{"id":68202,"date":"2010-08-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010"},"modified":"2017-11-02T01:51:46","modified_gmt":"2017-11-01T20:21:46","slug":"ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.L.Manjunath And B.Manohar<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE KIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 277'\" DAY OF AUGUST 2010\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE I-ION'BLE MR. JUSTICE ILL. it \".   ~\n\nAND    V\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUs'r1c1'-i=3.    '&amp;\nMISCELLANEOUS FIRST APi5\ufb02.2%L Nc;.8ej4s\/2o\u00a73V.i;_AA1VV :3\nBETWEEN  't tt  V'\n\n34\/5. I C D S Limited,\n\nHaving its registered Office at\n\nSyndicate House,    _  V\nManipal--576 119,  \n\nUdupi District,   _. .\n\nRep. by its GPA HoI::l'e1j'_~..V     V _\nSriK Baiakrishna Rap,i._  ' '   ._  '\n\nDeputy General Mat1ege\u00a7jI,\u00e9{v.r,  . _' Appellant\n[By Sri T N Raghupathy', 'A{i\u00a7iA;* fef\u00abe}5'pe1Iant)\n1. S\ufb01NBh\u00e9\u00a7ee:r\u00e9\ufb011an'  ..... \n\nAge:V.65 yea;'s, &amp; _' \nS\/0 Sri _V~Na'rh3;I1\u00bb._ \" _ \n\n V _ Mrs.  t K 'Menakat: Priyadarshini,\n'Age: (33 years,  ' \nA _ W,\/_o4 Sr: N Bhageerathan.\n\n   at\nA    fNath.\u00abBhayan,\n\n(,7,\n\n\n\nQui1on~69\u00a3 101 .\nKerala State.\n\n3. Sn' M Tajudeen.\n\nAge: 63 years.\n\nS\/0 K Mohammed Kunju,\n\nResiding at Pushpa Giri. i\n\nKiiigallor.   \nQui1on--691 004. \n(Kerala State}\n\n4. Sri Yogishwara Holla,\nAdvocate\/Arbitrator,\n\nVolakad, _  _    \nUdupi. .  &amp;_  ' '   V'  Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>(By Sri Dayananda Kini, Adv., for   <\/p>\n<p>This Misce11a.rieous.Firs-t Ap-p&#8217;ea3~i:s&#8221;\ufb011\u00e9d under Section 37(1) of the<br \/>\nArbitration and Conoi.1iation At t, t1;Q&#8217;96&#8211;. agajnist the judgment and decree<br \/>\ndated 7.7.2005vpaSsed&#8217;j;in A&#8217;:fCNoL.5&#8217;\/ }.99&#8217;2&#8243;&#8216;on the file of Addi. Civil Judge<br \/>\n(Sr. Divn.}, Udt1pi._a1lo*w.ing the&#8217;petit__ien [\ufb01led by respondent Nos.1 to 3<br \/>\nherein under Se&#8217;c_tion 33 o1*:1\u00bb:.e Arbitration Act.<\/p>\n<p>This Appealuxcorrandg -__or1._ hearing this day. Manjunath, J.,<\/p>\n<p>delivered the gfollowing:  _ &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>The*iega1ity&#8217; andoorrectness of the order passed by the Addl. Civil<\/p>\n<p>digudge-V(Sr.  Udupi. in A C No.5\/1992 dated 7&#8243;&#8221; of July 2005 is<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;by the appellant hereirr.\n<\/p>\n<p>  We-have heard the Counsel for the parties.<\/p>\n<p>541\/<\/p>\n<p>3. The appellant, as a Financier, had given vehiele~Mercedes Benz<br \/>\nbearing registration No.KRU 1884 to the IS&#8217; respondent on 166.1987<\/p>\n<p>and respondent Nos.2 and 3 stodd as guarantors to <\/p>\n<p>and on the same day, the 1s: respondent also purchased. <\/p>\n<p>vehicle-Tata Benz lorry bearing registration tl\\lo.&#8217;I-ZRQA tbyiveritelringt 7. it<\/p>\n<p>into hire purchase agreement on the ground  the_\u00bb_r1ASi~ respondent<\/p>\n<p>failed to pay the installments as and  fall due&#8217;,  was<br \/>\nreferred to an Arbitrator by nasnezpsri BY *i{{:olla:g._.&#8217;I&#8217;1riell respondents have<br \/>\nnot entered appearance before  Arbitration Case<\/p>\n<p>Nos.4 and 5\/1992 \ufb01led&#8217; on  V&#8217;there is no arbitration<\/p>\n<p>clause and  of the Arbitration Act was<br \/>\nnot maintainable and  had not agreed to refer the<br \/>\nmatter to an Arbitrator  arbitra\ufb01on clause has been interpolated<br \/>\nlaterp.   .:he.1St respondent got himself examined as<\/p>\n<p>P.W.l1._a1idl&#8217;l&#8217;;eVrelied &#8216;up&#8217;on_ Exs.P1 to P14. On behalf of the appellant, Sri<\/p>\n<p> B Rao  as D.W2. He relied upon Exs.D1 to D11.\n<\/p>\n<p> Civii Judge&#8217;?[pSr&#8217;.l:Divn.}, Udupi, having considered the case of the<\/p>\n<p> .:a;Elow.edlthe Appeal of the? respondents holding that the parties<\/p>\n<p> not  to refer the dispute to Sri B Y Holla, an Arbitrator, and<\/p>\n<p>&lt;9<\/p>\n<p>the said clause has been interpolated later and therefore allowed the<\/p>\n<p>Petition. Being aggrieved by the same, the present Appeal is \ufb011ed_,_<\/p>\n<p>4. We have heard the learned Counsel for the  C &#8221; ff &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>5. The learned Counsei for the appellant,   <\/p>\n<p>contends that the order passed by the jCAiyii*  <\/p>\n<p>erroneous and did not consider the eVidene__el*-led  the it<\/p>\n<p>According to him, there is no interpoiationin the arbitratjoanuclause and<\/p>\n<p>that the typed portion of cIause\u00a2zV&#8221;1(a}g.iwasiityped prior&#8221;~to.