{"id":67907,"date":"2011-01-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011"},"modified":"2016-12-28T13:02:30","modified_gmt":"2016-12-28T07:32:30","slug":"suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.MC.No. 4337 of 2010()\n\n\n1. SURESH, AGED 28 YEARS, S\/O. KARNAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. SHANMUGHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S\/O. BALAN,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.)\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :13\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                    THOMAS P.JOSEPH, J.\n            ====================================\n                     Crl. M.C. No.4337 of 2010\n            ====================================\n          Dated this the 13th     day of January,  2011\n\n\n                             O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>      Petitioners    are the driver and cleaner of a Jeep with Reg.<\/p>\n<p>No.KL-44\/7106. On May 11, 2010 while petitioners were allegedly<\/p>\n<p>carrying toddy in the said vehicle that vehicle was intercepted by<\/p>\n<p>the Excise Officials on Aluva-Munnar road and on examination it<\/p>\n<p>was found that the accused were carrying 384 litres of toddy.<\/p>\n<p>The officials of the Excise Department on verification of the permits<\/p>\n<p>produced by        petitioners learned that as per the permits<\/p>\n<p>petitioners could transport in the vehicle only 345 litres of toddy.<\/p>\n<p>Petitioners were arrested at the spot and the articles were seized.<\/p>\n<p>A case was registered as Crime No.30 of 2010 for offences<\/p>\n<p>punishable under Section 55(a) and 55(b) of the Abkari Act (for<\/p>\n<p>short, &#8220;the Act&#8221;).    Annexure-A is the photocopy of       crime and<\/p>\n<p>occurrence report.      Later it appeared that the Excise Officials<\/p>\n<p>issued notice to the permit holder-licensee, as seen from<\/p>\n<p>Annexure-E on May 19, 2010 stating about alleged transportation<\/p>\n<p>of toddy in excess of the quantity permitted and directed him to<\/p>\n<p>show cause why licence in favour of permit holder should not be<\/p>\n<p>CRL. M.C. No. 4337 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>cancelled. To that notice the licensee gave Annexure-F reply<\/p>\n<p>denying the allegations and contending that he has not done any<\/p>\n<p>act in violation of the shop licence or permits.   In this petition,<\/p>\n<p>petitioners\/accused pray that Annexure-A, crime and occurrence<\/p>\n<p>report (CR. No.30 of 2010 of Kothamangalam Excise Range) and<\/p>\n<p>further proceedings which concerned offence under Sec.55(a) of<\/p>\n<p>the Act be quashed.        Learned Senior Advocate appearing for<\/p>\n<p>petitioners contended that even as per Annexures A &amp; B it is clear<\/p>\n<p>that what is involved is only a violation of permit conditions in<\/p>\n<p>that the vehicle was carrying excess toddy than permitted<\/p>\n<p>quantity. It is contended by the learned Senior Advocate that in<\/p>\n<p>that case or even if it is assumed that toddy was collected from<\/p>\n<p>trees for which no tree tax is paid, no offence under Sec.55 or 58<\/p>\n<p>of the Act is made out and offence even as per Annexures A and B<\/p>\n<p>only comes under sec.56(b) of the Act. Learned Senior Advocate<\/p>\n<p>has placed reliance on the decisions in <a href=\"\/doc\/247908\/\">Sasidharan v. State<\/p>\n<p>of Kerala<\/a> (2007[1] KLT 1062), <a href=\"\/doc\/738571\/\">Pradeep T.B. &amp; Others v.<\/p>\n<p>State of Kerala &amp; Others<\/a> (2010 [2] KLJ 413) and<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/98247\/\">Mohanan v. State of Kerala<\/a> (2007 [1] KLT 845).                    In<\/p>\n<p>response it is contended by learned Public Prosecutor that of the<\/p>\n<p>CRL. M.C. No. 4337 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>three permits which petitioners were carrying at the relevant time<\/p>\n<p>one was found to be issued in respect of the vehicle concerned. It<\/p>\n<p>is also contended that records produced by petitioners did not<\/p>\n<p>show that there was any entry made at the Kombzha excise<\/p>\n<p>check post which indicated that the vehicle involved had not<\/p>\n<p>passed that check post.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.    Going by Annexures A and B it would appear that the<\/p>\n<p>case set up by the Excise Officials is that petitioners were found<\/p>\n<p>carrying toddy in excess of quantity permitted under the permits<\/p>\n<p>issued to the licensee concerned.        Annexure C and D are<\/p>\n<p>photocopies of the permits produced by petitioners and issued in<\/p>\n<p>favour of the licensee.     