{"id":68067,"date":"2010-08-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010"},"modified":"2014-12-07T12:09:07","modified_gmt":"2014-12-07T06:39:07","slug":"prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 13837 of 2010(D)\n\n\n1. PRASANTH.R.S., MEDICAL OFFICER,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DIRECTOR OF HOMOEOPATHY, OFFICE OF THE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. SURESH BABU.M.K.\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.N.SUGATHAN\n\n                For Respondent  :DR.K.P.SATHEESAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :13\/08\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                      ANTONY DOMINIC, J.\n                      ------------------\n                  WP(C) No.13837 of 2010 (D)\n                 --------------------------\n             Dated, this the 13th day of August, 2010\n\n                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>       Petitioner and the 2nd respondent are Homoeo Medical<\/p>\n<p>Officers. In this writ petition, what is under challenge is Ext.P7<\/p>\n<p>order dated 21\/04\/2010 to the extent the 2nd respondent is<\/p>\n<p>transferred and posted to Chadayamangalam in Kollam District.<\/p>\n<p>     2.     The petitioner joined service on 11\/08\/2000 and<\/p>\n<p>thereupon, was posted to Chadayamangalam. He continued in that<\/p>\n<p>Station till 26\/05\/2006 when he was transferred and posted to<\/p>\n<p>Nagaroor in Thiruvananthapuram District.      While continuing at<\/p>\n<p>Nagaroor, claiming preference on the basis that he is a physically<\/p>\n<p>handicapped person with 45% disability, the petitioner sought<\/p>\n<p>transfer and posting at Chadayamangalam in Kollam District, it<\/p>\n<p>being his Home District.     In Ext.P5 draft list of transfers and<\/p>\n<p>postings, the petitioner&#8217;s name was included at serial No.4 with a<\/p>\n<p>proposal to post him at Chadayamangalam.         In Ext.P5, the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent&#8217;s name was also included with a proposal to give him<\/p>\n<p>posting at Thottapuzhassery in Pathanamthitta District. It would<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.13837\/2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>appear that the 2nd respondent who had made an application for<\/p>\n<p>posting at Chadayamangalam, which being his 2nd choice, objected<\/p>\n<p>to the proposal in Ext.P5 to the extent he was transferred and<\/p>\n<p>posted to Pathanamthitta and the petitioner was posted to<\/p>\n<p>Chadayamangalam.        At that stage, he also had approached this<\/p>\n<p>Court by filing WP(C) No.10839\/2010, which was disposed of by<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 judgment dated 06\/04\/2010 directing consideration of his<\/p>\n<p>representation. Apparently in pursuance to the above, when Ext.P5<\/p>\n<p>draft list was finalised as per Ext.P7, the 2nd respondent was ordered<\/p>\n<p>to be posted at Chadayamangalam and the petitioner&#8217;s name does<\/p>\n<p>not find a place in the order, which means that the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>allowed to continue at Nagaroor. It is in these circumstances, the<\/p>\n<p>writ petition has been filed impuging Ext.P7 order to the extent the<\/p>\n<p>2nd respondent is given posting at Chadayamangalam.<\/p>\n<p>      3.    Main contention raised is that the petitioner is entitled to<\/p>\n<p>have a preferential posting in view of the Government Orders<\/p>\n<p>providing for preferences to physically handicapped persons. It is<\/p>\n<p>also contended that in Ext.P6 judgment, this Court only directed<\/p>\n<p>consideration of the representation made by the 2nd respondent,<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.13837\/2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>whereas in Ext.P7 order, the said direction to consider the<\/p>\n<p>representation has been misinterpreted as a binding direction<\/p>\n<p>requiring the authorities to give posting to the 2nd respondent as<\/p>\n<p>sought for by him.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    On the other hand, the 2nd respondent submits that he is<\/p>\n<p>a native of Kollam District, and that on joining service, he was<\/p>\n<p>posted to Kasaragod District, where he continued till 1999, when he<\/p>\n<p>was transferred to Kollam District. It is stated that from Kollam<\/p>\n<p>District, he was transferred to Palakkad District in 2002, where he<\/p>\n<p>continued till 2004, when he was transferred again to Kasaragod<\/p>\n<p>District.    From   there,   in  2005,    he  was    transferred  to<\/p>\n<p>Thiruvananthapuram District, where he continued till 2006, when he<\/p>\n<p>was transferred to Vakkom. It is stated that it was while continuing<\/p>\n<p>at Vakkom, in 2010 he applied for a transfer to Chadayamangalam,<\/p>\n<p>and it was in pursuance to that application, he is ordered to be<\/p>\n<p>posted by Ext.P7. Therefore, the endeavor of the learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>for the 2nd respondent is that out of about 14 years of service,<\/p>\n<p>except during the period 1999-2002, the remaining period the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent was outside Kollam District.