{"id":68427,"date":"2011-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011"},"modified":"2018-02-13T05:26:00","modified_gmt":"2018-02-12T23:56:00","slug":"mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                             File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001126\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Omprakash\u00a0Kashiram\n           H.No.03\/16,\u00a0Amol\u00a0Apartment\n           Waldhuni\n           Kalyan\u00a0421\u00a0301\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Central\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST\n           Mumbai\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: None\n\n           Western\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Mumbai\u00a0Central,\u00a0Churchgate\n           Mumbai\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Gopalakrishna,\u00a0PIO\n                                    Shri\u00a0S.K.Jain,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0&\u00a0ADRM\n                                    \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner             :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n ___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                           at\n                                                   New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001126\n\n\n\n                                                        ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.7.1.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       total\u00a0quantity\/Nos.\u00a0of\u00a0local\u00a0trains\u00a0of\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a012\u00a0cars\u00a0in\u00a0service\u00a0of\u00a0CR,\u00a0WR\u00a0Harbour\u00a0line,\u00a0Trans\u00a0Harbour\u00a0<\/p>\n
       line.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0sought\u00a0year\u00a0wise\u00a0increase\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0quantity\/No.\u00a0of\u00a0trains\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0given\u00a0\u00a0format\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0<\/p>\n
       1960\u00a0to\u00a02011.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Atul\u00a0Rane,\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a02.2.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0<\/p>\n
       on\u00a0 4.2.11\u00a0providing\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.12.2.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Authority \u00a0 stating \u00a0 that \u00a0 no \u00a0 information \u00a0 has \u00a0 been \u00a0 received \u00a0 by \u00a0 him. \u00a0 \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Ved \u00a0 Prakash, \u00a0 Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Authority,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.3.11\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.Jha,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0<\/p>\n
       replied\u00a0on\u00a010.3.11\u00a0informing\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0replies\u00a0already\u00a0sent.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       replies,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.2.4.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0suggesting\u00a0a\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0measures\u00a0<\/p>\n
       that\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0taken\u00a0up\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0railways\u00a0for\u00a0improving\u00a0its\u00a0functioning\u00a0and\u00a0requesting\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
       to\u00a0direct\u00a0the\u00a0Railways\u00a0to\u00a0take\u00a0up\u00a0the\u00a0suggestions.\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0sought\u00a0information\u00a0about\u00a0actual\u00a0numbers\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       9\/12\u00a0cars\u00a0trains\u00a0which\u00a0are\u00a0running\u00a0since\u00a01960\u00a0.\u00a0He\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0given\u00a0about\u00a0the\u00a0total\u00a0<\/p>\n
       number\u00a0of\u00a0trips\u00a0up\u00a0and\u00a0down\u00a0(services)\u00a0made\u00a0by\u00a0\u00a0trains\u00a0which\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0what\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0seeking.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
Decision<\/p>\n
2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0sought\u00a0starting\u00a0from\u00a01960\u00a0<\/p>\n
       till\u00a0date\u00a0which\u00a0makes\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0voluminous\u00a0in\u00a0nature.\u00a0Also\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n
       seeking\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0No.\u00a0of\u00a0trains\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0being\u00a0maintained\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Division\u00a0since\u00a0only\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0<\/p>\n
       of\u00a0services\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0said\u00a0trains\u00a0is\u00a0available.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0They\u00a0however\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0they\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0happy\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0compile\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0same\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 \u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0years\u00a0is\u00a0reduced\u00a0to2\u00a0or\u00a03\u00a0<\/p>\n
       years.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
 3.       In\u00a0the\u00a0light\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0submission\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0seek\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         required\u00a0information\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0specific\u00a0no.\u00a0of\u00a0years,\u00a0\u00a0say\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a03\u00a0to\u00a04\u00a0years\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0can\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n
         compiled\u00a0and\u00a0furnished\u00a0to\u00a0him\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0format\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0him.\u00a0 \u00a0Alternately,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0if\u00a0he\u00a0so\u00a0<\/p>\n
         desires,\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0allowed\u00a0to\u00a0inspect\u00a0the\u00a0records,\u00a0 \u00a0on\u00a0a\u00a0mutually\u00a0convenient\u00a0date\/s\u00a0so\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0can\u00a0<\/p>\n
         compile\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0for\u00a0himself\u00a0.\u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0PIO\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0with\u00a0attested\u00a0copies\u00a0<\/p>\n
         of\u00a0documents\u00a0identified\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0only\u00a050\u00a0pages\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0rest\u00a0at\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0page.\u00a0The\u00a0<\/p>\n
         information\u00a0in\u00a0any\u00a0event\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a025.9.11.<\/p>\n
4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n
                                                                                                                   \u00a0<\/p>\n
                                                                                                 (Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                        Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Omprakash\u00a0Kashiram
\n         H.No.03\/16,\u00a0Amol\u00a0Apartment
\n         Waldhuni
\n         Kalyan\u00a0421\u00a0301<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Central\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST
\n         Mumbai<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Western\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Mumbai\u00a0Central,\u00a0Churchgate
\n         Mumbai<\/p>\n
4.       Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC
\n Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission’s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0
\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0
\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0
\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0
\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001126 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a019,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0August\u00a019,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Omprakash\u00a0Kashiram H.No.03\/16,\u00a0Amol\u00a0Apartment Waldhuni Kalyan\u00a0421\u00a0301 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing Respondents Central\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office Commercial\u00a0Branch,\u00a0CST Mumbai Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: None Western\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office Mumbai\u00a0Central,\u00a0Churchgate Mumbai Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Gopalakrishna,\u00a0PIO Shri\u00a0S.K.Jain,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0&\u00a0ADRM \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Mumbai Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001126 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.7.1.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0 total\u00a0quantity\/Nos.\u00a0of\u00a0local\u00a0trains\u00a0of\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a012\u00a0cars\u00a0in\u00a0service\u00a0of\u00a0CR,\u00a0WR\u00a0Harbour\u00a0line,\u00a0Trans\u00a0Harbour\u00a0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-68427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":561,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011"},"wordCount":561,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011","name":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-12T23:56:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-omprakash-kashiram-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Omprakash Kashiram vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}