There is no dispute     regarding the<\/p>\n<p>authenticity of the said documents and it is also not disputed that<\/p>\n<p>the said documents were produced by the petitioners at the time<\/p>\n<p>of interception by the Excise Officials. As per Annexure C and D,<\/p>\n<p>permits total quantity of toddy which petitioners could carry in<\/p>\n<p>KL-44\/9414 or KL-44\/7106 is 345 litres whereas Annexures-B,<\/p>\n<p>mahazar shows that vehicle No.KL-44\/7106 (which was being used<\/p>\n<p>at the relevant time) carried 384 litres. Obviously it is a case<\/p>\n<p>where excess quantity of toddy in violation of the permitted<\/p>\n<p>quantity as per the permits was being transported. The decision<\/p>\n<p>CRL. M.C. No. 4337 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in  <a href=\"\/doc\/247908\/\">Sasidharan v. State of Kerala<\/a> (supra) states that<\/p>\n<p>when allegation is only that there was transportation of toddy in<\/p>\n<p>excess of the quantity permitted under the permit,         offence<\/p>\n<p>attracted is only under Sec.56(b) of the Act. There, learned Judge<\/p>\n<p>was considering whether an offence under 55(a) of the Act could<\/p>\n<p>be made out and the question was answered in the negative. The<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench also has taken the same view in the matter in<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/98247\/\">Mohanan v. State of Kerala<\/a> (supra). <a href=\"\/doc\/738571\/\">In Pradeep T.B.<\/p>\n<p>&amp; Others v. State of Kerala &amp; Others<\/a> (supra) learned<\/p>\n<p>Judge apart from holding that Sec.55 has no application in such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances also found that Sec.58 of the Act cannot be applied<\/p>\n<p>and that in such situation offence squarely fell under Sec.56(b) of<\/p>\n<p>the Act. In an unreported decision in Crl. M.C. No.4049 of 2010<\/p>\n<p>dated November 18, 2010 a similar question was considered and<\/p>\n<p>the offences attributed to the accused in that case under sec.55<\/p>\n<p>(a) (i) and 58 of the Act were quashed.     There it was held that<\/p>\n<p>non-payment of tree tax at the relevant time is no ground to<\/p>\n<p>implicate the accused for an offence other than under Sec.56(b)<\/p>\n<p>of the Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.   The above decisions inform me that so far as the<\/p>\n<p>present case is concerned, allegation being transportation of<\/p>\n<p>CRL. M.C. No. 4337 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>toddy in excess of the quantity permitted under the permits<\/p>\n<p>(Annexures C and D), the offence       can only fall under Sec.56(b)<\/p>\n<p>of the Act. I must also refer to the provisions of the Act in this<\/p>\n<p>regard. While Sc.55(d) and (e) of the Act refer to any person<\/p>\n<p>contravening the provisions of the Act or Rules so far as toddy is<\/p>\n<p>concerned it is relevant to note that before amendment by Act 16<\/p>\n<p>of 1977, Sec.55 was applicable to any person contravening the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of the Act or of any licence or permit obtained under<\/p>\n<p>the Act which meant that violation of conditions of permit would<\/p>\n<p>attract offence under Sec.55 of the Act. Now, the words &#8220;or of<\/p>\n<p>any licence    or  permit obtained under this Act&#8221; having been<\/p>\n<p>omitted from Sec.55 by Act No.16 of 1997 as aforesaid, violation<\/p>\n<p>of the licence or permit so far as it concerned articles referred to<\/p>\n<p>in Sec.55 of the Act cannot come within the purview of the said<\/p>\n<p>Act. This aspect has been considered in Rajan &amp; Others v.<\/p>\n<p>Sate of Kerala and Another                   (2010 [3] KLJ 461),<\/p>\n<p>paragraph 5. Section 56 of the Act directly deals with the holder<\/p>\n<p>of a licence or permit committing offences as stated therein and<\/p>\n<p>clause (b) relates to breach of any of the conditions or the licence<\/p>\n<p>or permit not otherwise provided for in the Act.                Thus<\/p>\n<p>transportation of toddy in excess of quantity permitted under the<\/p>\n<p>CRL. M.C. No. 4337 of 2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>licence is a violation of the permit condition punishable under<\/p>\n<p>Sec.56(b) of the Act. Viewed in that line offence under Sec.55(a)<\/p>\n<p>of the Act cannot stand against the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>      Resultantly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Case is allowed.<\/p>\n<p>Annexures- A, crime and occurrence report to the extent it<\/p>\n<p>concerned offence under Sec.55(a) of the Act is quashed. I make<\/p>\n<p>it clear that this order will not stand in the way of appropriate<\/p>\n<p>authority   proceeding with    investigation of the offence under<\/p>\n<p>sec.56(b) of the Act as provided under law.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                  THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>vsv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.MC.No. 4337 of 2010() 1. SURESH, AGED 28 YEARS, S\/O. KARNAN, &#8230; Petitioner 2. SHANMUGHAN, AGED 48 YEARS, S\/O. BALAN, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Respondent 2. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-67907","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1193,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011"},"wordCount":1193,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011","name":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-28T07:32:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/suresh-vs-state-of-kerala-on-13-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Suresh vs State Of Kerala on 13 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67907","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67907"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67907\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67907"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67907"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67907"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}