\n<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.13837\/2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      5.   Although it is true that in Ext.P6 judgment, this Court<\/p>\n<p>only directed consideration of the representation made by the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent, a reading of Ext.P7 order of transfer would indicate that<\/p>\n<p>the said direction was misunderstood and has been taken as a<\/p>\n<p>binding direction requiring the authorities to post the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent at the place opted by him. The question is whether in<\/p>\n<p>spite of the above, any injustice has been caused to the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>in issuing Ext.P7 order warranting interference in a proceedings<\/p>\n<p>under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Facts show that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner who joined service on 11\/08\/2000 was posted at<\/p>\n<p>Chadayamangalam, where he continued till 26\/05\/2006 when he<\/p>\n<p>was posted at Nagaroor, a boarder town in Thiruvananthapuram<\/p>\n<p>District, where he is continuing even now.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.   On the other hand, as far as the 2nd respondent is<\/p>\n<p>concerned, except the 3 year period, i.e. 1999 &#8211; 2002, rest of the<\/p>\n<p>whole period, he had service in far away Stations like Kasaragod and<\/p>\n<p>Palakkad Districts, and is getting a Home Station posting only now.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, it cannot be said that by giving posting to the 2nd<\/p>\n<p>respondent, any substantial injustice has been caused to the<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.13837\/2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner. In that view of the matter, I do not think that this Court<\/p>\n<p>should interfere with Ext.P7 order of transfer, which has been issued<\/p>\n<p>in the exigencies of service.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.    True,    the  petitioner   pressed    for    a  posting    at<\/p>\n<p>Chadayamangalam mainly relying on the concessions that are<\/p>\n<p>extended to physically handicapped persons.           Ext.P1 certificate<\/p>\n<p>produced by the petitioner shows that he is a person with 45%<\/p>\n<p>disability. Going by the affidavit in the writ petition, the petitioner is<\/p>\n<p>a resident of Thiruvananthapuram District, and it is the specific case<\/p>\n<p>of the 2nd respondent that since Government Orders permit<\/p>\n<p>preferential posting only to Home District and as the petitioner&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>Home District is Thiruvananthapuram, he cannot claim preferential<\/p>\n<p>posting at Chadayamangalam, which is within Kollam District. On<\/p>\n<p>the other hand, the case of the petitioner is that initially his Home<\/p>\n<p>District was Thiruvananthapuram, which was subsequently changed<\/p>\n<p>to Kollam District, and therefore, he is entitled to the preference.<\/p>\n<p>      First of all, the Government Orders relied on by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>providing for preference are only administrative guidelines, and if<\/p>\n<p>on exigencies of service and considering the requirements, the<\/p>\n<p>WP(C) No.13837\/2010<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                   -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Government departs from the same for bonafide reasons, this Court<\/p>\n<p>will not be interfered with such action of the Government. Here in<\/p>\n<p>this case, I am not satisfied that there is any malafide exercise of<\/p>\n<p>power, which alone justifies interference in a proceedings under<\/p>\n<p>Article 226 of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The writ petition fails and is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>                                         (ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)<br \/>\njg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 13837 of 2010(D) 1. PRASANTH.R.S., MEDICAL OFFICER, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DIRECTOR OF HOMOEOPATHY, OFFICE OF THE &#8230; Respondent 2. SURESH BABU.M.K. For Petitioner :SRI.N.SUGATHAN For Respondent :DR.K.P.SATHEESAN The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68067","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1022,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010"},"wordCount":1022,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010","name":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-07T06:39:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/prasanth-r-s-vs-director-of-homoeopathy-on-13-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Prasanth.R.S. vs Director Of Homoeopathy on 13 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68067","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}