0<br \/>\norder\u00a0dated\u00a02.6.2010,\u00a0the\u00a0contract\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\nterminated.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0petitioner\u00a0challenged\u00a0the\u00a0validity\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nwrit\u00a0petition\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0learned\u00a0single\u00a0Judge.\u00a0\u00a0Learned\u00a0single\u00a0Judge\u00a0vide\u00a0<br \/>\norder \u00a0 dated \u00a0 30.6.2010 \u00a0 dismissed \u00a0 the \u00a0 writ \u00a0 petition \u00a0 preferred \u00a0 by \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 order \u00a0 passed \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 learned \u00a0 single \u00a0 Judge \u00a0 was\u00a0<br \/>\nchallenged\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0in\u00a0Writ\u00a0Appeal\u00a0No.641\/2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>         This\u00a0Court\u00a0vide\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a05.8.2010\u00a0declined\u00a0to\u00a0interfere\u00a0with\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0order\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0learned\u00a0single\u00a0Judge\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0ground\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ndate\u00a0when\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0terminating\u00a0the\u00a0contractual\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner\u00a0was\u00a0passed,\u00a0his\u00a0appointment\u00a0had\u00a0ceased\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0in\u00a0existence.\u00a0<br \/>\nA\u00a0finding\u00a0was\u00a0also\u00a0recorded\u00a0by\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0that\u00a0from\u00a0tenor\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0<br \/>\n dated \u00a02.6.2010,\u00a0the \u00a0same \u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0appear \u00a0to\u00a0be \u00a0stigmatic\u00a0in\u00a0 nature.\u00a0<br \/>\nAccordingly,\u00a0the\u00a0writ\u00a0appeal\u00a0was\u00a0dismissed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>        Learned \u00a0 counsel \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 competent\u00a0<br \/>\nauthority\u00a0to\u00a0make\u00a0appointment,\u00a0to\u00a0grant\u00a0extension\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0terminate\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0services\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0employee\u00a0appointed\u00a0on\u00a0contractual\u00a0basis\u00a0is\u00a0District\u00a0<br \/>\nLevel\u00a0Committee.\u00a0\u00a0However,\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0termination\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Chief\u00a0Executive\u00a0Officer\u00a0who\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\ncompetent\u00a0authority\u00a0and,\u00a0therefore,\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a05.8.2010\u00a0passed\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\nthis\u00a0Court\u00a0deserves\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0reviewed.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>        We\u00a0have\u00a0considered\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0<br \/>\nthe\u00a0petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>        From\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a05.8.2010,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0apparent\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nsolitary \u00a0contention \u00a0raised\u00a0before\u00a0this\u00a0Court\u00a0was\u00a0that\u00a0the \u00a0petitioner&#8217;s\u00a0<br \/>\ncase\u00a0was\u00a0similar\u00a0to\u00a0that\u00a0of\u00a0petitioner\u00a0in\u00a0Writ\u00a0Petition\u00a0No.7830\/2010(s).\u00a0<br \/>\nThough \u00a0 the \u00a0 said \u00a0writ \u00a0petition \u00a0 was \u00a0entertained \u00a0by \u00a0 the \u00a0learned \u00a0 single\u00a0<br \/>\nJudge \u00a0 and \u00a0 an \u00a0 interim \u00a0 order \u00a0 was \u00a0 passed \u00a0 on \u00a0 2.10.2010, \u00a0 yet \u00a0 the \u00a0 writ\u00a0<br \/>\npetition\u00a0preferred\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0dismissed.\u00a0 \u00a0This\u00a0Court\u00a0dealt\u00a0<br \/>\nwith\u00a0the\u00a0aforesaid\u00a0submission\u00a0while\u00a0passing\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dated\u00a05.8.2010\u00a0<br \/>\nand\u00a0held\u00a0that\u00a0on\u00a02.6.2010,\u00a0the\u00a0appointment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0<br \/>\nexistence\u00a0whereas,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0in\u00a0Writ\u00a0Petition\u00a0No.7830\/2010(s)\u00a0was\u00a0<br \/>\nin \u00a0 employment \u00a0 when \u00a0 an \u00a0 order \u00a0 terminating \u00a0 his \u00a0 services \u00a0 was \u00a0 passed.\u00a0<br \/>\nTherefore, \u00a0 the \u00a0 petitioner \u00a0 cannot \u00a0 claim \u00a0 parity \u00a0 with \u00a0 the \u00a0 case \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\npetitioner\u00a0in\u00a0Writ\u00a0Petition\u00a0No.7830\/2010(s).