{"id":68019,"date":"2007-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007"},"modified":"2016-09-19T02:21:54","modified_gmt":"2016-09-18T20:51:54","slug":"purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","title":{"rendered":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nOP No. 26679 of 1999(A)\n\n\n\n1. PURUSHOTHAMAN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n1. DUR,IF CIUR DEVPOT,TVM.\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.L.SHENOY\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.V.N.SWAMINATHAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :22\/10\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n            THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.\n                  -------------------------------------------\n                      O.P.No.26679 OF 1999\n                  -------------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 22nd day of October, 2007\n\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>     The petitioners, a couple, obtained different decrees, by<\/p>\n<p>which, they are entitled to a portion of the properties (66 cents)<\/p>\n<p>which belonged to late Thankappan, the predecessor-in-interest<\/p>\n<p>of respondents 4 to 12. In execution of those proceedings for<\/p>\n<p>specific performance, the petitioners have taken delivery and are<\/p>\n<p>in possession and enjoyment of that parcel. A total amount of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.27,000\/- was also deposited by them; i.e., Rs.13,000\/- in<\/p>\n<p>O.S.No.34\/85 and Rs.14,000\/- in O.S.No.4\/86 of the Sub Court,<\/p>\n<p>Cherthala.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.   Thereafter, at the instance of the Project Officer (Coir),<\/p>\n<p>Alappuzha, certain actions were taken for recovery of amounts<\/p>\n<p>due from Thankapan. Petitioners, through their learned counsel,<\/p>\n<p>addressed Ext.P2 to the Project Officer (Coir) on 8.2.1990,<\/p>\n<p>intimating that the aforesaid amount of Rs.27,000\/- is lying with<\/p>\n<p>the Sub Court, Cherthala to the credit of Thankappan, the debtor<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>in the different matters, under which, the Project Officer is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to attach the assets of Thankappan.<\/p>\n<p>3.    The petitioners have been driven to file this writ petition in<\/p>\n<p>1999, nine years after Ext.P2, because, revenue recovery<\/p>\n<p>proceedings had reached their doors by action against the<\/p>\n<p>property obtained by delivery through court, consequent on the<\/p>\n<p>decrees for specific performance.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The legal niceties of the quality of a decree for specific<\/p>\n<p>performance under the Specific Relief Act qua the entitlement of<\/p>\n<p>the State under revenue recovery laws and any priorities are not<\/p>\n<p>matters required to be gone into to settle this case finally in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with justice.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>5.    It is admitted that Ext.P2 was received in 1990.          The<\/p>\n<p>learned Government Pleader            submits today, on latest<\/p>\n<p>instructions, that the present outstandings from Thankapan had<\/p>\n<p>grown to Rs.26,921\/- as on 12.9.2007. This means, it is still<\/p>\n<p>below the total principal amount deposited in the C.C.D. a\/c with<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>                           Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>the Sub Court, Cherthala in O.S.No.34\/85 and        O.S.No.4\/86,<\/p>\n<p>which deposits are lying there from 26.3.1987 and 17.1.1986<\/p>\n<p>respectively. One does not have to spent much time to note as to<\/p>\n<p>how easily the State could have reached and settled the revenue<\/p>\n<p>recovery demands without much of a burden on the debtor also,<\/p>\n<p>if prompt action had followed Ext.P2.<\/p>\n<p>6.    The counter affidavit discloses, among other things, that<\/p>\n<p>the officers of the State were taking different steps to get the<\/p>\n<p>amounts in the C.C.D. deposits attached, which ultimately<\/p>\n<p>become infructuous, the blame being passed on, also to the<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader at that end. I do not want to say much on<\/p>\n<p>that.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.    As of now, the learned counsel for the petitioners submits<\/p>\n<p>that even today, the aforesaid amounts are lying in the C.C.D.<\/p>\n<p>account because, even Thankappan or his legal representatives<\/p>\n<p>could not withdraw it since their request in that regard had<\/p>\n<p>been refused.\n<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>                              Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>8.    Having    regard    to   the   totality of   the  facts  and<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, it requires necessary that the interest of the<\/p>\n<p>State, that of the petitioners and of the legal representatives of<\/p>\n<p>the debtor are concluded in accordance with law and justice.<\/p>\n<p>Hence, this writ petition is disposed of in exercise of authority<\/p>\n<p>under Article 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, in the<\/p>\n<p>following terms:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>(i)   All amounts in deposit in      O.S.No.34\/85 and O.S.No.4\/86<\/p>\n<p>of the Sub Court, Cherthala will continue in C.C. deposit as of<\/p>\n<p>now. An appropriate officer on behalf of the State will make a<\/p>\n<p>fresh application claiming such amounts on the strength of the<\/p>\n<p>demands made as evidenced by Ext.P1.              The Sub Court,<\/p>\n<p>Cherthala will take up that application and pass appropriate<\/p>\n<p>orders in the light of what is stated above, since, Ext.P1 is<\/p>\n<p>conclusive of the liabilities of the defendant in those cases. As a<\/p>\n<p>consequence, necessary further orders shall be issued for<\/p>\n<p>transferring such amounts, as may be found necessary, to satisfy<\/p>\n<p>the debt in terms of Ext.P1 from the C.C.D. account to such<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>                            Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>account of the Revenue, as may be sought for on behalf of the<\/p>\n<p>State.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>(ii)  If any amount is left after being dealt with in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with what is stated above, the same may be disbursed to the<\/p>\n<p>appropriate applicant, if any, in accordance with law.<\/p>\n<p>(iii) There shall be no revenue recovery action against the writ<\/p>\n<p>petitioners or against the property they have obtained by<\/p>\n<p>delivery following decrees in O.S.No.34\/85 and O.S.No.4\/86 of<\/p>\n<p>the Sub Court, Cherthala.      If the outstandings due from the<\/p>\n<p>debtor under Ext.P1 is not satisfied by the above process, any<\/p>\n<p>further assets referable to him could be proceeded with in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law. It is clarified that this judgment would not<\/p>\n<p>stand in the way of any such action.        However, it shall be<\/p>\n<p>ensured that no property, as obtained by the petitioners in terms<\/p>\n<p>of the decrees in O.S.No.34\/85 and       O.S.No.4\/86 of the Sub<\/p>\n<p>Court, Cherthala, is disturbed in any manner.<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>                           Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>        The petitioners are directed to produce a copy of this<\/p>\n<p>judgment before the Sub Court, Cherthala. The Office will also<\/p>\n<p>communicate a copy of this judgment to that court.<\/p>\n<p>                                              Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>                         THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                             Judge<br \/>\nkkb.\n<\/p>\n<p>OP.26679\/99<\/p>\n<p>               Page numbers<\/p>\n<p>               =======================<\/p>\n<p>               THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, J<\/p>\n<p>                           O.P.NO.26679 OF 1999<\/p>\n<p>                                JUDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>                           22nd OCTOBER, 2007.\n<\/p>\n<p>               =======================<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OP No. 26679 of 1999(A) 1. PURUSHOTHAMAN &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DUR,IF CIUR DEVPOT,TVM. &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.V.L.SHENOY For Respondent :SRI.V.N.SWAMINATHAN The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN Dated :22\/10\/2007 O R D E R THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\"},\"wordCount\":883,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\",\"name\":\"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007","datePublished":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007"},"wordCount":883,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007","name":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-09-18T20:51:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/purushothaman-vs-dur-on-22-october-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Purushothaman vs Dur on 22 October, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68019"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68019\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}