-iputting the<\/p>\n<p>signatures by the parties andxhthe&#8217;  the respondents,<\/p>\n<p>considering the&#8221;  name of the Ieamed<br \/>\nArbitrator, hadvlused  Therefore, it cannot be<br \/>\nconsidered as interpolation circumstances, he requests the<br \/>\nCourts to   .  &#8230;.. 14 v<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;P:er&#8217;~contrai &#8216;llearned Counsel for the respondent, Sri Dayananda<\/p>\n<p>  into the hire purchase agreement, it is<\/p>\n<p>clear to a naked&#8221; eye that the name of the Arbitrator in clause-VI(a) of<\/p>\n<p>  agreement dated 16.6.1987 is interpolated by using a<\/p>\n<p>\/&#8217; &#8216;:W&#8221;Cii1f&#8217;1:fere);}.tlutypettrriter just prior to \ufb01ling of the Arbitration Case and he<\/p>\n<p>81\/<\/p>\n<p>also requests the Court to compare the typed portion of hire purchase<br \/>\nagreement in the first page and also the disputed portion. In the<br \/>\ncircumstances, he contends that the trial Court is justified inf\u00e9zllouring<\/p>\n<p>the claim of the respondents. .\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Having heard the Counsel for the parties, the <\/p>\n<p>considered is:\n<\/p>\n<p>Whether the trial Court is justi\ufb01jedi.  &#8216;A<br \/>\nthat the Arbitration Clause&#8217;__Clau&#8217;sesVI{a}&#8217;<br \/>\nhire purchase agreement  K <\/p>\n<p>interpolated ? V &#8212;..  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>8. We have  the&#8217;-.,dccuments. On perusal of the<br \/>\ndocuments, it is clear&#8217;   purchase agreement dated<br \/>\n16.6.1987 is aprinted forrn&#8217;,&#8217;1whi&#8217;chvcontains lots of blank columns. The<\/p>\n<p>same  t\u00a7rpedi.by  different typewriters. The name of<\/p>\n<p>_the Arbitrator&#8217;  in one particular typewriter and rest of<\/p>\n<p>:&#8217;thAe&#8217;Veoiumns.a__of  purchase agreement are typed in a different<\/p>\n<p> Coiisideringgthe age of the filling up the blank columns in column<\/p>\n<p>it  Arbitrators name in column (2) discloses that it is in<\/p>\n<p>  -different typewriters and ink used for typing the name of the<\/p>\n<p>  is so fresh and it cannot be held that the same was found on<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>the date of agreement dated 16.6.1987. Normaiiy, it is required for both<br \/>\nthe parties to put the signatures Whenever a document is fiL~&#8217;;ed.eup to<\/p>\n<p>show that later one shall not contend that the same.&#8217;jbeen<\/p>\n<p>interpolated or the said coiumn has been \ufb0111edH__up,:.   <\/p>\n<p>convenience of the parties, In the eircumstancedsgwe are of thevopinion 7.<\/p>\n<p>that the trial Court is justified in holding thatldname   &#8216;~ArEaitrator<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01lled in the hire purchase agreement dated&#8221;t16.6L1&#8217;\u00a3187Vis.&#8217;inter;nolated. <\/p>\n<p>9. In the result. this Appeai  Id,  <\/p>\n<p>%\u00a3%f% S\u00e9\ufb02t<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n<p>sag<br \/>\nIudge<\/p>\n<p>mgd\u00b0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 Author: K.L.Manjunath And B.Manohar IN THE KIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 277&#8242;&#8221; DAY OF AUGUST 2010 PRESENT THE I-ION&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE ILL. it &#8220;. ~ AND V THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUs&#8217;r1c1&#8242;-i=3. &#8216;&amp; MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APi5\ufb02.2%L [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68202","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":779,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010"},"wordCount":779,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010","name":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-11-01T20:21:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-i-c-d-s-limited-vs-n-bhageerathan-on-27-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S I C D S Limited vs N Bhageerathan on 27 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68202","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68202"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68202\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68202"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68202"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68202"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}