\n<\/p>\n<p>        It\u00a0is\u00a0well\u00a0settled\u00a0in\u00a0law\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0seek\u00a0review\u00a0of\u00a0order\u00a0the\u00a0<br \/>\nparty \u00a0 applying \u00a0 for \u00a0 review \u00a0 has \u00a0 to \u00a0 demonstrate \u00a0 that \u00a0 the \u00a0 order \u00a0 suffers\u00a0<br \/>\nfrom\u00a0a\u00a0mistake\u00a0or\u00a0an\u00a0error\u00a0apparent\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0face\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0record\u00a0which\u00a0<br \/>\nmeans\u00a0the\u00a0mistake\u00a0or\u00a0error,\u00a0which\u00a0is \u00a0prima\u00a0facie \u00a0visible\u00a0and\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0<br \/>\nrequire\u00a0any\u00a0detailed\u00a0examination.\u00a0\u00a0Mere\u00a0erroneous\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0law\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0a\u00a0<br \/>\nground\u00a0for\u00a0review.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0order\u00a0to\u00a0seek\u00a0review\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order,\u00a0the\u00a0error\u00a0has\u00a0to\u00a0<br \/>\nbe \u00a0 an \u00a0 error \u00a0 or \u00a0 inadvertence \u00a0 and \u00a0 should \u00a0 be \u00a0 manifest \u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 face \u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\nrecord. \u00a0 \u00a0 Under \u00a0 the \u00a0 guise \u00a0 of \u00a0 review \u00a0 the \u00a0 parties \u00a0 are \u00a0 not \u00a0 entitled \u00a0 to\u00a0<br \/>\nrehearing\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0issue.\u00a0[See:\u00a0State\u00a0of\u00a0West\u00a0Bengal\u00a0and\u00a0others\u00a0Vs. \u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>           Kamal\u00a0Sengupta\u00a0and\u00a0another \u00a0(2008)\u00a08\u00a0SCC\u00a0612, \u00a0S.\u00a0Bagirathi\u00a0Ammal\u00a0<br \/>\n          Vs. \u00a0 Palani \u00a0 Roman \u00a0 Catholic \u00a0 Mission, \u00a0(2009) \u00a0 10 \u00a0 SCC \u00a0 464]. \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 The\u00a0<br \/>\n          Supreme\u00a0Court\u00a0has\u00a0held\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0new\u00a0plea\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0raised\u00a0<br \/>\n          in \u00a0 the \u00a0 review\u00a0 petition.[See \u00a0 Inderchand \u00a0 Jain\u00a0 (dead) \u00a0 through \u00a0 Lrs. \u00a0 Vs. \u00a0<br \/>\n          MOtilal\u00a0(dead)\u00a0through\u00a0Lrs.\u00a0(2009)\u00a014\u00a0SsCC\u00a0663].\u00a0\u00a0Thus,\u00a0in\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0well\u00a0<br \/>\n          settled\u00a0legal\u00a0position,\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0review\u00a0petition\u00a0cannot\u00a0be\u00a0<br \/>\n          permitted\u00a0to\u00a0raise\u00a0the\u00a0new\u00a0plea\u00a0which\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0raised\u00a0in\u00a0writ\u00a0appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>                  The\u00a0review\u00a0petition\u00a0is\u00a0without\u00a0merit,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<pre>                      (S.R.Alam)                                \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(Alok\u00a0Aradhe)\n          \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Chief\u00a0Justice                      \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Judge\nA.Praj.\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Madhya Pradesh High Court Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 R.P.No.564\/2010 20.01.2011 Shri\u00a0Vipin\u00a0Yadav,\u00a0learned\u00a0counsel\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0petitioner. Heard\u00a0on\u00a0I.A.No.11698\/2010,\u00a0an\u00a0application\u00a0for\u00a0condonation\u00a0of\u00a0 delay. From \u00a0 the \u00a0 reasons \u00a0 stated \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 application, \u00a0 which \u00a0 is \u00a0 duly\u00a0 supported\u00a0by\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit,\u00a0we\u00a0find\u00a0that\u00a0sufficient\u00a0cause\u00a0for\u00a0condonation\u00a0 of \u00a0 delay \u00a0 is \u00a0 made \u00a0 out. \u00a0 \u00a0 Accordingly, \u00a0 the \u00a0 delay [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67811","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":649,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010"},"wordCount":649,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010","name":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-10-09T15:47:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/yogesh-gurjar-vs-collector-range-pipariya-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yogesh Gurjar vs Collector Range Pipariya on 20 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67811","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67811"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67811\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67811"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67811"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67811"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}